Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:30:23.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Ecological Study of Lens- and Globe-Podded Hoary Cresses in Saskatchewan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. W. Selleck
G. W. Selleck*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
Get access

Abstract

A 7-year ecological study of natural infestations of globe-podded (Cardaria pubescens) and lens-podded (C. chalapensis) hoary cresses was conducted under conditions of irrigation and dry land farming in southern Saskatchewan. Density and area measurements were compared annually in competition with grasses, forbs and shrubs in several environments. The hoary cresses are well adapted to moist situations but are not particularly vigorous in dry, semi-arid environments. Globe-podded hoary cress was better able to survive a period of drought than the lens-podded species. Native roses (Rosa spp.), western snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis) and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens) were the most effective competitors of the hoary cresses. Alfalfa and to a lesser degree, bromegrass were also effective. As these infestations of hoary cress are situated upstream from the Saskatchewan River Irrigation Project, they constitute a serious threat to many acres of irrigable farmland. Control by cultural means is shown to be feasible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bellue, M. K. 1933. New weeds confused with hoary cress. Monthly Bull. California Dept. Agr. 22:288–293.Google Scholar
2. Corns, W. G., and Frankton, C. 1952. Hoary cresses in Canada with particular reference to their distribution and control in Alberta. Sci. Agr. 32:484–495.Google Scholar
3. Coupland, R. T. and Skoglund, N. A. 1962. Techniques employed in measuring changes in extent of infestations of perennial weeds. Proc. NCWCC, 19:50–51.Google Scholar
4. Frankton, C. 1955. Weeds of Canada, p 70. Queens Printer, Ottawa.Google Scholar
5. Groh, H. 1940. Hoary cresses in Canada. Sci. Agr. 20:750–756.Google Scholar
6. Groh, H. 1940. Turkestan alfalfa as a medium of weed introduction. Sci. Agr. 21:36–43.Google Scholar
7. Lobay, W. 1961. Weed control activities in Alberta, 1961. Minutes and annual reports, Western Section National Weed Committee. Edmonton, Alberta, p. 20–25.Google Scholar
8. Mulligan, G. A. and Frankton, C. 1962. Taxonomy of the genus Cardaria with particular reference to the species introduced into North America. Canada J. Bot. 40:1411–1425.Google Scholar
9. Selleck, G. W. 1959. Leafy spurge control with 2,4-D. Proc. NCWCC 16:70.Google Scholar
10. Selleck, G. W., Coupland, R. T., and Frankton, C. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monog. 32:1–29.Google Scholar
11. Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility differences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar