Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:51:21.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Empirical Findings on Nations and their Behavior*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

R. J. Rummel
Get access

Extract

With The growing academic and governmental interest in quantitative research on nations, it is becoming increasingly important to separate substantive findings from the technical arcana in which they are embedded. In recognition of this need, this report extracts and consolidates the major results of the Dimensionality of Nations (DON) project.

The Don project (6) has been in existence since 1962 and is now in its second phase. Phase I of DON defined the major dimensions of variation among all nations for the mid-1950's and the grouping of nations on these dimensions. During this phase much of the methodological underbrush surrounding the use on cross-national data of its major mathematical model—factor analysis—was cleared away, and some measure of control was developed over problems of error and noncomparability in the data.

Type
Research Notes
Information
World Politics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , January 1969 , pp. 226 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1Rummel, R. J., “Dimensions of Conflict Within and Between Nations,” General Systems Yearbook, viii (1963), 1–50.Google Scholar
2Rummel, R. J., “Testing Some Possible Predictors Within and Between Nations,” Peace Research Society Papers, 1 (1964), 79–111.Google Scholar
3Rummel, R. J., “A Field Theory of Social Action with Application to Conflict Within Nations,” General Systems Yearbook, x (1965), 183–211.Google Scholar
4Rummel, R. J., “A Social Field Theory of Conflict,” Peace Research Society Papers, iv (1965), 131-50.Google Scholar
5Rummel, R. J., “A Foreign Conflict Behavior Code Sheet,” World Politics, xviii (January, 1966), 283-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Rummel, R. J., “The Dimensionality of Nations Project” in Merritt, Richard and Rokkan, Stein, eds., Comparing Nations (New Haven 1966), 109-29.Google Scholar
7Rummel, R. J.“Dimensions of Conflict Within Nations, 1946-1959,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (March 1966).Google Scholar
8Rummel, R. J., “Some Dimensions in the Foreign Behavior of Nations,” Journal of Peace Research, No. 3 (1966), 201-24.Google Scholar
9Rummel, R. J., “Some Attributes and Behavioral Patterns of Nations,” Journal of Peace Research, No. 2 (1967), 196-206.Google Scholar
10Rummel, R. J., “Dimensions of Dyadic War, 1820-1952,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, xi (June 1967), 176-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Rummel, R. J., “Domestic Attributes and Foreign Conflict,” in Singer, J. David, Quantitative International Politics (New York, 1968), 187–214.Google Scholar
12Rummel, R. J., “Understanding Factor Analysis,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, xi (December 1967), 444-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Rummel, R. J., “Delineating International Patterns and Profiles,” The Computer and the Policy Maying Community, 1968.Google Scholar
14Rummel, R. J., “Dimensions of Domestic Conflict Behavior: Review of Findings,” in Dean Pruitt and Richard Snyder, eds., Theories of International Conflict, 1968.Google Scholar
15Rummel, R. J., “Indicators of Cross-national and International Patterns,” American Political Science Review, LXIII (January 1969).Google Scholar
16Sawyer, Jack, “Dimensions of Nations: Size, Wealth, and Politics,” American Journal of Sociology, LXXIII (September 1967), 145-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Tanter, Raymond, “Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within and Between Nations, 1955-1960: Turmoil and Internal War,” Peace Research Society Papers, m (1965), 158-83.Google Scholar
18Tanter, Raymond, “Dimensions of Conflict Behavior Within and Between Nations, 1957-1960,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (March 1966), 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Rummel, R. J., “Dimensions of Error in Cross-national Data,” 1964.Google Scholar
20Rummel, R. J., “Dyadic Study Second Revised Variable List,” Research Report No. 3, 1966.Google Scholar
21Rummel, R. J., “Attribute Space of Nations for 1963: Variable List,” Research Report No. 5, 1966.Google Scholar
22Rummel, R. J., “Regional Correlations with Dimensions of Nations,” Research Report No. 6, 1967.Google Scholar
23“DON Data Collection Procedures,” 1964.Google Scholar
24“Dyadic Relations Random Sample,” 1964.Google Scholar
25“Dyadic Relations Selected Sample,” 1964.Google Scholar
26“236 Variable Revised List of Variables and Indices,” 1963.Google Scholar
27“Unrotated Factor Tables for 236 Variables,” 1964.Google Scholar
28“Orthogonally Rotated Factor Tables for 236 Variables,” 1964.Google Scholar
29“Oblique Factor Tables for 236 Variables,” 1965.Google Scholar
30“Nations, Political Dependence, and Political Units ID: Numerical Listing,” 1965.Google Scholar
31“Correlations Between Foreign Conflict Behavior 1955-57 and 1955 National Characteristics,” 1964.Google Scholar
32“Dimensionality of Nations Project 236 Variable Correlation Matrix,” 1964.Google Scholar
33“Descriptive Statistics in 236 Cross-National Variables,” 1964.Google Scholar
34“Definitions, Sources, and Years for 236 Variables,” 1964.Google Scholar
35“Common Dimensions of Internation Behavior and Attribute Spaces,” DON Chart No. 1, 1966.Google Scholar
36“Comparisons of Peace and Conflict Attribute and Behavioral Systems,” DON Chart No. 4, 1966.Google Scholar
37“Comparisons of Peace and Conflict Behavioral Systems to the General Behavioral System,” DON Chart No. 6, 1966.Google Scholar
3838. “Comparisons of Peace and Conflict Behavioral Systems,” DO N Chart No. 5, 1966.Google Scholar