Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T15:14:50.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Fenuron on Four Southwestern Shrubs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert F. Wagle  and
Ervin M. Schmutz
Robert F. Wagle
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Ervin M. Schmutz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Get access

Abstract

The injurious effects of different rates of fenuron (3-peynyl-1,1-dimethylurea) on four species of brush were recorded for two years in two different types of southwestern brushlands, the Oak-chaparral and the Chihuahuan Desert Shrub. Fenuron was more injurious to fire sprouts than to mature plants of turbinella oak (Quercus turbinella Greene) in the Oak- chaparral type especially at 2 to 8 lb/A ai. The effects of fenuron on mature plants were reduced by burning, suggesting that much of the fenuron absorbed was residual in the stems, twigs, and leaves where it was destroyed by the fire. The effect of fenuron on the fire sprouts changed only slightly between six months and two years. Gibberellic acid was applied to sprouts and mature oak plants appeared to slightly reduce the injurious effects of some rates of fenuron during the first six months but no gibberellin induced differences were observed after two years. In the Chihuahuan Desert shrub type, tarbush (Flourencia cernua DC.) and whitethorn (Acacia constricta Benth.) were about equally susceptible to injury by fenuron with creosotebush (Larrea tridentata (DC.) Cov.) slightly more resistant. Summer applications just before the rainy season were most effective and 4 lb/A combined high shrub kill with greatest grass growth.

Although 8 and 16 lb/A ai killed and injured both grasses and shrubs on the oak plots, grass naturally reseeded into these plots within six months after treatment, but on the Chihuahuan Desert area grass had not recovered on the plots treated at 8 lb/A after two years. This difference in grass re-establishment was probably due to rainfall differences which would give differences in leaching of fenuron. Palatability of the grasses in the oak plots increased due to fenuron treatments, particularly on the heavily treated plots. These studies indicate that moderate rates of fenuron, applied just prior to favorable seasonal rains and repeated at several-year intervals, may be used to control turbinella oak sprouts and mature Chihuahuan Desert shrubs. However, treatments would only be economical where high forage and watershed values would result.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1963 , pp. 149 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Benson, L. and Darrow, R. A. 1954. The trees and shrubs of the southwestern deserts. The Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona and The Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 437 pp.Google Scholar
2. Brinkman, K. A. 1959. Killing oak brush—a tricky business. U.S. Forest Service, Central States For. Expt. Sta. Tech. Paper 165.Google Scholar
3. Brinkman, K. A. 1960. Controlling oaks with stem-applied herbicides. Iowa State J. Sci. 34:613–622.Google Scholar
4. Cooke, P. S. 1878. The conquest of New Mexico and California. A historical and personal narrative. G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York. 307 pp.Google Scholar
5. Crawford, H. S. 1960. Effect of aerial 2,4,5-T sprays on forage production in west-central Arkansas. J. Range Mgmt. 13:44.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. 1961. The chemistry and mode of action of herbicides. Interscience Publishers, New York, N. Y. 269 pp.Google Scholar
7. Darrow, R. A. and McCully, W. G. 1958. Pellet applications of fenuron for the control of post and blackjack oaks. Texas Agri. Expt. Sta. Prog. Rept. 2041.Google Scholar
8. Darrow, R. A. and McCully, W. G. 1959. Brush control and range improvement in the post oak-blackjack area of Texas. Texas Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull. 942.Google Scholar
9. Davis, K. P. 1959. Forest fire control and use. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 584 pp.Google Scholar
10. Davis, E. A. and Lillie, D. T. 1961. Effectiveness of soil-herbicide irrigation treatments for the control of shrub live oak in Arizona. Res. Prog. Report, WWCC, pp. 20–22, Salt Lake City, Utah. Google Scholar
11. Duisberg, P. C. 1951. Economic potential of the creosotebush. Chemurgic Digest 10(10):6–8.Google Scholar
12. Emrick, W. E. and Leonard, O. A. 1954. Delayed kill of interior live oak by fall treatment with 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. J. Range Mgmt. 7:75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gardner, J. L. 1951. Vegetation of the creosotebush area of the Rio Grande Valley in New Mexico. Ecol. Mon. 21:379–403.Google Scholar
14. Graham, C. A. 1958. Killing brush sprouts on open woodland. U. S. Forest Serv., California. Forest and Range Expt. Sta. Res. Note 136.Google Scholar
15. Grano, C. X. 1958. Response of southern red oak to seasonal applications of 2,4,5-T. J. Forestry 56:140–141.Google Scholar
16. Humphrey, R. R. 1958. The desert grassland—a history of vegetational change and an analysis of causes. Botan. Rev. 24(4):193–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Klingman, G. C. 1961. Weed control: As a science. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 421 pp.Google Scholar
18. Leonard, O. A. 1957. Effect of phenoxy herbicide concentrates applied to cuts of sprouting tree species. Weeds 5:291–303.Google Scholar
19. Leonard, O. A. and Carlson, C. E. 1959. Aircraft spraying of blue oak. California Agri. 13(12):3.Google Scholar
20. Leonard, O. A. and Harvey, W. A. 1956. Chemical control of woody plants in California. California Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull. 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Nichol, A.A. 1952. The natural vegetation of Arizona. Arizona Agri. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 127. pp. 188–230.Google Scholar
22. Parry, C. C. 1859. Introduction to geographical distribution and botanical features. In: Emory, W. H. Report on the United States and Mexican boundary survey. House Exec. Doc. No. 135, 34th Congress, 1st Session, Vol. 2 pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
23. Peevy, F. A. 1959. Methods of applying herbicides for controlling individual trees. Forest and People, Third Quarter Issue. pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
24. Peevy, F. A. 1961. Basal application of herbicides for control of woody plants. In: The use of chemicals in southern forests. Louisiana State Univ. Press, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
25. Pond, F. W. and Cable, D. R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. J. Range Mgmt. 13:313–317.Google Scholar
26. Sachs, R. M. 1961. Gibberellin, auxin, and growth retardent effects upon cell division and shoot histogenesis. Adv. in Chem. Series No. 28. pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
27. Sampson, A. W. 1944. Plant succession on burned chaparral lands in northern California. California Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull. 685.Google Scholar
28. Schmutz, E. M., Tschirley, F. H. and Turner, R. M. 1957. Chemical control of three desert shrubs. Progressive Agriculture in Arizona 9(1):14.Google Scholar
29. Schmutz, E. M., Tschirley, F. H. and Whitham, D. H. 1962. Shrub control studies in the oak-chaparral of Arizona. J. Range Mgmt. 15:61–67.Google Scholar
30. Sellers, W. D. (Editor). 1960. Arizona climate. Univ. Arizona. Inst. Atmos. Physics, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. 60 pp.Google Scholar
31. Shreve, F. 1951. Vegetation of the Sonoran Desert. Carnegie Institution of Washington. Publ. 591.Google Scholar
32. U.S. Weather Bureau. 1942–61. Hourly precipitation data: Arizona. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Wash., D.C. (Monthly issues).Google Scholar
33. Wirwille, J. W. and Mitchell, J. W. 1950. Six new plant-growth-inhibiting compounds. Bot. Gaz. 111:491–494.Google Scholar
34. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1959. Comparative studies with labeled herbicides on woody plants. Hilgardia 29:171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Yang, T. W. 1961. The recent expansion of creosotebush (Larrea divaricata) in the North American desert. Western Reserve Academy Nat. Hist. Museum Spec. Publ. No. 1.Google Scholar