Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-bthnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T15:41:04.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Mechanical Activation on the Heat of Fusion of a Conventional Batch Used for the Manufacture of Float Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

J. López-Cuevas Open the ORCID record for J. López-Cuevas [Opens in a new window] ,
G. Vargas-Gutiérrez ,
P.P. Rodríguez-Salazar  and
S.R. Ruiz-Ontiveros
J. López-Cuevas*
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México
G. Vargas-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México
P.P. Rodríguez-Salazar
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México
S.R. Ruiz-Ontiveros
Affiliation:
VITRO Vidrio y Cristal S.A. de C.V., Carretera a García Km 10, S/N, 66000, García, Nuevo León, México
*
*Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed (jorge.lopez@cinvestav.edu.mx.)
Get access

Abstract

An initial mixture of raw materials (batch) typically used for the manufacture of conventional soda-lime float glass was subjected to a mechanical activation process for 30 or 60 minutes in a planetary ball mill. An intensification of the chemical reactivity of the batch, which was directly related with the increase in the milling time, was observed. This accelerated the chemical reactions that took place during the batch melting process between sodium, calcium and magnesium carbonates and other components of the mixture, which happened at significantly lower temperatures with respect to the batch without mechanical activation. The heat of fusion of the batch, estimated using a methodology previously reported in the literature, indicated that the mechanical activation given to the initial mixture of raw materials decreased the energy consumed during the batch melting. This was also evidenced by a decrease in the temperature at which the release of CO2 ended, which was considerably larger than that previously reported in the literature based solely on the decrease in the particle size of a batch of similar composition achieved by dry sieving.

Keywords

glassreactive ball millingcalorimetry

Information

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 57-58: International Materials Research Congress XXVIII , 2019 , pp. 3171 - 3180
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Kawaguchi, M. and Kato, T., in GlassTrend - DGG/HVG - NCNG Seminar on Alternative Raw Materials and Advanced Batch Pretreatment for Glass Melting, (NL Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2012), p. 23.Google Scholar
Ciecińska, M., J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 84, 201 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalunenko, N.I., Iskhakova, A.Yu. and Sulimenko, L.M., Glass Ceram. 63, 336 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlahovic, M., Martinovic, S., Jovanic, P., Boljanac, T. and Vidojkovic, V., in Proceedings of European Congress of Chemical Engineering - 6, edited by Gani, R. and Dam-Johansen, K. (Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2007), p. 1196.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, M., Kato, T., Imamura, Y., Yoshida, N. and Aoki, S., Ceramics - Silikáty 52, 218 (2008).Google Scholar
Shelaeva, T.B., Solinov, V.F. and Mikhailenko, N.Yu., Glass Ceram. 71, 3 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D.-S. and Matyáš, J., Batch Reactions of a Soda-Lime Silicate Glass (Report for G Plus Project for Libbey Inc.), PNNL-13994 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J.B., Wiebelt, J.A., Tant, M.R. and Moore, G.R., Thermochim. Acta 57, 161 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J.B., Emmerich, W.-D. and Wassmer, E., J. Therm. Anal. 33, 1067 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, A.K., Ludwig’s Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants, Volume 1, 4th ed. (Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, MA, 2011).Google Scholar
Munro, R.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 1919 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León-Carriedo, M., Gutiérrez, C.A., López-Cuevas, J., Pech-Canul, M.I. and Rodríguez-Galicia, J.L., Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. Vidrio 55, 87 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, R.F., Thermal Analysis of Materials (Materials Engineering Book 5), 1st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, 1993), p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savard, M.E. and Speyer, R.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 671 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baláž, P., Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience and Minerals Engineering, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008).Google Scholar