Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T11:12:50.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management Programs with Pyroxasulfone in Field Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

Daniel O. Stephenson IV ,
Jason A. Bond ,
James L. Griffin ,
Randall L. Landry ,
Brandi C. Woolam ,
H. Matthew Edwards  and
John M. Hardwick
Daniel O. Stephenson IV*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Research Associates, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Dean Lee Research and Extension Center, Alexandria, LA 71302
Jason A. Bond
Affiliation:
Professor and Research Associate, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus and former Graduate Student, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Randall L. Landry
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Research Associates, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Dean Lee Research and Extension Center, Alexandria, LA 71302
Brandi C. Woolam
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Research Associates, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Dean Lee Research and Extension Center, Alexandria, LA 71302
H. Matthew Edwards
Affiliation:
Professor and Research Associate, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776
John M. Hardwick
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus and former Graduate Student, School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: dstephenson@agcenter.lsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Louisiana and Mississippi from 2011 through 2013 to evaluate crop injury, weed control, and yield in field corn following pyroxasulfone applied PRE and POST. Pyroxasulfone PRE or POST did not injure corn at any evaluation. Barnyardgrass control was not improved with the addition of any POST treatment to pyroxasulfone alone or atrazine plus pyroxasulfone PRE; however, all POST treatments increased barnyardgrass control to at least 95% at all evaluations following atrazine PRE. All treatments that contained a PRE followed by POST application controlled browntop millet ≥90% at all evaluations. All POST treatments increased ivyleaf morningglory control to ≥92% following atrazine or pyroxasulfone alone PRE. However, control with atrazine plus pyroxasulfone PRE was similar or greater 28 d after POST than all treatments that received a POST application. In the absence of a POST treatment, pyroxasulfone or atrazine plus pyroxasulfone PRE controlled Palmer amaranth 93 to 96% at all evaluations, but atrazine alone PRE provided 84, 82, and 66% control 7, 14, and 28 d after POST, respectively. All programs that contained a PRE followed by POST herbicide treatment controlled Palmer amaranth >90% at all evaluations. Corn yield following all treatments except atrazine alone PRE and the nontreated were similar and ranged from 10990 to 12330 kg ha−1. This research demonstrated that pyroxasulfone can be a valuable tool for weed management in a corn weed management program.

Keywords

Atrazineglyphosatepyroxasulfonebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCGbrowntop millet, Urochloa ramosa (L.) Nguyen PANRAivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea Jacq. IPOHEPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPAcorn, Zea mays L.Residual herbicidestank mixtures
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 496 - 502
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: William Johnson, Purdue University

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, (2017a) Aatrex herbicide product label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld280001.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2017Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2017b) USDA-NASS 2010 Corn, Upland Cotton, and Fall Potatoes Chemical Use. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Pre-Defined_Queries/2010_Corn_Upland_Cotton_Fall_Potatoes/. Accessed February 2, 2017Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2017c) USDA-NASS 2014 Corn and Potatoes Chemical Use. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Pre-Defined_Queries/2014_Corn_and_Potatoes/. Accessed February 2, 2017Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2017d) Zidua herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldAMK010.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2017Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Eubank, TW, Bond, RC, Golden, BG, Edwards, HM (2014) Glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) control with fall-applied residual herbicides. Weed Technol 28:361–370 Google Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Frihauf, JC (2006) KIH-485 and S-metolachlor efficacy comparisons in conventional and no-tillage corn. Weed Technol 20:622–626 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Cutts, GS 3rd, Newsom, LJ, Newell, SH 2nd (2014) Comparison of pyroxasulfone to soil residual herbicide for glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth control in glyphosate resistant soybean. Crop Manage 12: 10.1094/CM-2013-0032-RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed March 7, 2017Google Scholar
Hulting, AG, Dauer, JT, Hinds-Cook, B, Curtis, D, Koepke-Hill, R, Mallory-Smith, C (2012) Management of Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne spp. multiflorum) in western Oregon with preemergence applications of pyroxasulfone in winter wheat. Weed Technol 26:230–235 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Kumar, V, Garcia, J, Reichard, N (2015) Tank mixing pendimethalin with pyroxasulfone and chloroacetamide herbicides enhances in-season residual weed control in corn. Weed Technol 29:198–206 Google Scholar
King, SR, Garcia, JO (2008) Annual broadleaf control with KIH-485 in glyphosate-resistant furrow-irrigated corn. Weed Technol 22:420–424 Google Scholar
King, SR, Ritter, RL, Hagood, ES Jr, Menbere, H (2007) Control of acetolactate synthase-resistant shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in field corn with KIH-485. Weed Technol 21:578–582 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Datta, A, Scott, J, Porpiglia, PJ (2009) Dose-response curves of KIH-485 for preemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technol 23:34–39 Google Scholar
[LSUAC-CES] Louisiana State University Agricultural Center-Cooperative Extension Service (2017) Corn weed management. Pages 17–24 in Stephenson, DO 4th, ed. 2017 Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Management Guide. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center-Cooperative Extension Service Google Scholar
Mahoney, KJ, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2014) Weed management in conventional- and no-tillage soybean using flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone. Weed Technol 28:298–306 Google Scholar
McNaughton, KE, Shropshire, C, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2014) Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to timing applications of pyroxasulfone, flumioxazin, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. Weed Technol 28:494–500 Google Scholar
[MSU-ES] Mississippi State University-Extension Service. (2016) Corn. Pages 61–68 in Calcote, K ed., 2016 Weed Control Guidelines for Mississippi. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University-Extension Service Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE (2011) Efficacy and dissipation of pyroxasulfone and three chloroacetamides in Tennessee field soil. Weed Sci 59:574–579 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(Spec. Issue 1): 31–62 Google Scholar
Prostko, EP, Grey, TL, Webster, TM, Kemmerait, RC (2011) Peanut tolerance to pyroxasulfone. Peanut Sci 38:111–114 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Steele, GL, Porpiglia, PJ, Chandler, JM (2005) Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and selected broadleaf weeds in corn. Weed Technol 19:866–869 Google Scholar
Stephenson, DO 4th, Blouin, DC, Griffin, JL, Landry, RL, Woolam, BC, Hardwick, JM (2017) Effect of pyroxasulfone application timing and rate on soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol (in press)Google Scholar
Tanetani, Y, Fujioka, T, Kaku, K, Shimizu, T (2011) Studies on the inhibition of plant very-long-chain fatty acid elongase by a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone. J Pestic Sci 36:221–228 Google Scholar
Tanetani, Y, Kaku, K, Kawai, K, Fujioka, T, Shimizu, T (2009) Action mechanism of a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone. Pestic Biochem Physiol 95:47–55 Google Scholar
Yamaji, Y, Honda, H, Kobayashi, M, Hanai, R, Inoue, J (2014) Weed control efficacy of a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone. J Pestic Sci 39:165–169 Google Scholar