Achinstein, Sharon. “Afterword.” In Milton’s Modernities: Poetry, Philosophy, and History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present, ed. Mohamed, Feisal G. and Fadely, Patrick. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2017, 349–354Google Scholar

Achinstein, Sharon. “Cloudless Thunder: Milton in History.” Milton Studies. 48 (2008), 1–12Google Scholar

Achinstein, Sharon. “Early Modern Marriage in a Secular Age: Beyond the Sexual Contract.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 363–378Google Scholar

Achinstein, Sharon. Milton and the Revolutionary Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Achinstein, Sharon. “Samson Agonistes and the Politics of Memory.” In Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes, ed. Kelley, Mark R. and Wittreich, Joseph. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002, 168–191Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. The End of the Poem: Studies in Poetics, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, trans. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. “What Is the Contemporary?” In What Is an Apparatus? and Other Essays, trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009, 39–54Google Scholar

Ali, Tariq. Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihad, and Modernity. New York: Verso, 2003Google Scholar

Aristotle, . “Poetics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984, Vol. 2, 2316–2340Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy and Tennenhouse, Leonard. The Imaginary Puritan: Literature, Intellectual Labor, and the Origins of Personal Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992Google Scholar

Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Augustine, . On Christian Doctrine, trans. D. W. Robertson, Jr. New York: Macmillan, 1958Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain. Being and Event, trans. Oliver Feltham. New York: Continuum, 2005Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain. “What Is a Poem?” In Handbook of Inaesthetics, ed. Badiou, Alain. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005, 16–27Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. “Epic and Novel: Toward a Methodology for the Study of the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981, 3–40Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. “Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel: Notes Toward a Historical Poetics.” In The Dialogic Imagination, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981, 84–258Google Scholar

Barker, Arthur E. “Structural Pattern in Paradise Lost.” In Milton: Modern Essays in Criticism, ed. Barker, Arthur E.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965, 142–155Google Scholar

Baym, Nina. “Melodramas of Beset Manhood: How Theories of American Fiction Exclude Women Authors.” American Quarterly. 33.2 (Summer 1981), 123–139Google Scholar

Behn, Aphra. Oroonoko, or, the Royal Slave, intro. Lore Metzger. New York: Norton, 1973Google Scholar

Bell, Millicent. “The Fallacy of the Fall in Paradise Lost.” PMLA. 48.4 (September 1953), 863–883Google Scholar

Bennett, Joan S. Reviving Liberty: Radical Christian Humanism in Milton’s Great Poems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Berman, Marshall. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin, 1988Google Scholar

Black, Scott. Without the Novel: Romance and the History of Prose Fiction. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. Heritage of Our Times, trans. Neville and Stephen Plaice. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991Google Scholar

Boesky, Amy. “Samson and Surrogacy.” In Milton and Gender, ed. Martin, Catherine Gimelli. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 153–166Google Scholar

Bradford, Richard. “Milton’s Graphic Poetics.” In Remembering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret. New York: Methuen, 1988, 179–196Google Scholar

Brague, Rémi. The Kingdom of Man: Genesis and Failure of the Modern Project, trans. Paul Seaton. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2018Google Scholar

Bryson, Michael. “From Last Things to First: The Apophatic Vision of Paradise Regain’d.” In Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence, ed. Medine, Peter E., Shawcross, John T., and Urban, David V.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2010, 241–265Google Scholar

Bryson, Michael. “The Gnostic Milton: Salvation and Divine Similitude in Paradise Regained.” In The New Milton Criticism, ed. Herman, Peter C. and Sauer, Elizabeth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 102–119Google Scholar

Bryson, Michael. The Tyranny of Heaven: Milton’s Rejection of God as King. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004Google Scholar

Burden, Dennis. The Logical Epic: A Study of the Argument of Paradise Lost. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967Google Scholar

Burt, Stephanie. Don’t Ready Poetry: A Book about How to Read Poems. New York: Basic Books, 2019Google Scholar

Bush, Douglas. Paradise Lost in Our Time: Some Comments. 1957, repr. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1945Google Scholar

Campe, Rüdiger. The Game of Probability: Literature and Calculation from Pascal to Kleist, trans. Ellwood H. Higgins, Jr. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Carey, John. “A Work in Praise of Terrorism? September 11 and Samson Agonistes.” Times Literary Supplement (September 6, 2002), 15–16Google Scholar

Carey, John and Fowler, Alastair, eds. The Poems of John Milton. New York: Longman, 1968Google Scholar

Chaplin, Gregory. “The Circling Hours: Revolution in Paradise Regain’d.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 265–283Google Scholar

Chernaik, Warren. Milton and the Burden of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017Google Scholar

Coogan, Michael D., ed. The New Oxford Annotated Bible, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Coiro, Ann Baynes. “Milton’s Essay of Dramatic Poesy: Samson Agonistes.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 97–120Google Scholar

Coiro, Ann Baynes. “Sufficient and Free: The Poetry of Paradise Lost.” In Milton Now: Alternative Approaches and Contexts, ed. Gray, Catharine and Murphy, Erin. New York: Palgrave, 2014, 83–108Google Scholar

Danielson, Dennis Richard. Milton’s Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danielson, Dennis Richard. “Through the Telescope of Typology: What Adam Should Have Done.” Milton Quarterly. 23.3 (October 1989), 121–127Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason, trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Dobranski, Stephen. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Donne, John. “An Anatomy of the World: The First Anniversary.” In The Complete Poetry and Selected Prose of John Donne, ed. Coffin, Charles M.. New York: The Modern Library, 1952, 185–197Google Scholar

Duran, Angelica. The Age of Milton and the Scientific Revolution. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2007Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. The Rape of Clarissa: Writing, Sexuality and Class Struggle in Samuel Richardson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Malden: Blackwell, 2003Google Scholar

Edwards, Karen. Milton and the Natural World: Science and Poetry in Paradise Lost. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Edwards, Karen. “Resisting Representation: All about Milton’s Eve.” Exemplaria. 9.1 (Spring 1997), 231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliot, T. S. “Milton I.” In On Poetry and Poets. London: Faber & Faber, 1957, 138–145Google Scholar

Ellwood, Thomas. The history of the life of Thomas Ellwood. Or, an account of his birth, education, &c. with divers observations on his life and manners when a youth: and how he came to be convinced of the truth; with his many sufferings and services for the same. Also several other remarkable passages and occurrences. Written by his own hand. To which is added, a supplement by J. W. London, 1714. 2nd ed., 246. 18th-century collections online: Range 7266. ECCO release date January 6, 2003Google Scholar

Empson, William. Milton’s God. 1961. Reprint: Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978Google Scholar

Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015Google Scholar

Fenton, Mary G. and Schwartz, Louis, eds. With Wandering Steps: Generative Ambiguity in Milton’s Poetics. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2016Google Scholar

Ferguson, Frances. “Rape and the Rise of the Novel.” Representations. 20 (Autumn 1987), 88–112Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Discovery as Form in Paradise Lost.” New Essays on Paradise Lost, ed. Kranidas, Thomas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969, 1–14Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. How Milton Works. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Induction and Silence: The Reader in Paradise Regained.” In Calm of Mind: Tercentenary Essays on Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes in Honor of John S. Diekhoff, ed. Wittreich, Joseph Anthony, Jr. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University, 1971, 25–47Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Spectacle and Evidence in Samson Agonistes.” Critical Inquiry. 15.3 (Spring 1989), 556–586.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Transmuting the lump: Paradise Lost, 1942–1979.” In Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989, 247–293Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. Versions of Antihumanism: Milton and Others. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Forsyth, Neil. The Satanic Epic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair. Triumphal Forms: Structural Patterns in Elizabethan Poetry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair. “Paradise Lost: Introduction.” In Milton: Paradise Lost, ed. Fowler, Alastair. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman, 1997Google Scholar

Friedman, Susan. Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity Across Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Froula, Christine. “When Eve Reads Milton: Undoing the Canonical Economy.” Critical Inquiry, 10.2 (December 1983), 321–347Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra M., “Patriarchal Poetry and Women Readers: Reflections on Milton’s Bogey.” PMLA. 93.3 (May 1978), 368–382Google Scholar

