Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:14:49.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Atomizers Upon Efficacy of Tridiphane plus Atrazine Applied Postemergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph P. Reed ,
Franklin R. Hall  and
Donald L. Reichard
Joseph P. Reed
Affiliation:
Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Cent., The Ohio State Univ., Wooster, OH 44691
Franklin R. Hall
Affiliation:
Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Cent., The Ohio State Univ., Wooster, OH 44691
Donald L. Reichard
Affiliation:
USDA-Agric. Res. Serv., Wooster, OH 44691
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies with flatfan, twinjet, flood and rotary atomizers were conducted in 1987 and 1988. The results indicated that tridiphane at 0.6 kg ai/ha plus atrazine at 1.7 kg ai/ha with 2.0 L/ha of soybean oil adjuvant was more effective in controlling giant foxtail and common lambsquarters when applied by the flatfan, twinjet, and rotary atomizers. Image analysis indicated that weed control by a postemergence herbicide was generally enhanced by better application coverage. Droplet size measurement by phase droplet particle/droplet analyzer demonstrated that the rotary atomizer produced a narrower range of droplet diameters between the Dv.1 and Dv.9 volumes than any of the other atomizers.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminetridiphane, 2-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2-(2,2,2-trichloroethyl)oxiranegiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯3 SETFAcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. ♯ CHEALAtrazinedroplet imageflatfanflooding nozzleimage analysisspinning disc nozzlespray coveragetridiphanetwinjet nozzle
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 92 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agrichemical Age. 1986. Figuring the Market. 30:14–15.Google Scholar
2. ASAE. 1987. Test procedure for measuring deposits and airborne spray for ground swath sprayers. S 387.1 ASAE Standards, ASAE, St. Joseph, ML.Google Scholar
3. Akesson, N. B., and Yates, W. E. 1964. Problems relating to application of agricultural chemicals and resulting drift residues. Ann. Rev. Ent. 9:285–318.Google Scholar
4. Burroughs, F. G., and Ehr, R. J. 1988. Control of spray variables to achieve optimum foliar coverage with tandem herbicide. Down Earth 44(1):8–11. Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI.Google Scholar
5. Ehr, R. J., Burroughs, F. G., Corder, R. C., and Gray, N. 1985. Use of Tandem in a triazine management system for control of 4 to 6 leaf annual grasses in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:53.Google Scholar
6. Gebhardt, M.R. 1987. Rotary atomization. p. 111–121 in McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., ed. Methods of Applying Herbicides. WSSA Monogr. 4:111–121.Google Scholar
7. Jensen, V.I.N., Stephenson, G. R., and Hunt, L. A. 1977. Detoxification of atrazine in graminaceae subfamilies. Weed Sci. 25:212–220.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, T. N. 1981. Effects of diluent volumes and surfactant on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 29:79–83.Google Scholar
9. Lamoureaux, G. L., and Rusness, D. G. 1983. Glutathione transferase inhibition as the basis of DOWCO 356 synergist of atrazine. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Pest. Chem. Abstr. No. 115, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
10. McCall, P. J., Stafford, L. E., Zorner, P. S., and Gavit, P. D. 1986. Modelling the foliar behavior of atrazine with and without crop oil concentrate on giant foxtail and the effect of tridiphane on the model rate constants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34:235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pimentel, D., and Levitan, L. 1986. Pesticides: amounts applied and amounts reaching pests. BioScience 36:86–91.Google Scholar
12. Reichard, D. L., and Triplett, G. B. 1983. Paraquat efficacy as influenced by atomizer type. Weed Sci. 31:779–782.Google Scholar
13. Shimabukuro, R. H., Lamoureaux, G. L., and Freer, D. S. 1978. Glutathione conjugation: a mechanism of herbicide detoxification and selectivity in plants, p. 139–149 in Pallos, B. and Casida, J. E., eds. Chemistry and Action of Herbicide Antidotes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
14. Special Report. 1984. Crop losses in Canada and the United States. Weed Sci. 32:1–12.Google Scholar