Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-08T08:55:12.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental investigation of droplet morphology in swirl flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2022

Pavan Kumar Kirar ,
Surendra Kumar Soni ,
Pankaj S. Kolhe  and
Kirti Chandra Sahu Open the ORCID record for Kirti Chandra Sahu [Opens in a new window]
Pavan Kumar Kirar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy 502 284, Telangana, India
Surendra Kumar Soni
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy 502 284, Telangana, India
Pankaj S. Kolhe*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy 502 284, Telangana, India
Kirti Chandra Sahu*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy 502 284, Telangana, India
*
†Email addresses for correspondence: psk@mae.iith.ac.in, ksahu@che.iith.ac.in
†Email addresses for correspondence: psk@mae.iith.ac.in, ksahu@che.iith.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of a droplet with a swirling airstream is investigated experimentally using shadowgraphy and particle image velocimetry techniques. In swirl flow, the droplet experiences oppose-flow, cross-flow and co-flow conditions depending on its ejection location, the velocity of the airstream and the swirl strength, which results in distinct droplet morphologies as compared with the straight airflow situation. We observe a new breakup phenomenon, termed as ‘retracting bag breakup’, as the droplet encounters a differential flow field created by the wake of the swirler's vanes and the central recirculation zone in swirl airflow. A regime map demarcating the various modes, such as no breakup, vibrational breakup, retracting bag breakup and bag breakup modes, is presented for different sets of dimensionless parameters influencing the droplet morphology and its trajectory. In contrast to the straight flow, the swirl flow promotes the development of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability, enhancing the stretching factor in the droplet deformation process, resulting in a larger number of fingers on the droplet's surface. In order to gain physical insight, a modified theoretical analysis based on the Rayleigh–Taylor instability is proposed for the swirl flow. The experimental behaviour of droplet deformation phenomena in swirl flow conditions can be determined by modifying the stretching factor in the theoretical model.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Breakup/coalescence Geophysical and Geological Flows: Rotating flows

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 938 , 10 May 2022 , A6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Balla, M., Tripathi, M.K. & Sahu, K.C. 2019 Shape oscillations of a nonspherical water droplet. Phys. Rev. E 99 (2), 023107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beér, J.M. 1974 Combustion aerodynamics. In Combustion Technology, pp. 61–89. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X.K., Sun, Z.G., Li, W.F., Liu, H.F. & Yu, Z.H. 2007 A new breakup regime of liquid drops identified in a continuous and uniform air jet flow. Phys. Fluids 19 (5), 057103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Z. & Faeth, G.M. 2001 Temporal properties of secondary drop breakup in the multimode breakup regime. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 27 (2), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fakhari, A. & Rahimian, M.H. 2011 Investigation of deformation and breakup of a falling droplet using a multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method. Comput. Fluids 40 (1), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flock, A.K., Guildenbecher, D.R., Chen, J., Sojka, P.E. & Bauer, H.J. 2012 Experimental statistics of droplet trajectory and air flow during aerodynamic fragmentation of liquid drops. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 47, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Y., Yang, S., Deng, C., Xu, B., Ji, F. & He, Y. 2015 Breakup, instabilities, and dynamics of high-speed droplet under transcritical conditions. Adv. Mech. Engng 7 (6), 1–15.Google Scholar
Guildenbecher, D.R., López-Rivera, C. & Sojka, P.E. 2009 Secondary atomization. Exp. Fluids 46 (3), 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, A.R., Domich, E.G. & Adams, H.S. 1963 Shock tube investigation of the breakup of drops by air blasts. Phys. Fluids 6 (8), 1070–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiang, L.P. & Faeth, G.M. 1993 Drop properties after secondary breakup. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 19 (5), 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackiw, I.M. & Ashgriz, N. 2021 On aerodynamic droplet breakup. J. Fluid Mech. 913, A33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, M., Prakash, R.S., Tomar, G. & Ravikrishna, R.V. 2015 Secondary breakup of a drop at moderate weber numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 471 (2177), 20140930.Google Scholar
Jain, S.S., Tyagi, N., Prakash, R.S., Ravikrishna, R.V. & Tomar, G. 2019 Secondary breakup of drops at moderate weber numbers: effect of density ratio and Reynolds number. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 117, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D.D., Belanger, J. & Beavers, G.S. 1999 Breakup of a liquid drop suddenly exposed to a high-speed airstream. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 25 (6–7), 1263–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katre, P., Banerjee, S., Balusamy, S. & Sahu, K.C. 2021 Fluid dynamics of respiratory droplets in the context of COVID-19: airborne and surfaceborne transmissions. Phys. Fluids 33 (8), 081302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kékesi, T., Amberg, G. & Wittberg, L.P. 2014 Drop deformation and breakup. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 66, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komabayasi, M., Gonda, T. & Isono, K. 1964 Life time of water drops before breaking and size distribution of fragment droplets. J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 42 (5), 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzeczkowski, S.A. 1980 Measurement of liquid droplet disintegration mechanisms. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 6 (3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, V. & Sojka, P.E. 2014 Bag breakup of low viscosity drops in the presence of a continuous air jet. Phys. Fluids 26 (7), 072103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. & Sahu, S. 2019 Large scale instabilities in coaxial air-water jets with annular air swirl. Phys. Fluids 31 (12), 124103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A.H. & McDonell, V.G. 2017 Atomization and Sprays. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmottant, P. & Villermaux, E. 2004 On spray formation. J. Fluid Mech. 498, 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkle, K., Haessler, H., Büchner, H. & Zarzalis, N. 2003 Effect of co-and counter-swirl on the isothermal flow-and mixture-field of an airblast atomizer nozzle. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 24 (4), 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, R., Ni, R. & Seo, J.H. 2020 The flow physics of covid-19. J. Fluid Mech. 894, F2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nykteri, G. & Gavaises, M. 2021 Droplet aerobreakup under the shear-induced entrainment regime using a multiscale two-fluid approach. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (8), 084304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, S. & Sahu, S. 2021 Air swirl effect on spray characteristics and droplet dispersion in a twin-jet crossflow airblast injector. Phys. Fluids 33 (7), 073314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilch, M. & Erdman, C.A. 1987 Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 13 (6), 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakaran, P., Weiss, S., Krekhov, A., Pumir, A. & Bodenschatz, E. 2017 Can hail and rain nucleate cloud droplets? Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (12), 128701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajamanickam, K. & Basu, S. 2017 On the dynamics of vortex–droplet interactions, dispersion and breakup in a coaxial swirling flow. J. Fluid Mech. 827, 572–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitz, R.D. & Diwakar, R. 1987 Structure of high-pressure fuel sprays. SAE Trans. 5, 492–509.Google Scholar
Rimbert, N., Escobar, S.C., Meignen, R., Hadj-Achour, M. & Gradeck, M. 2020 Spheroidal droplet deformation, oscillation and breakup in uniform outer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 904, A15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, K.C., Ding, H., Valluri, P. & Matar, O.K. 2009 a Linear stability analysis and numerical simulation of miscible two-layer channel flow. Phys. Fluids 21 (4), 042104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, K.C., Ding, H., Valluri, P. & Matar, O.K. 2009 b Pressure-driven miscible two-fluid channel flow with density gradients. Phys. Fluids 21 (4), 043603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, K.C. & Vanka, S.P. 2011 A multiphase lattice boltzmann study of buoyancy-induced mixing in a tilted channel. Comput. Fluids 50 (1), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D.H. 1983 Overview of Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D 12, 3–18.Google Scholar
Soni, S.K., Kirar, P.K., Kolhe, P. & Sahu, K.C. 2020 Deformation and breakup of droplets in an oblique continuous air stream. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 122, 103141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soni, S.K. & Kolhe, P.S. 2021 Liquid jet breakup and spray formation with annular swirl air. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 134, 103474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suryaprakash, R. & Tomar, G. 2019 Secondary breakup of drops. J. Ind. I. Sci. 99 (1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1963 The shape and acceleration of a drop in a high speed air stream. Sci. Pap. GI Taylor 3, 457–464.Google Scholar
Vadivukkarasan, M. & Panchagnula, M.V. 2017 Combined Rayleigh–Taylor and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities on an annular liquid sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 812, 152–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, C.M., Lasheras, J.C. & Hopfinger, E.J. 2003 Initial breakup of a small-diameter liquid jet by a high-speed gas stream. J. Fluid Mech. 497, 405–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Bossa, B. 2009 Single-drop fragmentation determines size distribution of raindrops. Nat. Phys. 5 (9), 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Eloi, F. 2011 The distribution of raindrops speeds. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (19), L19805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Chang, S., Wu, H. & Xu, J. 2014 Modeling of drop breakup in the bag breakup regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (15), 154107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzba, A. 1990 Deformation and breakup of liquid drops in a gas stream at nearly critical Weber numbers. Exp. Fluids 9 (1–2), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, F., Wang, Z.G., Sun, M.B., Liu, N. & Yang, X. 2017 Simulation of drop deformation and breakup in supersonic flow. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36 (2), 2417–2424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Jia, M., Che, Z., Sun, K. & Wang, T. 2017 Transitions of deformation to bag breakup and bag to bag-stamen breakup for droplets subjected to a continuous gas flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 111, 884–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Liu, H.F., Li, W.F. & Xu, J.L. 2010 Morphological classification of low viscosity drop bag breakup in a continuous air jet stream. Phys. Fluids 22 (11), 114103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirar et al. supplementary movie 1

An animation showing the vibrational (first row), retracting bag breakup (second row) and bag breakup (third row). This movie corresponds to figure 2 of the main manuscript.

Download Kirar et al. supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 21.9 MB

Kirar et al. supplementary movie 2

An animation showing the front and top views of a retracting bag breakup morphology. This movie corresponds to figure 3 of the main manuscript.

Download Kirar et al. supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 24 MB