I. Introduction

A thin water layer produced by the melting and refreezing of basal ice in a temperate glacier on up- and down-stream faces of bed protuberances provides lubrication for the basal sliding which may be a significant part of the overall motion. The shear stress in such a thin layer is negligible and so there is no resistive tangential traction to the ice motion over the bed. The bed drag is the resultant, along the mean bed line, of the pressure distribution over the protuberances. This perfect-slip model is the basis of flow solutions obtained by Reference NyeNye(1969,1970), Reference KambKamb (1970), and more recently, Reference MorlandMorland (1976). It is assumed that the ice can be approximated as an incompressible Newtonian fluid of high viscosity in slow steady flow, and that the bed profile is periodic with small maximum slope ∊∊ relative to the bed line.Solutions are obtained as power series expansions in ∊∊ assuming that the ice base remains everywhere in contact with the bed. For a given glacier depth h an inclination ∊∊ of the mean bed line to the horizontal, and a profile shape, the plane flow solution determines the basal-sliding velocity, which is defined as the tangential velocity along the mean bed line.A calculation for a sinusoidal bed shows that the basal-sliding velocity is sensitive to the length scale of the bed undulation. Furthermore, the normal traction on the bed remains compressive everywhere only if ∊∊ for some critical angle ∊∊ which is of order ∊∊, and hence the solution predicts tensile tractions on part of the bed for ∊∊ of the order of one and for some range of ∊∊ of order ∊∊. In these situations cavitation must occur, and a valid formulation must incorporate cavity sections over which the ice base is traction free, these sections and the profile of the ice base being part of the solution. This intricate problem involving, as it does, such mixed boundary values, has not yet been attempted. It is, however, expected that when the tensile sections are relatively small, the resulting cavitation will not have a significant effect on the overall solution.

The condition of zero tangential traction requires the existence of a continuous water layer. Pinching-out of the water layer at the crests of protuberances will cause local failure of this condition, but debris protruding from the basal ice makes frictional contact with the bed across the large areas over which it is carried (Reference Boulton and CoatesBoulton, 1974, p. 41;1975, p. 7). The interaction of such debris with the bed is complex, as is its dependence on bed profile (which reveals how it is transported and deposited). Data obtained by G. S. Boulton, A. Armstrong and E. M. Morris from field work carried out on the Glacier d'Argentière in 1973 and 1975 are being analysed in an attempt to construct "simple" friction laws exhibiting the main features observed in different situations. To ensure a manageable analysis one must assume that the mean effect of the individual debris contacts can be described by friction laws which apply continuously over the bed surface. It is with such an analysis in mind that any possible qualitative effects of bed friction on basal sliding are explored here, by solving the plane flow problem for two conventional friction laws.

First, the Coulomb law

where t_s and t _n are the tangential.and normal tractions on the ice base, with s defining a tangential coordinate in the direction of flow and n a normal coordinate directed into the ice,v is the friction coefficient assumed to be of order unity. The limiting friction form of Equation (1) presupposes that sliding occurs everywhere. It is reasonable to assume that any non-slip zones will be of limited extent and should not influence significantly the overall basal sliding. Secondly, a velocity power law

where V _s is the tangential velocity of the base ice, and E and m are constants. The form of

Equation (2) 2 has been used by Reference NyeNye (1959) in a different context, and is also inferred by Reference WeertmanWeertman (1957,1964) as a global relation between mean drag and basal-sliding velocity in his regelation theory which takes a non-linear viscous law for the ice, Weertman suggested that m is approximately 2 or a little larger, but gave no explicit value for E. In the present analysis, however, Equation (2) 2 is considered as a possible qualitative relation arising from debris friction, in contrast with Equation (I), and also in an exploration of its effects on basal-sliding velocity and cavitation. A value of m ∊∊ 2 is used in the calculations, and a range of values for E compatible with steady flow down the inclined bed is considered.

If part of the work done by the basal friction is released as a surface heat flux, and not used solely for surface crushing or other mechanical effects, it contributes to the thermal balance in the regelation mechanism and a non-linear thenno-mechanical coupling is introduced into the boundary conditions. When only a sma∊∊ part is released as heat this coupling may be neglected, and it is also shown here that, under moderate restrictions on the glacier depth and bed profile slope, the entire work contribution is small compared with the latent-heat terms. The solutions are therefore derived neglecting any friction contribution to the thermal balance, so that the surface distribution of heat sources at the ice base per unit area, is LV _n (Reference NyeNye, 1969), where L = 2.8 × 10⁸ J m ^-3 is tin latent heat and V _n is the normal velocity of the basal ice. Thus, at the bed

where T and S denote temperature in the ice and bedrock respectively, and k _i and k _b are the

thermal conductivities of ice and bedrock respectively, k _i ∊∊ 2.1 J m^-1 K^-1 and k _b = rk _i

where r ranges from 1 to 2 for typical bed rocks; the value r = 1.6 (appropriate to granite) is

used in later calculations. In the regelation model the basal ice is everywhere al its melting

point, and if (P _o, T _o) is a pressure-melting point on the bed-line, then at the bed

Such a linear relation presupposes that T and S remain close to T ₀ at the bed, and C — 0.7 × 10⁷ K/(N m²). Following Reference KambKamb (1970) the firsl-order dependence is on pressure p only with no contribution from deviatoric stress changes.Figure I shows the overall plane-flow problem, with coordinates (x,y) respectively along and normal to a bed line which is inclined at angle ∊∊ to the horizontal. U _s is the surface velocity at y = h, in the x-direction, and the basal-sliding velocity U _b is defined as the leading-order term of the x-velocity in a flow continued onto y — o. The bed profile is

Where f(x) is smooth and extends periodically as x ∊∊ It is assumed that the bed slope is everywhere small, thus

Fig. 1. Glacier flow over a wavy bed.

The bed conditions (Equations (I) or (2)) and Equations (3) and (4) are applied y ∊∊ yb(x).

On the upper free surface the stress ∊∊ satisfies

where p _a is atmospheric pressure, and where it is anticipated that the normal velocity V_y on y = h is zero to the required order in ∊∊. The exponential decay of V_y with height demonstrated in the solutions justifies the surface prescription y ∊∊h under a very weak restriction on h. A geothermal heat flux Q normal to the bed line, with a typical value of 4 × 10^-2 J m^-2 s^-1 (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1969) is included, requiring

in the half-plane solutions determined for T and S.

2.Flow Equations

The construction of velocity and temperature fields, in terms of complex potentials, and the development of boundary-condition expansions in powers of ∊∊, have been described by Reference MorlandMorland (1976). Equations from this earlier paper are prefixed by the letter "M", only the main steps are repeated here.

A length scale of the bed undulation λ is defined by

and dimensionless coordinates (X, Y) are defined by

x = ∊∊X, y = ∊∊Y,

in which the bed profile becomes

The following velocity, pressure and temperature decompositions are formulated:

A value for ∊∊ of 3 × 10¹² N m^-2 s is used in the calculations. For given values of h,Equation (15) 15 determines U_s once k is known. The velocities u and v are dimensionless with a scale unit U_s P is a dimensionless pressure with unit 2μU _s/λ (∑ will denote a dimensionless stress tensor with the same unit), ∊∊ and ∊∊ dimensionless temperatures with unit ∊∊ The free surface conditions of Equation (7) 7 and the (flux conditions of Equation (8) 8 are satisfied exactly if

The condition of momentum balance is satisfied for slow viscous flow if

so that P, u and v are the pressure and velocity fields for viscosity 0.5 in the absence of any body force (Reference LangloisLanglois, 1964). V^z is the two-dimensional Laplacian in (X,Y) coordinates. Steady heat conduction in the ice and bed respectively requires that

if we neglect the motion of the ice (Reference KambKamb, 1970). Solutions of the biharmonic relations (Equation (17) 17) and the harmonic relations (Equations (18)) can be expressed in terms of analytic functions of a complex variable z ∊∊ X∊∊ir (equations (M₄₃) to (M₄₇)). Let the

values of u, v,∊∊ and ∊∊ on r = o (continued analytically where r = o lies outside the domain) be denoted by

and also assume that U, V, ∊∊ and ∊∊ vanish or behave sinusoidally as X ∊∊ 00. Then, assuming that the complex potentials vanish at infinity in a way consistent with Equation (16) 16, the potentials may be represented as Cauchy integrals U, V, ∊∊ and ∊∊(equations (M₅₀)-(M₅₃)).The boundary values at Y— r _b which arise in the bed conditions (Equations (I)-(4)), can be approximated by a truncated Taylor scries in r about r = o. The series appears as a power expansion in ∊∊ by virtue of Equation (II). Evaluation of the various quantities and derivatives on r = o is made from equations (M₅₀)-(M₅₃), these involve Hubert transforms Erdélyi 1954) If W(t) is continuous and vanishes or behaves sinusoidally at infinity, then its Hubert transform is

Where ∊∊ denotes the Cauchy principal value. Also

the latter being the inversion theorem. The useful results when F(x) is a truncated Fourier series are

the constant function does not satisfy the inversion theorem.

Now the bed conditions represented by Equations (3) and (4) are given by equations (M6₅), (M6₃) and (M6₂), respectively. Neglecting terms of order ∊∊² (U, V,∊∊, ∊∊)), these are

The argument X is omitted for brevity. Λ natural length ∊∊ and later a length ∊∊ occur, these are defined by

with previous values, and the ratios

are introduced for convenience. The constants B and D in Equations (24) and (25) are given by

The bed conditions given by Equations (I) and (2) require expansions for the dimension-less tractions Σ_s and Σ_n, and the dimensionless tangential velocity V ₈/U₈ To the same approximation as Equations (23)-(25), these expansions are:

Where

It is supposed that

So that Equation (16) 16 is satisfied to any order in ∊∊ with the exponential decay of u, v and P in r. Also

In order to balance the boundary conditions in powers of ∊∊, let

A determination of the coefficients ∊∊_∊∊ gives k in terms of ∊∊ and, in turn, U _s and U _b It is expected that k ∊∊ O(i)so y _o = o, but this will follow from the balance of the boundary conditions.

Finally, if a proportion j of he work done against basal friction is released as heat, then in Equation (3) 3 V _n is replaced by F"" ∊∊ For the Coulomb law (Equation (I)) t _s is of order pgh (and possibly also for the velocity power law (Equation (2) 2) when ∊∊ is of order I)

and generally (V_n/V_s ) is of order ∊∊, so neglect of the coupling term requires

This is satisfied for small j, or j approximately one, provided h is moderate. In fact, for Equation

(2) the condition for no cavitation when ∊∊ is of order one also requires that h be not too

large. When ∊∊ is of order ∊∊ and non-coupling only requires∊∊;

3.Coulomb Law

The bed conditions are given by Equations (23) to (25) together with Equation (1) 1 written in the form

where Σ₃ and Σ_n are given by Equations (29) and (30). First, consider

and suppose ∊∊ is of order I in the series balance. Values of ∊∊ which are smaller or larger may be treated directly, or obtained as limits to the present solution.

The term in ∊∊ gives immediately from Equation (39) 39

and the ∈⁰ terms give

setting constant terms to zero in order to obtain the required behaviour at infinity. Now the ∊∊ terms of Equations (23) to (25) give

leading to

A search for a periodic solution without constant term,

and the use of the results of Equation (22) 22 shows that both α_n and b_n are zero, so

Similarly, the ∊ terms of Equations (39) show that

and Equations (24) and (25) show that

Using these results in the ∊ balance of Equation (23) 23 gives

where

It was shown in Reference MorlandMorland (1976) that A has a maximum value of 0.05 for extreme values of the glacier parameters, so contributions to the geothermal heat flux which arise solely from this coefficient are small. The bounded complementary solution of Equation (49) 49 is zero, analogous to Equation (44) 44. The determination of a particular periodic integral needs F to be specified. As an illustration of this consider a sinusoidal bed whose shape is described by the equation

The solution of Equation (49) 49 is now

As v tends to zero, U₁ tends also to zero, and

thus we recover the solution for perfect slip (Reference MorlandMorland, 1976).

The leading velocity terms U_I and V_I , are now determined but, in contrast with the perfect slip solution, y₂ = o and so k, U_s and U_b are still unknown. From the «² terms of Equation (39) 39

Thus, the second-order velocity coefficient U₂ is given by the balance of periodic terms whereas ß_ly₃ is equal to the constant term of

For the profile represented by Equation (51) 51

which, since κ arid £, are positive, implies thai [_a is less than zero. This contradictory result stems from the application of Equation (39) 39 to the regions of negative pressure (Σ" > o) given in this solution, when the friction (Σ, > o) is directed up-glacier. From Equation (30) 30 the leading normal pressure term is

which oscillates equally between positive and negative values. Thus there is no balance without cavitation for Equations (39) and (40).

Now, a is of order one as are both β and β ₀. If we assume that vβ_o is not equal to one, then the ∊∊⁰terms of Equation (39) 39 give

and so Equations (23) to (25) lead to Equations (43) to (46) again. Similarly, the ∊∊ terms give

and also Equations (48) to (54), while the «r¹ terms of Equation (39) 39 give Equation (56) 56 for a left-hand side of y₂( β _o — v ^I).Thus

which tends to (I — k) ∊∊²/(I + ∊∊²)) as v tends to zero; we recover the perfect slip solution in this case also. Provided v is less than I /β then we are able to predict a positive surface velocity U_s But, again, Equation (58) 58 determines the leading normal pressure term, showing that there is no balance without cavitation. The case where ∊∊ is equal to one allows a balance only if U_s is zero.

In conclusion, the solutions constructed for the Coulomb law, assuming no cavitation, are invalid for all ranges of bed-line inclination ∊∊

4.Velocity Power Law

The law represented by Equation (2) 2 can be rewritten as

but we lack data for the physical constant E. However, if we suppose that t_t is less than or equal to pgh sin « (a condition compatible with the gravity driving force) then

since K is of the order of one for U_b greater than zero. This is satisfied by the equation

where e is less than or equal to the order of one provided that k is of order one. If any solution with e of order one predicts a smaller k and hence a V_s of the order of U_b and U_s , then larger values of t_s ,, occur, presumably with compensating bed tensions as with the Coulomb law, so that cavitation occurs. However, the form of Equation (63) 63 includes all possible valid situations. By construction, the equation

is independent of the solution variable U_s , but depends explicitly on ∊∊ and on h if m is not equal to 2. The perfect slip law ∑₈ = 0 is given by the limit as e tends to zero.

Now V_s is of order of U_b , and if

then Equation (62) 62 approaches the perfect slip law. These conditions do not, in general, follow Reference MorlandMorland (1976), so we assume that

and hence from Equation (33) 33

With the restriction of Equation (34) 34 the ∊∊₀ terms of Equation (63) 63 give

and then, the ∊∊⁰ terms of Equations (23) to (25) are identical with the perfect slip balance implying that

Next, the t terms of Equation (63) 63 give

One solution to these equations is

thus determining k,and U_s independent of F(X) Again, the ∊∊ balance of Equations (23) to (25) is identical with the perfect slip solution, so

and, for the sinusoidal bed (Equation (51) 51)

In the limit as e tends to zero, Equation (69) 69 implies that ∊∊₁ = O as in the perfect slip solution. The alternative solution of Equation (69) 69 is simply

and the perfect-slip results (Equations (71) and (72)) again follow. Now, the ∊∊² balance in Equation (6₃) requires that

The product FH[V”₁] is in general the sum of a constant I’ and a periodic term W X), as in the perfect slip solution, so

where a non-zero Γ implies that y₂ , is not equal to zero. As

(which is equivalent to y₁ , being non-zero), Equation (75) 75 approaches the result. Equation (70) 70). Thus, the first solution is given by taking small values for he² in Equation (75b). For the sinusoidal bed (by equation (M88)).

and U₂ and V₂ are given by the perfect slip solutions (equations (M90) and (M94)).Thus the velocity perturbation is changed only by the scale factor U_s , which changes with (Equation (8) 8). Now Equation (75b) becomes

When e = o, Equation (77) 77 reduces to the perfect slip result (equation (M89)). The basal-sliding velocity is given by

and, for fixed values of A and ?, as e increases k/(I —k) increases and so U_b , decreases. As expected, friction decreases the sliding velocity. Calculations have been made for m — 2. Figures 2 and 3 show the variation of U_b with ? for values for h∊∊² of o. 1, 0.4. I, and 4, for e = 0.5 (Fig. 2) and e = I (Fig. 3), compared with U_b of the perfect-slip solution (e = o).

