Hostname: page-component-6565fbc58-lkrg5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-13T00:24:03.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium states for non-uniformly expanding skew products

Part of: Smooth dynamical systems: general theory Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2023

GREGORY HEMENWAY
GREGORY HEMENWAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43232, USA
*
e-mail: hemenway.math@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study equilibrium states for a class of non-uniformly expanding skew products, and show how a family of fiberwise transfer operators can be used to define the conditional measures along fibers of the product. We prove that the pushforward of the equilibrium state onto the base of the product is itself an equilibrium state for a Hölder potential defined via these fiberwise transfer operators.

Keywords

equilibrium statesRPF transfer operatornon-uniformly expandingskew products

MSC classification

Primary: 37D35: Thermodynamic formalism, variational principles, equilibrium states
Secondary: 37C30: Zeta functions, (Ruelle-Frobenius) transfer operators, and other functional analytic techniques in dynamical systems

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 44 , Issue 9 , September 2024 , pp. 2599 - 2620
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Birkhoff, G.. Extensions of Jentzsch’s theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1957), 219–227.Google Scholar
Castro, A. and Varandas, P.. Equilibrium states for non-uniformly expanding maps: Decay of correlations and strong stability. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30(2) (2013), 225–249.10.1016/j.anihpc.2012.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climenhaga, V. and Hemenway, G.. A nonstationary Ruelle–Perron–Frobenius theorem. Manuscript in preparation, 2024.Google Scholar
Denker, M. and Gordin, M.. Gibbs measures for fibred systems. Adv. Math. 148(2) (1999), 161–192.10.1006/aima.1999.1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafouta, Y.. Limit theorems for some time-dependent expanding dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 33(12) (2020), 6421–6460.10.1088/1361-6544/aba5e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kifer, Y.. Equilibrium states for random expanding transformations. Random Comput. Dynam. 1(1) (1992), 1–31.Google Scholar
Naud, F.. Birkhoff cones, symbolic dynamics and spectrum of transfer operators. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 11(2–3) (2004), 581–598.10.3934/dcds.2004.11.581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piraino, M.. Single site factors of Gibbs measures. Nonlinearity 33(2) (2019), 742–761.10.1088/1361-6544/ab5179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollicott, M. and Kempton, T.. Factors of Gibbs measures for full shifts. Entropy of Hidden Markov Processes and Connections to Dynamical Systems (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 385). Eds. Marcus, B., Petersen, K. and Weissman, T.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 246–257.10.1017/CBO9780511819407.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokhlin, V. A.. On the fundamental ideas of measure theory. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 1952(71) (1952), 55.Google Scholar
Stadlbauer, M., Suzuki, S. and Varandas, P.. Thermodynamic formalism for random non-uniformly expanding maps. Comm. Math. Phys. 385 (2021), 369–427.10.1007/s00220-021-04088-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varandas, P. and Viana, M.. Existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium states for non-uniformly expanding maps. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 27(2) (2010), 555–593.10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. Invariant measures and equilibrium states for some mappings which expand distances. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 236 (1978), 121–153.10.1090/S0002-9947-1978-0466493-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar