Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:23:52.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Stubble Fields Sprayed with Herbicides in 1998: Cultural Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gail A. Wicks*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, North Platte, NE 69101
Don H. Popken
Affiliation:
United Suppliers Inc., North Platte, NE 69101
Garold W. Mahnken
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, North Platte, NE 69101
Gordon E. Hanson
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, North Platte, NE 69101
Drew J. Lyon
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gwicks1@unl.edu

Abstract

A survey of 174 fields was conducted during August and September of 1998 to investigate effects of cultural and herbicide practices on postharvest weed control in winter wheat stubble fields across western and southern Nebraska. Seventy-four percent of the fields were seeded at rates of 67 to 100 kg/ha, with 60% of the wheat seeded in rows spaced 25 cm apart. Wheat seeded in east–west rows contained 98% more stinkgrass and 82% more tumble pigweed than wheat seeded in north–south rows. Sixty-nine percent of winter wheat stubble fields were rated excellent for weed control. Postharvest weed control with herbicides was not affected by row spacing. In western Nebraska, density of tumble pigweed and Russian thistle was greater when wheat seeding rate was 50 kg/ha than at higher seeding rates. Short-stature winter wheat cultivars had greater densities of Pennsylvania smartweed and toothed spurge than taller cultivars. The most common winter wheat cultivars were ‘Arapahoe’ (34%) and ‘Alliance’ (17%). Weed control was positively correlated with number of winter wheat stems per square meter (r = 0.22∗∗). Density of several weed species was greater in fields seeded with a disk than with a hoe drill. The most common crop rotations sampled were winter wheat–corn–fallow (50%), winter wheat–fallow (18%), and winter wheat–corn–soybean (13%). Winter wheat yields and wheat stem densities were greater and weed density was less when winter wheat was seeded after an 11- to 14-mo fallow period rather than a 0- to 5-mo period.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Publication 13601 University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series.

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D., Ramsel, R. E., Burnside, O. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1985. Survey of Weeds in Nebraska During 1980 and 1981. Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, Miscellaneous Publ. 40. 38 p.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. S., Omernik, J. M., and Freeouf, J. A. et al. 2001. Ecoregions of Nebraska and Kansas (Color Poster with Map, Descriptive Text, Summary Tables, and Photographs). Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Klein, R. N. 1995. Most profitable ecofarming crop rotation with winter wheat. Nebraska Ecofarming and Winter Wheat Conference. Proc. Univ. Neb. Ext. Serv. 17: 124.Google Scholar
Norwood, C. A., Schlegel, A. J., Morishita, D. W., and Gwin, R. E. 1990. Cropping system and tillage effects on available soil water and yield of grain sorghum and winter wheat. J. Prod. Agric. 3: 356362.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. The SAS System for Windows: Release 6.12. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute. 955 p.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. P. and Burr, W. W. 1909. Crop Production in Western Nebraska. University of Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 109. pp. 141.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture. AC97-A-27. Nebraska State and County Data. Volume 1. Geographic Area Series Part 27. 505 p.Google Scholar
Valenti, S. A. and Wicks, G. A. 1992. Influence of nitrogen rates and wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars on weed control. Weed Sci. 40: 115121.Google Scholar
Vaughan, B., Westfall, D. G., and Barbarick, K. A. 1990. Nitrogen rate and timing effects on winter wheat grain yield, grain protein, and economics. J. Prod. Agric. 3: 324328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Fenster, C. R. 1979. Variability in postemergence herbicide performance under ecofallow. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34: 4042.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Klein, R. N. 1991. Feasibility of non-irrigated soybean (Glycine max) production in the semi-arid central Great Plains. Weed Technol. 5: 369375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Mahnken, G. W., and Hanson, G. E. 1995a. Influence of small grain crops on weeds and ecofallow corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 43: 128133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Martin, A. R., and Lyon, D. J. 1999. Cultural Practices to Improve Weed Control in Winter Wheat. Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska. G99-1389-A. 4 p.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Popken, D. H., and Lowry, S. R. 1989. Survey of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble fields sprayed with herbicides after harvest in 1986. Weed Technol. 3: 244254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Somerhalder, B. R. 1971. Effect of seedbed preparation for corn on distribution of weed seed. Weed Sci. 19: 666668.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Stahlman, P. W., and Anderson, R. L. 1995b. Weed management systems for semiarid areas of the central Great Plains. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 174190.Google Scholar