Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:48:08.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whole-genome sequencing for neonatal intensive care unit outbreak investigations: Insights and lessons learned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Sarah E. Sansom*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Latania K. Logan
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Stefan J. Green
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Nicholas M. Moore
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Mary K. Hayden
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
*
Author for correspondence: Sarah Sansom, DO, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S Paulina St, Ste 143, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: sarah_e_sansom@rush.edu

Abstract

Infectious diseases outbreaks are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are particularly vulnerable to infectious complications during hospitalization. Thus, rapid recognition of and response to outbreaks in the NICU is essential. At Rush University Medical Center, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been utilized since early 2016 as an adjunctive method for outbreak investigations. The use of WGS and potential lessons learned are illustrated for 3 different NICU outbreak investigations involving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), group B Streptococcus (GBS), and Serratia marcescens. WGS has contributed to the understanding of the epidemiology of outbreaks in our NICU, and it has also provided further insight in settings of unusual diseases or when lower-resolution typing methods have been inadequate. WGS has emerged as the new gold standard for evaluating strain relatedness. As barriers to implementation are overcome, WGS has the potential to transform outbreak investigation in healthcare settings.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

The highest burden of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) is observed in intensive care units (ICUs). Reference Zingg, Soulake and Baud1 Infants admitted to neonatal ICUs (NICUs) are particularly vulnerable to infectious complications. Preterm infants often have impaired immune function and skin integrity, extensive exposure to antibiotics, undergo invasive or surgical procedures, have prolonged indwelling devices, and have multiple contacts with healthcare providers. Reference Curtis and Shetty2 Infection outbreaks can be devastating in this population, and they are associated with high morbidity, cost, and mortality. Reference Gastmeier, Loui and Stamm-Balderjahn3 Rapid recognition and response to outbreaks is essential to protecting this vulnerable population.

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a powerful tool in epidemiologic and outbreak investigation. WGS provides superior resolution to discriminate between genetically similar organisms, even among highly related lineages, Reference Quainoo, Coolen and van Hijum4 and it has been used to investigate and terminate many outbreaks. Reference Gilchrist, Turner, Riley, Petri and Hewlett5 WGS provides accurate identification of the pathogen and identifies sequence differences to the level of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). Additionally, WGS uniquely allows for longitudinal analysis of samples due to the expected accumulation of genetic mutations over time, allowing identification of chains of transmission in addition to clusters. Reference Gilchrist, Turner, Riley, Petri and Hewlett5

In our institution, WGS has been used since early 2016 as an adjunctive method to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for outbreak investigations. However, as the following cases illustrate, PFGE may lack adequate discriminatory power in certain situations. WGS has provided real-time, critical information for a deeper understanding of outbreak epidemiology in the NICU. Here, we describe selected cases and insights from our single-center experience with WGS as a tool for NICU outbreak investigation.

Materials and methods

Rush University Medical Center (Rush) is a 650-bed tertiary-care, academic institution in Chicago, Illinois. The Renée Schine Crown NICU at Rush is a 40,000-square-foot, level 3, labor-and-delivery NICU with 3 pods and 60 single beds. During the study period, clinical and surveillance cultures from infants admitted to the NICU were monitored by infection control personnel. Samples were collected and cultured according to routine clinical microbiologic practices and standards 6 at Rush Medical Laboratories, which is certified by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and accredited by The College of American Pathologists (CAP). Bacterial isolates from cultures were submitted to the Genome Research Core (GRC) and Research Informatics Core (RIC) at the University of Illinois—Chicago for nucleic acid extraction, library preparation, WGS, and genomic analysis, as described previously. Reference Popovich, Green and Okamoto7 Informed consent was not required because clinical samples were collected during routine clinical care and investigations were performed as part of infection control management. The project was waived from review by the institutional review board.

Environmental samples were collected by personnel from Hygieneering (Willowbrook, IL) and were submitted to EM Lab P&K (Marlton, NJ) for semiquantitative bacterial culture. Surface samples were collected with moistened sterile swabs, and water samples were collected in sterile glass or plastic bottles. Samples were inoculated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates. Bacterial growth was identified according to routine microbiologic procedures. Reference Bergey and Holt8

Clinical vignette 1: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

A clinical endotracheal aspirate sample from a 6-month-old infant (B1) in the NICU grew MRSA during an evaluation for lower respiratory tract infection (index case). Subsequently, all patients in the same NICU pod underwent MRSA surveillance by anterior nares swab culture. Four infants (B2, B3, B4, and B5) in nonadjacent rooms had asymptomatic colonization with similar USA 300 strain types upon PFGE analysis (Table 1). Reference Tenover, Arbeit and Goering9 Total unit surveillance was done next, which identified 1 additional infant (B6) in a different pod who had MRSA colonization. Notably, this infant was previously known to carry a different strain of MRSA as determined by earlier PFGE testing. Next, screening of all 291 NICU healthcare personnel (HCP) by anterior nares swab identified 5 HCP (1.7%) as MRSA carriers; all 3 of these isolates (H1, H2, and H3) were similar by PFGE to the MRSA isolates in the infant cluster (ie, they matched a USA 300 pattern). All MRSA-colonized staff were referred for decolonization. Figure 1A shows a PFGE analysis of representative MRSA isolates and demonstrates similar banding patterns between select infant and HCP isolates, Reference Tenover, Arbeit and Goering9 suggesting a common source or cross transmission of the outbreak strain.

Table 1. Characteristics of Infants with MRSA Isolates

Note. GA, gestational age; LBW, low birth weight; VLBW, very low birth weight; NBW, normal birth weight; CVC, central venous catheter; G-tube, gastrostomy tube; J-tube, jejunostomy tube.

Fig. 1. MRSA outbreak investigation. (A) PFGE of MRSA isolates from healthcare workers and infants. Total genomic DNA of MRSA isolates was digested using SmaI restriction enzyme and resolved in 1% agarose in 0.5× TBE buffer (pulse time, 1–50 seconds; run time, 21 hours). Selected infant isolates (B1, B2, and B4) showed similar banding patterns to HCP isolates (H1 and H2) (all USA 300). Molecular weight marker (M) is shown in the first column. (B) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequencing analysis of MRSA isolates from the NICU outbreak. Genomic sequence data were processed using the software package SPANDx Reference Sarovich and Price37 to generate a variant matrix. This matrix was used to create a bootstrapped phylogenetic tree within the software package MEGA. Reference Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski and Kumar38 The scale bar represents genetic distances based on number of nucleotide differences, and the numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1,000 iterations; only nodes with >70% support are indicated). Isolates were compared to a reference MRSA USA 300 genome (GenBank accession no. NC 010079). Isolates collected from the infants (“B” isolates) were highly similar; at most, 5 SNVs were detected between infant isolates. HCP isolates (H1 and H2) were highly divergent from the infant isolates, and unrelated to each other. One HCP isolate (H3) shared a common ancestor more recently with the infant isolates than the other HCP isolates but differed from the infant isolates by >100 nucleotides, indicating that H3 was not the source of the outbreak. Note. HCP, healthcare personnel; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SNV, single nucleotide variant.

The 5 infant isolates and 3 HCP MRSA isolates with similar PFGE patterns were submitted for WGS, with a turnaround time of 4.5 days for extraction, library preparation, sequencing, data processing, and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1B). The infant isolates were highly similar, with 5 nucleotide differences at most. However, 2 HCP isolates (H1 and H2) were highly divergent from the infant isolates and were not closely related to each other. Isolate H3 shared a more recent common ancestor with the infant isolates than did the other HCP isolates, but this isolate had >100 nucleotide differences, indicating that H3 was also unlikely to be the source of the infant outbreak. Previous MRSA outbreak investigations have proposed SNV cutoffs (range, ≤22 to <60 SNVs) as indicative of isolate genomic relatedness. Reference Durand, Javerliat and Bes10

The WGS results suggested that the cluster of MRSA colonization and infection was likely due to cross transmission within the NICU via contaminated HCP hands and was not due to a point-source outbreak related to a colonized HCP. However, a point source outbreak related to an undetected healthcare worker or environmental reservoir could not be ruled out. The rapid turnaround time of WGS allowed rapid implementation of measures to reduce cross transmission. The outbreak resolved with staff education and reinforcement of routine infection control practices including patient cohorting and enhanced hand hygiene compliance.

