Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:41:11.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Voting for Women Candidates by Level and Type of Office

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2016

Kathleen Dolan  and
Timothy Lynch
Kathleen Dolan
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Timothy Lynch
Affiliation:
Lewis-Clark State College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research has documented that the public often views women candidates through the lens of gender stereotypes. However, as much of this work draws on experimental designs and hypothetical candidates, we have less information about whether and how voters employ stereotypes in the face of real candidates for office. This project examines one important aspect of the impact of stereotypes on the fate of actual women candidates: whether gender stereotypes have a different influence on elections for different levels and types of offices. Previous research suggests that voters are more likely to apply male stereotypes and evaluate candidates differently as the level of office increases and as we consider executive versus legislative office. The research reported here draws on new data that capture voter attitudes and behaviors in real-world elections to test a series of hypotheses related to when and how gender stereotypes affect candidates for the U.S. Congress and governorships. In general, we find little evidence to support claims that voters stereotype women candidates differently when they seek different kinds of offices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 573 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, William. 1975. “Candidate Characteristics, Office of Election, and Voter Responses.” Experimental Study of Politics 4 (1): 76–88.Google Scholar
Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Clyde, Heighberger, Neil, and Shocket, Peter. 1993. “Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates.” Women & Politics 13 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 2008. “Likeable? Effective Commander in Chief? Polling on Candidate Traits in the ‘Year of the Presidential Woman.’” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 747–52.Google Scholar
Callegaro, Mario, and DiSogra, Charles. 2011. “Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (5): 1008–32.Google Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2012. Women Candidates in 1992–2012: A Summary of Major Party Candidates for U.S. Senate, U.S. House. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (4): 912–39.Google Scholar
Cook, Charlie. 2010. “Hurricane GOP on the Way.” National Journal, July 3.Google Scholar
Dennis, J. Michael, and Li, Rick. 2007. “More Honest Answers to Web Surveys? A Study of Data Collection Mode Effects.” Journal of Online Research 10 (7): 1–15.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1997. “Gender Differences in Support for Women Candidates: Is There a Glass Ceiling in American Politics?” Women & Politics 17 (2): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the Year of the Woman.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 96–107.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–50.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Smith, Eric R. A. N.. 1998. “The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision-Making.” Political Psychology 19 (2): 405–19.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 5 (3): 301–24.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., Kenney, Patrick J., and Woodall, Gina Serignese. 2009. “Bad for Men, Better for Women: The Impact of Stereotypes During Negative Campaigns.” Political Behavior 31 (1): 53–78.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ann, and Miller, Jerry. 2005. When Stereotypes Collide: Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Videostyle in Congressional Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hamby, Peter. 2014. “Ann Romney Blasts Democrat for Sexist Slur.” CNN, October 29. http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/28/politics/ann-romney-nikki-haley/ (accessed March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–65.Google Scholar
Heerwegh, Dirk. 2009. “Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability Effects.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21 (1): 111–21.Google Scholar
Henderson, Nia-Malika. 2014. “In Revealing She Had an Abortion, Wendy Davis Did Something Few Women Candidates Have Ever Done.” Washington Post, September 6. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/09/06/in-revealing-she-had-an-abortion-wendy-davis-did-something-few-women-candidates-have-ever-done/ (accessed March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Offices.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kantor, Jodi, and Taylor, Kate. 2013. “In Quinn's Loss, Questions about the Role of Gender and Sexuality.” The New York Times, November 18.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” In Political Cognition, eds. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 233–56.Google Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 1999. “Candidate Gender and Assessments of Women Candidates.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (1): 84–96.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impression of House Candidates Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.Google Scholar
Kreuter, Frauke, Presser, Stanley, and Tourangeau, Roger. 2008. “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (5): 847–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Hayes, Danny. 2013. “A Non-Gendered Lens: The Absence of Stereotyping in Contemporary Congressional Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 67–82.Google Scholar
Leeper, Mark Stephen. 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 248–61.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.Google Scholar
McKinney, Dave, Spielman, Fran, and Korecki, Natasha. 2012. “Lisa Madigan Refuses to Tip Hand on Governor's Race.” Chicago Sun-Times, September 4. http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/14938617-505/lisa-madigan-refuses-to-tip-hand-on-governors-race.html#.U3qOkOZdV7E (accessed March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Milligan, Susan. 2014. “Michael Hayden's Unhealthy ‘Emotional’ State.” U.S. News & World Report, April 7. http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/susan-milligan/2014/04/07/michael-haydens-sexist-emotional-attack-on-dianne-feinstein (accessed March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Mueller, Carol M. 1986. “Nurturance and Mastery: Competing Qualifications for Women's Access to High Public Office?” In Women and Politics: Activism, Attitudes, and Office-Holding, eds. Moore, Gwen and Spitze, Glenna. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 211–32.Google Scholar
Paul, David, and Smith, Jessi L.. 2008. “Subtle Sexism? Examining Vote Preferences When Women Run against Men for the Presidency.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 29 (4): 451–76.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2008. “Men or Women: Who's the Better Leader? A Paradox in Public Attitudes.” August 25. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader/ (accessed March 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1993. “Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter.” In Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective, ed. Grofman, Bernard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 17–35.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.Google Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley Miller, and Dean, Norma G.. 1989. “Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (1): 77–85.Google Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Seale, Jana. 1988. “Attitudes Toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Candidate for President—A Research Note.” Political Psychology 9 (4): 591–98.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981/82. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 2 (1/2): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora Cate, and Presser, Stanley. 2003. “The Science of Asking Questions.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 65–88.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Sigelman, Carol K., and Fowler, Christopher. 1987. “A Bird of a Different Feather? An Investigation of Physical Attractiveness and the Electability of Female Candidates.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (1): 32–43.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, Roger, and Smith, Tom W.. 1996. “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (2): 275–304.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dolan and Lynch supplementary material

Appendix

Download Dolan and Lynch supplementary material(File)
File 15.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dolan and Lynch supplementary material

Online Abstract

Download Dolan and Lynch supplementary material(File)
File 13.9 KB