Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:45:54.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review: Role of tubal environment in preimplantation embryogenesis: application to co-culture assays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2010

Pierre Guérin*
Affiliation:
VetAgro Sup, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile cedex, France.
Yves Ménézo
Affiliation:
UNILABs, 12 Place Cornavin, Genève, Switzerland and Laboratoire d'Eylau, 55 Rue St Didier, 75116 Paris, France.
*
All correspondence to Pierre Guérin. VetAgro Sup, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile cedex, France. Tel: +33 4 78 87 26 08. Fax: +33 4 78 87 67 88. e-mail: p.guerin@vet-lyon.fr

Summary

The culture of early preimplantation stage embryo is still delicate and the metabolic pathways of embryos are not completely understood. Embryo needs are evolutionary during the preimplantation development, consequently it is difficult to meet embryo needs in vitro. Culture conditions have to respect several physical and chemical equilibria: such as redox potential, pH, osmotic pressure, metabolic flux of energetic compounds, endogenous pools of amino acids and transcripts, etc. Embryo culture media are generally supplemented with amino acids, glucose, other energetic metabolites and antioxidant compounds, vitamin, and growth factors etc. Furthermore autocrine and paracrine regulation of embryo development probably exist. In fact embryo culture conditions have to be as non-toxic as possible. Various types of co-culture systems have been devised to overcome these problems. Complex interrelations exist between embryos and co-cultured cells. The beneficial effects of co-cultured cells may be due to continuous modifications of the culture medium, i.e. the elimination of toxic compounds and/or the supply of embryotrophic factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, J. & Reyley, M. (2005). The uterine tubal fluid: secretion, composition and biological effects. Anim. Reprod. 2, 91105.Google Scholar
Barnett, D.K. & Bavister, B.D. (1992). Hypotaurine requirement for in vitro development of golden hamster one cell embryos into morulae and blastocysts, and production of term offspring from in vitro-fertilized ova. Biol. Reprod. 47, 297304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Mouatassim, S., Guérin, P. & Ménézo, Y. (1999). Mammalian oviduct and protection against free oxygen radicals: expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in human and mouse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 89, 16.Google Scholar
Fisher, B. & Bavister, B.D. (1993). Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. J. Reprod. Fertil. 99, 673–9.Google Scholar
Freese, V.E., Orman, S. & Paulos, P. (1973). An autoradiographic investigation of epithelium egg interaction in the mouse oviduct. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 117, 833–7.Google Scholar
Gandolfi, F. & Moor, R.M. (1987). Stimulation of early embryonic development in the sheep by coculture with oviduct epithelial cells. J. Reprod. Fertil. 81, 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, K., Noda, Y., Mori, T. & Nakano, M. (1993). Increased generation of reactive oxygen species in embryos cultured in vitro. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 15, 6975.Google Scholar
Guérin, P. & Ménézo, Y. (1995). Hypotaurine and taurine in gamete and embryo environments: de novo synthesis via the cysteine sulfinic acid pathway in oviduct cells. Zygote 3, 33343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guérin, P., Gallois, E., Croteau, S., Revol, N., Maurin, F., Guillaud, J. & Ménézo, Y. (1995a). Techniques de récolte et aminogrammes des liquides tubaire et folliculaire chez les femelles domestiques. Revue Méd. Vét. 146, 805–14.Google Scholar
Guérin, P., Guillaud, J. & Ménézo, Y. (1995b). Hypotaurine in spermatozoa and genital secretions and its production by oviduct epithelial cells in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 10, 866–72.Google Scholar
Guérin, P., El Mouatassim, S. & Ménézo, Y. (2001). Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the preimplantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum. Reprod. Update, 7, 175–89.Google Scholar
Guyader-Joly, C., Guérin, P., Renard, J.P., Guillaud, J., Ponchon, S. & Ménézo, Y. (1998). Precursors of taurine in female genital tract: effects on developmental capacity of bovine embryo produced in vitro. Amino Acids, 15, 2742.Google Scholar
Hansen, C., Srikandakumar, A. & Downey, B.R. (1991). Presence of follicular fluid in the porcine oviduct and its contribution to the acrosome reaction. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 30, 148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyman, Y., Ménézo, Y., Chesne, P., Camous, S. & Garnier, V. (1987). In vitro cleavage of bovine and ovine early embryos: improved development using coculture with trophoblastic vesicles. Theriogenology 27, 5968.Google Scholar
Hull, K.L. & Harvey, S. (2001). Growth hormone: role in female reproduction. J. Endocrinol. 168, 123.Google Scholar
Iwata, H., Akamatsu, S., Minami, N. & Yamada, M. (1998). Effects of antioxidants on the development of bovine IVM/IVF embryos in various concentrations of glucose. Theriogenology 50, 365–75.Google Scholar
Larson, R.C., Ignotz, G.G. & Currie, W.B. (1992). Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) stimulates development of bovine embryos during the fourth cell cycle. Development 115, 821–6.Google Scholar
Leese, H.J. (1988). The formation and function of oviduct fluid. J. Reprod. Fertil. 82, 843–56.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Kimura, K., Aoki, M. & Hirako, M. (2002). Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on maturation, fertilization and developmental competence of bovine oocytes. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 64, 803–6.Google Scholar
Ménézo, Y. (1976). Milieu synthétique pour la survie et la maturation des gamètes et pour la culture de l’œuf fécondé. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, ser. D. 282, 1967–70.Google Scholar
Ménézo, Y., Testart, J. & Perdrone, D. (1984). Serum is not necessary for human in vitro fertilization, early embryo culture and transfer. Fertil. Steril. 42, 750–1.Google Scholar
Ménézo, Y., Hamidi, J., Khatchadourian, Ch. & Nardon, C. (1989). The murine prepuberal oviduct supports early embryo development in vitro. Dev. Growth Differ. 31, 551–5.Google Scholar
Ménézo, Y., Guérin, J.F. & Czyba, J.C. (1990). Improvement of human early embryo development in vitro by coculture on monolayers of Vero cells. Biol. Reprod. 42, 301–6.Google Scholar
Morales, H., Tilquin, P., Rees, J.F., Massip, A., Dessy, F. & Van Langendonckt, A. (1999). Pyruvate prevents peroxide-induced injury of in vitro preimplantation bovine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 52, 149–57.Google Scholar
Nagao, Y., Saeki, M.H. & Kainuma, H. (1994). Effects of oxygen concentration and oviductal tissue on the development of in vitro matured and fertilized bovine oocytes cultured in protein-free medium. Theriogenology 41, 681–7.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T., Noda, Y. & Goto, Y, Mori, T. (1994). Effects of visible light and others environmental factors on the production of oxygen radicals by hamster embryos. Theriogenology 41, 499510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noda, Y., Matsumoto, H., Umaoka, Y., Tatsumi, K., Kishi, J. & Mori, T. (1991). Involvement of superoxide radicals in the mouse 2-cell block. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 28, 356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouhibi, N., Hamidi, J., Guillaud, J. & Ménézo, Y. (1990). Co-culture of one cell mouse embryos on different cell supports. Hum. Reprod. 5, 737–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parchment, R.E., Lewellyn, A., Swartzzendruber, D. & Pierce, B. (1990). Serum amine oxidase activity contributes to crisis in mouse embryo cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4340–4.Google Scholar
Paszkowski, T. & Clarke, R.N. (1999). The Graafian follicle is a site of l-ascorbate accumulation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 16, 41–5.Google Scholar
Pushpakumara, P.G., Robinson, R.S., Demmers, K.J., Mann, G.E., Sinclair, K.D., Webb, R. & Wathes, D.C. (2002). Expression of the insuline-like growth factor (IGF) system in the bovine oviduct at oestrus and during early pregnancy. Reproduction 123, 859–68.Google Scholar
Quinn, P., Warner, G.M., Kerin, J.R. & Kirby, C. (1985). Culture factors affecting the rate of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 442, 195203.Google Scholar
Thibodeaux, J.K., Ménézo, Y., Roussel, D.J., Hansel, W., Goodeaux, L.L., Thompson, D.L. Jr & Godke, R.A. (1992). Co-culture of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos with oviductal epithelial cells originating from different stages of the estrous cycle. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 1448–55.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, S.E., Schoenfelder, M., Thoene, S. & Einspanier, R. (2004). Hyaluronan in the bovine oviduct: modulation of synthases and receptors during the estrous cycle. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 214, 918.Google Scholar