MRSA can cause a wide variety of infectious complications in neonates; the most common is late-onset sepsis. MRSA infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in premature and low-birth-weight neonates. Reference Dong, Glaser and Speer12,Reference Lessa, Edwards, Fridkin, Tenover, Horan and Gorwitz13 The most common site of colonization is the anterior nares, but MRSA can also be detected in the umbilicus, axilla, groin and perineum. Reference Dong, Glaser and Speer12 Colonization is the most important step preceding development of MRSA infection; ∼1 in 5 neonates colonized with MRSA may develop an infection, with rates even higher in premature infants. Reference Dong, Glaser and Speer12 Despite aggressive infection control measures, MRSA remains endemic in some NICUs.

Clinical vignette 2: Group B Streptococcus

A 15-day-old premature infant in the NICU (B1) developed group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis with meningitis. GBS carriage in the mother was known from rectovaginal culture at delivery. Seven days later, a second premature infant (B2), whose mother did not have any history of GBS colonization, also developed sepsis with GBS. (Table 2) The infants were located in separate NICU pods at the time of positive clinical cultures. However, a review of room history revealed that there was a 2-day period before the first positive GBS clinical cultures during which the infants were located 5 rooms apart in the same NICU pod (Fig. 2). No other clinical cases of GBS were identified, and no surveillance of babies for GBS colonization was performed. No additional clinical cases of GBS were identified in the following 3 months.

Table 2. Characteristics of Infants with GBS Isolates

Note. GA, gestational age; BW, birth weight; LBW, low birth weight; GBS, group-B Streptococcus; CS, cesarean section; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.

Fig. 2. Epidemiologic map of 2 patients with late-onset disease group B Streptococcus (GBS). The infants were located in separate NICU pods at the time of positive clinical cultures, but previously shared a 2-day overlap period in the same NICU pod. WGS showed that the isolates were highly similar. In total, results of the outbreak investigation suggested horizontal transmission.

Due to the unusual nature of concurrent patients with late-onset GBS disease, both isolates were submitted for WGS, as described above. Genomes were highly similar, with only 3 nucleotide differences. This result was consistent with a limited cluster of GBS transmission in the NICU with spontaneous resolution of the outbreak. GBS disease is largely clonal, Reference Chen14 and outbreaks may be frequently missed due to prolonged intervals between cases within clusters. Reference Collin, Groves and O’Sullivan15 A population-based evaluation of 754 unique invasive GBS isolates from the United Kingdom and Ireland suggested the use of ≤5 SNV differences to define invasive GBS clusters. Reference Collin, Groves and O’Sullivan15 Identification of a possible nosocomial link in this outbreak may provide key insights for future research efforts.

Invasive GBS infection is an important cause of neonatal sepsis; bacteremia and meningitis are the most common presentations in late-onset disease. Early-onset disease occurs at 0–6 days of life, while late-onset disease occurs between 7 and 89 days. Early-onset disease results from vertical transmission during the intrapartum period. However, the epidemiology of late-onset disease remains incompletely understood, Reference Berardi, Rossi and Lugli16 with high morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Reference Nanduri, Petit and Smelser17,18 Although early-onset disease has been decreasing with implementation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, the incidence of late-onset disease has remained stable over the past decade. Reference Nanduri, Petit and Smelser17

Few modern outbreaks of late-onset GBS disease that used genomic methods for investigation are available in the literature. Juaneikaite et al Reference Jauneikaite, Kapatai and Davies19 described genomic analysis of 12 late-onset invasive GBS cases that revealed 4 clusters over 2 years. A common source was supported by the low number of observed SNVs (0–5 differences) between isolates. Although a clear source was not identified, a potential breakdown of multiple hygiene practices (eg, breast-pump hygiene) was suspected as the cause. Several additional clusters identified by Collin et al Reference Collin, Groves and O’Sullivan15 through population-based genomic epidemiology further supports the possibility of horizontal transmission. The authors hypothesized that clusters of infection could be driven by environmental contamination or by transmission via intermediary staff or equipment. In the current investigation, WGS results provided support for the hypothesis that late-onset GBS disease may be the result of nosocomial transmission.

Clinical vignette #3: Serratia marcescens

A preterm infant in the NICU (B1) grew Serratia marcescens from an eye-discharge culture. Seven days later, 2 additional infants (B2 and B3) grew S. marcescens from respiratory specimens. On day 8, a fourth infant (B4) grew S. marcescens from an endotracheal aspirate. On day 10, perirectal screening of NICU patients identified 3 more asymptomatically colonized infants (B5, B6, and B7) (Table 3). Most infants were located within close spatial proximity in the NICU but had not been housed in the same rooms. Four infants (B1, B5, B6, and B7) were located in adjacent rooms in 1 pod. Three infants (B2, B3, and B4) were located in adjacent rooms in a separate pod. HCP screening was not performed.

Table 3. Characteristics of Infants With Serratia marcescens Isolates

Note. GA, gestational age; VLBW, very low birth weight; LBW, low birth weight.

The WGS revealed 2 separate clusters of highly related organisms (Fig. 3). The genomes of isolates of the first cluster (which included isolates B2, B3 and B4) were identical without detectable nucleotide differences. The genomes of isolates of the second cluster (including B1, B5, and B6) had zero or 1 nucleotide difference between isolates. The clusters were distinct from one another, with tens of thousands of nucleotide differences. The clusters were spatially related: infants (B1, B5, and B6) in one pod had the same strain and infants (B2, B3, and B4) in a second pod share a different strain. Infant B7 in the second pod was colonized with a separate unrelated strain of S. marcescens. In the literature, proposed SNV cutoff thresholds for relatedness of isolates for S. marcescens are limited. For example, 25 SNVs was the proposed cutoff in several publications, but smaller SNV cutoffs have been proposed in other outbreak reports. Reference Phan, Stoesser and Maciuca20,Reference Gery, Mouet and Gravey21

Fig. 3. Serratia marcescens outbreak investigation. (A) Epidemiologic map of 7 patients with S. marcescens. Clinical and screening isolates are shown. Most of the patients were housed within close spatial proximity to each other in the NICU. Infants B1, B5, B6, and B7 were located in adjacent rooms in pod II. Infants B2, B3, and B4 were located in adjacent rooms in pod I. (B) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequencing analysis of Serratia marcescens isolates from the NICU outbreak. The phylogenetic tree was created as described previously. The scale bar represents genetic distances based on number of nucleotide differences, and the numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1,000 iterations; only nodes with >70% support are indicated). Isolates were compared to a reference S. marcescens genome (GenBank accession no. CP018917). Two separate clusters of 3 organisms each were identified, with the seventh organism not closely related to either group (B7). The genomes of the organisms within each cluster were identical or nearly identical. The genomes of isolates of cluster 1 (comprised of isolates B2, B3, and B4) were identical without detectable nucleotide differences. The genomes of isolates of cluster 2 (comprised of B1, B5, and B6) had at most 1 nucleotide mismatch between isolates. The clusters were highly distinct from one another, with tens of thousands of nucleotide differences.

The NICU underwent deep cleaning on day 7 of the outbreak. Black-light inspections of high-touch surfaces were conducted to monitor adequacy of cleaning. Extensive environmental sampling was performed on day 10 of the outbreak including public and staff restrooms (eg, shower head, water from faucet, hand sink, and hand dryer), patient room (eg, hand sink, sink handles, nasal cannula, IV pump, bed humidifier and reservoir, bedside cabinet, bed fan and underside, bed heating element, mattress cover, bassinet, and curtain), hallway, and common areas (eg, scrub sink, alcohol pump, soap dispenser, and water fountain), respiratory therapy areas (eg, procedure hand sink, clean room door handle, clean room hand sink, and procedure-room dirty sink), and other high-touch items (eg, keyboards, handheld portable phones, interior/exterior door handles, bar code scanner, and lotion bottle). Although several gram-negative bacteria were isolated, S. marcescens was not detected in any of the 46 environmental samples that were collected.

Routine infection control measures were reinforced, including proper glove use and requiring “bare below the elbows” by HCP. Routine black-light inspections of high-touch surfaces continued. New sink drain covers were installed (Biodome, Boehringer Laboratories, Pheonixville PA), and a new quaternary disinfectant sink-flushing protocol was implemented (Virex II 256, Diversey, Fort Mill, SC). Examination of clinical equipment identified several ventilators with components that had missed preventive maintenance; any outstanding maintenance was promptly performed; and revised preventive maintenance schedules were implemented. Additionally, the cleansing procedure was revised, and 5 Giraffe beds were removed. No subsequent cases of S. marcescens were detected.

Serratia marcescens is the third most commonly identified microbial etiology of NICU outbreaks in published literature. Reference Gastmeier, Loui and Stamm-Balderjahn3 It can cause a wide variety of clinical syndromes, including bacteremia, meningitis, pneumonia, conjunctivitis, and urinary tract infections. Reference Johnson and Quach22 S. marcescens is pervasive in the hospital environment and can also cause early neonatal gastrointestinal colonization. Reference Fleisch, Zimmermann-Baer and Zbinden23 A number of outbreak sources have been described, including medical equipment, food, baby bottles, intravenous or liquid medications, and the environment (eg, sink traps, liquid soap, respiratory oscillator). Reference Gastmeier24Reference Macdonald, Langley and Mailman27 However, environmental sampling during outbreak investigation is rarely revealing, Reference Zingg, Soulake and Baud1,Reference Montagnani, Cocchi and Lega28 and the source of S. marcescens NICU outbreaks is not identified in 60% of published reports. Reference Gastmeier24 Additionally, it is common to identify >1 strain of S. marcescens during a single or sequential outbreak. Reference Fleisch, Zimmermann-Baer and Zbinden23,Reference Casolari, Pecorari and Della Casa29

In this case, WGS was useful to identify 2 separate clusters of S. marcescens in the NICU. Utilizing traditional epidemiologic investigation methods, only a single cluster would have been suspected. Genomic analysis combined with close spatial proximity suggested transmission from 2 separate environmental sources and by HCP hand transmission between infants in close spatial proximity.

Discussion

WGS has emerged as the gold standard for evaluation of strain relatedness during bacterial outbreak investigations. WGS can identify transmission events that are missed by less discriminatory methods, Reference Bogaty, Mataseje and Gray30 and it can expand our ability to detect unsuspected nosocomial transmissions, as well as to identify chance clusters. Reference Peacock, Parkhill and Brown31,Reference Ward, Hoss and Kolde32 WGS has the potential to provide pertinent clinical information regarding antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes that may not be detected by phenotypic or targeted molecular testing. Reference Quainoo, Coolen and van Hijum4 The robust capacity and scale of WGS has been useful to document transmission both within and between hospitals, as well as on an intercontinental scale. Reference Harris, Feil and Holden33 WGS is replacing other molecular genomic methods as the primary molecular subtyping tool. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and public health laboratories have transitioned foodborne pathogen strain typing from PFGE to WGS with early evidence of improved precision. Reference Dunn34 However, WGS alone should not replace traditional surveillance and epidemiologic investigation because outbreak detection is highly complex, requiring WGS interpretation and evaluation of potential points of transmission in a healthcare facility.

Peacock et al Reference Peacock, Parkhill and Brown31 suggested a “sequence first” approach to outbreak investigation. This strategy may involve routine genomic surveillance to provide early warning of transmission events or outbreaks, thus allowing for earlier recognition and implementation of control measures. Prospective surveillance with WGS has been shown to be feasible and may result in cost savings. Reference Durand, Javerliat and Bes10,Reference Ward, Hoss and Kolde32,Reference Mellmann, Bletz and Boking35

Although there have been significant advances in the accessibility of WGS in the past decade, several challenges remain in its implementation as a routine tool for outbreak investigation. The largest hurdles are turnaround time, accessibility, cost, and standardization. Methods for library preparation are becoming more rapid. Instruments with rapid (<1 day) sequencing capabilities are now available, and turnaround times from sample collection to analyzed results have decreased to as little as 2 days. Reference Peacock, Parkhill and Brown31,Reference Ward, Hoss and Kolde32,Reference McGann, Bunin and Snesrud36 The availability of benchtop instruments with short run times, such as the Oxford Nanopore MinION and the Illumina iSeq and MiniSeq sequencers, represent particular advances in accessibility of WGS within individual healthcare facilities. Reference Peacock, Parkhill and Brown31 However, interpretation of data remains a roadblock in facilities without bioinformatics expertise, which will likely need to be overcome by availability of complete analysis software. Reference Quainoo, Coolen and van Hijum4,Reference Durand, Javerliat and Bes10

In conclusion, bacterial outbreaks cause significant morbidity and mortality in susceptible neonates admitted to the NICU. Prompt identification of the outbreak source with implementation of infection control measures are critical to limit further transmission. Older molecular typing methods (ie, PFGE) may fail to adequately discriminate between isolates and may lead to erroneous inferences about strain relatedness. WGS has become the new gold standard for strain typing in outbreak investigation because it provides superior resolution to determine strain relatedness. We have described 3 outbreaks with different organisms (MRSA, GBS, and Serratia marcescens) in a single NICU in which WGS proved to be a useful tool. As barriers to its use decrease, WGS is revolutionizing outbreak investigation, and it is expected to become more accessible as cost and turnaround times decrease. Emerging applications of WGS include primary genomic surveillance, which could identify potential transmission earlier to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with outbreaks.

