Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:53:14.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of a Cereal Rye Cover Crop and Conservation Tillage on the Critical Period for Weed Control in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Andrew J. Price ,
Nicholas E. Korres ,
Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Steve Li
Andrew J. Price*
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Auburn, AL, USA
Nicholas E. Korres
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Steve Li
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
*
*Author for correspondence: Andrew Price, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 411 S. Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832. (Email: andrew.price@ars.usda.gov)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cover crops are being increasingly recommended as an integrated approach to controlling glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth and other troublesome weeds. Thus, a field experiment was conducted in 2010 through 2012 to evaluate the critical period for weed control (CPWC) in cotton as affected by a cereal rye cover crop and tillage. The management systems evaluated included conventional tillage following winter fallow, conservation tillage (CT) following winter fallow, and CT following a cereal rye cover crop managed for maximum biomass. Throughout most of the growing season, weed biomass in cereal rye cover crop plots was less than the CT winter-fallow system in both years and less than both CT winter fallow and conventional tillage in 2012. The CPWC was shortest in 2010 following conventional tillage; however, in 2012, production system influences on CPWC were less. The presence of the rye cover crop delayed the critical timing for weed removal (CTWR) approximately 8 d compared with fallow treatment both years, while conventional tillage delayed CTWR about 2 wk compared with winter fallow. Relative yield losses in both years did not reach the 5% threshold limit until about 2 wk after planting (WAP) for CT following winter fallow, 3 WAP for CT following a cover crop, and 3.5 WAP following conventional tillage. Thus, CT following winter fallow should be avoided to minimize cotton yield loss.

Keywords

Prashant Jha, Montana State UniversityGlyphosatePalmer amaranthAmaranthus palmeri (S.) Watsoncereal ryeSecale cereale L.cottonGossypium hirsutum L.Conservation agriculturecultural weed controlnonlinear modelsweed suppressionwinter fallow
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 683 - 690
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akemo, MC, Regnier, EE, Bennett, MA (2000) Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereal) pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technol 14:545–549 Google Scholar
Ashford, DL, Reeves, DW (2003) Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. Am J Altern Agric 18:37–45 Google Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS (2011) Weed management and cotton yield under two row spacings, conventional and conservation tillage systems utilizing conventional, glufosinate-, and glyphosate-based weed management systems. Weed Technol 25:542–547 Google Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Enloe, SF, van Santen, E, Wehtje, G, Patterson, MG (2012) Palmer amaranth management in glufosinate-resistant cotton: I. tillage system, cover crops and herbicide management. Weed Management and Herbicide Resistance Special Issue. Agronomy 2:295–311 Google Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Enloe, SF, Wehtje, G, Patterson, MG (2013) Palmer amaranth management in glufosinate-resistant cotton: II. primary, secondary, and conservation tillage. Weed Management and Herbicide Resistance Special Issue. Agronomy 3:28–42 Google Scholar
Blankenship, EE, Stroup, WW, Evans, SP, Knezevic, SZ (2003) Statistical inference for calibration points in nonlinear mixed effects models. J Agr Biol Env Stat 8:455–468 Google Scholar
Buchanan, GA, Burns, ER (1970) Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci 18:149–154 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri ) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626 Google Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Bauman, TT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2007) Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed population dynamics and crop yield. Weed Sci 55:508–516 Google Scholar
Derpsch, R, Roth, CH, Sidiras, N, Köpke, U (1991) Controle da erosão no Paraná, Brazil: Sistemas de cobertura do solo, plantio directo e prepare conservacionista do solo. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit Google Scholar
Duzy, LM, Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Kornecki, TS (2015) Conservation tillage is under threat in the United States. Outlooks on Pest Management 26:257–262 Google Scholar
Gustafson, DI (2008) Sustainable use of glyphosate in North American cropping systems. Pest Manag Sci 64:409–416 Google Scholar
Haramoto, ER, Gallandt, ER (2004) Brassica cover cropping for weed management: a review. Renew Agr Food Syst 19:187–198 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786 Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Norsworthy, JK (2015) Influence of a rye cover crop on the critical period for weed control in cotton. Weed Sci 63:346–352 Google Scholar
