Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:53:01.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Density and Control of Canada Thistle on Production and Utilization of Alfalfa Pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marvin M. Schreiber*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana
Get access

Abstract

A 4-year field study was conducted to determine losses and gains in alfalfa production and utilization due to direct competition of various densities of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) and their control. Regardless of initial Canada thistle density, within 4 years all stands under no control approached one plant/sq ft. Mowing after each grazing period for 4 years almost eliminated Canada thistle. Throughout the study, the rate of alfalfa stand reduction was the same under mowing treatment regardless of Canada thistle density. Mowing increased alfalfa production 6.2 T/A in 4 years over no control in plots having initial Canada thistle stands of two plants/sq ft. The production loss due to Canada thistle stands of two plants/sq ft was 7.4 T of alfalfa for a 4-year period. Alfalfa consumption was reduced 4.5 T/A.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arny, A. C. 1932. Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 84. 28 pp.Google Scholar
2. Ball, R. W. E. and Wilson, C. W. 1960. 2,4-DB and MCPB in lucerne. III The effects of MCPB and 2,4-DB on established lucerne. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 4:3032.Google Scholar
3. Bondarenko, D. D. 1957. The absorption and translocation of C14-labeled ATA and 2,4-D in Canada thistle. Proc. NCWCC 14:910.Google Scholar
4. Clements, F. E., Weaver, J. E., and Hanson, H. C. 1929. Plant Competition. Pub. Carneg. Inst. No. 398. 340 pp.Google Scholar
5. Derscheid, L. A. and Schultz, R. E. 1956. The age of Canada thistle flowers when viable seeds were produced. Res. Rep. NCWCC 13:184.Google Scholar
6. Derscheid, L. A. and Schultz, R. E. 1960. Achene development of Canada thistle and perennial sow thistle. Weeds 8:5562.Google Scholar
7. Derscheid, L. A. and Zilke, S. 1956. Factors affecting the germination of Canada thistle seeds. Res. Rep. NCWCC 13:185186.Google Scholar
8. Derscheid, L. A., Zilke, S. and Schultz, R. W. 1956. Preliminary studies on pollination and seed germination and maturation of thistle. Proc. NCWCC 13:1011.Google Scholar
9. Derscheid, L. A., Nash, R. L., and Wicks, G. A. 1961. Thistle control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weeds 9:90102.Google Scholar
10. Detmers, F. 1927. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Tourn.). Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 414. 45 pp.Google Scholar
11. Gilchrist, D. A. 1923. Eradication of thistle. Bull. 35. Armstrong College, Newcastle-upon Type.Google Scholar
12. Halliday, D. L. and Templeman, W. C. 1951. Field experiments in selective weed control by plant-growth regulators. Emp. J. Exp. Agr. 19:3344.Google Scholar
13. Hodgson, J. M. 1958. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.) control with cultivation, cropping and chemical sprays. Weeds 6:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Hodgson, J. M. 1964. Variations in ecotypes of Canada thistle. Weeds 12:167171.Google Scholar
15. Prentiss, A. N. 1889. On root-propagation of Canada thistle. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 15:190192.Google Scholar
16. Rasmussen, L. W. 1956. The effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T applications on the stand density of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.). Weeds 4:343348.Google Scholar
17. Rogers, C. 1928. Canada thistle and Russian knapweed and their control. Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 348. 44 pp.Google Scholar
18. Thrasher, F. P., Cooper, C. S., and Hodgson, J. M. 1963. Competition of forage species with Canada thistle as effected by irrigation and nitrogen levels. Weeds 11:136138.Google Scholar
19. Welton, F. A., Morris, V. H., and Hartzler, A. J. 1929. Organic food reserves in relation to the eradication of Canada thistle. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 441. 25 pp.Google Scholar
20. Zilke, S. and Derscheid, L. A. 1957. Factors affecting germination of Canada thistle and perennial sow thistle seeds. Proc. NCWCC 14:4243.Google Scholar