Glimp, David. Increase and Multiply: Governing Cultural Reproduction in Early Modern. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan. “What Dost thou in this world?” In Milton Now: Alternative Approaches and Contexts, ed. Gray, Catharine and Murphy, Erin. New York: Palgrave, 2014, 51–68Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan. “Samson Uncircumcised.” In Political Theology and Early Modernity, ed. Hammill, Graham and Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012, 282–298Google Scholar

Gray, John. Al Qaeda and What It Means to Be Modern. London: Faber & Faber, 2003.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. New York: Routledge, 1997Google Scholar

Gregerson, Linda. “Milton and the Tragedy of Nations.” PMLA. 129.4 (2014), 672–687.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989Google Scholar

Greene, Brian. The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. New York: Vintage, 2003Google Scholar

Guibbory, Achsah. “‘The Jewish Question’ and ‘the Woman Question.’ in Samson Agonistes: Gender, Religion, and Nation.” In Milton and Gender, ed. Martin, Catherine Gimelli. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 184–203Google Scholar

Guillory, John. “Dalila’s House: Samson Agonistes and the Sexual Division of Labor.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ferguson, Margaret W., Quilligan, Maureen, and Vickers, Nancy J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986, 106–122Google Scholar

Guillory, John. “From the Superfluous to the Supernumerary: Reading Gender into Paradise Lost.” In Soliciting Interpretation: Literary Theory and Seventeenth-Century English Poetry, ed. Harvey, Elizabeth D. and Maus, Katharine Eisaman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, 68–88Google Scholar

Guillory, John. “The Father’s House: Samson Agonistes in Its Historical Moment.” In Remembering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret. New York: Methuen, 1988, 148–176Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Modernity – An Incomplete Project.” In The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Post Modern Culture, ed. Foster, Hal. Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press, 1983, 3–15Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987Google Scholar

Hanford, James Holly. “Samson Agonistes and Milton in Old Age.” In Twentieth Century Interpretations of Samson Agonistes, ed. Crum, Galbraith M.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968, 14–32Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Press, 2004Google Scholar

Haskin, Dayton. Milton’s Burden of Interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Penn Press, 1994Google Scholar

Hawkes, David. John Milton: A Hero of Our Time. Berkeley: Counterpoint, 2009Google Scholar

Hayot, Eric. On Literary Worlds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Heise, Ursula. “Chronoschisms.” In Essentials of the Theory of Fiction. 3rd ed. Hoffman, Michael J. and Murphy, Patrick D.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005, 361–385Google Scholar

Herman, Peter. Destabilizing Milton: “Paradise Lost” and the Poetics of Incertitude. New York: Palgrave, 2005Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas in the English Revolution. New York: Viking, 1972Google Scholar

Hiltner, Ken. Milton and Ecology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar

HirschJr, E. D. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul. Before Novels: The Cultural Contexts of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New York: Norton, 1990Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. New York: Verso, 2002Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. “Religion and Ideology: A Political Reading of Paradise Lost.” In Literature, Politics, and Theory: Papers from the Essex Conference, 1976–1984, ed. Barker, Francis, Hulme, Peter, Iversen, Margaret, and Loxley, Diana. New York: Methuen, 1986, 35–56Google Scholar

Jauss, Hans Robert. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” In Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982, 3–45Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. The Lives of the English Poets, ed. Hill, George Birkbeck. 3 vols. 1905; reprint, New York: Octagon Books, 1967Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. “Milton.” In Lives of the English Poets. 2 vols. New York: Dutton, 1950, 55–114Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. The Rambler 139 July 16, 1751, ed. Bate, W. J. and Strauss, Albrecht. Vol. 2. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969, 370–376Google Scholar

Jordan, Matthew. Milton and Modernity: Politics, Masculinity and Paradise Lost. New York: Palgrave, 2001Google Scholar

Juergensmeyer, Mark. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001Google Scholar

Kahn, Victoria. “Disappointed Nationalism: Milton in the Context of Seventeenth-Century Debates about the Nation-State.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. Loewenstein, David and Stevens, Paul. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016, 249–272Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question What Is Enlightenment?” In What Is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, ed. Schmidt, James. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, 58–64Google Scholar

Kean, Margaret. “Paradise Regained.” In A Companion to Milton, ed. Corns, Thomas N.. Malden: Blackwell, 2001, 429–443Google Scholar

