Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:50:47.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability measurements of craniofacial implants by means of resonance frequency analysis. A clinical pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

S. J. Heo
Affiliation:
Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden The Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
L. Sennerby*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, the Brånemark Clinic, Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
M. Odersjö
Affiliation:
The Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
G. Granström
Affiliation:
The Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
A. Tjellström
Affiliation:
The Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
N. Meredith
Affiliation:
The Department of Oral and Dental Science, Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Lars Sennerby, Dept of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 8B, S-413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Abstract

Nineteen patients previously treated with 52 implants for anchorage of craniofacial prostheses were subjected to implant stability measurements by means of resonancefrequency analysis (RFA), six months to 15 years after implant placement. The resonance frequency (RF) of a transducer attached to the implant abutment was measured by using a frequency response analyser, a personal computer (PC) and dedicated software. Statisticallysignificant higher RF values were seen for implants in the temporal bone as compared to implants in the nose and periorbital regions. There was a positive correlation with time since implant placement for the period from six months up to seven years. It was concludedthat the preliminary results suggest that implant stability increases with time and that implants in temporal bone are more stable than implants in the bone in the nose and periorbital regions, probably reflecting differences in bone density.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrektsson, T., Isidor, F. (1994) Consensus report of session V. In Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. (Lang, N. P., Karring, T., eds.), Quintessence, London, pp 365369.Google Scholar
Derhami, K., Wolfaardt, J. F., Dent, M., Faulkner, G., Grace, M. (1995) Assessment ofthe Periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 221229.Google Scholar
Friberg, B., Jemt, T., Lekholm, U. (1991) Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6: 142146.Google Scholar
Granström, G., Bergström, K., Tjellströom, A., Brånemark, P. I. (1994) A detailed analysis of titanium implants lost in irradiated tissues. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9: 653662.Google Scholar
Granströom, G., Tjellström, A., Brånemark, P. I., Fornander, J. (1993) Bone-anchored reconstruction of the irradiated head and neck cancer patient. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 108: 334343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, M. (1985) On Bone Behaviour After Irradiation. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, M., Tjellströom, A., Fine, L., Andersson, H. (1992) A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prosthesis. International Journal of Oraland Maxillofacial Implants 7: 523528.Google Scholar
Jaffin, R. A., Berman, C. L. (1991) The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures intype IV bone: a five year analysis. Journal of Periodontology 62: 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, N. (1997) On the Clinical Measurements of Implant Stability and Osseointegration. thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gotenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Meredith, N., Alleyne, D., Cawley, P. (1996) Quantitative measurement of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clinical Oral Implant Research 7: 261267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, N., Book, K., Friberg, B., Jemt, T., Sennerby, L. (1997a) Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clinical Oral Implant Research 8: 226233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, N., Friberg, B., Sennerby, L., Aparicio, C. (1998) Quantitative determination of the relationship between contact time measurements and Periotest values when using the Periotest® to measure implant stability. International Journal of Prosthodontics (in press).Google Scholar
Meredith, N., Shagaldi, F., Alleyne, D., Sennerby, L., Cawley, P. (1997b) The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clinical Oral Implant Research 8: 234243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusson, L., Meredith, N., Sennerby, L. (1997) Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8: 316322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roumanas, E., Nishimura, R., Beumer, J. III, Moy, P., Weinlander, M., Lorant, J. (1994) Craniofacial defects and osseointegrated implants: Six year follow-up report on the success rates of craniofacial implants at UCLA. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9: 579585.Google Scholar
Sundén, S., Gröndahl, K., Gröndahl, H. G. (1995) Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical intabiity of Brånemark dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 220226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teerlinck, J., Quirynen, M., Darius, P., van Steenberghe, D. (1991) Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6: 5561.Google ScholarPubMed
Tjellströom, A. (1989) Carcinoma of the face: Aspects of tumour surgery and operative technique – the prosthesis. Archives of Otolaryngology 246: 368372.Google Scholar
Tjellström, A., Granström, G. (1995) One stage procedure to establish osseointegration. A zero to five years follow-up report. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 109: 593598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjellstrom, A., Jacobsson, M. (1992) The bone-anchored maxillofacial prosthesis. In The Brånemark Osseointegrated Implant. (Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G. A., eds.) Quintessence, Chicago, pp 235244.Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, D., Klinge, B., Lindén, U., Quirynen, M., Hernnann, I., Garpland, C. (1993) Periodontal indices around natural and titanium abutments: A longitudinal multicentre study. Journal of Periodontology 64: 538541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, E., Tjellström, A., Jacobsson, M., Albrektsson, T. (1992) Long-term observations on removal torque of directly bone-anchored implants in man. In Transplants and Implants in Otology. (Yanagihara, N., Suzuki, J., eds.) Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, pp 112117.Google Scholar