Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Words on FireEloquence and Its Conditions, pp. 195 - 214Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abizadeh, Arash. “Banishing the Particular: Rousseau on Rhetoric, Patrie, and the Passions.” Political Theory 29(4) (2001): 556–82.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. “The Passions of the Wise: Phronêsis, Rhetoric, and Aristotle’s Passionate Practical Deliberation.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2002): 267–96.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. “On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, Is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33(4) (2007): 445–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan and Webster, Steven. “All Politics Is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21st Century.” stevenwwebster.com/research/all_politics_is_national.pdfGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Ahl, Frederick. “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome.” American Journal of Philology 105(2) (1984): 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, Michael von. “M.T. Cicero, Sprache und Stil.” In Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung. Ed. Ziegler, Konrat. Supplementband 13. Munich: Alfred Druckmüller, 1973.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle S. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Arena, Valentina. “The Orator and His Audience: The Rhetorical Perspective in the Art of Deliberation.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Ed. Steel, Catherine and van der Blom, Henriette. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Truth and Politics.” In Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Trans. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Rhetoric. In Aristotle. Vol. 22. Trans. J. H. Freese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Trans. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée.” History of European Ideas 38(4) (2012): 493–507.Google Scholar
Ashfield, Andrew and de Bolla, Peter, eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, Catherine. “Hand Over Fist: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric.” The Classical Quarterly 38(2) (1988): 392–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustus, . Res gestae divi Augusti. In Valleius Paterculus and Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Trans. Frederick W. Shipley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Vol. 1. Ed. St John-Stevas, Norman. London: Routledge, 1965.Google Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Vol. 6. Ed. St John-Stevas., Norman London: Routledge, 1974.Google Scholar
Balot, Ryan K. “Free Speech, Courage, and Democratic Deliberation.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael and Pope, Jeremy. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review 113(1) (2019): 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Mémoire.” In The Semiological Challenge. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang, 1988.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi. “Praise and Doublespeak: Tacitus’ Dialogus.” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus. Ed. Ash, Rhiannon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Baumlin, James S. “Ciceronian Decorum and the Temporalities of Renaissance Rhetoric.” In Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Sipiora, Phillip and Baumlin, James S.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bejan, Teresa M. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Teresa M. “The Two Clashing Meanings of ‘Free Speech.’” The Atlantic. December 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Bell, Andrew J. E. “Cicero and the Spectacle of Power.” The Journal of Roman Studies 87 (1997): 1–22.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bender, John and Wellbery, David E.. “Rhetoricality: On the Modernist Return of Rhetoric.” In The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Ed. Bender, John and Wellbery, David E.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bessette, Joseph M. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Biden, Joe. “Inaugural Address.” January 20, 2021. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr.Google Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1) (1968): 1–14.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Ed. Ferreira-Buckley, Linda and Halloran, S. Michael. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Blake, Aaron. “Everything That Was Said at the Second Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton Debate, Highlighted.” Washington Post. October 9, 2016. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/09/everything-that-was-said-at-the-second-donald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-debate-highlighted.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bonald, Louis de. “Du style et de la littérature.” In Œuvres Complètes. Ed. Jacques-Paul Migne. Vol. 3. Paris: Ateliers Catholiques, 1859.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Bort, Ryan. “Decoding Trump’s Staged Inaugural Speechwriting Photo.” Newsweek. January 18, 2017. www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-inaugural-speech-tweet-544314.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. Private Papers of James Boswell from Malahide Castle. Ed. Scott, Geoffrey and Pottle, Frederick A.. Vol. 6. New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1928–37.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard. Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David. The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke: From the Sublime and Beautiful to American Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Browning, Reed. “The Origin of Burke’s Ideas Revisited.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 18 (1984): 57–71.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. “Cicero and Historiography.” In Miscellanea di Studi Classici in Onore di Eugenio Manni. Vol. 1. Rome: G. Bretschneider, 1979.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. “Libertas in the Republic.” In The Fall of the Roman Republic and Other Related Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bullard, Paddy. Edmund Burke and the Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 4. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. The Correspondence of Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. Ed. Sutherland, Lucy S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “First Letter on a Regicide Peace.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 5. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Letter to a Noble Lord.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 5. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas Concerning the Sublime and Beautiful. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 1. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Representation to His Majesty. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech on American Taxation.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech on Conciliation with the Colonies.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech in General Reply: Ninth Day.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 12. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech on Mr. Fox’s East India Bill.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech on the Nabob of Arcot’s Private Debts.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 3. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “Speech in Opening the Impeachment: First Day.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 9. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 3. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar
Canter, H. V. “The Impeachments of Verres and Hastings: Cicero and Burke.” Classical Journal 9(5) (1914): 199–211.Google Scholar
Carnall, Geoffrey. “Burke as Modern Cicero.” In The Impeachment of Warren Hastings. Ed. Carnall, Geoffrey and Nicholson, Colin. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Carrère, Emmanuel. The Kingdom. Trans. John Lambert. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017.Google Scholar
Carroll, Ross. “Revisiting Burke’s Critique of Enthusiasm.” History of Political Thought 35(2) (2014): 317–44.Google Scholar
Carter, D. M. “Citizen Attribute, Negative Right: A Conceptual Difference between Ancient and Modern Ideas of Free Speech.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 37(3) (2009): 323–50.Google Scholar
Christian, Brian. “The A/B Test: Inside the Technology That’s Changing the Rules of Business.” Wired, April 25, 2012, www.wired.com/2012/04/ff-abtesting.Google Scholar
Chua, Amy. Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations. New York: Penguin Random House, 2018.Google Scholar
Cicero, . Brutus. Trans. G. L. Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Cicero, . Brutus and Orator. Trans. Robert A. Kaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De legibus. In On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De officiis. In Ethical Writings of Cicero. Trans. Andrew W. Peabody. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1887.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De re publica. In On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cicero, . On Friendship [De amicitia]. In On Old Age, On Friendship, On Divination. Trans. W. A. Falconer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Cicero, . On the Ideal Orator [De oratore]. Trans. James M. May and Jakob Wisse. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cicero, . The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Trans. Charles Duke Yonge. London: Bohn, 1856.Google Scholar
Clarke, Michelle T. “Doing Violence to the Roman Idea of Liberty?: Freedom as Bodily Integrity in Roman Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 35(2) (2014): 211–33.Google Scholar
Clive, John. Not by Fact Alone: Essays on the Writing and Reading of History. New York: Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas M. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Coppins, McKay. “Newt Gingrich Says You’re Welcome.” The Atlantic. November 2018. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/11/newt-gingrich-says-youre-welcome/570832.Google Scholar
Corbeill, Anthony. “Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy M. The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116 (1986): 229–39.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. “Cicero’s Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius.” American Journal of Philology 111(1) (1990): 75–81.Google Scholar
Craig, Christopher P. “A Survey of Recent Work on Cicero’s Rhetorica and Speeches.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Culler, A. Dwight. The Victorian Mirror of History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, Hellfried. “Caesars Schrift über die Analogie.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 84 (1935): 258–75.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994.Google Scholar