Acknowledgments

The authors recognize Marcelina Wawrzyniak, MSN, RN, and the entire Rush infection control and prevention team for their diligent work in infection control in the NICU during these outbreaks. We thank Dagmar Sweeney and Kevin Kunstman of the UIC Genome Research Core for support in DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing. We also thank Dr Arden Zhengdeng Lei for support in processing sequence data through the SPANDx pipeline.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare related to this article.

Financial support

This project was supported by internal departmental funding.

References

Zingg, W, Soulake, I, Baud, D, et al. Management and investigation of a Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatal unit in Switzerland—the role of hand hygiene and whole-genome sequencing. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017;6:125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C, Shetty, N. Recent trends and prevention of infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008;21:350356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gastmeier, P, Loui, A, Stamm-Balderjahn, S, et al. Outbreaks in neonatal intensive care units—they are not like others. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:172176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quainoo, S, Coolen, JPM, van Hijum, S, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens: the future of nosocomial outbreak analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2017;30:10151063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, CA, Turner, SD, Riley, MF, Petri, WA Jr, Hewlett, EL. Whole-genome sequencing in outbreak analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015;28:541563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Third Edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2010.Google Scholar
Popovich, KJ, Green, SJ, Okamoto, K, et al. MRSA transmission in ICUs: genomic analysis of patients, their environments and healthcare workers. Clin Infect Dis 2020. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergey, DH, Holt, JG. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Ninth Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.Google Scholar
Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:22332239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durand, G, Javerliat, F, Bes, M, et al. Routine whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigations of Staphylococcus aureus in a national reference center. Front Microbiol 2018;9:511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, H, Coleman, DC. Contribution of whole-genome sequencing to understanding of the epidemiology and control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2019;102:189199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, Y, Glaser, K, Speer, CP. New Threats from an old foe: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in neonates. Neonatology 2018;114:127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessa, FC, Edwards, JR, Fridkin, SK, Tenover, FC, Horan, TC, Gorwitz, RJ. Trends in incidence of late-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in neonatal intensive care units: data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, 1995–2004. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:577581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, SL. Genomic insights into the distribution and evolution of group B Streptococcus. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collin, SM, Groves, N, O’Sullivan, C, et al. Uncovering infant group B streptococcal (GBS) disease clusters in the UK and Ireland through genomic analysis: a population-based epidemiological study. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:e296e302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardi, A, Rossi, C, Lugli, L, et al. Group B Streptococcus late-onset disease: 2003–2010. Pediatrics 2013;131:e361368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanduri, SA, Petit, S, Smelser, C, et al. Epidemiology of invasive early-onset and late-onset group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: multistate laboratory and population-based surveillance. JAMA Pediatr 2019;173:224233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. Red Book. Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018.Google Scholar
Jauneikaite, E, Kapatai, G, Davies, F, et al. Serial clustering of late-onset group B streptococcal infections in the neonatal unit: a genomic re-evaluation of causality. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:854860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, HTT, Stoesser, N, Maciuca, IE, et al. Illumina short-read and MinION long-read WGS to characterize the molecular epidemiology of an NDM-1 Serratia marcescens outbreak in Romania. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:672679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gery, A, Mouet, A, Gravey, F, et al. Investigation of Serratia marcescens surgical site infection outbreak associated with peroperative ultrasonography probe. J Hosp Infect 2021;111:184188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J, Quach, C. Outbreaks in the neonatal ICU: a review of the literature. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017;30:395403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleisch, F, Zimmermann-Baer, U, Zbinden, R, et al. Three consecutive outbreaks of Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:767773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastmeier, P. Serratia marcescens: an outbreak experience. Front Microbiol 2014;5:81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regev-Yochay, G, Smollan, G, Tal, I, et al. Sink traps as the source of transmission of OXA-48–producing Serratia marcescens in an intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:13071315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffet-Bataillon, S, Rabier, V, Betremieux, P, et al. Outbreak of Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit: contaminated unmedicated liquid soap and risk factors. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, TM, Langley, JM, Mailman, T, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit related to the exit port of an oscillator. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:e282e86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagnani, C, Cocchi, P, Lega, L, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit: crucial role of implementing hand hygiene among external consultants. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casolari, C, Pecorari, M, Della Casa, E, et al. Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit: two long-term multiclone outbreaks in a 10-year observational study. New Microbiol 2013;36:373383.Google Scholar
Bogaty, C, Mataseje, L, Gray, A, et al. Investigation of a carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak using whole-genome sequencing versus a standard epidemiologic investigation. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018;7:140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, SJ, Parkhill, J, Brown, NM. Changing the paradigm for hospital outbreak detection by leading with genomic surveillance of nosocomial pathogens. Microbiology 2018;164:12131219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, DV, Hoss, AG, Kolde, R, et al. Integration of genomic and clinical data augments surveillance of healthcare-acquired infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:649655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, SR, Feil, EJ, Holden, MT, et al. Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 2010;327:469474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, JR. Whole-genome sequencing: opportunities and challenges for public health, food-borne outbreak investigations, and the global food supply. J Infect Dis 2016;213:499501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellmann, A, Bletz, S, Boking, T, et al. Real-time genome sequencing of resistant bacteria provides precision infection control in an institutional setting. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54:28742881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, P, Bunin, JL, Snesrud, E, et al. Real-time application of whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigation—what is an achievable turnaround time? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2016;85:277282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarovich, DS, Price, EP. SPANDx: a genomics pipeline for comparative analysis of large haploid whole-genome resequencing data sets. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A, Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:27252729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of Infants with MRSA Isolates

