Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:08:14.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazamox for Winter Annual Grass Control in Imidazolinone-Tolerant Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick W. Geier ,
Phillip W. Stahlman ,
Anthony D. White ,
Stephen D. Miller ,
Craig M. Alford  and
Drew J. Lyon
Patrick W. Geier*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Anthony D. White
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Plant Science Division, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Craig M. Alford
Affiliation:
Plant Science Division, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Drew J. Lyon
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pgeier@ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at five locations in Kansas, Nebraska, and Wyoming to determine the effects of imazamox rate and application timing on winter annual grass control and crop response in imidazolinone-tolerant winter wheat. Imazamox at 35, 44, or 53 g ai/ha applied early-fall postemergence (EFP), late-fall postemergence, early-spring postemergence (ESP), or late-spring postemergence (LSP) controlled jointed goatgrass at least 95% in all experiments. Feral rye control with imazamox was 95 to 99%, regardless of rate or application timing at Hays, KS, in 2001. Feral rye control at Sidney, NE, and Torrington, WY, was highest (78 to 85%) with imazamox at 44 or 53 g/ha. At Sidney and Torrington, feral rye control was greatest when imazamox was applied EFP. Imazamox stunted wheat <10% in two experiments at Torrington, but EFP or LSP herbicide treatments in the Sidney experiment and ESP or LSP treatments in two Hays experiments caused moderate (12 to 34%) wheat injury. Wheat injury increased as imazamox rate increased. Wheat receiving imazamox LSP yielded less grain than wheat treated at other application timings in each Hays experiment and at Sidney in 2001. No yield differences occurred in one Torrington experiment. However, yields generally decreased as imazamox application timing was delayed in the other Torrington experiment. Generally, imazamox applied in the fall provided the greatest weed control, caused the least wheat injury, and maximized wheat yield.

Keywords

Imazamoxferal rye, Secale cereale L. #3 SECCEjointed goatgrass, Aegilops cylindrica Host # AEGCYwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘CO980875’Central Great Plainsherbicide-tolerant wheatIMI-wheatEFP, early-fall postemergenceESP, early-spring postemergenceKS-A, Hays, KS, experiment AKS-B, Hays, KS, experiment BLFP, late-fall postemergenceLSP, late-spring postemergenceMSO, methylated seed oilNE, Sidney, NEUAN, urea ammonium nitrateWY-A, Torrington, WY, experiment AWY-B, Torrington, WY, experiment B.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 924 - 930
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. L. 1993. Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) ecology and interference in winter wheat. Weed Sci. 41:338–393.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 1997. Cultural systems can reduce reproductive potential of winter annual grasses. Weed Technol. 11:608–613.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 1998. Ecological characteristics of three winter annual grasses. Weed Technol. 12:478–483.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1999. Selective control of jointed goatgrass with imazamox in herbicide-resistant wheat. Weed Technol. 13:77–82.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6:621–625.Google Scholar
Daugovish, O., Lyon, D. J., and Baltensperger, D. D. 1999. Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:120–126.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 5:3–17.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36:479–486.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., Peterson, D. E., and Miller, S. D. 2002. Application timing affects BAY MKH 6561 and MON 37500 efficacy and crop response in winter wheat. Weed Technol. 16:800–806.Google Scholar
Kappler, B. F., Lyon, D. J., Stahlman, P. W., Miller, S. D., and Eskridge, K. M. 2002. Wheat plant density influences jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competitiveness. Weed Technol. 16:102–108.Google Scholar
Mesbah, A. O. and Miller, S. D. 1999. Fertilizer placement affects jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competition in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:374–377.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D. and Ogg, P. J. 1999. Winter annual grass control in winter wheat with imazamox. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 54:54.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D., Van Vleet, S. M., and Ogg, P. J. 1998. Winter annual grass control in imi-tolerant wheat. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 53:51–52.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Seefeldt, S. S. 1999. Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 47:74–80.Google Scholar
Pester, T. A., Westra, P., Anderson, R. L., Lyon, D. J., Miller, S. D., Stahlman, P. W., Northam, F. E., and Wicks, G. A. 2000. Secale cereale interference and economic thresholds in wheat Triticum aestivum . Weed Sci. 48:720–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. SAS User's Manual. Version 6.12. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Bascomb, N. F., and Smith, W. 1996. Imidazolinone-resistant crops: selection, characterization, and management. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. New York: CRC Lewis. Pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
White, A. D., Stahlman, P. W., and Geier, P. W. 2003. Imazamox rate and timing combinations in Clearfield wheat. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 56:75–76.Google Scholar