Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:29:04.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management with Oxyfluorfen and Napropamide in Mulched Strawberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James P. Gilreath  and
Bielinski M. Santos
James P. Gilreath
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 5007 60th Street East, Bradenton, FL 34203
Bielinski M. Santos*
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 5007 60th Street East, Bradenton, FL 34203
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: bmsantos@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of herbicide and mulch on weed management and strawberry yield. Napropamide at rates of 4.50, 6.75, or 9.00 kg ai/ha; oxyfluorfen at 0.57 kg ai/ha; and napropamide plus oxyfluorfen at 4.50 plus 0.57 kg/ha were applied pretransplant on pressed beds covered with either low-density polyethylene mulch or virtually impermeable film. There was no herbicide by mulch interaction. Mulch types had no influence on weed counts and fruit yield, whereas herbicides affected both variables. The napropamide plus oxyfluorfen treatment resulted in the highest fruit number and weight, increasing yield by 20% with respect to the nontreated control. This herbicide combination provided the best weed suppression.

Keywords

Napropamideoxyfluorfenstrawberry, Fragaria × ananassa DuchAcetamidescrabgrassdiphenylethersinterferencemulchprimroseragweedGCREC, Gulf Coast Research and Education CenterWAP, weeks after planting
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 325 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Publication R-10267 Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series.

References

Literature Cited

Berenson, M. L. and Levine, D. M. 1992. Basic Business Statistics: Concepts and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 579–583.Google Scholar
Chase, C. A., Sinclair, T. R., Chellemi, D. O., Olson, S. M., Gilreath, J. P., and Locascio, S. J. 1999. Heat-retentive films for increasing soil temperatures during solarization in a humid, cloudy environment. HortScience 34:1085–1089.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Haar, M. J., and Ajwa, H. A. 2003. Weed control in strawberry provided by shank- and drip-applied methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 38:55–61.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P., Noling, J. W., and Santos, B. M. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives for bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) rotations. Crop Prot. 23:347–351.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004. Efficacy of methyl bromide alternatives on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in tomato and pepper. Weed Technol. 18:141–145.Google Scholar
Howell, D. C. 1992. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Boston, MA: Duxbury. Pp. 432–450.Google Scholar
Lamont, W. J. 1993. Plastic mulches for production of vegetable crops. HortTechnology 3:35–39.Google Scholar
Locascio, S. J., Dickson, D. W., and Rosskopf, E. 2002. Alternative fumigants applied with standard and virtually impermeable mulches for tomato. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 115:192–194.Google Scholar
Noling, J. W. and Gilreath, J. P. 2001. Methyl Bromide, Progress and Problems: Identifying Alternatives to Methyl Bromide. Volume II. Citrus and Vegetable Magazine. Gainesville, FL: IFAS. 16 Pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Ott, L. 1984. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury. Pp. 425–428.Google Scholar
Simonne, E. H., Hochmuth, G. J., Stall, W. M., Duval, J. R., Kucharek, T. A., Price, J. F., Taylor, T. G., and Smith, S. A. 2003. Strawberry production in Florida. in Olson, S. O. and Simonne, E. H., eds. Vegetable Production Guide for Florida, 2003–2004. Gainesville, FL: IFAS. Pp. 251–263.Google Scholar
Stall, W. M. and Gilreath, J. P. 2002a. Estimated effectiveness of recommended herbicides on selected common weeds in Florida vegetables. in Stall, W. M., ed. Weed Management in Florida Fruits and Vegetables, 2002–2003. Gainesville, FL: IFAS. Pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
Stall, W. M. and Gilreath, J. P. 2002b. Weed control in strawberry. in Stall, W. M., ed. Weed Management in Florida Fruits and Vegetables, 2002– 2003. Gainesville, FL: IFAS. Pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2003. Vegetables: 2002 Summary. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service. 84 p.Google Scholar