Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Kant on Moral Autonomy
  • Cited by 12
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
February 2013
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9780511792489
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792489
Subjects:
Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, Philosophy
Information

Book description

The concept of autonomy is one of Kant's central legacies for contemporary moral thought. We often invoke autonomy as both a moral ideal and a human right, especially a right to determine oneself independently of foreign determinants; indeed, to violate a person's autonomy is considered to be a serious moral offence. Yet while contemporary philosophy claims Kant as the originator of its notion of autonomy, Kant's own conception of the term seems to differ in important respects from our present-day interpretation. Kant on Moral Autonomy brings together a distinguished group of scholars who explore the following questions: what is Kant's conception of autonomy? What is its history and its influence on contemporary conceptions? And what is its moral significance? Their essays will be of interest both to scholars and students working on Kantian moral philosophy and to anyone interested in the subject of autonomy.

Reviews

'This rich collection of essays, many inspired by or referencing the work of Onora O’Neill, offers various perspectives on autonomy in Kant with some effort to draw relations to other issues in moral theory.'

Frederick Rauscher Source: Journal of the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

References

Allais, Lucy 2007. “Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 143–50 Google Scholar
Allison, Henry 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Allison, Henry 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. A Commentary. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2010. “Kant’s Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation,” in D. Schulting and J. Verburgt (eds.), Kant’s Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine. Berlin: Springer: 29–54 Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2011. “Das Schicksal von Kants Rezensionen zu Herders Ideen,” in O. Höffe (ed.), Immanuel Kant. Geschichtsphilosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag: 119–36 Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012a. “Kant, Human Nature, and History after Rousseau,” in Shell and Velkley (eds.), Kant’s Observations and Remarks. A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press: 247-65 Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012b. “Ambiguities in the Will: Kant and Reinhold, Briefe II,” in V. Stolz, M. Heinz, and M. Bondeli (eds.), Wille, Willkür, Freiheit. Berlin: de Gruyter: 71–90 Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl in press a. “Is Practical Justification in Kant Ultimately Dogmatic?,” in M. Timmons and S. Baiasu (eds.), Kant on Practical Justification. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl in press b. “Kant’s Ambivalent Cosmopolitanism,” in Bacin et al. (eds.) Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl and Sturma, Dieter (eds.) 2004. Kants Ethik: Beiträge der kontinentaleuropäischen und angloamerikanischen Philosophie. Paderborn: Mentis Google Scholar
Anscombe, E. 1967. “Who is Wronged?,” Oxford Review 5: 16–17 Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1937. Language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefanoet al. (eds.) in press. Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense: Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Congress. Berlin: de Gruyter Google Scholar
Barry, Brian 1989. Theories of Justice. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. 2005. “Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?,” in Taylor (ed.): 310–19 Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. 2008. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Anne, and Tipton, Steven M. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press Google Scholar
Benson, Paul 2005. “Feminist Intuitions and the Normative Substance of Autonomy,” in Taylor (ed.): 124–42 Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah 2002. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1993. Essays on Quasi-Realism. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela 2009. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur. Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Berlin: de Gruyter Google Scholar
Budick, Sanford 2010. Kant and Milton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1963. Rousseau, Kant, and Goethe. New York: Harper & Row Google Scholar
Christman, John (ed.) 1989. The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Christman, John 2009. The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-historical Selves. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine 2000. “The Perversion of Autonomy and the Subjection of Women,” in Mackenzie and Stoljar (eds.): 181–209 Google Scholar
Damschen, Gregor and Schönecker, Dieter 2012. Selbst philosophieren. Ein Methodenbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 2006a. “The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will,” Ethics 116: 263–84 Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 2006b. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.) 2010. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald 1970. “Acting Freely,” Noûs 4: 367–83 Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald 1989. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo 1841. “Self-Reliance,” in Essays and Lectures. New York: Library of America, 1983 Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen 2009. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen 2010. “Reason, Desire, and the Will,” in Denis (ed.): 28–50 Google Scholar
Faden, Ruth and Beauchamp, Tom. L. 1986. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin 2007. Freedom. Contemporary Liberal Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin 2009. “Hope as Prudence: Practical Faith in Kant’s Political Thinking,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 7: 95–117 Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart 2002. “Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56: 169–90 and 321–45. [English translation 2009/10: “The Significance of §§ 76 and 77 of the Critique of Judgment for the Development of Post-Kantian Philosophy,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 30:2: 197–217 and 31:2: 323–47] Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart 2008. “Von der Eigentümlichkeit unseres Verstandes in Ansehung der Urteilskraft (§§ 74–78),” in Höffe (ed.): 259–74 Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart 2011. Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 1999. Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 2002. “Reply to Gary Watson,” in S. Buss and L. Overton (eds.), Contours of Agency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 160–64 Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel 2003. “John Rawls – An Overview,” in S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press: 1–62 Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn 2003. Autonomy, Gender, Politics. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1963. Practical Reasoning. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Gaylin, Willard and Jennings, Bruce 1996 [2003]. The Perversion of Autonomy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol 1986. “Remapping the Moral Domain: New Images of the Self in Relationship,” in T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, and D. E. Wellberry (eds.), Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford University Press: 237–52 Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah 1997. “Kant on Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath et al. (eds.): 329–60 Google Scholar
Griffin, James 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 1992. TheCambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 1993. Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2000. Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2003. “Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy,” in Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Autonomy. Cambridge University Press: 70–98 Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2005. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2007. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. London and New York: Continuum Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2009. “Problems with freedom: Kant’s argument in Groundwork III and its subsequent emandations,” in Timmermann (ed.): 176–202 Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2010. “Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Denis (ed.): 130–51 Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (ed.) 2012. “Freedom as the Foundation of Morality: Kant’s Early Efforts,” in Shell and Velkley (eds.): 77–98 Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1979. Werke, vol. i, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Google Scholar
Held, Virginia 2006. The Ethics of Care. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1982. Selbstverhältnisse. Gedanken und Auslegungen zu den Grundlagen der klassischen deutschen Philosophie. Stuttgart: Reclam Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 2007. Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., Jr. 1984. “Autonomy and Benevolent Lies,” Journal of Value Inquiry 18: 251–67 Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1991. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 2000. Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 2002. Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 2012. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (ed.) 1989. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein kooperativer Kommentar. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (ed.) 2008. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 1995. The Fragmented World of the Social. Albany: SUNY Press Google Scholar
Horn, Christoph, Mieth, Corinna, and Scarano, Nico 2007. “Kommentar,” in Kant, Immanuel, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 105–343 Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. 2009. “The Discourse of Bioethics in the United States,” in R. B. Baker and L. B. McCulloch (eds.), The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. Cambridge University Press: 477–85 Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick 2004. “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86: 257–306 Google Scholar
Kateb, George 1992. The Inner Ocean. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. and Meyers, D. T. (eds.) 1987. Women and Moral Theory. London: Roman and Littlefield Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2008. “Moralisches Sollen, Autonomie und Achtung. Kants Konzeption der ‘libertas indifferentiae’ zwischen Wolff und Crusius,” in Valerio Rohdenet al. (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. v. Berlin: de Gruyter: 215–27 Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. 2009. “John McDowell und die Aufklärung. Eine Kritik der neo-aristotelischen Ethik,” in Heiner F. Klemme (ed.), Kant und die Zukunft der europäischen Aufklärung. Berlin: de Gruyter: 369–85 Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. in press. Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein systematischer Kommentar. Stuttgart: Reclam Google Scholar
Kolnai, Aurel 1976. “Dignity,” Philosophy 5: 251–71 Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1989. “Kant’s Analysis of Obligation: The Argument of Foundations I,” TheMonist 72: 311–40 Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996a. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008. The Constitution of Agency. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Kumar, Rahul 2003. “Reasonable Reasons in Contractualist Moral Argument,” Ethics 114: 6–37 Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will 1990. Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Langton, Rae 1998. Kantian Humility. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles 2008. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Lehmann, Gerhard 1981. “Kants Bemerkungen im Handexemplar der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft,” Kant-Studien 72: 132–39 Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1898 [1948]. The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings, trans. R. Latta. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Lepore, Jill 2010. “Fixed,” New Yorker, March 29, 2010 Google Scholar
Lipscomb, Benjamin 2010. “Moral Imperfection and Moral Phenomenology in Kant,” in B. Lipscomb and J. Krueger (eds.), Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. Berlin: de Gruyter: 49–79 Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid 2009. Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. New York: Viking Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1981. After Virtue. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Catriona 2010. “Conceptions of Autonomy and Conceptions of the Body in Bioethics,” in J. Leach-Scullyet al. (eds.), Feminist Bioethics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 71–90 Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Catriona and Natalie Stoljar (eds.) 2000. Relational Autonomy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Martin, Adrienne M. 2006. “How to Argue for the Value of Humanity,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 118 Google Scholar
May, Thomas 2005. “The Concept of Autonomy in Bioethics: An Unwarranted Fall from Grace,” in Taylor (ed.): 299–309 Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael 2005. “Autonomous and Morally Responsible Agency,” in Taylor (ed.): 205–34 Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1985. On Liberty. New York: Penguin Classics Google Scholar
Mishra, Pankaj 2008. “From a Mansion Near Tora Bora: Review of The Wasted Vigil, by Nadeem Aslam,” New York Review of Books 55(16), October 23 Google Scholar
Moore, Margaret 1996. “On Reasonableness,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 13: 167–78 Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris 1970. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun 2004. Sentimental Rules. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun 2005. “Innateness and Moral Psychology,” in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind, vol. i, Structure and Contents. Oxford University Press: 353–69 Google Scholar
Nucci, Larry and Lee, John 1993. “Morality and Personal Autonomy,” in G. G. Noam and T. E. Wren (eds.), The Moral Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 123–48 Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1989. Constructions of Reason. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1992a. “Vindicating Reason,” in Guyer (ed.): 280–308 Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1992b. “Autonomy, Coherence, and Independence,” in D. Miller and W. W. Miler (eds.), Liberalism, Citizenship, and Autonomy. Aldershot: Avebury Press: 209–29 Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2000. Bounds of Justice. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2002. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2003. “Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 77: 1–21 Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2004. “Self-Legislation, Autonomy and the Form of Law,” in H. Nagl-Docekal and R. Langthaler (eds.), Recht, Geschichte, Religion: Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart. Berlin: Akademie Verlag: 13–26 Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2007. “Experts, Practitioners, and Practical Judgment,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4: 154–66 Google Scholar
Orenstein, Peggy 2010. “The Femivore’s Dilemma,” New York Times Magazine, March 14 Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek 2011. On What Matters. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Paton, Herbert James 1947. The Categorical Imperative. Chicago University Press Google Scholar
Paton, Herbert James 1953. The Moral Law. London: Hutchinson Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip 1997. Republicanism. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Pieper, Annemarie 1989. “Wie ist ein kategorischer Imperativ möglich?,” in Höffe (ed.): 264–81 Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel 1673 [1991]. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, ed. James Tully, trans. Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan 2010. Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford Universiy Press Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick 2009. “Freedom and Reason in Groundwork III,” in Timmermann (ed.): 203–23 Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1971 [1999]. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999. Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. B. Herman. Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1984. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1999. Engaging Reason. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 1997. “Legislating for a Realm of Ends: The Social Dimension of Autonomy,” in Reath et al. (eds.): 214–40 Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2008. “Autonomy, Taking One’s Choices to be Good, and Practical Law,” Philosophical Books 49:2: 125–37 Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews 2010. “Formal Principles and the Form of a Law,” in A. Reath and J. Timmermann (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews in press. “The Ground of Practical Laws,” in Bacin et al. (eds.) Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine (eds.) 1997. Reclaiming the History of Ethics. Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Reich, K. 1936. Rousseau und Kant. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr Google Scholar
Ross, David 1954. Kant’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press Google Scholar
Ross, David 2002. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1762 [1964]. Du contrat social, in Oeuvres complètes, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Éditions Gallimard Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1979. Emile or On Education, trans. A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1997. Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men, in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. V. Gourevitch. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul 1948. Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul 1956. “Existentialism is a Humanism,” in W. A. Kaufmann (ed.), Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul 2007. Existentialism is a Humanism. New Haven: Yale University Press Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1930 [1939]. Problems of Ethics. New York: Prentice Hall Google Scholar
Schmucker, J. 1961. Die Ursprünge der Ethik Kants in seiner vorkritishen Schriften und Reflexionen. Meisenheim: Anton Hain Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1977. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome 2009. “Kant against the ‘Spurious Principles of Morality’,” in Timmermann (ed.): 140–58 Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 1997. “Die Methode der Grundlegung und der Übergang von der gemeinen sittlichen zur philosophischen Vernunfterkenntnis,” in H. Oberer (ed.), Kant: Analysen – Probleme – Kritik, vol. iii. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann: 81–98 Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 1999. Kant: Grundlegung III. Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs. Freiburg and Munich: Alber Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2004. “Textvergessenheit in der Philosophiehistorie,” in D. Schönecker and T. Zwenger (eds.), Kant verstehen/Understanding Kant. Über die Interpretation philosophischer Texte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: 159–81 Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit. Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie, with S. Buchenau and D. Hogan. Berlin: de Gruyter Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2006. “How is a Categorical Imperative Possible? Kant’s Deduction of the Moral Law in Groundwork III,” in C. Horn and D. Schönecker (eds.), Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Berlin: de Gruyter: 302–24 Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter 2011. “Kant über die Möglichkeit zum Bösen in der Grundlegung. Eine kommentarische Interpretation von GMS 457,25–458,5,” Studi Kantiani: 24: 73–91 Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter and Wood, Allen W. 2011. Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein einführender Kommentar, 4th edn. Paderborn: Schöningh Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Schuster, Jack H. and Finkelstein MartinJ. 2006. The American Faculty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2009. “Kant’s Conception of Human Dignity,” Kant-Studien 100: 309–31 Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2011. Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin: de Gruyter Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ 2003. Moral Realism. A Defense. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Shell, Susan 1996. The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community. University of Chicago Press Google Scholar
Shell, Susan 2009. Kant and the Limits of Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Skorupski, John 1993. “Autonomy in its Place,” in D. Knowles and J. Skorupski (eds.), Virtue and Taste. Oxford University Press: 19–33 Google Scholar
Skorupski, John 1999. Ethical Explorations. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Skorupski, John 2006. “Green and the Idealist Conception of a Person’s Good,” in Maria Dimova-Cookson and W. J. Mander (eds.), T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press: 47–75 Google Scholar
Stattler, Benedikt 1788 [1968]. Anhang zum Anti-Kant in einer Widerlegung der Kantischen Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Munich: Lentner Google Scholar
Steigleder, Klaus 2002. Kants Moralphilosophie. Die Selbstbezüglichkeit reiner praktischer Vernunft. Stuttgart: Metzler Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi 2010. “Kant and the Culture of Discipline: Rethinking the Nature of Nature,” Epoche, 15: 121–37 Google Scholar
Taurek, J. M. 1977. “Should the Numbers Count?,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 293–316 Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Google Scholar
Taylor, James Stacey (ed.) 2005. Personal Autonomy. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Thorpe, Lucas 2011. “Kant and the Relationship between Community and Autonomy,” in C. Payne and L. Thorpe (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community. University of Rochester Press: 63–87 Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2007. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2009. “Acting from Duty: Inclination, Reason and Moral Worth,” in Timmermann (ed.): 45–62 Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (ed.) 2009. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard 1989. Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press Google Scholar
Velleman, David 2006. Self to Self. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. 1963. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Google Scholar
Wagner, Hans 1994. “Kants Konzept von hypothetischen Imperativen,” Kant-Studien 85: 78–84 Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2008. “Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft und Kants Ablehnung alternativer Teleologien (§§ 69–71 und §§ 72–73),” in Höffe (ed.): 241–58 Google Scholar
Watson, Gary 2004. Agency and Answerability. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath 2003. “The Paradox of Group Autonomy,” Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 20: 265–85 Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul 1973. The Autonomy of Reason. New York: Harper & Row Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1990. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2008. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Zammito, J. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. University of Chicago Press Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology. Cambridge University Press Google Scholar

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1084
Total number of PDF views: 5704 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 18544 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th March 2025. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.