David, Jean-Michel “L’action oratoire de C. Gracchus: L’image d’un modele.” In Demokratia et Aristokratia: à propos de Caius Gracchus: mots grecs et réalités romaines. Ed. Nicolet, Claude. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1983.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans. “‘Expressive Uncertainty’: Edmund Burke’s Theory of the Sublime and Eighteenth Century Conceptions of Metaphor.” In The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Deckard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, Frans. The Literary Genres of Edmund Burke: The Political Uses of Literary Form. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar
De Libero, Loretana. “Mit eiserner Hand ins Amt?” In Res Publica Reperta: Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Ed. Spielvogel, Jörg. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2002.Google Scholar
Demosthenes, . On the Crown. Trans. John J. Keaney. In Demosthenes’ On the Crown. Ed. Murphy, James J.. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Desmouliez, André. Cicéron et Son Goût: Essai sur Une Définition d’une Esthétique Romaine à la fin de la République. Brussels, 1976.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus. On the Style of Demosthenes. In The Critical Essays. Vol. 1. Trans. Stephen Usher. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Dlouhy, Jennifer A. “Obama Blasts Trump’s Virus Response as ‘Chaotic Disaster.’” Bloomberg. May 9, 2020. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-09/obama-blasts-trump-s-virus-response-as-chaotic-disaster.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Douglas, Alan Edward. “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1(3) (1973): 95–138.Google Scholar
Douglas, Alan Edward. “M. Calidius and the Atticists.” Classical Quarterly 49 (1955): 241–7.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38(3) (2010): 319–39.Google Scholar
Dugan, John. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Alexis de Tocqueville: The First Social Scientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” In Deliberative Democracy. Ed. Elster, Jon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. “Theophrastus and the Theory of Style.” In Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work. Ed. Fortenbaugh, William Wall, Huby, Pamela M., and Long, Anthony A., vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas B. “Knowledge, Consensus, and Rhetorical Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 62 (1976): 1–14.Google Scholar
Farrell, Thomas B. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. Oz-Salzberger, Fania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan. “‘What Is the Point of Parliamentary Debate?’ Deliberation, Oratory, Opposition and Spectacle in the British House of Commons.” Redescriptions 20(1) (2017): 11–31.Google Scholar
Fong, David. “Macaulay: The Essayist as Historian.” Dalhousie Review 51 (1971): 38–48.Google Scholar
Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia.” foucault.info/system/files/pdf/DiscourseAndTruth_MichelFoucault_1983_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Fox, Charles James. “Mr. Fox’s East India Bill.” In Speeches of the Right Honourable Charles James Fox. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Aylott, 1853.Google Scholar
Frank, Jason. “‘Delightful Horror’: Edmund Burke and the Aesthetics of Democratic Revolution.” In The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought. Ed. Kompridis, Nikolas. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Furet, François. Interpreting the French Revolution. Trans. Elborg Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Furet, François and Mélonio, Françoise. “Introduction.” In Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the Revolution. Vol. 1. Trans. Alan S. Kahan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom. Edmund Burke’s Aesthetic Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Relevance of the Beautiful: Art as Play, Symbol, and Festival.” In The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
GannettJr., Robert T. Tocqueville Unveiled: The Historian and His Sources for the Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gaonkar, Dilip Parmeshwar. “Introduction: Contingency and Probability.” In A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. Ed. Jost, Walter and Olmsted, Wendy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. “The Rhetoric Revival in Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (2011): 159–80.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelzer, Thomas. “Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus.” In Le classicisme à Rome. Ed. Flashar, Hellmut. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1979.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Vol. 1. London: Strahan and Cadell, 1776.Google Scholar
Gleason, Maud W. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Goodman, Rob. “The Deliberative Sublime: Edmund Burke on Disruptive Speech and Imaginative Judgment.” American Political Science Review 112(2) (2018): 267–79.Google Scholar
Goodman, Rob. “‘The Low Principles of Jurisprudence’: Legal Indeterminacy in Edmund Burke’s Impeachment of Warren Hastings.” The Review of Politics 82(3) (2020): 459–83.Google Scholar
Goodman, Rob and Bagg, Samuel. “Preaching to the Choir? Rhetoric and Identity in a Polarized Age.” Journal of Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonah. Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy. New York: Crown Forum, 2018.Google Scholar
Görler, Woldemar. “From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero’s De oratore.” Rhetorica 6(3) (1988): 215–35.Google Scholar
Gormley, Steven. “Deliberation, Unjust Exclusion, and the Rhetorical Turn.” Contemporary Political Theory 18(2) (2019): 202–26.Google Scholar
Gorton, William A. “Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy.” New Political Science 36(1) (2016): 61–80.Google Scholar
Gotoff, Harold C. “Cicero’s Caesarian Orations.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Gotoff, Harold C. Cicero’s Elegant Style: An Analysis of the Pro Archia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Gowing, Alain M. “Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Ed. Steel, Catherine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Graf, Fritz. “Cicero, Plautus and Roman Laughter.” In A Cultural History of Humour. Ed. Bremmer, Jan and Roodenburg, Herman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Grant, W. Leonard. “Cicero on the Moral Character of the Orator.” Classical Journal 38 (1943): 472–8.Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey Edward. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Greene, Lane. Talk on the Wild Side: The Untameable Nature of Language. London: Economist Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Gursky, Jacob and Woolley, Samuel. “The Trump 2020 App Is a Voter Surveillance Tool of Extraordinary Power.” MIT Technology Review. June 21, 2020. www.technologyreview.com/2020/06/21/1004228/trumps-data-hungry-invasive-app-is-a-voter-surveillance-tool-of-extraordinary-scope.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Oxford: Polity, 1989.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hall, Catherine. Macaulay and Son: Architects of Imperial Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hall, Cheryl. “‘Passions and Constraint’: The Marginalization of Passion in Liberal Political Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 28(6) (2002): 727–48.Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hallam, Henry. The Constitutional History of England from the Accession of Henry VII. to the Death of George II. Vol. 3. Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1829.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. Macaulay and the Whig Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Tom. “Cruz Campaign Credits Psychological Data and Analytics for Its Rising Success.” Washington Post. December 13, 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cruz-campaign-credits-psychological-data-and-analytics-for-its-rising-success/2015/12/13/4cb0baf8-9dc5-11e5-bce4-708fe33e3288_story.html.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
Hampsher-Monk, Iain. “Rhetoric and Opinion in the Politics of Edmund Burke.” History of Political Thought 9(3) (1988): 455–84.Google Scholar
Hariman, Robert. Political Style: The Artistry of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Stephen, Yudkin, Daniel, Juan-Torres, Míriam, and Dixon, Tim. “Hidden Tribes: A Study of America’s Polarized Landscape.” October 2018. static1.squarespace.com/static/5a70a7c3010027736a22740f/t/5bbcea6b7817f7bf7342b718/1539107467397/hidden_tribes_report-2.pdf.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their Correspondence and Subsequent Marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Longinus on Sublimity.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45 (1999): 43–74.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. “The De Analogia of Julius Caesar; Its Occasion, Nature, and Date, with Additional Fragments.” Classical Philology 1 (1906): 97–120.Google Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hindson, Paul and Gray, Tim. Burke’s Dramatic Theory of Politics. Aldershot: Avebury, 1988.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. “Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Roman Aristocrat.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Ed. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2010.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. “Schmitt: The Debility of Liberalism.” In The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip N. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1) (2015): 1–17.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon, 1950.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of Eloquence.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar
Hume, David. The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar
IJsseling, Samuel. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.” Mnemosyne 55 (2002): 259–84.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Broadway Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. “E Pluribus Pluribus, or Divided We Stand.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1) (2016): 219–24.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J., “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3) (2012): 405–31.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. Tocqueville: The Aristocratic Sources of Liberty. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Braman, Donald, Gastil, John, Slovic, Paul, and Mertz, C. K.. “Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3) (2007): 465–505.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel. “Cicero on Decorum and the Morality of Rhetoric.” European Journal of Political Theory 10(1) (2011): 92–112.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel and Schwarze, Michelle A.. “The Rhetoric of Sincerity: Cicero and Smith on Propriety and Political Context.” American Political Science Review 110(1) (2016): 100–11.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Ellen. “Introduction: Carl Schmitt’s Parlamentarismus in Its Historical Context.” In The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Ed. Schmitt, Carl, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kimball, Bruce. Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Koziak, Barbara. Retrieving Political Emotion: Thumos, Aristotle and Gender. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth. “Introduction.” In Livy, , Ab Urbe Condita, Book VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth and Woodman, Anthony John. Latin Historians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. “Micro-Targeting, the Quantified Persuasion.” Internet Policy Review 6(4) (2017). policyreview.info/articles/analysis/micro-targeting-quantified-persuasion.Google Scholar
Kreiss, Daniel. “Yes We Can (Profile You).” Stanford Law Review 64 (2012). www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-yes-we-can-profile-you.Google Scholar
Krostenko, Brian. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lambert, Elizabeth R. Edmund Burke of Beaconsfield. Cranbury: University of Delaware Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Landauer, Matthew. Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Landauer, Matthew. “Parrhesia and the Demos Tyrannos: Frank Speech, Flattery and Accountability in Democratic Athens.” History of Political Thought 33(2) (2012): 185–208.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Trans. Matthew T. Bliss et al. Boston, 1998.Google Scholar
Leeman, Anton D. “Julius Caesar, the Orator of Paradox.” In The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome. Ed. Wooten, Cecil W.. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Leeman, Anton D. and Pinkster, Harm. M.T. Cicero: De oratore libri III, Buch I, 1-165. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1981.Google Scholar
Leff, Michael. “The Habitation of Rhetoric.” In Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader. Ed. Lucaites, John L., Condit, Celeste M., and Caudill, Sally. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. “The Question of Democracy.” In Democracy and Political Theory. Trans. David Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Leigh, Matthew. “Wounding and Popular Rhetoric at Rome.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40 (1995): 195–215.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. “Historians without History: Against Roman Historiography.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Ed. Feldherr, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lévesque de Pouilly, Louis-Jean. Theorie des sentiments agréables: òu après avoir indiqué les règles, que la nature suit dans la distribution du plaisir, on établit les principes de la théologie naturelle et ceux de la philosophie morale. Paris, 1748.Google Scholar
Levine, George. The Boundaries of Fiction: Carlyle, Macaulay, Newman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In The Works of John Locke. Vol. 2. Reprint ed. Aalen, Germany: Scientia Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar
London, Jennifer. “How to Do Things with Fables: Ibn al-Muqaffa’s Frank Speech in Stories from the Kalila wa Dimna.” History of Political Thought 29(2) (2008): 189–212.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On the Sublime. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Luntz, Frank. “The 11 Words for 2011.” Huffington Post. January 3, 2011. www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-luntz/words-2011_b_829603.html.Google Scholar
Luttig, Matthew D. The Rise of Partisan Rigidity. PhD diss. conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/178943/Luttig_umn_0130E_16828.pdf.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “On the Athenian Orators.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Edinburgh Election, 1839.” In Speeches of Lord Macaulay: Corrected by Himself. London: Longman, 1863.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Francis Bacon,” in Critical and Historical Essays. Vol. 2. London: J. M. Dent, 1927.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “History.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. The History of England from the Accession of James the Second. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Mill’s Essay on Government.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Mirabeau.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (March 2, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (December 16, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (September 20, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “The People’s Charter (May 3, 1842).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Sir William Temple.” In Macaulay’s Essays and Lays of Ancient Rome. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. History of the Revolution in England in 1688: Comprising a View of the Reign of James II. from His Accession, to the Enterprise of the Prince of Orange. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard, 1835.Google Scholar
Maguire, Matthew W. The Conversion of Imagination: From Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Trans. Elly Stein and Jane Mansbridge. Political Theory 15(3) (1987): 338–68.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and Mackuen, Michael, eds. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Markovits, Elizabeth. The Politics of Sincerity. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marshall, David L. The Weimar Origins of Rhetorical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Marx, F., ed. Incerti auctoris De ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium libri IV. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. “A Cross-Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1) (2016): 351–77.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. “Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities,” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(S1) (2018): 280–301.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
May, James M. “Cicero as Rhetorician.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Ed. Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
McCullagh, C. Behan. Justifying Historical Descriptions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McDowell, R. B. and Webb, D. A.. Trinity College Dublin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Stephen. “Ezra Klein’s ‘Why We’re Polarized’ and the Drawbacks of Explainer Journalism.” New Yorker. March 11, 2020. www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/ezra-kleins-why-were-polarized-and-the-drawbacks-of-explainer-journalism.Google Scholar
Michel, Alain. Rhétorique et Philosophie chez Cicéron. Paris: University Press of France, 1960.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Harvey. Individual Choice and the Structures of History: Alexis de Tocqueville as Historian Reappraised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Monoson, Sara S. Plato’s Democratic Entanglements. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. Cohler, Anne M. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Morley, John. Nineteenth Century Essays. Ed. Stansky, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, Robert. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Müller, Reimar. “Die Wertung der Bildungsdisziplinen bei Cicero. Bios praktikos und Bildung.” Klio 128 (1965): 77–173.Google Scholar
Narducci, Emanuele. “Orator and the Definition of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, Walter. Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nuzzi, Olivia. “Who Really Writes Trump’s Speeches? The White House Won’t Say.” New York. January 30, 2018. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/who-really-writes-trumps-speeches-white-house-wont-say.html.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel I. The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Daniel I. Edmund Burke and the Conservative Logic of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar
O’Neill, John. “The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy.” Res Publica 8 (2002): 249–68.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic, 1962.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Packer, George. “A New Report Offers Insights into Tribalism in the Age of Trump.” New Yorker. October 13, 2018. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-new-report-offers-insights-into-tribalism-in-the-age-of-trump.Google Scholar
Parry, Marc. “Is Political Science Too Pessimistic?” (interview with Jennifer Hochschild). Chronicle of Higher Education. September 19, 2016.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. “Resilience as the Explanandum of Social Theory.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen. Ed. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: NYU Press 2007.Google Scholar
Pezzini, Giuseppe. “Caesar the Linguist: The Debate about the Latin Language” In The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Ed. Luca Grillo and Christopher B. Krebs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Pilkington, Ed and Michel, Amanda. “Mitt Romney’s Campaign Closing Gap on Obama in Digital Election Race.” The Guardian. June 14, 2012, www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/14/romney-campaign-digital-data-obama.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus. In Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 1. Trans. Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Plato, . Republic. In Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 6. Trans. Paul Shorey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . “The Life of Demosthenes.” In Demosthenes’ On the Crown. Ed. Murphy, James J.. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. “The Varieties of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform.” In Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. “Des sons qu’on ne peut entendre: Cicéron, les ‘kritikoi’ et la tradition du sublime dans la critique littéraire.” In Cicéron et Philodème: La Polémique en philosophie. Ed. Auvray-Assayas, Clara and Delattre, Daniel. Paris: Éditions rue d’Ulm, 2001.Google Scholar
Porter, James I. The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam S. “Classical Eloquence and Polite Style in the Age of Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 25(1) (1991): 31–56.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam S. The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Press, Gerald Alan. The Development of the Idea of History in Antiquity. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph. A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. Ed. Bevilacqua, Vincent and Murphy, Richard. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’s Values. Ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Quintilian. Institutio oratoria [4 vols.]. Trans. H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953–8.Google Scholar
Quintilian. The Orator’s Education [Institutio oratoria] [5 vols.]. Trans. Donald A. Russell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. Republics Ancient & Modern. Vol. 3. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Reid, Christopher. “Burke as Rhetorician and Orator.” In The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Burke. Ed. Dwan, David and Insole, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Remer, Gary. Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Remer, Gary. “Political Oratory and Conversation: Cicero versus Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 27(1) (1999): 39–64.Google Scholar
Remer, Gary. “Two Modes of Deliberation: Oratory and Conversation in Ratifying the Constitution.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(1) (2000): 68–90.Google Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. Caplan, Harry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. “Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools.” In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. Ed. Dominik, William. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Robin, Corey. The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Roisman, Joseph. “Speaker-Audience Interaction in Athens: A Power Struggle.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew B. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” Classical Philology 99 (1) (2004): 1–56.Google Scholar
Romilly, Samuel. Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly. Vol. 2. London: John Murray, 1840.Google Scholar
Rooney, Sally. “Even If You Beat Me.” The Dublin Review. Spring 2015. thedublinreview.com/article/even-if-you-beat-me.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Government of Poland. Trans. Willmoore Kendall. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.Google Scholar
Ryan, Cressida. “Burke’s Classical Heritage: Playing Games with Longinus.” In The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Deckard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jonathan. Romantic Antiquity: Rome in the British Imagination, 1789–1832. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sasse, Ben. Them: Why We Hate Each Other – and How to Heal. New York: St. Martin’s, 2018.Google Scholar
Satkunanandan, Shalini. “Drawing Rein: Shame and Reverence in Plato’s Law-Bound Polity and Ours.” Political Theory 46(3) (2018): 331–56.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene. Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Scherer, Michael. “Inside the Secret World of the Data Crunchers Who Helped Obama Win.” Time. November 7, 2012. swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win/.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, Alessandro. “Didaxis, Rhetoric, and the Law in Lucretius.” In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Ed. Heyworth, S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Romanticism. Trans. Guy Oakes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Roman Catholicism and Political Form. Trans. G. L. Ulmen. Westport: Greenwood, 1996.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, Eckart. “Platonic Elements in the Structure of Cicero De Oratore Book 1.” Rhetorica 6(3) (1988): 237–58.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Seligman, Adam B., Weller, Robert P., Puett, Michael, and Simon, Bennett. Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Selinger, William. Parliamentarism: From Burke to Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Serwer, Adam. “America’s Problem Isn’t Tribalism – It’s Racism.” The Atlantic. November 7, 2018. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/racism-not-tribalism/575173.Google Scholar
Shaw, Tamsin. “Invisible Manipulators of Your Mind.” New York Review of Books. April 20, 2017. www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/04/20/kahneman-tversky-invisible-mind-manipulators.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Patrick. “Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory, 55 BCE-CE 39.” In Roman Literature and Ideology: Ramus Essays for J.P. Sullivan. Bendigo: Aureal Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
Simon, Felix. “The Big Data Panic.” Medium. March 25, 2018. medium.com/viewpoints/cambridge-analytica-and-the-big-data-panic-5029f12e1bcb.Google Scholar
Siroker, Dan. “How Obama Raised $60 Million by Running a Simple Experiment.” Optimizely. November 29, 2010. blog.optimizely.com/2010/11/29/how-obama-raised-60-million-by-running-a-simple-experiment.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles-Lettres. Ed. Bryce, E. J. C.. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, John E. “Time and Qualitative Time.” In Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Sipiora, Phillip and Baumlin, James S.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” The American Journal of Philology 62(2) (1941): 169–90.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Aristotle and Cicero on the Orators’ Playing upon the Feelings.” Classical Philology 33(4) (1938): 390–404.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “Cicero’s First Speeches: A Rhetorical Analysis.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69 (1938): 542–56.Google Scholar
Soni, Jimmy and Goodman, Rob. A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine. “Cicero’s ‘Brutus’: The End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 46 (2002–3): 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine. “Tribunician Sacrosanctity and Oratorical Performance in the Late Republic.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Ed. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. “America Wasn’t Built for Humans.” New York. September 17, 2017. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/can-democracy-survive-tribalism.html.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. “How Do We Cope with Trump?” New York. February 23, 2018. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/andrew-sullivan-how-do-we-cope-with-trump.html.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Robert E. Macaulay: The Tragedy of Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tacitus, . Dialogus de oratoribus. In Complete Works of Tacitus. Ed. Hadas, Moses, trans. Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb. New York: Modern Library, 1942.Google Scholar