Figure 1

Fig. 1. MRSA outbreak investigation. (A) PFGE of MRSA isolates from healthcare workers and infants. Total genomic DNA of MRSA isolates was digested using SmaI restriction enzyme and resolved in 1% agarose in 0.5× TBE buffer (pulse time, 1–50 seconds; run time, 21 hours). Selected infant isolates (B1, B2, and B4) showed similar banding patterns to HCP isolates (H1 and H2) (all USA 300). Molecular weight marker (M) is shown in the first column. (B) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequencing analysis of MRSA isolates from the NICU outbreak. Genomic sequence data were processed using the software package SPANDx37 to generate a variant matrix. This matrix was used to create a bootstrapped phylogenetic tree within the software package MEGA.38 The scale bar represents genetic distances based on number of nucleotide differences, and the numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1,000 iterations; only nodes with >70% support are indicated). Isolates were compared to a reference MRSA USA 300 genome (GenBank accession no. NC 010079). Isolates collected from the infants (“B” isolates) were highly similar; at most, 5 SNVs were detected between infant isolates. HCP isolates (H1 and H2) were highly divergent from the infant isolates, and unrelated to each other. One HCP isolate (H3) shared a common ancestor more recently with the infant isolates than the other HCP isolates but differed from the infant isolates by >100 nucleotides, indicating that H3 was not the source of the outbreak. Note. HCP, healthcare personnel; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SNV, single nucleotide variant.

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics of Infants with GBS Isolates

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Epidemiologic map of 2 patients with late-onset disease group B Streptococcus (GBS). The infants were located in separate NICU pods at the time of positive clinical cultures, but previously shared a 2-day overlap period in the same NICU pod. WGS showed that the isolates were highly similar. In total, results of the outbreak investigation suggested horizontal transmission.

Figure 4

Table 3. Characteristics of Infants With Serratia marcescens Isolates

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Serratia marcescens outbreak investigation. (A) Epidemiologic map of 7 patients with S. marcescens. Clinical and screening isolates are shown. Most of the patients were housed within close spatial proximity to each other in the NICU. Infants B1, B5, B6, and B7 were located in adjacent rooms in pod II. Infants B2, B3, and B4 were located in adjacent rooms in pod I. (B) Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome sequencing analysis of Serratia marcescens isolates from the NICU outbreak. The phylogenetic tree was created as described previously. The scale bar represents genetic distances based on number of nucleotide differences, and the numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1,000 iterations; only nodes with >70% support are indicated). Isolates were compared to a reference S. marcescens genome (GenBank accession no. CP018917). Two separate clusters of 3 organisms each were identified, with the seventh organism not closely related to either group (B7). The genomes of the organisms within each cluster were identical or nearly identical. The genomes of isolates of cluster 1 (comprised of isolates B2, B3, and B4) were identical without detectable nucleotide differences. The genomes of isolates of cluster 2 (comprised of B1, B5, and B6) had at most 1 nucleotide mismatch between isolates. The clusters were highly distinct from one another, with tens of thousands of nucleotide differences.