In the perfect-slip case the ratio U _b∊∊²/h is independent of h∊∊². For ∊∊.0.1, this range of h∊∊² covers values of h running from 10-400 m. If e, ∊∊ and ? are fixed, we see that U _b decreases as h decreases. Also, for fixed e, the variation of U _b with ? (the length scale of the undulation) decreases as h decreases, and, in particular, U _b is very insensitive to changes in ω provided h is small. (As the graph ordinates are proportional to U _b/h (Figs 2 and 3), so these effects are more significant than the Figures appear to suggest. Figure 4 shows the variation of the ratio U _b/U with ∊∊ for the values of he² used in the previous Figures. This ratio decreases with increase of e for each values of he² and, including the case where e = o (figure 3, Reference MorlandMorland (1976)). At fixed U_b/U_s becomes less sensitive to a change in w as he² decreases. At both fixed e and the ratio increases as h∊∊² decreases.

Finally, the relation for normal bed pressure (Equation (30) 30) has leading terms (recall Equation (40) 40)

Now if X/h is of order ∊∊ Equation (77) 77 reduces to Equation (70) 70 with y₁ ≠ O, k = O(I), and,for such relatively thin glaciers. Equation (79) 79 shows that there is no cavitation if ∊∊ is of order ∊∊ or if ∊∊ is of order one and

For the sinusoidal bed the latter condition becomes

Fig. 2. Variation of basal sliding velocity U_b with undulation length λ (SI-units) for e — 0.5. The perfect-slip solution (e = ) is shown by the dotted line.

Fig. 3. Variation of baml sliding velocity Vb with undulation length A (SI-units ) for e = 1.0. The perfect-slip solution (e = 0) is shown by the dotted line.

Fig. 4. Variation of the ratio of basal-sliding velocity to surface velocity with undulation length λ for different values of h∈²(SI-units). These values are shown against the curves. The dashed lines are for e = 0 .5, the full lines are for e = 1.0.

For λ/λ of order ∊∊ zero and y ₂ non-zero, Equation (79) 79 shows that Σ_n oscillates about zero to the order of ∊∊ when ∊∊ is of the order of one, so cavitation always occurs then. But for ∊∊ of the order of ∊∊, cavitation does not occur if ∊∊ is greater than or equal to (H[V’₁]) max For the sinusoidal bed. neglecting the small coefficient A, the condition becomes

As with the perfect-slip result of Reference MorlandMorland (1976) (equation (M102)), there is a critical limit ∊∊ of the order $ which increased with the friction coefficient e through the factor k/(I — k)

Thus, the law represented by Equation (2) 2 allows non-cavitation solutions for "thin glaciers" for all ∊∊ less than or equal to ∊∊_e (of order one), and for "thick glaciers" for ∊∊ less than or equal to ∊∊_c (of order ∊∊).

5.Concluding Remarks

The flow solutions which have been established for both friction laws exhibit features which differ from each other and from the perfect-slip solution. With the Coulomb law. (Equation (I)), the normal bed traction becomes a tensile stress over finite sections of the profile however small the inclination ∊∊; this implies the onset of cavitation and the failure of the solution which assumes contact everywhere. In the perfect-slip solution the bed pressure remains positive everywhere provided that ∊∊ is less than or equal to ∊∊_e. where ∊∊_e is of the order of ∊∊, Since the mean tangential traction must be less than the mean down-plane gravity force, and by Equation (I) t_s is of the same order as the normal pressure —t_n in the mathematical solution, regions of large normal pressure are counterbalanced by regions of negative pressure accompanied by negative values of t_s (the traction driving the glacier). Thus, the Coulomb law is possible only if a significant amount of cavitation takes place. In contrast, the power-velocity law (Equal (2)) gives a bed pressure which is everywhere positive if ∊∊ is less than or equal to ∊∊ (of order one), provided the glacier depth h is not too large, and if ∊∊ is less than or equal to ∊∊_e (∊∊_ee ∊∊) for deep glaciers. Furthermore, the predicted basal-sliding velocity for a sinusoidal bed is smaller and varies much less with the length scale of the undulation than it does in the perfect-slip solution, both the magnitude and variation decreasing as h decreases. These broad features of the different friction laws may be helpful in the construction of friction models from empirical data.

Acknowledgment

This investigation was pursued in connection with a Natural Environment Research Council Grant GR₃/2680 "Flow of glaciers over deformable materials" held jointly with Dr G. S. Boulton in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.