King, Thomas A. The Gendering of Men, 1600–1750: The English Phallus. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004Google Scholar

Knoppers, Laura Lunger. Politicizing Domesticity: From Henrietta Maria to Milton’s Eve. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “‘England’s Case’: Contexts of the 1671 Poems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, 571–588Google Scholar

Knoppers, Laura Lunger. Historicizing Milton: Spectacle, Power, and Poetry in Restoration England. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1994Google Scholar

Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “Preface: Milton’s Poetics.” Milton Studies. 59 (2018), vii–x.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, Leszek. Modernity on Endless Trial, trans. Stefan Czerniawski, Wolfgang Freis, and Agnieszka Kolakowska. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar

Kolbrener, William. Milton’s Warring Angels: A Study of Critical Engagements. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar

Kornbluh, Anna. The Order of Forms: Realism, Formalism, and Social Space. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. Sediments of Time: On Possible Histories, trans. and ed. Franzel, Sean and Hoffman, Stefan-Ludwig. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2018Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. “What Is Modernity?” In Introduction to Modernity: Twelve Preludes, September 1959–May 1961, trans. John Moore. New York: Verso, 2011, 168–238Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory, trans. David Macey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988Google Scholar

Leo, Russ. Tragedy as Philosophy in the Reformation World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Leonard, John. Naming in Paradise: Milton and the Language of Adam and Eve. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Leonard, John. “Self-Contradicting Puns in Paradise Lost.” In A Companion to Milton, ed. Corns, Thomas N.. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001, 393–410Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. “The Prohibition against Representation and ‘The Rights of Man’.” In Alterity and Transcendence, trans. Michael B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, 121–130Google Scholar

Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015Google Scholar

Levine, Joseph. The Battle of the Books: History and Literature in the Augustan Age. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. Milton’s Brief Epic: The Genre, Meaning, and Art of Paradise Regained. Providence: Brown University Press, 1966Google Scholar

Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. “Milton’s Idea of Authorship.” In Milton in the Age of Fish: Essays on Authorship, Text, and Terrorism, ed. Lieb, Michael and Labriola, Albert. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2006, 53–79Google Scholar

Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. The Life of John Milton. Malden: Blackwell, 2000Google Scholar

Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer. Paradise Lost and the Rhetoric of Literary Forms. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. A Preface to Paradise Lost. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962Google Scholar

Lieb, Michael. “‘Our Living Dread’: The God of Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies: The Milton Samson, ed. Labriola, Albert and Lieb, Michael. 33. 1996, 3–25Google Scholar

Lincoln, Bruce. Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003Google Scholar

Loewenstein, David. “From Politics to Faith in the Great Poems?” In Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence, ed. Medine, Peter E., Shawcross, John T., and Urban, David V.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2010, 269–285Google Scholar

Loewenstein, David. Representing Revolution in Milton and His Contemporaries: Religion, Politics, and Polemics in Radical Puritanism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luther, Martin. “The Pagan Servitude of the Church (1520).” In Martin Luther: Selections from His Writings, ed. with an introduction by John Dillenberger. Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1961, 249–359Google Scholar

Luxon, Thomas H. Single Imperfection: Milton, Marriage and Friendship. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Lynch, Deidre Shauna. The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998Google Scholar

MacKellar, Walter. A Variorum Commentary on the Poems of John Milton: Paradise Regained. With a Review of Studies of Style and Verse Form by Edward R. Weismiller. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975Google Scholar

Macpherson, Sandra. Harm’s Way: Tragic Responsibility and the Novel Form. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. Ethics, Evil and Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel: 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. “Paradise Lost in the Long Restoration, 1660–1742.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro., Ann Baynes New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 503–530Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. The Secret History of Domesticity: Public, Private, and the Division of Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Madsen, William. From Shadowy Types to Truth: Studies in Milton’s Symbolism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968Google Scholar

Mancuso, Paolo and Vailati, Ezio. “Torricelli’s Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the Seventeenth Century.” ISIS (1991), 82, 50–70Google Scholar

Martin, Catherine Gimelli. “John Dennis, John Locke, and the Sublimation of Revolt: Samson Agonistes after the Glorious Revolution.” In Milton in the Long Restoration, ed. Hoxby, Blair and Coiro, Ann Baynes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 121–142Google Scholar

Martin, Catherine Gimelli. The Ruins of Allegory: Paradise Lost and the Metamorphosis of Epic Convention. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998Google Scholar

Martz, Louis L. “Paradise Regained: The Interior Teacher.” In Milton’s Epic Poetry: Essays on Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained, ed. Patrides, C. A.. Hammondsworth: Penguin, 1967, 348–376Google Scholar

McColley, Diane Kelsey. Milton’s Eve. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983Google Scholar

Mignolo, Walter D. “The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.” South Atlantic Quarterly. 101.1 (Winter 2002), 57–96Google Scholar

Milner, Andrew. John Milton and the English Revolution. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble, 1981Google Scholar

Miller, Tim, ed. The Critical Response to John Milton’s Paradise Lost. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1997Google Scholar

Milton, John. Areopagitica. Complete Prose Works, ed. Sirluck, Ernest. Vol. 2. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959, 486–570Google Scholar

Milton, John. The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce. In Complete Prose Works. Vol. 2, ed. Sirluck, Ernest. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959, 222–356Google Scholar

Milton, John. John Milton, ed. Orgel, Stephen and Goldberg, Jonathan. New York, Oxford University Press, 1991, 355Google Scholar

Milton, John. “Letter to Peter Heimbach.” August 15, 1666. In Complete Prose Works. Vol. 8, ed. Kelley, Maurice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982 , 3–4Google Scholar

Milton, John. Milton: The Complete Shorter Poems, ed. Carey, John. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 1997Google Scholar

Milton, John. Reason of Church Government. In Complete Prose Works. Vol. 1, ed. Wolfe, Donald M.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953, 745–861Google Scholar

Milton, John. The Second Defense of the English People. In Complete Prose Works. Vol. 4, Part I, ed. Wolfe, Don M.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966, 548–686Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco. Modern Epic: The World System from Goethe to Garcia Marquez. New York: Verso, 1996Google Scholar

Morrissey, Lee. From the Temple to the Castle: An Architectural History of British Literature, 1660–1760. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1999Google Scholar

Morrissey, Lee. The Constitution of Literature: Literacy, Democracy, and Early English Literary Criticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. “Democracy, Power, and the Political.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, 245–256Google Scholar

Moyles, R. G. The Text of Paradise Lost: A Study in Editorial Procedure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985Google Scholar

Nagel, Alexander and Wood, Christopher S.. Anachronic Renaissance. New York: Zone Books, 2010Google Scholar

Nancy, Jean-Luc. Being Singular Plural, trans. Robert Richardson and Anne O’Byrne. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Norbrook, David. Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627–1660. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011Google Scholar

Nuttall, A. D. Why Does Tragedy Give Pleasure? Oxford: Clarendon, 2001Google Scholar

Nyquist, Mary. “Fallen Differences, Phallogocentric Discourses: Losing Paradise Lost to History.” In Post-structuralism and the Question of History, ed. Attridge, Derek, Bennington, Geoff, and Young, Robert. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 212–243Google Scholar

Paige, Nicholas. Before Fiction: The Ancièn Regime of the Novel. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011Google Scholar

Pateman, Carol. The Sexual Contract. 30th Anniversary Edition, with a New Preface by the Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019Google Scholar

Patterson, Annabel. “No Mere Amatorious Novel?” In Politics, Poetics, and Hermeneutics in Milton’s Prose, ed. Loewenstein, David and Turner, James Grantham. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990, 85–101Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Petty, Sir William. Political Arithmetick, or a Discourse Concerning the Extent and Value of Lands, People, Buildings; Husbandry, Manufacture, Commerce, Fishery, Artizans, Seamen, Soldiers; Public Revenues, Interest, Taxes, Superlucration, Registries, Banks; Valuation of Men, Increasing of Seamen, of Militia’s, Harbours, Situation, Shipping, Power at Sea, &c. As the same relates to every Country in general, but more particularly to the Territories of His Majesty of Great Britain, and his Neighbours of Holland, Zealand, and France. London, 1691Google Scholar

Picciotto, Joanna. Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Poole, William. Milton and the Idea of the Fall. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Poole, William. Milton and the Making of Paradise Lost. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017Google Scholar

Porter, Roy. The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment. New York: Norton, 2000Google Scholar

Quint, David. “David’s Census: Milton’s Politics and Paradise Regained.” In Remembering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions, ed. Nyquist, Mary and Ferguson, Margaret. New York: Methuen, 1988, 128–147Google Scholar

Quint, David. Inside Paradise Lost: Reading the Designs of Milton’s Epic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Rajan, Balachandra. Milton and the Climates of Reading: Essays by Balachandra Rajan. Afterword Joseph A. Wittreich. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006Google Scholar

Rajan, Balachandra. “The Imperial Temptation.” In Milton and the Imperial Vision, ed. Rajan, Balachandra and Sauer, Elizabeth. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1999, 294–314.Google Scholar

Ranciére, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. Afterword by Slavoj Žižek. New York: Continuum, 2004Google Scholar

Raymond, Joad. “Look Homeward Angel: Guardian Angels and Nationhood in Seventeenth-Century England.” In Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England, ed. David Loewenstein and Paul Stevens. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016, 139–172Google Scholar

Reisner, Noam. Milton and the Ineffable. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Revard, Stella “Charles, Christ, and Icon of Kingship in Paradise Regain’d.” In Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence, ed. Medine, Peter E., Shawcross, John T., and Urban, David V.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2010, 215–239Google Scholar

Richardson, Samuel. Clarissa, or the History of a Young Lady. New York: Penguin, 1985Google Scholar

Richardson, Samuel. Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded, ed. Sabor, Peter. Margaret Doody, introduction. New York: Penguin, 1982Google Scholar

Robinson, Marilyn. Absence of Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Rogers, John. “Paradise Regained and the Memory of Paradise Lost.” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, 589–612Google Scholar

Rogers, John. “The Secret of Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies: The Milton Samson, ed. Albert Labriola and Michael Lieb, 33 (1996), 111–132.Google Scholar

Rogers, John. The Matter of Revolution: Science, Poetry, and Politics in the Age of Milton. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Rose, Mary Beth. “Why Is the Virgin Mary in Paradise Regain’d.” In Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence, ed. Medine, Peter E., Shawcross, John T., and Urban, David V.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2010, 193–213Google Scholar

Roth, Philip. The Plot Against America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004Google Scholar

Rumrich, John. Milton Unbound: Controversy and Reinterpretation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Rushdy, Ashraf H. A. The Empty Garden: The Subject of Late Milton. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1992Google Scholar

Said, Edward. On Late Style: Music and Literature Against the Grain. New York: Pantheon, 2006Google Scholar

Scott, David. Omens of Adversity: Tragedy, Time, Memory, Justice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Serjeantson, R. W. “Samson Agonistes and ‘Single Rebellion.’” In The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. McDowell, Nicholas and Smith, Nigel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, 613–631Google Scholar

Shawcross, John T. Paradise Regained: Worthy T’have Not Remained So Long Unsung. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1988Google Scholar

Shawcross, John T. “The Balanced Structure of Paradise Lost.” Studies in Philology 62.5 (October 1965), 696–718Google Scholar

Shawcross, John T. The Uncertain World of “Samson Agonistes.” Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer, 2001Google Scholar

Sherman, Stuart. Telling Time: Clocks, Diaries, and English Diurnal Form, 1660–1785. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996Google Scholar

Shohet, Lauren. “Reading History with Samson Agonistes.” Milton Studies. 41 (2002), 94–116.Google Scholar

Shullenberger, William. “Imagining Eden.” In The Cambridge Companion to Paradise Lost, ed. Schwartz, Louis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 125–137.Google Scholar

Siedentrop, Larry. Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism. Penguin, 2015Google Scholar

Silver, Victoria. Imperfect Sense: The Predicament of Milton’s Irony. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Silver, Victoria. “The Problem of God.” In The Cambridge Companion to Paradise Lost, ed. Schwartz, Louis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 42–54Google Scholar

Simpson, James. Permanent Revolution: The Reformation and the Illiberal Roots of Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019Google Scholar

Song, Eric B. Dominion Undeserved: Milton and the Perils of Creation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013Google Scholar

Stedall, Jaqueline. “Introduction.” In Wallis, John. The Arithmetic of Infinitesimals, trans. Jacqueline A. Stedall New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004 [1656]Google Scholar

Stein, Arnold. “The Return of Samson.” In Twentieth Century Interpretations of Samson Agonistes, ed. Crum, Galbraith M. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968, 63–73Google Scholar

Stein, Gertrude. “Composition as Explanation.” In Gertrude Stein: Writings and Lectures, 1911–1945, ed. Meyerowitz, Patricia. Introduction by Elizabeth Sprigge. London: Peter Owen, 1947, 21–30Google Scholar

Swift, Jonathan. The Battle of the Books. In A Tale of a Tub and Other Works, ed. Ross, Angus and Woolley, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, 104–125Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. “Afterword: Apologia pro Libro suo.” In Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age, ed. Warner, Michael, Vanantwerpen, Jonathan, and Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010, 300–321Google Scholar

Teskey, Gordon. Delirious Milton: The Fate of the Poet in Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Teskey, Gordon. The Poetry of John Milton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015Google Scholar

Thickstun, Margaret Olofsun. “Fame, Shame, and the Importance of Community in Samson Agonistes.” In Milton’s Rival Hermeneutics: “Reason Is but Choosing,” ed. DuRocher, Richard J. and Thickstun, Margaret Olofsun. Pittsburgh: Duquense University Press, 2012, 183–203Google Scholar

Turner, James Grantham. “Libertinism and Toleration: Milton, Bruno, and Aretino.” In Milton and Toleration, ed. Achinstein, Sharon and Sauer, Elizabeth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, 107–125Google Scholar

Turner, James Grantham. One Flesh: Paradisal Marriage and Sexual Relations in the Age of Milton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987Google Scholar

Walker, Julia M. “Only the Phoenix Has a Womb: Samson and the Homeless Women of Israel.” In Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes, ed. Kelley, Mark R. and Wittreich, Joseph. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002, 54–71Google Scholar

Wallace, David Foster. Everything and More: A Compact History of ∞. New York: Norton, 2003Google Scholar

Warren, Christopher N. “Samson and The Chorus of Dissent.” In Uncircumscribed Mind: Reading Milton Deeply: Reading Milton Deeply, ed. Durham, Charles W. and Pruitt, Kristin A.. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2008, 276–291Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Modern Tragedy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966Google Scholar

Winstanley, William. The Lives of the Most Famous English Poets. London, 1687. Early English Books Online. Web. June 26, 2018. http://gateway.proquest.com.libproxy.clemson.edu/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&rs_id=xri:eebo&rft_id=xri:eebo:image:59216:110.Google Scholar

Wittreich, Joseph. Feminist Milton. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Wittreich, Joseph. “The Ramifications of Those Ramifications: Compounding Contexts for Samson Agonistes.” In Milton in the Age of Fish: Essays on Authorship, Text, and Terrorism, ed. Lieb, Michael and Labriola, Albert. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2006, 167–199Google Scholar

Wittreich, Joseph. Shifting Contexts: Reinterpreting Samson Agonistes. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Wittreich, Joseph. Why Milton Matters: A New Preface to His Writings. New York: Palgrave, 2006Google Scholar

Wittreich, Joseph. “A World with a Tomorrow: Paradise Regain’d and Its Hermeneutic of Discovery.” In Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence, ed. Medine, Peter E., Shawcross, John T., and Urban, David V.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2010, 109–135Google Scholar

Woods, Susanne. “How Free Are Milton’s Women?” In Milton and the Idea of Woman, ed. Julia M. Walker. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. “Milton, Samson Agonistes, and the Restoration.” In Culture and Society in the Stuart Restoration, ed. MacLean, Gerald. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 111–136Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William. “London, 1802.” In Selected Poetry, ed. Van Doren, Mark. New York: Modern Library, 1950Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. “Carl Schmitt in the Age of Post-Politics.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. New York: Verso, 1999, 18–37Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. The Fragile Absolute, or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? New York: Verso, 2000Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador, 2008Google Scholar