Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-92wsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T10:44:17.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equivalent income versus equivalent lifetime: does the metric matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2023

Harun Onder
Affiliation:
The World Bank, 1818 H. Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 MSN: J5-504, United States
Pierre Pestieau
Affiliation:
University of Liege, CORE and Paris School of Economics 31 boulevard du Rectorat, 4000 Liege, Belgium
Gregory Ponthiere*
Affiliation:
UCLouvain, Hoover Chair in Economic and Social Ethics, College Dupriez, 3 Place Montesquieu, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Corresponding author: Gregory Ponthiere; E-mail: gregory.ponthiere@uclouvain.be
Get access

Abstract

We examine the effects of the postulated metric on the measurement of well-being, by comparing, in the (income, lifetime) space, two indexes: the equivalent income index and the equivalent lifetime index. The conditions under which the equivalent lifetime index exists are more restrictive than the ones under which the equivalent income index exists, but it is possible to define an alternative equivalent lifetime index, based on two reference income levels, for which the non-existence problem is less acute. Those indexes are also shown to satisfy different properties concerning interpersonal well-being comparisons, which can lead to contradictory rankings. While those incompatibilities arise under distinct indifference maps, we also explore the effects of the metric while relying on a unique indifference map, and show that, even in that case, the postulated metric matters for the measurement of well-being.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Onder et al. supplementary material 1

Onder et al. supplementary material
Download Onder et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 62.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Onder et al. supplementary material 2

Onder et al. supplementary material
Download Onder et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 3 KB