Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:56:14.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suction Trap Records of Myzus lythri (Homoptera: Aphididae) Associated with Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) Infestations in Idaho

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Susan E. Halbert  and
David J. Voegtlin
Susan E. Halbert
Affiliation:
University of Idaho, Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, P.O Box AA, Aberdeen, ID 83210
David J. Voegtlin
Affiliation:
Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 E. Peabody, Champaign, IL 61820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mean Idaho suction trap collections of Myzus lythri, an aphid which infests purple loosestrife, reflected weed distribution and were used successfully to predict undocumented weed populations. To our knowledge, this is the first time insect survey records have been used to document the range of an introduced weed.

Keywords

Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L. ♯ LYTSAInsect surveynoxious weedsrange expansionweed surveyLYTSA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 794 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, D. and Pike, K. S. 1988. An inexpensive suction trap and its use in an aphid monitoring network. J. Agric. Entomol. 5:103–107.Google Scholar
2. Cole, N. 1991. Beautiful plant is a significant threat. Sage Notes 14(4):1–3.Google Scholar
3. Dedryver, C. A., Gamon, A., and Gillet, H. 1991. Plurilocal assessment of the risk of primary infection of young cereals by BYDV in autumn in the west of France. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 26:51–57.Google Scholar
4. Gillette, C. P. and Palmer, M. A. 1934. The Aphididae of Colorado, Part III. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 27:133–255.Google Scholar
5. Halbert, S. E., Connelly, B. J., and Sandvol, L. E. 1990. Suction trapping of aphids in western North America (emphasis on Idaho). Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 25:411–422.Google Scholar
6. Halbert, S. E., Elberson, L., and Johnson, J. B. 1992. Suction trapping of Russian wheat aphid: What do the numbers mean? p. 282–297 in Morrison, W. P., ed. Proc. Fifth Russian Wheat Aphid Conference. Great Plains Agricultural Council, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
7. Halbert, S. E., Jennings, M. D., Cogan, C. B., Quisenberry, S. S., and Johnson, J. B. 1994. Potential use of suction trap collections of aphids as indicators of plant biodiversity. In Stork, N. E. and Harrington, R., eds. Insects in a Changing Environment. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
8. Shaposhnikov, G. Ch. 1964. Suborder Aphidinea. p. 616–799 in Bei-Bienko, G. Y., ed. Keys to the Insects of the European USSR. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
9. Stroyan, H. L. G. 1984. Aphids—Pterocommatinae and Aphidinae (Aphidini) Homoptera, Aphididae. Royal Entomological Society of London, London. 232 p.Google Scholar
10. Taylor, L. R. 1985. An international standard for the synoptic monitoring and dynamic mapping of migrant pest aphid populations. p. 337–418 in MacKenzie, D. R., Barfield, C. S., Kennedy, G. G., Berger, R. D., and Taranto, D. J., eds. The Movement and Dispersal of Agriculturally Important Biotic Agents. Claitor's Publishing Division, Baton Rouge. 611 p.Google Scholar