Mirsky, SB, Curran, WS, Mortensen, DM, Ryan, MR, Shumway, DL (2011) Timing of cover crop management effects on seed suppression in no-till planted soybean using a roller-crimper. Weed Sci 59:380–389 Google Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modeling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton. Weed Technol 25:335–343 Google Scholar
Nichols, RL, Bond, J, Culpepper, AS, Dodds, D, Nandula, V, Main, CL, Marshall, MW, Mueller, TC, Norsworthy, JK, Price, AJ, Patterson, M, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, D, Wright, D, York, AC (2009) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) spreads in the southern United States (U.S.) Res Pest Manag Newsletter 18:8–10 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, RL (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108–113 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, McClelland, M, Griffith, G, Bangarwa, SK, Still, J (2011) Evaluation of cereal and Brassicaceae cover crops in conservation-tillage, enhanced, glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 25:6–13 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations Weed Sci 60(SP1):31–62 Google Scholar
Peachy, E, Luna, J, Dick, R, Sattell, R (1999) Cover Crop Weed Suppression in Annual Rotations. Oregon cover crops. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service EM 8725. 7 p Google Scholar
Owen, M, Zelaya, IA (2005) Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61:301–311 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Arriaga, FJ (2005) Rye biomass amount affects weed suppression levels in conservation-tillage cotton. Pages 2921–2923 in Proceedings of the 2005 Beltwide Cotton Conferences. New Orleans, LA: National Cotton CouncilGoogle Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Culpepper, SA, Kelton, JA, Nichols, RL, Schomberg, H (2011a) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv 66:265–275 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA (2012) Herbicide and cover cop residue integration for Amaranth control in conservation agriculture cotton. Weed Technol 26:490–498 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Raper, RL, Monks, CD, Barentine, RM, Iversen, KV (2011b) Controlling Glyphosate-Resistant Pigweed in Conservation Tillage Cotton Systems. USDA Special Publication 09. http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/64200500/csr/SpecialPubs/SP09.pdf. Accessed: March 7, 2011Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Monks, CD, Culpepper, AS, Duzy, LM, Kelton, JA, Marshall, MW, Steckel, LE, Sosnoskie, LM, Nichols, RL (2016) High residue cover crops alone or with strategic tillage to manage glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Southeastern Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Soil Water Conserv 71:1–11 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Reeves, DW, Lamm, DA (2009) Glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth—a threat to conservation tillage [abstract]. National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, Texas, January 5–8Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Reeves, DW, Patterson, MG (2006) Evaluation of weed control provided by three winter cereals in conservation-tillage soybean. Renewable Agric Food Syst 21:159–164 Google Scholar
Reeves, DW (2003) A Brazilian model for no-tillage cotton production adapted to the southeastern USA. Proceedings of the II World Congress on Conservation Agriculture—Producing in Harmony with Nature. Iguassu Falls, Paraná, Brazil, August 11–15, 2003. Pp 372–374Google Scholar
Reeves, DW, Price, AJ, Patterson, MG (2005) Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage non-transgenic cotton. Weed Technol 19:731–736 Google Scholar
Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Grantham, AM, Hunsberger, LK, Mirsky, SB, Mortensen, DA, Nord, EA, Wilson, DO (2011) Effects of seeding rate and poultry litter on weed suppression from a rolled cereal rye cover crop. Weed Sci 59:438–444 Google Scholar
Shilling, DG, Brecke, BJ, Hiebsch, C, MacDonald, G (1996) Effect of soybean (Glycine max) cultivar, tillage, and rye (Secale cereale) mulch on sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Technol 9:339–342 Google Scholar
Smith, AN, Reberg-Horton, SC, Place, GT, Meijer, AD, Arellano, C, Mueller, JP (2011) Rolled rye mulch for weed suppression in organic no-tillage soybeans. Weed Sci 59:224–231 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable systems. J Prod Agric 9:475–479 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron J 85:673–680 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (2000) The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 48:385–392 Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in Broadleaf Crops, Fruits & Vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016-Weed-Survey_Broadleaf-crops.xlsx. Accessed: December 11, 2017Google Scholar
Weaver, SE (1984) Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Res 24:317–325 Google Scholar
Williams, MM II, Ransom, CV, Thompson, WM (2007) Volunteer potato density influences critical time of weed removal in bulb onion. Weed Technol 21:136–140 Google Scholar