Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:02:49.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Infestations and Economic Returns as Influenced by Frequency of Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John T. O'Donovan
John T. O'Donovan*
Affiliation:
Alberta Environ. Cent., Vegreville T0B 4L0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In continuous wheat or barley or in a canola/barley rotation, wild oat control every year over 4 yr maintained wild oat seedling populations at 3 plants/m2 or less. Failure to control wild oats annually increased wild oat populations (>200 plants/m2 by the fourth year) in continuous wheat dramatically, while in the other two cropping systems, populations increased to only 40 plants/m2 or less by the fourth year. In the continuous wheat and in the canola/barley rotation, wild oat control every year generally provided the best economic returns when prices and costs were averaged over 4 yr; in continuous barley, the average return was better when wild oats was controlled only in the second or third years rather than every year.

Keywords

Barley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Klondike’canola, Brassica campestris L. ‘Tobin’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’wild oats, Avena fatua L. # AVEFACanola/barley rotationBrassica campestrisHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumAVEFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 495 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chancellor, R. J., and Peters, N.C. B. 1970. Seed production by Avena fatua populations in various crops. p. 7–11 in Proc. 10th Br. Weed Control Conf., Brighton, U.K. Google Scholar
2. Dew, D. A. 1972. An index of competition for estimating crop loss due to weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:921–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dew, D. A. 1978. Estimating crop losses caused by wild oats. p. 15–18 in Wild Oat Action Comm. Proc., Regina, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
4. Dew, D. A., and Keys, C. H. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:1005–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. O'Donovan, J. T. 1985. Influence of stage of removal of wild oats with diclofop methyl on yield of canola. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds, West. Can. Sect., 3:212–213.Google Scholar
6. O'Donovan, J. T. 1986. Influence of stage of removal of wild oats with diclofop methyl on yield of canola. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. Weeds, West. Can. Sect., 3:182–183.Google Scholar
7. O'Donovan, J. T., and Sharma, M. P. 1983. Wild oats, competition and crop losses. p. 27–37 in Wild Oat Action Comm. Proc., Regina, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
8. O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.Google Scholar