Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:55:22.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control and Cotton Response to Combinations of Glyphosate and Trifloxysulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Clifford H. Koger ,
Andrew J. Price  and
Krishna N. Reddy
Clifford H. Koger*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
Andrew J. Price
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, 411 Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ckoger@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to evaluate potential interactions between glyphosate and trifloxysulfuron on barnyardgrass, browntop millet, hemp sesbania, seedling johnsongrass, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, and velvetleaf control as well as cotton injury and yield. In the greenhouse, glyphosate at 840 g ae/ha controlled all weed species 62 to 99%, which was better than trifloxysulfuron at 2.5 or 5 g ai/ha. Control of four-leaf pitted morningglory and hemp sesbania was 80 to 88% when glyphosate and trifloxysulfuron were mixed compared with 62 to 66% control with glyphosate alone. Mixing trifloxysulfuron with glyphosate did not affect control of other species compared with glyphosate alone. In the field, glyphosate controlled barnyardgrass, prickly sida, sicklepod, seedling johnsongrass, and velvetleaf 68 to 100%. Trifloxysulfuron controlled hemp sesbania, seedling johnsongrass, and sicklepod 65 to 88%. All other species were controlled 36 to 72% with glyphosate and 10 to 60% with trifloxysulfuron. Combinations of glyphosate (840 g/ha) and trifloxysulfuron (5 g/ha) were applied postemergence over-the-top and postemergence-directed to three-, six-, and nine-leaf glyphosate-resistant cotton in the field. Cotton injury at 2 wk after treatment (WAT) was less than 13% for all herbicide treatments and less than 5% by 3 WAT. Herbicides did not affect the percent of open bolls or nodes per plant. Seed cotton yield ranged from 1,430 to 1,660 kg/ha, and only the sequential over-the-top applications of trifloxysulfuron reduced cotton yield compared with the weed-free, nontreated cotton.

Keywords

Glyphosatetrifloxysulfuronbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGbrowntop millet, Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf # PANRAentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHGhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill # SEBEXjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense L. Pers. # SORHApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin & Barnaby # CASOBvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. # ABUTHcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.CGA-362622crop injuryglyphosate-resistant cottonherbicide interactionspesticide interactionstank mixturesALS, acetolactate synthaseEPOST, early postemergencefb, followed byGRC, glyphosate-resistant cottonLPOST, late postemergenceMPOST, midpostemergencePD, postemergence-directedPOST, postemergencePOT, postemergence over-the-topWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 113 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2004. Roundup WeatherMax Supplemental label. Monsanto. Webpage: http://www.CDMS.net/manuf/acproducts.asp. Accessed: October 14, 2004.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:308–313.Google Scholar
Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:394–398.Google Scholar
Barber, L. T., Reynolds, D. B., Sanders, J. C., Wilson, D. G., Buehring, N. W., and Bloodworth, K. M. 2002. Weed control with CGA-362622 in roundup ready and BXN cotton systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:140.Google Scholar
Branson, J. W., Smith, K. L., and Barrentine, J. L. 2004. The potential role of CGA-362622 in glyphosate-tolerant and bromoxynil-resistant cotton weed control systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 57:35.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic response of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1997. Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 11:335–345.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotray, P. A., Keeling, J. W., Henniger, C. G., and Abernathy, J. R. 1996. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and devil's-claw (Proboscidea louisianica) control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with pyrithiobac. Weed Technol. 10:7–12.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., and Goodman, W. R. 2001. Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15:544–551.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heering, D. C., Voth, R. D., Ferreira, K., and Mills, J. A. 1998. Commercial experience with Roundup Ready cotton in 1997. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf 22:851.Google Scholar
Hicks, T. V., Wehtje, G. R., and Grey, T. L. 1998. The interaction of pyridate and 2,4-DB in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 46:284–288.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. A. and Snipes, C. E. 1999. Tolerance of transgenic cotton to topical applications of glyphosate. J. Cotton Sci 3:19–26.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Influence of application rate and timing on efficacy of DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:216–219.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanie, A. J., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1994a. Herbicide combinations for soybean (Glycine max) planted in stale seedbed. Weed Technol. 8:17–22.Google Scholar
Lanie, A. J., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1994b. Weed control with non-selective herbicides in soybean (Glycine max) stale seedbed culture. Weed Technol. 8:159–164.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:12–21.Google Scholar
[NCC] National Cotton Council. 2002. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Web page: http//www.cotton.org/tech/biotech/NCFAP-study.cfm. Accessed: November 13, 2002.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002a. Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:438–447.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., Clewis, S. B., and Edmisten, K. L. 2002b. Weed-free response of seven cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars to CGA-362622 postemergence. Weed Technol. 16:180–183.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, J. W., and Clewis, S. B. 2003. Weed management with CGA-362622 in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton. Weed Sci. 51:1002–1009.Google Scholar
Rawls, E. K., Wells, J. W., Hudetz, M., Jain, R., and Ulloa, M. F. 2000. CGA-362622: a new herbicide for weed control in sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:163.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2001. Broadleaf weed control in ultra narrow row bromoxynil-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15:497–504.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14:204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., Armel, G. R., and Hines, T. E. 2004a. Mixtures of glyphosate with CGA 362622 for weed control in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 18:16–22.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., Armel, G. R., and Hines, T. E. 2004b. Influence of adjuvants on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to postemergence applications of CGA 362622. Weed Technol. 18:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2001. SAS User's Guide. Release 8.2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Schraer, S. M., Cloud, G. L., Minton, B. W., Porterfield, C. D., Martin, S. H., Driver, J. E., Lunsford, J., Black, D. L., and Johnson, M. 2002. Cotton response to CGA 362622: rates, timings, and tank-mixtures. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:139–140.Google Scholar
Schraer, S. M., McLean, H. S., Holloway, J. C., Pearson, C. A. S., and Foresman, C. 2003. Enkoke: cotton tolerance and yield. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 56:223.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., Bennet, A. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton. Weed Sci. 49:549–557.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Arnold, J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1992. Influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42:210–215.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652–660.Google Scholar
Syngenta. 2004a. Herbicides. Web page: http//www.syngenta.com/en/index.aspx. Accessed: July 25, 2004.Google Scholar
Syngenta. 2004b. Syngenta Crop Protection US. Web page: http//www.syngentacropprotection-us.com. Accessed: July 25, 2004.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. 1996. Effect of Rate and Application Timing of Glyphosate to Control Sicklepod and Other Problem Weeds of the Mississippi Delta. M.S. thesis. University of Arkansas, Fayetville, AR. 116 p.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 1999. Influence of herbicide application rate, timing, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield in glufosinate-resistant and glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Technol. 13:807–813.Google Scholar
Vidirine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Blouin, D. C. 2002. Evaluation of reduced rates of glyphosate and chlorimuron in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:731–736.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. and Walker, R. H. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate and 2,4-DB for the control of selected morningglory (Ipomoea spp) species. Weed Technol. 11:152–156.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D. 1999. Chemical weed control. in Ruberson, J. R., ed. Handbook of Pest Management. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 627–661.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. 2000. Weed management in cotton. in Edmisten, K. L., ed. 2000 Cotton Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. AG-417. Pp. 69–111.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Young, J. M., Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., Wax, L. M., and Kaputsa, G. 2001. Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:112–121.Google Scholar