Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T06:53:33.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modern China's financial obligations and strategies, 1901–1925: the depreciation of tael, the Austrian loans and the gold franc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Chihyun Chang  and
Chiu-Ya Kao
Chihyun Chang*
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai City, P. R. China
Chiu-Ya Kao
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai City, P. R. China
*
Author for correspondence: Chihyun Chang, E-mail: chihyun@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The financial burden of the Boxer Indemnity forced the Chinese government to change its behaviours since 1901. This article re-examines the position that the decision to honour indeminity obligations enabled the Chinese state to maintain peaceful relations with western powers during the first quarter of the twentiety century. The 1901 edict affirming that China would re-examine its capacity to satisfy its international commitments. Before this edict, China had selectively followed its Sino-foreign treaties, but thereafter, China completely assumed all of her financial obligations to foreign creditors. These changes in behaviour helped China restore its deteriorated foreign relations and were followed by Provisional Executive Duan Qirui until 1925. These changes can be illustrated by three cases, namely the depreciation of tael, the Austrian loans, and the gold franc. The cases were highly international as the first concerned eleven foreign creditors, the second concerned two, and the third concerned three. From 1901–1925, foreign powers also provided China with reciprocal favours in exchange for China's responsible behaviours. Eventually, China retrieved its tariff autonomy in 1930.

Keywords

Austrian loansBoxer indemnityfinancial policygold francmodern China

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , July 2023 , pp. 827 - 849
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Battilossi, Stefano, Cassis, Youssef and Yago, Kazuhiko (eds.) (2020). Handbook of the History of Money and Currency. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0596-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Chihyun (2012). Government, Imperialism and Nationalism: The Maritime Customs Service and Its Chinese Staff. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, Chihyun 張志雲 (2015). “Geminghoudecaizhengzhixu: xinhaigemingyuhaiguanjieyucunfangquanzhizhuanyi 革命後的財政秩序：辛亥革命與海關結餘存放權之轉移 [The Financial Order after the 1911 Revolution: The Wuchang Uprising and the Transfer of Customs Surplus].”, Jindaizhongguodezhongwaichongtuyusiying 近代中國的中外衝突與肆應 [Modern Sino-Foreign Conflicts and Modern China's Response]. Taipei: National Cheng-chi University Press, pp. 155–97.Google Scholar
China Weekly Review (1925). “The Gold Franc Settlement”, China Weekly Review, 25 April 1925.Google Scholar
Ding, Zhongjiang 丁中江 (2000). Beiyangjunfashihua北洋軍閥史話 [Historical Tales on Northern Warlords], 10th ed., vol. IV. Taipei: Shiying Bookstore.Google Scholar
Duan, Qirui 段祺瑞 (1925). “The Executive's Statement for the Gold Franc”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 396, 28 April 1925; The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 55, p. 98.Google Scholar
Financial Ministry (1925). “The Statement for the Sino-French Agreement”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 396, 28 April 1925; The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 55, p. 103.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1923). FO 371/9177.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1924). FO/371/10230.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1925). FO: 371/10918.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1925). FO: 371/10919.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1925). FO: 371/10937.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. Great Britain (1925). FO: 371/10938.Google Scholar
Hart, Robert (2007). “Juwaipangguanlun局外旁觀論 [A Bystander's View]”, Tongzhichao Choban Yiwu Shimo 同治朝籌辦夷務始末[A Complete Account of the Management of Barbaric Affairs in the Tongzhi Reign] (Peking, 1880). This set was reprinted in 2007 by the China Bookstore: henceforth the citation manner is TZ YWSM, vol. XL. pp. 13–22.Google Scholar
Hertslet, Edward (ed.) (1905). A Complete Collection of the Treaties and Conventions, and Reciprocal Regulations at Present Subsisting between Great Britain and Foreign Powers: and of the Laws, Decrees, Orders in Council, &c., Concerning the Same; So Far as They Relate to Commerce and Navigation, the Slave Trade, Post Office Communications, Copyright, &c.: and to the Privileges and Interests of the Subjects of the High Contracting Parties, vol. XXIII. London: Wyman and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, Bert F. (1947). “International Cartel Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 55:1, pp. 1–27.10.1086/256456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Qiuyuan 胡秋原 and 王萍 Wang, Ping (eds.) (1959–1990). Jindaizhongguo duixifangjilieqiangrenshi ziliaohuibian 近代中國對西方及列強認識資料彙編 [Edited Primary Mateirals Concerning Modern China's Understandings of the Foreign Powers], vol. 4.1. Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Jia, Shiyi 賈士毅 (1930). Guoquanyujinrong 國權與金融 [National Power and Finance]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Jia, Shiyi 賈士毅 (1967). Minguochuniandejirencaizhengzngzhang 民國初年的幾任財政總長 [The Financial Ministers during the Early Republican Era]. Taipei: Biographical Literature Press.Google Scholar
King, Frank H. H. (2006). “The Boxer Indemnity – ‘Nothing but Bad’.” Modern Asian Studies 40:3, p. 673.10.1017/S0026749X06002071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Wellington V. K. (2013). The Memoir of V. K. Koo, vol. 1. Beijing: Zhonghua Bookstore.Google Scholar
Li, Sihao (1925). “The Financial Ministry's Statement for the Gold Franc “, 1 April 1925, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 396, vol. 55, p. 98. 28 April 1925.Google Scholar
Li, Yixiang 李一翔 (2003). “Zhongfashiyeyinhangtingyefengposhuping 中法實業銀行停業風波述評 [The Closure of the Industrial Bank of China].” Shilin 史林 [Historical Review] 3, pp. 15–24.Google Scholar
The Library of Nanjing (ed.) (2014). The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 41. Beijing: Zhonghua Bookstore, p. 458.Google Scholar
Liu, Chongyou 劉崇佑 (1923). “The Judicial Statement for the Luo Wengan Case”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 302, 12 June 1923.Google Scholar
Lo, Hui-min (ed.) (1978). The Correspondence of G. E. Morrison II, 1912–1920, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Modern Critique (1925). “Contemporary Critique: Has the Austrian Loans Been Settled?”, Modern Critique 43, 3 October 1925.Google Scholar
Morse, H. B. (1902). “Currency in China.” Journal of the North-China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 38, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
Moure, Kenneth (2002). The Gold Standard Illusion: Franc, the Bank of France, and the International Gold Standard, 1914–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 52, p. 70, p. 87.10.1093/oso/9780199249046.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R. (1989). “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49:4, pp. 803–32.10.1017/S0022050700009451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North-China Herald (1925). “Terms of Settlement”, North China Herald, 30 March 1925.Google Scholar
North-China Herald (1925). “Agreement on Gold Franc Issue”, North China Herald, 28 March 1925.Google Scholar
North-China Herald (1925). “The Gold Franc Controversy”, North-China Herald, 20 December 1923.Google Scholar
Ruan, Jingru (1924). “Provisional Executive Duan Qirui's Nishihara Loans”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 377, 2 December 1924; The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 52, p. 275.Google Scholar
Ruan, Jingru (1925). “The History of the Gold Franc, I”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 396, 28 April 1925; The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 55, p. 3.Google Scholar
Shenbao (1924). Shenbao, 21 November 1924.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takeo 鈴木武雄 (ed.) (1972). Nishihara Shakkan Shiryō Kenkyū 西原借款資料研究 [The Studies on the Documents of the Nishihara Loans]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Lin 唐林 (1923). “The Proposal for Foreign Loans’ Organisation”, The Bankers’ Weekly, No. 284, 23 January 1923; The Bankers’ Weekly, vol. 39, p. 48.Google Scholar
Tang, Lin (1925). “How China's Finance has become chaotic?”, Modern Critique 5, 1, 10 January 1925.Google Scholar
The Times, 6 July 1926.Google Scholar
Wang, Shu-huai 王樹槐 (1972). “Gengzidifangpeikuan 庚子地方賠款 [The Local Boxer Indemnity]”, Zhongyangyanjiuyuan jindaishiyansuoji 中央研究院近代史研所集刊 [Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History Academia Sinica]. Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, 3, 1. pp. 25–57.Google Scholar
Wang, Shu-huai 王樹槐 (1974). Gengzipeikuan 庚子賠款 [The Boxer Indemnity]. Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wilbur, C. Martine (1976). Sun Yat-sen: Frustrated Patriot. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Stanley (1935). China's Customs Revenue since the Revolution of 1911. Shanghai: Kelly & Walsh.Google Scholar
Wright, Stanley (1938). China's Struggle for Tariff Autonomy: 1843–1938. Shanghai: Kelly & Walsh, Limited.Google Scholar