Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:13:01.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What exists in the environment that motivates the emergence, transmission, and sophistication of tool use?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Tetsushi Nonaka
Tetsushi Nonaka
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Health and Welfare, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Okayama, 716-8508, Japan; and Advanced Research Center for Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan. tetsushi.nonaka@gmail.comhttp://www.kiui.ac.jp/~nonaka_t/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his attempt to find cognitive traits that set humans apart from nonhuman primates with respect to tool use, Vaesen overlooks the primacy of the environment toward the use of which behavior evolves. The occurrence of a particular behavior is a result of how that behavior has evolved in a complex and changing environment selected by a unique population.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 233 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asfaw, B., White, T., Lovejoy, O., Latemer, B., Simpson, S. & Suwa, G. (1999) Australopithecus garhi: A new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. Science 284:629–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bril, B., Rein, R., Nonaka, T., Wenban-Smith, F. & Dietrich, G. (2010) The role of expertise in tool use: Skill differences in functional action adaptation to task constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36(4):825–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. R. (1859) The origin of species. John Murray.Google Scholar
Delanges, A. & Roche, H. (2005) Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 48:435–72.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23(4):536–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (2002) Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change. Psychological Review 109:211–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, M., Hernandez-Aguilar, A., Ling, V., Carvalho, S., de la Torre, I., DeStefano, A., Du, A., Hardy, B., Harris, J., Marchant, L., Matsuzawa, T., McGrew, W., Mercader, J., Mora, R., Petraglia, M., Roche, H., Visalberghi, E. & Warren, R. (2009) Primate archaeology. Nature 469:339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G. L. (1976) Plio-Pleistocene artifact assemblages from East Rudolf, Kenya. In: Earliest man and environment in the Lake Rudolf Basin: Stratigraphy, paleoecology, and evolution, ed. Coppens, Y., Howell, F. C., Isaac, G. L. & Leakey, R., pp. 552–64. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kappelman, J. (1996) The evolution of body mass and relative brain size in fossil hominids. Journal of Human Evolution 30:243–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepre, C. J., Roche, H., Kent, D. V., Harmand, S., Quinn, R. L., Brugal, J.–P., Texier, P.–J., Lenoble, A. & Feibel, C. S. (2011) An earlier origin for the Acheulian. Nature 477:82–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (2001) Gene, organism, and environment. In: Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution, ed. Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D., pp. 59–66. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McPherron, S. P., Alemseged, Z., Marean, C. W., Wynn, J. G., Reed, D., Geraads, D., Bobe, R. & Béarat, H. A. (2010) Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature 466:857–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonaka, T., Bril, B. & Rein, R. (2010) How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution 59:155–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. C., ed. (1988) The role of behavior in evolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Plummer, T. (2004) Flaked stones and old bones: Biological and cultural evolution at the dawn of technology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 47:118–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1985) An ecological approach to the evolution of behavior. In: Issues in the ecological study of learning, ed. Johnston, T. & Pietrewicz, A., pp. 357–83. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1996) Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, H. (2005) From simple flaking to shaping: Stone-knapping evolution among early hominins. In: Stone knapping: The necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour, ed. Roux, V. & Bril, B., pp. 35–48. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2000) Essays on life itself. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Semaw, S., Renne, P. R., Harris, J. W. K., Feibel, C. S., Bernor, R. L., Fesseha, N. & Mowbray, K. (1997) 2.5 million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature 385:333–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, D., Semaw, S., Rogers, M. J. & Cauche, D. (2010) Technological variation in the earliest Oldowan from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution 58:474–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E., Fragaszy, D., Ottoni, E., Izar, P., de Oliveira, M. G. & Andrade, F. R. D. (2007) Characteristics of hammer stones and anvils used by wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) to crack open palm nuts. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 132:426–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed