Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:33:58.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological Properties in Relation to Chick Growth of Acid Proteases from Aspergillus SP and Rhizopus SP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

D. Lewis  and
G. Hiller
D. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Nottingham, England
G. Hiller
Affiliation:
Henkel KGaA Dusseldorf. W., Germany
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , November 1980 , pp. 237 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anson, M. L. (1938). The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with haemoglobin. J. Gen. Physiol. 22, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, G. S. (1966). Studies of viscosity as the probable factor involved in the improvement of certain barleys for chickens by enzyme supplementation. Brit. Poult. Sci. 7, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calet, C. (1965). The relative value of pellets versus mash and grain in poultry nutrition. World Poult. Sci. J. 23, 23.Google Scholar
Fry, R. E., Aldred, J. B.Jensen, L. S. and McGinnis, J. (1958). Influence of enzyme supplementation and water treatment on the nutritional value of different grains for poultry. Poult. Sci. 37, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohl, B., Alden, S., Elwinger, K. and Thomke, S. (1978). Influence of β-glucanase on feeding value of barley for poultry and moisture content of excreta. Brit. Poult. Sci. 19, 41.Google Scholar
Hale, W. H. and Theurer, C. B. (1972). Feed Preparation and Processing. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, Vol. 3. Ed. Church, D. C.Pub. Church. Cornvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
Hartel, J. (1976). Effekte kombinierter Zusätze von Proteasen und Virginiamycin zum Futter auf die Mastleistung von Broilern. Kraftfulter 10, 396.Google Scholar
Hutton, K. and Armstrong, D. G. (1975). Cereal Processing. Feed Energy Sources for Livestock, p. 47. Eds. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.Pub. Butterworths, London-Boston.Google Scholar
Kasbaoui, M. and Guillaume, J. (1976). Essai d'un nouveau type d'additifs alimentaires les enzymes protéolytiques, chez le poulet de chair. Ind. Aliment. Anim. 11 15.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1976). Some results from and consequential projected economic responses to feeding the bacon pig on maize or barley based diets in ground or micronized farms at three different levels of digestible energy intake. Optimising the utilisation of cereal energy by cattle and pigs. p. 17Pub. U.S. Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1978). Processing and preparation of cereals for pig diets. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition p. 83. Eds. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.Pub. Butterworths, London-Boston.Google Scholar
Vohra, P. (1972). Developments in cereal processing and digestion—poultry. Cereal Processing and Digestion, p. 53. Pub. U.S. Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. and Harnisch, S. (1978). Proteasen im Geflügelfutter. Arch. Geflugelk. 42. 183.Google Scholar
Woodham, A. A. (1977). Cereals as protein sources. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed