Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-27T20:58:30.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wasserstein convergence rates in the invariance principle for deterministic dynamical systems

Part of: Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Ergodic theory Limit theorems Probability theory on algebraic and topological structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2023

ZHENXIN LIU  and
ZHE WANG
ZHENXIN LIU
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, P. R. China (e-mail: zxliu@dlut.edu.cn)
ZHE WANG*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, P. R. China (e-mail: zxliu@dlut.edu.cn)
*
e-mail: zwangmath@hotmail.com, wangz1126@mail.dlut.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the convergence rate with respect to Wasserstein distance in the invariance principle for deterministic non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Our results apply to uniformly hyperbolic systems and large classes of non-uniformly hyperbolic systems including intermittent maps, Viana maps, unimodal maps and others. Furthermore, as a non-trivial application to the homogenization problem, we investigate the Wasserstein convergence rate of a fast–slow discrete deterministic system to a stochastic differential equation.

Keywords

invariance principlerate of convergenceWasserstein distancenon-uniformly hyperbolic systemhomogenization

MSC classification

Primary: 37A50: Relations with probability theory and stochastic processes 60F17: Functional limit theorems; invariance principles
Secondary: 37D20: Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.) 60B10: Convergence of probability measures

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , April 2024 , pp. 1172 - 1191
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antoniou, M.. Rates of convergence for statistical limit laws in deterministic dynamical systems. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick, 2018.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M. and Melbourne, I.. Rate of convergence in the weak invariance principle for deterministic systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 369 (2019), 1147–1165.Google Scholar
Benedicks, M. and Young, L.-S.. Sinaĭ–Bowen–Ruelle measures for certain Hénon maps. Invent. Math. 112 (1993), 541–576.Google Scholar
Benedicks, M. and Young, L.-S.. Markov extensions and decay of correlations for certain Hénon maps. Astérisque 261 (2000), 13–56.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P.. Convergence of Probability Measures (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Statistics), 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Borovkov, A. A.. The rate of convergence in the invariance principle. Teor. Verojatnost. i Primenen. 18 (1973), 217–234.Google Scholar
Castro, A.. Backward inducing and exponential decay of correlations for partially hyperbolic attractors. Israel J. Math. 130 (2002), 29–75.Google Scholar
Chen, M.-F., From Markov Chains to Non-equilibrium Particle Systems, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2004.Google Scholar
Chung, K. L., A Course in Probability Theory, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 2001.Google Scholar
Dedecker, J. and Rio, E.. On mean central limit theorems for stationary sequences. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 44 (2008), 693–726.Google Scholar
Denker, M. and Philipp, W.. Approximation by Brownian motion for Gibbs measures and flows under a function. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 4 (1984), 541–552.Google Scholar
Dolgopyat, D.. On dynamics of mostly contracting diffeomorphisms. Comm. Math. Phys. 213 (2000), 181–201.Google Scholar
Donsker, M. D.. An invariance principle for certain probability limit theorems. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1951), 12pp.Google Scholar
Gordin, M. I.. The central limit theorem for stationary processes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 188 (1969), 739–741.Google Scholar
Gottwald, G. A. and Melbourne, I.. Homogenization for deterministic maps and multiplicative noise. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 469 (2013), 20130201, 16pp.Google Scholar
Gouëzel, S.. Central limit theorem and stable laws for intermittent maps. Probab. Theory Related Fields 128 (2004), 82–122.Google Scholar
Gouëzel, S.. Decay of correlations for nonuniformly expanding systems. Bull. Soc. Math. France 134 (2006), 1–31.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Heyde, C. C., Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application (Probability and Mathematical Statistics). Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York–London, 1980.Google Scholar
Hénon, M.. A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor. Comm. Math. Phys. 50 (1976), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korepanov, A., Kosloff, Z. and Melbourne, I.. Averaging and rates of averaging for uniform families of deterministic fast-slow skew product systems. Studia Math. 238 (2017), 59–89.Google Scholar
Korepanov, A., Kosloff, Z. and Melbourne, I.. Martingale-coboundary decomposition for families of dynamical systems. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 35 (2018), 859–885.Google Scholar
Kubilyus, K.. The rate of convergence in the invariance principle for martingale differences. Liet. Mat. Rink. 34 (1994), 482–494.Google Scholar
Liverani, C., Saussol, B. and Vaienti, S.. A probabilistic approach to intermittency. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 19 (1999), 671–685.Google Scholar
Melbourne, I. and Nicol, M.. Almost sure invariance principle for nonuniformly hyperbolic systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 260 (2005), 131–146.Google Scholar
Melbourne, I. and Török, A.. Convergence of moments for Axiom A and non-uniformly hyperbolic flows. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 32 (2012), 1091–1100.Google Scholar
Merlevède, F., Dedecker, J. and Rio, E.. Rates of convergence for minimal distances in the central limit theorem under projective criteria. Electron. J. Probab. 14 (2009), 978–1011.Google Scholar
Pomeau, Y. and Manneville, P.. Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 74 (1980), 189–197.Google Scholar
Rachev, S. T., Klebanov, L. B., Stoyanov, S. V. and Fabozzi, F. J.. The Methods of Distances in the Theory of Probability and Statistics. Springer, New York, 2013.Google Scholar
Rio, E.. Upper bounds for minimal distances in the central limit theorem. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 45 (2009), 802–817.Google Scholar
Sawyer, S.. Rates of convergence for some functionals in probability. Ann. Math. Stat. 43 (1972), 273–284.Google Scholar
Viana, M.. Multidimensional nonhyperbolic attractors. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. 85 (1997), 63–96.Google Scholar
Villani, C.. Optimal Transport: Old and New (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 338). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar
Young, L.-S.. Statistical properties of dynamical systems with some hyperbolicity. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 585–650.Google Scholar
Young, L.-S.. Recurrence times and rates of mixing. Israel J. Math. 110 (1999), 153–188.Google Scholar