Tanasoca, Ana and Sass, Jensen. “Ritual Deliberation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 27(2) (2019): 139–65.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato’s Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Thiers, Adolphe. The History of the French Revolution. Vol. 1. Trans. Frederick Shoberl. Philadelphia: 1844.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark. Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics. New York: St. Martin’s, 2016.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution. Ed. Elster, Jon. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Correspondance anglais. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 6. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. Trans. Gerald Bevan. New York: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Études économiques, politiques. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 9. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Souvenirs. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 12. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar
Trenchard, John. “Of Eloquence, Considered Politically.” November 17, 1722. In John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, Cato’s Letters. Vol. 2. Ed. Hamowy, Ronald. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1995.Google Scholar
Trevelyan, George Otto. The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1876.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, Christopher S. The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Van der Blom, Henriette. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. “Repetition and Emphasis in Rhetoric: Theory and Practice.” In Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 7: Repetition. Ed. Fischer, Andreas. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Vivenza, Gloria. Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith’s Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Volk, Katharina. “The Genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo.” In Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Ed. Papanghelis, Theodore D. et al. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Volk, Katharina and Zetzel, James E. G.. “Laurel, Tongue, and Glory (Cicero, De consulatu suo fr. 6 Soubiran).” Classical Quarterly 65(1) (2015): 204–23.Google Scholar
Wallace, David Foster. “Up, Simba.” In Consider the Lobster and Other Essays. New York: Little, Brown and Co., 2006.Google Scholar
Wallace, Robert W. “The Power to Speak – and Not to Listen – in Ancient Athens.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution. Ed. Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Waterlow, Sarah. Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle’s Modal Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Weber, Ronald. “Singer and Seer: Macaulay on the Historian as Poet.” In Papers on Language and Literature 3 (Summer 1967): 210–19.Google Scholar
Weeden, Lisa. “Acting ‘As If’: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40(3) (1998): 503–23.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “The Historical Text as Literary Artifact.” In Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wille, Günter. Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1967.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, Michael. “Quintilian and the Vir Bonus.” The Journal of Roman Studies 54 (1 and 2) (1964): 90–7.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wisse, Jakob. “The Bad Orator: Between Clumsy Delivery and Political Danger.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Ed. Catherine Steel and Henriette van der Blom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wisse, Jakob. “De Oratore: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Making of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Wisse, Jakob. “Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism.” In Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld. Ed. Abbenes, Jelle G. J., Slings, S. R., Schenkeveld, Dirk Marie, and Sluiter, Ineke. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Politics and Vision. Expanded ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. Tocqueville between Two Worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wood, Neal. “The Aesthetic Dimension of Burke’s Political Thought.” Journal of British Studies 4(1) (1964): 41–64.Google Scholar
Wood, Neal. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. “History.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Vol. 1. Ed. Sloane, Thomas O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Wooten, Cecil W. “Cicero and Quintilian on the Style of Demosthenes.” Rhetorica 15(2) (1997): 177–92.Google Scholar
Wooten, Cecil W. Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Fourteen-Book Prelude. Ed. Owen, W. J. B.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. “Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 34(4) (2006): 417–38.Google Scholar
Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zerba, Michelle. “Love, Envy, and Pantomimic Morality in Cicero’s ‘De oratore.’” Classical Philology 97(4) (2002): 299–321.Google Scholar
Zetzel, James E. G. “Review of Christopher P. Craig, Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches.” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 4(6) (1993): 446–51.Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.Google Scholar
Zuckerberg, Donna. Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar