Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:27:01.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adjuvant Efficacy with Quinclorac in Canola (Brassica napus) and Turfgrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph E. Zawierucha
Affiliation:
BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pennerd@msu.edu.

Abstract

Several commercial and experimental adjuvants were evaluated for efficacy in enhancing activity and selectivity of quinclorac in two cultivars of canola and four turfgrass species. Weed species investigated included cleavers, annual sowthistle, large crabgrass, and goosegrass. Turfgrass species evaluated included Kentucky bluegrass, perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, and creeping bentgrass. A variety of adjuvant types were selected, such as a methylated seed oil (Sunit II), a petroleum-based crop oil concentrate, the silicone-based Sylgard 309, a cationic fatty amine ethoxylate surfactant (Frigate), and modified crop oils (Dash and Merge). Adjuvant efficacy was evaluated by calculating the quinclorac rate required to reduce plant growth 50% (GR50) based on rates applied at 0, 15.6, 31.2, 62.5, and 125 g ai/ha. For goosegrass, quinclorac rates evaluated were increased to 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 g ai/ha. All evaluated adjuvants provided similar enhancement of control for cleavers and annual sowthistle. Sylgard 309 was the least effective adjuvant for control of large crabgrass. Goosegrass was tolerant to quinclorac across the evaluated rate range regardless of adjuvant; therefore, GR50 values could not be determined. None of the adjuvants alone caused phytotoxicity to canola or any turfgrass species.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, W. P. 1996. Weed Science: Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. pp. 8196.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1988. BAS 514 Technical Review. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation. 4 p.Google Scholar
Chism, W. S., Bingham, W., and Shaver, R. L. 1991. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of quinclorac in two grass species. Weed Technol. 5: 771775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chism, W. S., Birch, J. B., and Bingham, S. W. 1992. Nonlinear regressions for analyzing growth stage and quinclorac interactions. Weed Technol. 6: 898903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enache, A. J. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1991. BAS 514 and Dithiopyr for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol. 5: 616621.Google Scholar
Grossmann, K. 1998. Quinclorac belongs to a new class of highly selective auxin herbicides. Weed Sci. 46: 70716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harr, J., Guggenheim, R., Schulke, G., and Falk, R. H. 1991. The Leaf Surface of Major Weeds. Basel: Sandoz Agro. 122 p.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Watschke, T. L., Dernoeden, P. H., and Shetlar, D. J. 1995. Managing Turfgrass Pests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 47, 84-85.Google Scholar
WSSA Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. p. 313.Google Scholar
Zawierucha, J. E. and Penner, D. 2000. Absorption, translocation, metabolism, and spray retention of quinclorac in Digitaria sanquinalis and Eleusine indica . Weed Sci. 48: 296301.Google Scholar