Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:05:57.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide programs to manage glyphosate/dicamba-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Ramawatar Yadav ,
Vipan Kumar Open the ORCID record for Vipan Kumar [Opens in a new window]  and
Prashant Jha
Ramawatar Yadav
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Vipan Kumar*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, KS, USA
Prashant Jha
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Vipan Kumar, Agricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, 1232 240th Avenue, Hays, KS67601. Email: vkumar@ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolution of kochia resistance to glyphosate and dicamba is a concern for growers in the US Great Plains. An increasing use of glyphosate and dicamba with the widespread adoption of glyphosate/dicamba-resistant (GDR) soybean in recent years may warrant greater attention. Long-term stewardship of this new stacked-trait technology will require the implementation of diverse weed control strategies, such as the use of soil-residual herbicides (PRE) aimed at effective control of GDR kochia. Field experiments were conducted in Huntley, MT, in 2017 and 2018, and Hays, KS, in 2018 to determine the effectiveness of various PRE herbicides applied alone or followed by (fb) a POST treatment of glyphosate plus dicamba for controlling GDR kochia in GDR soybean. Among PRE herbicides tested, sulfentrazone provided complete (100%), season-long control of GDR kochia at both sites. In addition, PRE fb POST programs tested in this study brought 71% to 100% control of GDR kochia throughout the season at both sites. Pyroxasulfone applied PRE resulted in 57% to 70% control across sites at 9 to 10 wk after PRE (WAPRE). However, mixing dicamba with pyroxasulfone improved control up to 25% at both sites. Kochia plants surviving pyroxasulfone applied PRE alone produced 2,530 seeds m−2 compared with pyroxasulfone + dicamba (230 seeds m−2) at the Montana site. No differences in soybean grain yields were observed with PRE alone or PRE fb POST treatments at the Montana site; however, dicamba, pyroxasulfone, and pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P applied PRE brought lower grain yield (1,150 kg ha−1) compared to all other tested programs at the Kansas site. In conclusion, effective PRE or PRE fb POST (two-pass) programs tested in this research should be proactively utilized by the growers to manage GDR kochia in GDR soybean.

Keywords

glyphosate resistancedicamba resistancemultiple-herbicide resistanceGlyphosatedicambadimethenamid-Ppendimethalinpyroxasulfonesulfentrazonekochia, Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scottsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 568 - 574
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References

Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, R, Hall, L, Johnson, E (2016) Pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow in kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 64:624–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, RE, Low, R, Hall, LM, Sauder, CA, Martin, S, Brandt, EN, Shirriff, SW (2013) Glyphosate- and acetolactate synthase inhibitor–resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Sci 61:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, AR, Nalewaja, JD, Schooler, AB (1972) Light period, temperature, and kochia flowering. Weed Sci 20:462–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranston, HJ, Kern, AJ, Hackett, JL, Miller, EK, Maxwell, BD, Dyer, WE (2001) Dicamba resistance in kochia. Weed Sci 49:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, RJ, Bernards, ML, Sbatella, GM, Kruger, GR, Lee, DJ, Wilson, RJ (2014) Response of Nebraska kochia (Kochia scoparia) accessions to dicamba. Weed Technol 28:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, LF, Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Van Acker, RC (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can J Plant Sci 89:141–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godar, AS, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M, Dille, JA (2015) Glyphosate-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in Kansas: EPSPS gene copy number in relation to resistance levels. Weed Sci 63:587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, LM, Beckie, HJ, Low, R, Shirriff, SW, Blackshaw, RE, Kimmel, N, Neeser, C (2014) Survey of glyphosate-resistant kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] in Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 94:127–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2019) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: August 25, 2019Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J, Jackson, G, Jones, C (2005) Fertilizer Guidelines for Montana Crops. Montana State University Extension Bulletin EB0161. http://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility/documents/PDF/pub/FertGuidelMTCropsEB161.pdf. Accessed: January 27, 2020Google Scholar
Jha, P, Kumar, V, Lim, CA (2015) Variable response of kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] to auxinic herbicides dicamba and fluroxypyr in Montana. Can J Plant Sci 95:965–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P (2015) Effective preemergence and postemergence herbicide programs for kochia control. Weed Technol 29:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P (2016) Differences in germination, growth, and fecundity characteristics of dicamba-fluroxypyr–resistant and susceptible Kochia scoparia. PLoS One 11:e0161533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161533CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Jugulam, M, Yadav, R, Stahlman, PW (2019a) Herbicide-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) in North America: a review. Weed Sci 67:4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Currie, RS, Jha, P, Stahlman, PW (2019b) First report of kochia (Bassia scoparia) with cross-resistance to dicamba and fluroxypyr in western Kansas. Weed Technol 33:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Engel, RP, Currie, RS, Jha, P, Stahlman, PW, Thompson, C (2019c) Dicamba-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) in Kansas: characterization and management with fall- or spring-applied PRE herbicides. Weed Technol 33:342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Giacomini, D, Westra, E, Westra, P (2015) Molecular basis of evolved resistance to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase–inhibitor herbicides in kochia (Kochia scoparia) accessions from Montana. Weed Sci 63:758–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P, Reichard, N (2014) Occurrence and characterization of kochia (Kochia scoparia) accessions with resistance to glyphosate in Montana. Weed Technol 28:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeClere, S, Wu, C, Westra, P, Sammons, RD (2018) Cross-resistance to dicamba, 2, 4-D, and fluroxypyr in Kochia scoparia is endowed by a mutation in an AUX/IAA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E2911–E2920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712372115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, KL, Johnson, JM, Gover, AE, Sellmer, JC (2011) Preemergence and postemergence suppression of kochia on rights-of-way. Weed Technol 25:292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengistu, LW, Messersmith, CG (2002) Genetic diversity of kochia. Weed Sci 50:498–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithila, J, Hall, JC, Johnson, WG, Kelley, KB, Riechers, DE (2011) Evolution of resistance to auxinic herbicides: historical perspectives, mechanisms of resistance, and implications for broadleaf weed management in agronomic crops. Weed Sci 59:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modelling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Res 51:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou, J, Thompson, CR, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M (2018) Preemergence application of dicamba to manage dicamba-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol 32:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Belles, DS, Westra, PH, Nissen, SJ, Ward, SM (2009) Inheritance of resistance to the auxinic herbicide dicamba in kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 57:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwinghamer, TD, Van Acker, RC (2008) Emergence timing and persistence of kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 56:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, GP, Thill, DC, Mallory-Smith, CA, Shafii, B (1995) Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 43:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, KL, Hartzler, RG (2000) Effect of seedbank augmentation on herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol 14:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Godar, AS, Currie, RS, Dille, AJ, Thompson, CR, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M (2015) Field evolved resistance to four modes of action of herbicides in a single kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] population. Pest Manag Sci 71:1207–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, J, Thompson, CR, Peterson, DE, Currie, RS, Olson, BLS, Stahlman, PW, Khatib, KA (2013) Differential kochia (Kochia scoparia) populations response to glyphosate. Weed Sci 61:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, EP, Nissen, SJ, Getts, TJ, Westra, P, Gaines, TA (2019) Survey reveals frequency of multiple resistance to glyphosate and dicamba in kochia (Bassia scoparia). Weed Technol 33:664–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersma, AT, Gaines, TA, Preston, C, Hamilton, JP, Giacomini, D, Buell, CR, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2015) Gene amplification of 5-enol-pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase in glyphosate resistant Kochia scoparia. Planta 241:463–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, R, Clay, SA, Wrage, LJ (2000) Herbicide strategies for managing kochia (Kochia scoparia) resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar