Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:08:13.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A preliminary investigation of cultivated and wild species of Luffa for oil and protein contents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

Krishna Prakash
Affiliation:
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi110 012, India
Jalli Radhamani*
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi110 012, India
Anjula Pandey
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi110 012, India
Sangita Yadav
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi110 012, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: radhamani@nbpgr.ernet.in

Abstract

Seeds of wild and cultivated species of Luffa were studied to determine the variability in morphological (seed size, colour, seed-coat surface and 100-seed weight) and biochemical (oil and protein) characteristics. A total of 80 accessions of three cultivated species (71 accessions) and three wild species (9 accessions) of Luffa under the present investigation from diverse regions (12 states of five regions) of India showed variations in seed size, colour, seed-coat surface, 100-seed weight, and seed protein and oil contents both within the accessions of the same species and between different species. Significant variability in seed morphological traits was observed. Both seed oil and soluble seed protein contents were highest in some accessions of the cultivated species (25–27% oil and 8–10% protein, respectively, on a fresh seed weight basis). Using the 2D scatter plot diagram derived from the principal components analysis, the morphological and biochemical traits of the 80 Luffa accessions classified the wild species into one cluster (cluster I) and the cultivated species into a second major cluster (cluster II). The present investigation on the correlation between seed morphology and biochemical traits in the cultivated and wild species of Luffa can help in identifying the genotypes of Luffa species with valuable traits for further exploring the potential of this valuable crop as a source of edible oil, food and fodder in edible seed types or as a source of industrial oil/biodiesel in non-edible seed types. The protein-rich seed could be further explored to be utilized in the fortification of food products for value addition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abitogun, AS and Ashogbon, AO (2010) Nutritional assessment and chemical composition of raw and defatted Luffa cylindrica seed flour. Ethnobotanical Leaflets 14: 225235.Google Scholar
Adebooye, OC (2009) Properties of seed oil and protein of three underutilized edible Cucurbitaceae of South-West Nigeria. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 806: 347354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajiwe, VIE, Ndukwe, GI and Anyadiegwu, IE (2005) Vegetable diesel fuels from Luffa cylindrica oil, its methyl ester and ester-diesel bends. Chemistry Class Journal 2: 14.Google Scholar
Amoo, IA, Emenike, AE and Akpambang, VOE (2008) Chemical composition and nutritive significance of Luffa aegyptica and Castenea sp. seeds. Trends in Applied Sciences Research 3: 298302.Google Scholar
Andres, TC (2000) A preliminary survey of oilseeds in the Cucurbitaceae. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 23: 9698 (article 32).Google Scholar
Anwar, F, Mohammed, AN, Othman, F and Nazamid, S (2011) Intervarietal variation in composition of seed and seed oil from winter melon [Benincasahispida (Thunb.) Cogn.] fruit. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43: 20292037.Google Scholar
AOAC(2005) Oil in Cereal Adjuncts, Method 945.16. In: Horwitz, William (ed.) Official Method of Analysis. 18th edn. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC Int, pp. 56132.Google Scholar
Arunachalam, V (1981) Genetic distance in plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 41: 226236.Google Scholar
Bal, KE, Bal, Y and Lallam, A (2004) Gross morphology and absorption capacity of cell-fibers from the fibrous vascular system of Loofah (Luffa cylindrica) Textile Res. J. 74: 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, GM (1970) Multivariate analysis approach to selection of parents of hybridization aiming at yield improvement in self-pollinated crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynthia, NI, Okoye, COB and Akuzuo, UO (2012) Comparative study of the physicochemical characterization of some oils as potential feedstock for biodiesel production. ISRN Renewable Energy, 5 pages. doi:10.5402/2012/621518.Google Scholar
Dairo, FAS, Aye, PA and Oluwasola, TA (2007) Some functional properties of loofah gourd (Luffa cylindrica L., M. J. Roem) seed. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 5: 97101.Google Scholar
Earle, FR and Jones, Q (1962) Analyses of seed samples from 113 plant families. Economic Botany 16: 221250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elemo, BO, Elemol, GN and Erukainure, OL (2011) Characterization of sponge gourd (Luffa aegyptiaca Mill.) seed oil. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 49: 128130.Google Scholar
Hedge, DM (2012) Carrying capacity of Indian agriculture: oilseeds. Current Science 102: 867872.Google Scholar
Jacks, TJ, Henserling, TP and Yatsu, LY (1972) Cucurbit seeds. I. characteristics and uses of oils and proteins – a review. Economic Botany 26: 135141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi BK, Hari BKC, Tiwari RK, Ghale M, Sthapit BR and Upadhyay MP (2004) Descriptors for sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica). NARC, Nepal LIBIRD, Nepal and IPGRI, Italy.Google Scholar
Lee S and Yoo JG (2006) (W/2006/019205) Method for preparing transformed Luffa cylindrica Roem (World Intellectual property organization). Available at: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA = KR2004002745&DISPLAY = STATUS.Google Scholar
Lowry, OH, Rosebrough, NJ, Farr, AL and Randall, RJ (1981) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagents. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193: 265275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariod, AA, Ahmed, YM, Bertr, M, Galaledin, K, Abdeen, S, Mohamed, AG and Abdelwahab, SI (2009) A comparative study of the properties of six Sudanese cucurbit seeds and seed oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 86: 11811188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin FW (1984) Cucurbit seed as possible oil and protein sources. Echo Technical Note. Available at: http://www.echotech.org/network/modules.php?name = News&file = article&sid = 592.Google Scholar
Oboh, IO and Aluyor, EO (2009) Luffa cylindrica: an emerging cash crop. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 684688.Google Scholar
Ram, D, Rai, M, Verma, A and Singh, Y (2006) Genetic variability and association analysis in Luffa sp. Indian Journal of Horticulture 63: 94297.Google Scholar
Tolentino, MIS, Laude, RP and DelaVina, AC (1997) Genetic diversity analysis of Luffa species based on seed protein profile using SDS-PAGE. Philippines Journal of Crop Sciences 22: 141146.Google Scholar
Varalakshmi, B, Reddy, YN and Reddy, BM (1994) Genetic divergence in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula (Roxb.) L.). Journal of Genetics and Breeding 48: 131134. Available at: www.essence-of-mineral-makeup.com/luffa-cylindrica.html.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Prakesh Supplementary Material

Table

Download Prakesh Supplementary Material(File)
File 278 KB