Book contents
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Therapeutic Approaches
- Part III Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation
- Part IV Addressing the Needs of Diverse Populations
- Part V Special Topics in Fertility Counseling
- Part VI Practice Issues
- Index
- References
Part VI - Practice Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2022
Edited by
Book contents
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Therapeutic Approaches
- Part III Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation
- Part IV Addressing the Needs of Diverse Populations
- Part V Special Topics in Fertility Counseling
- Part VI Practice Issues
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fertility Counseling: Case Studies , pp. 137 - 155Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. 2017. Available at: www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. 2014. Available at: www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
Corey, DM, Ben-Porath, YS. Practical guidance on the use of the MMPI instruments in remote psychological testing. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2020;51:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, MS, Ones, DS. Psychometric equivalence of the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI: a meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 1999;11:58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Pub., L,104–191. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule. 2013. Technical safeguards. 45 CFR § 164.312(e).Google Scholar
Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists. Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Am Psychol 2013;68:791–800.Google Scholar
Luxton, DD, Pruitt, LD, Osenbach, JE. Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Prof Psychol Res Practice 2014;45:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menton, WH, Crighton, AH, Tarescavage, AM, Marek, RJ, Hicks, AD, Ben-Porath, YS. Equivalence of laptop and tablet administrations of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form. Assessment 2019;26:661–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Swain, M, Petok, W. Legal issues for fertility counselors. In: Covington, SN, Ed. Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searight, HR, Searight, BK. Working with foreign language interpreters: recommendations for psychological practice. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2009;40:444–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daar, J, Collins, L, Davis, J, et al. Interests, obligations, and rights in gamete and embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2019;111:664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Guidance regarding gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2021;115:1395–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacitus. No Title. Quotesia. Available at: https://quotesia.com/tacitus-quote/694265.%0A%0ARead; more at: https://quotesia.com/tacitus-quote/694265/citation [last accessed June 19, 2022].Google Scholar
References
Miller, DT, Lee, K, Gordon, AS, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021;23(8):1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheuner, MT, Peredo, J, Benkendorf, J, et al. Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in. Genet Med 2015;17(1):27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2015;103(6):1418–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelouto, SM, Archer, SR, Morris, JR, et al. Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018;35(3):409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daar, J. The role of providers in assisted reproduction: potential conflicts, professional conscience, and personal choice. In: Francis, L, Ed. The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 242.Google Scholar
Hendl, T. feminist, A critique of justifications for sex selection. J Bioeth Inq 2017;14(3):427–438.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, De Wert, G, Pennings, G, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod 2013;28(6):1448–1454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savulescu, J, Pugh, J, Douglas, T, et al. The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos. Protein Cell 2015;6(7):476–479.Google Scholar
Deech, R. Reproductive autonomy and regulation – coexistence in action. Just reproduction: reimagining autonomy in reproductive medicine, special report. Hastings Center Rep 2017;47(6):S57–S63.Google ScholarPubMed