Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T03:21:33.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injury and Yield Effects on Crops Grown in CGA 152005-Treated Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John O'Sullivan  and
Robert J. Thomas
John O'Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Simcoe, Ontario, Canada N3Y 4N5
Robert J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Simcoe, Ontario, Canada N3Y 4N5
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: josulliv@uoguelph.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of CGA 152005 residues in the soil on six crops grown in rotation with field corn was investigated over a 2-yr period. CGA 152005 at 10, 15, 20, and 30 g ai/ha was applied postemergence (POST) to corn in 1994. CGA 152005 at 15 and 30 g ai/ha, atrazine at 1,000 g ai/ha, CGA 152005 at 15 g plus atrazine at 500 g ai/ha, and CGA 152005 at 30 g plus atrazine at 1,000 g ai/ha were applied POST to corn in 1995. Soybean, pea, cabbage, tomato, pepper, and potato were planted each spring, 1 yr after herbicide application. Cabbage exhibited injury and yield reductions that increased with increasing application rate, and pepper exhibited slight injury at the highest rate and yield reduction in 1995. Cabbage yields were reduced by CGA 152005 plus atrazine, and tomato yields were reduced by CGA 152005 and CGA 152005 plus atrazine in 1996. Yields of other crops were not affected in either year.

Keywords

CGA 152005 (proposed common name, prosulfuron), 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]-ureacabbage, Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.: corn, Zea mays L.pea, Pisum sativum L.pepper, Capsicum annuum L.potato, Solanum tuberosum L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrtomato, Lycopersicon esculentum MillCrop injuryherbicide carryoversoil pHsoil temperatureOM, organic matterPOST, postemergenceSU, sulfonylurea
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 594 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1995. Vegetable Production Recommendations. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Publ. 363. 240 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Grower Technical Guide-Peak. Guelph, Ontario: Novartis Crop Protection Canada.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel-Dekker. pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Blacklow, W. M. and Pheloung, P. C. 1991. Sulfonylurea herbicides applied to acidic sandy soils: a bioassay for residues and factors affecting recoveries. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42: 1205–1216.Google Scholar
Chomas, A. J. and Kells, J. J. 1993. Response of rotation crops to nicosulfuron or primisulfuron following application in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 263:88.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Knake, E. L., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Corn (Zea mays) injury following use of clomazone, chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5: 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, A. G. and Luecke, J. L. 1993. Herbicide carryover to sugarbeet and other crops. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 50: 116–118.Google Scholar
Duffy, M. J. and Hanafey, M. K. 1987. Predicting sulfonylurea herbicide behavior under field conditions. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 6: 541–547.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement and plant uptake of chlorosulfuron. Weed Sci. 34: 328–332.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol. 7: 641–644.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1993. Carryover of DPX-PE350 to grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and soybean (Glycine max) on two Arkansas soils. Weed Technol. 7: 645–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39: 629–633.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1995. Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops. Weed Technol. 9: 373–379.Google Scholar
Novosel, K. M. and Renner, K. A. 1995. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron root uptake, translocation, and inhibition of acetolactate synthase in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 43: 342–346.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Thomas, R. J., and Bouw, W. J. 1998. Effect of imazethapyr and imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78: 647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, M., Kreuz, K., Nelgen, N., Hudetz, M., and Meyer, W. 1993. CGA 152005—a new herbicide for broadleaf weed control in European maize. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 2: 53–59.Google Scholar
Vicari, A., Zimdahl, R. L., Cranmer, B. K., and Dinelli, G. 1996. Primisulfuron and rimsulfuron degradation in aqueous solution and adsorption in six Colorado soils. Weed Sci. 44: 672–677.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. D., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) herbicide carryover to grain and fibre crops. Weed Technol. 7: 625–632.Google Scholar