Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-xh428 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T04:49:27.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should panpsychists be supernaturalists?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2023

Andrei A. Buckareff Open the ORCID record for Andrei A. Buckareff [Opens in a new window]
Andrei A. Buckareff*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
*
Email: andrei.buckareff@marist.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Joanna Leidenhag's claim in her book, Minding Creation, that panpsychists should (a) abandon naturalism and (b) adopt traditional theism is evaluated and critiqued. It is argued that panpsychism is compatible with naturalism and does not commit one to any metaphysic of the divine, including traditional theism.

Information

Type
Book Symposium
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 60 , Special Issue 3: Women-Focused , September 2024 , pp. 482 - 488
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Buckareff, A (2016) Theological realism, divine action, and divine location. In Buckareff A and Nagasawa Y (eds), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–233.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722250.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckareff, A (2022) Pantheism. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108558266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goff, P (2019) Did the universe design itself? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85, 99–122.10.1007/s11153-018-9692-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, J (2015) Aristotelian supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115, 41–56.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00383.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidenhag, J (2021) Minding Creation: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation. New York: T&T Clark.10.5040/9780567696236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, J (2001) Infinite Minds: A Philosophical Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mørch, H (2020) Does dispositionalism entail panpsychism? Topoi 39, 1073–1088.Google Scholar
Nagel, T (1979) Panpsychism. In Mortal Questions. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–195.Google Scholar
Nagel, T (2002) The psychophysical nexus. In Concealment and Exposure: And Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 194–235.Google Scholar
Nagel, T (2012) Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, K (2016) Pantheism as panpsychism. In Buckareff, A and Nagasawa, Y (eds), Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–49.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722250.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, W (2017) Panpsychist infusion. In Brüntrup, G and Jaskolla, L (eds), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–248.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T (2006) The God of Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, G (2008) The identity of the categorical and the dispositional. Analysis 68, 271–282.Google Scholar
Strawson, G (2012) Real naturalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 86, 125–154.Google Scholar
Strawson, G (2020) What does ‘physical’ mean? A prolegomenon to physicalist panpsychism. In Seager, W (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism. New York: Routledge, pp. 317–339.Google Scholar