Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:34:12.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Control of Field Horsetail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. B. Hoyt  and
A. C. Carder
P. B. Hoyt
Affiliation:
Experimental Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture
A. C. Carder
Affiliation:
Experimental Farm, Beaverlodge, Alberta, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture
Get access

Abstract

In the Peace River region, vegetative shoots of field horsetail, Equisetum arvense L., emerge from June 1 to July 1, and reach full growth about July 16. All herbicides studied were most effective applied July 16 to 30. Amitrole (3–amino–1,2,4–triazole) at 8 lb/A at this time gave 96% stand reduction the next year. For selective killing in barley, MCPA (2–methyl–4–chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 4 to 8 oz/A killed 100% of the top growth in the year of application and gave 50 to 65% stand reduction the next year. Other herbicides tried were less effective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1962 , pp. 111 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abel, A. L. 1957. The substituted urea herbicides. Chemistry and Industry 33:1106–1112.Google Scholar
2. Äberg, E. 1956. Weed control research and development in Sweden. Proc. 3rd Brit. Weed Control Conf.: 144–164.Google Scholar
3. Adamson, R. M. 1954. Herbicidal control of horsetail (E. arvense). Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section):41.Google Scholar
4. Adamson, R. M. 1955. Herbicidal control of horsetail. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 37.Google Scholar
5. Anonymous. 1955. Weeds poisonous to livestock. Alberta Dept. of Agr. Pub. 38.Google Scholar
6. Campbell, J. B., Lodge, R. W., and Budd, A. C. 1956. Poisonous plants of the Canadian prairies. Canada Dept. of Agr. Pub. 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Craig, H. A. 1952. Horsetail: Equisetum spp. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 29.Google Scholar
8. Duncan, D. A. 1950. Chemical control of common perennial weeds. Proc. Western Can. Weed Control Conf. 4:57–64.Google Scholar
9. Friesen, G. 1959. The effect of various herbicides on field horsetail. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West Section): 28–29.Google Scholar
10. Fyles, Faith. 1920. Principal poisonous plants of Canada. Canada Dept. of Agr. Bul. 39.Google Scholar
11. Godbout, E. 1959. Residual effect of soil sterilants alone on horsetail, couchgrass and mixed hay harvested 2 years after their application. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (East. Section): 106.Google Scholar
12. Groh, H. 1930. Horsetail, a horse-poisoning weed. Canada Dept. of Agr. Cir. 74.Google Scholar
13. Groh, H. 1937. Peace-Athabasca weeds. Canada Dept. of Agr. Pub. 556.Google Scholar
14. Güssow, H. T. 1910. Common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) as a stock poisoning plant. In Experimental Farm Reports: 280–281.Google Scholar
15. Güssow, H. T. 1912. Field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) In Experimental Farm Reports. 210–211.Google Scholar
16. Hoffman, O. L., and Sylwester, E. P. 1951. Weed control with CMU. Res. Rept. NCWCC. 8:146.Google Scholar
17. Holly, K. 1953. The effect of synthetic growth regulator herbicides on Equisetum palustre . Proc. 1st. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 227–233.Google Scholar
18. Holly, K., Woodford, E. K., and Blackman, G. E. 1952. The control of some perennial weeds in permanent grassland by selective herbicides. Agriculture, London, 59:19–23.Google Scholar
19. Hoyt, P. B. 1954. The effect of 2,4–D and MCP on field horsetail, E. arvense, and on yield of barley. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 41.Google Scholar
20. Holz, Van W., and Richter, W. 1954. Versuche mit Wuchsstoffherbiziden zur Bekampfung des Duwochs (Equisetum palustre L.) Landw. Forsch. 7:56–58.Google Scholar
21. Hughes, E. C. 1957. Chemical trials on couchgrass (Agropyron repens) and horsetail (Equisetum arvense). Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 7.Google Scholar
22. Jackman, G. R., and Tincker, M. A. H. 1949. The use of a selective weed killer in nursery gardens, the control of horsetail. Jour. R. Hort. Soc.: 351–355.Google Scholar
23. King, E. M. 1957. Control of couchgrass and horsetail in asparagus. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 112.Google Scholar
24. McLean, A., and Nicholson, H. H. 1958. Stock poisoning plants of the British Columbia ranges. Canada Dept. of Agr. Pub. 1037.Google Scholar
25. Murphy, J. R. 1959. Roadside beside tobacco: ATA, Atlacide and FB–2. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (East. Section): 94.Google Scholar
26. Plant, W. 1952. Hormones kill horsetail. Farmer and Stockbreeder 66:34–35.Google Scholar
27. Plant, W. 1952. The control of horsetail in pastures with MCPA. Agriculture, London, 59:86–88.Google Scholar
28. Wood, H. E. 1949. The effect of 2,4–D on perennial weeds. Proc. 3rd Western Can. Weed Control Conf.: 23–28.Google Scholar
29. Wood, H. E. 1951. Controlling field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) with 2,4–D. Proc. 5th Western Can. Weed Control Conf.: 105–106.Google Scholar
30. Wood, H. E. and Bourns, J. J. 1949. Controlling field horsetail with 2,4–D. Proc. 3rd. Western Can. Weed Control Conf.: 29.Google Scholar
31. Wood, H. E., Garvin, J. W., and Watson, W. D. 1952. Response of field horsetail to treatments with several chemicals. Res. Rept. NCWCC 9:32.Google Scholar
32. Wood, H. E., and Mants, J. R. 1954. Effect of various herbicides applied to field horsetail. Res. Rept. Natl. Weed Com. (West. Section): 42.Google Scholar