Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:22:20.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of Ironweed as Affected by Mowing and Storage Root Removal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. K. McCarty  and
D. L. Linscott
M. K. McCarty
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
D. L. Linscott
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, formerly at University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska; now at Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York
Get access

Abstract

Rhizome sections of ironweed from which the fleshy roots had been pruned made less than half as much growth in the greenhouse as sections which had three inches of fleshy roots attached. Rhizome sections at least two inches long with portions of the fleshy roots intact should be used for asexual reproduction of ironweed. Ironweed plants in the field after 8 and 9 years of mowing treatments at 2 dates were approximately ⅔ as tall as untreated plants. No significant reduction in stand was obtained by 9 successive years of mowing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1963 , pp. 223 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldous, A. E. 1930. Effect of different clipping treatments on the yield and vigor of prairie grass vegetation. Ecol. 11:752–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Conard, Elverne C., and Arthaud, Vincent H. 1957. Effect of time of cutting on yield and botanical composition of prairie hay in Southeastern Nebraska. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 184.Google Scholar
3. Crider, Franklin J. 1955. Root growth stoppage resulting from defoliation of grass. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1102.Google Scholar
4. Hanson, H. C., Love, L. D., and Morris, M. S. 1931. Effects of different systems of grazing by cattle upon a western wheat type of range, near Ft. Collins, Colorado. Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 377.Google Scholar
5. Klingman, Dayton L., and McCarty, M. K. 1958. Inter-relations of methods of weed control and pasture management at Lincoln, Nebraska, 1949–55. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1180.Google Scholar
6. Linscott, D. L., and McCarty, M. K. 1962. Effect of mowing and 2,4-D on carbohydrate content and amount of ironweed roots. Weeds 10:298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McCarty, M. K., and Linscott, D. L. 1962. Response of ironweed to mowing and 2,4-D. Weeds 10:240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Parker, Kenneth W., and Sampson, Arthur W. 1931. Growth and yield of certain Gramineae as influenced by reduction of photosynthetic tissue. Hilgardia 5:361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stapledon, R. G., and Milton, W. 1930. The effect of different cutting and manurial treatments on the tiller and root development of cocksfoot. Welsh, J. Agr. 6:166–174.Google Scholar
10. Wagner, R. E. 1952. Yields and botanical composition of four grass-legume mixtures under differential cutting. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1063.Google Scholar
11. Weaver, J. E., and Darland, R. W. 1948. Changes in vegetation and production of forage resulting from grazing lowland prairie. Ecol. 29:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar