Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T19:45:27.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

S. K. S. Raghuvansi
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
R. Prasad
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
M. K. Tripathi*
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
A. S. Mishra
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
O. H. Chaturvedi
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
A. K. Misra
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
B. L. Saraswat
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Udai Pratap Autonomous College, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221 002, India
R. C. Jakhmola
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar(Via- Jaipur), Rajasthan, 304 501, India
*
E-mail: msom@dr.com

Abstract

A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on a pasture and supplemented with concentrate mixture at 250 g per head per day. Intake in grazing animals was determined using chromium III oxide as internal marker. Intake of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter (OM) were higher ( P < 0.01) in SF than in GR animals. Similarly, digestibility of OM, CP and energy were higher ( P < 0.01) in SF animals. Average daily gain in SF animals (101 g) was significantly ( P < 0.01) higher than in GR animals (78 g) but total wool yield was similar for the two groups (856 g, SF; 782 g, GR). The pH of the rumen content, concentration of total volatile fatty acids and total activities of carboxymethyl cellulase, xylanase and esterase in the rumen liquor were similar. The concentrations (mg/dl) of total nitrogen (125, SF; 63, GR) and NH3-nitrogen (42, SF; 31, GR) were higher in SF animals than that of GR animals. A significantly higher activity ( P < 0.05) of microcrystalline cellulase (24.5 v. 7.7 units) and lower activity ( P < 0.05) of protease (309 v. 525 units), was observed in the rumen of SF animals than in GR animals. SF animals could therefore harness more energy through degradation of plant cell walls thus reducing breakdown of plant proteins as gluconeogenic source. The SF system of feeding where CFB was offered to sheep appeared superior to GR in terms of intake, nutrient utilisation and animal performance. Therefore the SF feeding system where CFB are offered to animals can be advocated as an alternative to grazing and supplementation feeding strategy for sheep production, especially where the pastures are highly eroded and need resting for regeneration or curing. The CFB feeding can also be adopted under adverse conditions like drought and famine, a common phenomenon in arid and semiarid conditions.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of complete feed block (CFB) supplement and grazing pasture

Figure 1

Table 2 Nutrient intake and digestibility by SF and GR lambs (n=12)†

Figure 2

Table 3 Rumen fermentation characteristics of SF and GR lambs

Figure 3

Table 4 Rumen microbial enzymes activity (Unit) of SF and GR lambs

Figure 4

Table 5 Wool yields and performance of lambs on complete feed block or grazing with supplement feeding