Book contents
Part II - Two-Party/Multi-Party Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Political Patronage in Asian Bureaucracies , pp. 97 - 228Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Abe, H. et al. (1990). The Government and Politics of Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Aberbach, J. D. & Rockman, B. A. (2009). The Appointments Process and the Administrative Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akizuki, K. (2010). History and Context of Public Administration in Japan in Berman, E. et al., eds., Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearfield, D. A. (2009). What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenschot, W. & Aspinall, E. (2020) How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies. Democratization, 27(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. C. (1989). Bureaucratic Primacy: Japanese Policy Communities in an American Perspective. Governance, 2(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. (1999). The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, B. (2018). Why Political Competition Can Increase Patronage. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, H. (1970). Party in Power: The Japanese Liberal-Democrats and Policy-making. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibney, F. ed. (1998). Unlocking the Bureaucrat’s Kingdom: Deregulation and the Japanese Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hayao, K. (1993). The Japanese Prime Minister and Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. D. (2014). Linking Capital and Countryside: Patronage and Clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines in Brun, D. A. & Diamond, L., eds., Clientelism, Social Policy and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 174–203.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, P. D. (2015). The Origins of Patronage Democracy: State Building, Centrifugalism, and Decolonization. British Journal of Political Science, 45(1) 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikuchi, M. (2010). Public Policy Process and Citizens Participation in Japan in Berman, E., et al., eds., Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 273–290.Google Scholar
Kingston, J., ed. (2019). Critical Issues in Contemporary Japan, Second Edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, B. C. (1989). Japan’s Administrative Elite. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kopecky, P. et al. (2016). Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, E. & Pekkanen, R. J. (2011). The Rise and Fall of Japan’s LDP. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclachlan, P. (2014). The Electoral Power of Japanese Interests Groups. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14, 429–458.Google Scholar
Muramatsu, M. & Krauss, E. (1984). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Policy Making: The Case of Japan. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 126–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, A. & Kikuchi, M. (2011). Japanese Public Administration at the Crossroads: Declining Trust in Government and Civil Service Reform in the Age of Fiscal Retrenchment in Massey, A., ed., International Handbook on Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. 282–304.Google Scholar
Painter, M. (2010). Legacies Remembered, Lessons Forgotten: The Case of Japan in Peters, G. & Painter, M., eds., Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 84–98.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., et al. (2019) Testing Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage. Public Administration, 97, 14–161.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1974). The Bureaucratization of Policymaking in Postwar Japan. American Journal of Political Science, 18(4), 647–664.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (1992). Political Parties and Representation: The Case of Japan. Political Science and Politics, 25(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. ed. (1990). Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, G. & Pierre, J. eds. (2004). The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, M. & Rosenbluth, F. (1993). Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, S. (2021). Patronage and Predominance: How the LDP Maintains Its Hold on Power. Social Science Japan Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyab033Google Scholar
Resh, W. G. (2015). Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, R. J. (1987) Research Collaboration in Japan. M.I.T.-Japan Science and Technology Program Working Paper No. 2. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Scheiner, E. (2007). Clientelism in Japan: The importance and limits of institutional explanations in Kitschelt, H. & Wilkinson, S. eds., Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Y. (2019). The Origins of the Modern Japanese Bureaucracy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Silberman, B. (1993). Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sorauf, F. J. (1960). The Silent Revolution in Patronage. Public Administration Review, 20 (1), 28–34.Google Scholar
Spaulding, R. M. (1967). Imperial Japan’s Higher Civil Service Examinations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Takenaka, H. (2014). Failed Democratization in Prewar Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, H. (2017). Interpretation of the Pacifist Article of the Constitution by the Bureau of Cabinet Legislation: A New Source of Constitutional Law? Washington International Law Journal, 26(1), 99–124.Google Scholar
References
Adiyamaa, S. (2021). Элчин сайдуудыг гацаагч Ерɵнхийлɵгч (The President who blocks the ambassadors). https://news.mn/r/2409524/ (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Anews. (2019). НИТХ-ын шинэхэн дарга С. Амарсайхантай танилц (Introduction of S. Amarsaikhan, the new chairman of the Citizen’s Representative Khural). http://m.anews.mn/?nid=19692 (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar
Bat-Ulzii, Erdenedalai. (2020). Монголын улс тɵрийн намын тɵлɵвшлийн асуудалд (Улс тɵрийн авилгын жишээн дээр) (On the development of Mongolian political parties (In the example of political corruption). Тɵрийн байгуулал судлал (Public Administration Studies), No. 3, 6–15.Google Scholar
Batbayar, Erdenebat. (2016). Democratic Revolution and Capitalist Development of Mongolia. Retrieved October 15, 2021. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/socresp_etds/4 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Batzaya, S. (2019, February 1). Хотоос “хотын фракц”-ыг салгах акц (An action to separate the “city faction” from the city). http://eagle.mn/r/56229 (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar
Bayarkhuu, D. (2021). Угаасаа дипломат албыг онилоод байгаа юм биш УУ? (Were they targeting the diplomatic service from the beginning?) www.sonin.mn/blog/bayarkhuud/121322 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Foundation. (2020). Bertelsmann Transformation Index. https://bti-project.org/en/index/political-transformation (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Civil Service Council, Mongolia. (2021, November 5). Монгол Улсын Тɵрийн албаны ʏйл ажиллагааны тайлан-2020 он (Civil Service of Mongolia in 2020: Annual Report). https://csc.gov.mn/s/52/914 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Civil Service Council and World Bank. (2020). Mongolia – Towards a High Performing Civil Service: Reform Progress and Challenges. World Bank, Ulaanbaatar.Google Scholar
Dierkes, Julian. (2016, September 12). Future of the DP? Mongolia Focus. http://blogs.ubc.ca/mongolia/2016/where-to-for-democratic-party/ (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Jargalsaikhan, Mendee. (2019). Small Islands of Democracy in an Authoritarian Sea: Explaining Mongolian and Kyrgyz Democratic Development. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Jargalsaikhan, Uriankhan B. (2001). Алаг жарны бодрол (Reflections on Sixty Years). Ulaanbaatar: Interpress.Google Scholar
Khangai, L. (2021). Москва дахь элчин сайдын яам: Тʏʏх, онцлог (Mongolian Embassy in Moscow: History and Particularities). Монгол-Оросын дипломат харилцааны хɵгжил-100 жил: ϴнгɵрсɵн, одоо, ирээдʏй (Development of Mongolian-Russian Diplomatic Relations – 100 Years: Past, Present and Future) Conference Proceedings. Ulaanbaatar: UdamSoyol.Google Scholar
Kherlen, Badarch. (2013). Integrating New Values into Mongolian Public Management. Ph.D. dissertation. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mair, P., and Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party patronage and party government in European democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Mahroor. (2005). Corruption in civil administration: Causes and cures. Humanomics, No. 3, 62–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxima Consulting. (2019). Perceptions of Corruption in Politics and Law Enforcement Bodies. Ulaanbaatar: Maxima Consulting.Google Scholar
MONTSAME. (2021). Шʏʏгчийн цалин (Judge salary) www.montsame.mn/mn/read/250546 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
Munkhtamir, B. (2021, February 10). Ерɵнхийлɵгч Х.Баттулга, “Голомт”-ын Д.Баясгалан нар хожсон (President Kh. Battulga and Golomt’s D. Bayasgalan won.) https://news.mn/r/2400569/ (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar
National Statistical Office, Mongolia. (2021). Монгол Улсын хʏн ам 2020 онд (Mongolian Population in 2020). https://1212.mn/BookLibraryDownload.ashx?url=Population_2020.pdf&ln=Mn (accessed November 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Nyamulzii, A. (2020, October 28). Х.Нямбаатар: УДШ бол компаниуд хуулийн зɵвлɵхɵɵ уралдаж тавьдаг газар биш (Nyambaatar: The Supreme Court is not a place where companies compete for placing their legal advisors). https://ikon.mn/n/20ug (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar
Oyunsuren, D. (2021). Дипломатуудтай хийсэн ярилцлага II (Interviews with diplomats II) in print.Google Scholar
Radchenko, Sergey and Jargalsaikhan, Mendee. (2017). Mongolia in the 2016–17 electoral cycle: The blessings of patronage. Asian Survey, 1032–1057.Google Scholar
Research Institute of Labour and Social Protection of Mongolia. (2017). Youth unemployment and economic inactivity. Research Report. Ulaanbaatar.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ryan. (2012). Unraveling the Population History of the Xiongnu to Explian Molecular and Archaeological Models of Prehistoric Mongolia. Las Vegas: University of Nevada.Google Scholar
Shuud.mn. (2015) Дипломат албанд орох хаалга 20 саяар нээгддэг ʏʏ? (Does the door to the diplomatic service open for 20 million?). www.shuud.mn/a/455133 (accessed on November 15, 2021)Google Scholar
Social Medee. (2021). Хууль бусаар томилогдсон гэх УИХ-ын гишʏʏн М.Оюунчимэгийн хʏʏ Б.Энхмɵрɵнг ажлаас нь чɵлɵɵлжээ (B. Enkhmoron, the son of MP M Oyunchimeg, who was allegedly illegally appointed, has been dismissed). http://socialmedee.mn/29678.html (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar
The Parliament of Mongolia. (2017). Law of Mongolia on the Civil Service. https://legalinfo.mn/mn/detail/15786 (accessed November 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Tsolmon, D., Oyunsuren, D., and Bayasgalan, S. (2009). Гадаад бодлого, дипломат ажиллагаа, дипломат албаны ʏндэс (Introduction to Foreign Policy, Diplomacy and Diplomatic Service). Ulaanbaatar: MunkhiinUseg Group.Google Scholar
Zumberellkham, Shurentsetseg. (2012). The Political Impact on the Civil Service System in Mongolia (Case study of personnel selection process). Master Thesis. Sejong: KDI School of Public Policy and Management.Google Scholar
24Barimt (24 Facts). (2018, November 15). Тɵрийн албаны ургийн мод (Family Trees in Civil Service). https://24barimt.mn/2263.html (accessed October 23, 2021).Google Scholar
References
Aberbach, J.D. and Rockman, B.A., 2009. The Appointments Process and the Administrative Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 38–59.Google Scholar
Askim, J., Karlsen, R., and Kolltveit, K., 2017. Political Appointees in Executive Government: Exploring and Explaining Roles using a Large-N survey in Norway. Public Administration, 95 (2), 342–358.Google Scholar
Bearfield, D.A., 2009. What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination. Public Administration Review, 69 (1), 64–76.Google Scholar
Chang, T.-C., 2008. The Political Logic of Economic Liberalization in Taiwan: The Transformation of Party-state Capitalism and the Reconstruction of State-business Relations. Taiwan Political Science Reviews, 12 (1), 101–145. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Chen, D.-Y., 2012. Democratic Governance: An Institutional Reconciliation of Public Administration and Democracy. Taipei: WuNan Book Inc. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Chen, M. and Chu, Y., 1992. Regional Oligopoly, Local Factions, and Provincial Assembly Elections. Proceedings of the National Science Council, 2 (1), 77–97.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. and White, L., 1990. Elite Transformation and Modern Change in Mainland China and Taiwan: Empirical Data and the Theory of Technocracy. The China Quarterly, 121, 1–35.Google Scholar
Cheng, T.-J., 1989. Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41 (4), 471–499.Google Scholar
Chiu, Y.-C. and Hsu, Y.-M., 2004. “New” Government, “Old” Bureaucracy: Regime Turnover and Mobility of Administrative Elites. Journal of Public Administration, 12, 1–40. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Cohen, J.E., 1986. On the Tenure of Appointive Political Executives: The American Cabinet, 1952–1984. American Journal of Political Science, 30 (3), 507–516.Google Scholar
Cooper, C.A., 2021. Politicization of the Bureaucracy across and within Administrative Traditions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44 (7), 564–577.Google Scholar
Duverger, M., 1980. A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8 (2), 165–187.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Matthews, F., 2010. Think Again: Patronage, Governance and the Smarter State. Policy & Politics, 38 (4), 639–656.Google Scholar
Hahm, S.D., Jung, K., and Lee, S.Y., 2013. Exploring the Determinants of the Entry and Exit of Ministers in Korea: 1980–2008. Governance, 26 (4), 657–675.Google Scholar
Hao, P.-C., 2013. The Evolution of Semi-presidentialism: Presidentialization and Cabinet Instability. Issue & Studies, 52 (1), 101–141.Google Scholar
Hart, P. ’t and Wille, A., 2006. Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart? Public Administration, 84 (1), 121–146.Google Scholar
Hollibaugh, G.E., Horton, G., and Lewis, D.E., 2014. Presidents and Patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (4), 1024–1042.Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.-M. and Chen, H.-C., 2004. Local Factions and the Kuomintang: Decline or Deepening Crisis? Taiwanese Sociology, 8, 193–228. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.-M. and Chen, H.-C., 2007. Intra-party Factional Competition and the Fate of the Party Election: A Case Study of the Democratic Progressive Party. Political Science Review, 31, 129–174. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Hu, L.-T., 2007. A Comparison on Administrative Elites’ Mobility before and after Party Alternation in Taiwan. National Elite, 3 (4), 31–42. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Huang, C.-H. and Chen, D.-Y., 2018. The Interaction between Political Appointees and Career Officials: A Study of Bureaucrats’ Tolerance of Politics in Taiwan. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 36 (2), 1–64. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Huang, T.-Y., 2013. From Value Difference to Partnership: the Interactive Management between Political Appointees and Bureaucrats. Taipei, Taiwan: WuNan Book Inc. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Huang, T.-Y., Chen, D.-Y., and Yu, C., 2005. The Political Attitudes of Public Managers in Taiwan. The Chinese Public Administration Review, 14 (2), 1–32.Google Scholar
Huang, T.-Y. and Huang, Z.-X., 2020. New Problems, Old Paradoxes? Assessing the Dual-track System of Third-Level Agency Heads’ Appointments. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 38 (2), 1–54. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Hung, M.-J., 2020. The Development and Impacts of the Politicization of Civil Service System: With Reference to the U.K. Case. Journal of Public Administration, 59, 31–65. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Jan, C.-Y., 2017. History and Context of Public Administration in Taiwan. In: Berman, E.M., ed. Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 497–516.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mair, P., and Spirova, M., 2014. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Sahling, J.-H.M., Panizza, F., Scherlis, G., Schuster, C., and Spirova, M., 2016. Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55 (2), 416–431.Google Scholar
Lee, D.S., 2018. Portfolio Allocation as the President’s Calculations: Loyalty, Copartisanship, and Political Context in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18 (3), 345–365.Google Scholar
Lewis, D.E., 2009. Revisiting the Administrative Presidency: Policy, Patronage, and Agency Competence. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 60–73.Google Scholar
Mansergh, L. and Thomson, R., 2007. Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking. Comparative Politics, 39 (3), 311–329.Google Scholar
Martínez-Gallardo, C. and Schleiter, P., 2015. Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 48 (2), 231–264.Google Scholar
Moe, T.M., 1985. The Politicized Presidency. In: Chubb, J.E. and Peterson, P.E., eds. The New Direction in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 235–272.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D.P. and Wilson, J.Q., 1964. Patronage in New York State, 1955–1959. The American Political Science Review, 58 (2), 286–301.Google Scholar
Neto, O.A., 2006. The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies, 39 (4), 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, O.A. and Samuels, D., 2010. Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: a Global Perspective. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos, 1 (1), 10–23.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., Peters, B.G., and Larraburu, C.R.R., 2019. Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97 (1), 147–161.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J., 2004. The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., and Boyne, G.A., 2017. What Explains Agency Heads’ Length of Tenure? Testing Managerial Background, Performance, and Political Environment Effects. Public Administration Review, 77 (4), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resh, W.G., 2015. Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Rudalevige, A., 2009. The Administrative Presidency and Bureaucratic Control: Implementing a Research Agenda. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., 2012. Comparative Research on the “Power Presidentialization” of Semi-Presidentialism. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 9 (4), 1–36. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Shen, Y., 2014. Government Type and Dual Executive System under the Semi-Presidentialism: Comparative Study of Taiwan and Romania. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 11 (3), 41–82. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Sorauf, F.J., 1956. State Patronage in a Rural County. The American Political Science Review, 50 (4), 1046–1056.Google Scholar
Sorauf, F.J., 1960. The Silent Revolution in Patronage. Public Administration Review, 20 (1), 28–34.Google Scholar
Su, T.-T., 2017. Civil Service Reforms in Taiwan. In: Berman, E.M., ed. Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 609–626.Google Scholar
Tsai, H.-C., 2012. Taiwan’s Democratic Governance: Interaction between Political Appointees and Bureaucrats. Taipei: Taiwan Brain Trust. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Tzelgov, E. and Wang, Y.-T., 2016. Party Ideology and Clientelistic Linkage. Electoral Studies, 44, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.-S., 2006. Judicial Independence Reform and the Breakdown of the Kuomintang Clientelism in Taiwan. The Taiwanese Political Science Review, 10 (1), 103–162. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wang, C.-S., 2007. The Openness of Political Market and the Breakdown of Local Factions. Journal of Electoral Studies, 14 (2), 25–51. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
Wang, C.-S. and Kurzman, C., 2007. Dilemmas of Electoral Clientelism: Taiwan, 1993. International Political Science Review, 28 (2), 225–245.Google Scholar
Wang, F., 1994. The Political Economy of Authoritarian Clientelism in Taiwan. In: Roniger, L. and Güneş-Ayata, A., eds. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. London: Lynne Rienner, 181–206.Google Scholar
Waterman, R.W. and Ouyang, Y., 2020. Rethinking Loyalty and Competence in Presidential Appointments. Public Administration Review, 80 (5), 717–732.Google Scholar
Weingrod, A., 1968. Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 10 (4), 377–400.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q., 1961. The Economy of Patronage. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (4), 369–380.Google Scholar
Wu, Y.-S., 2014. Comparing Development Models in Mainland China and Taiwan: A Macro Analytical Framework. In: Leng, Tse-Kang and Wu, Yu-Shan, eds. Chinese Models of Development: Global, Local, and Comparative Perspectives. 165–187.Google Scholar
Yu, C., 2016. Democracy and Administration: The Impact and Influence of Party Alternation on Civil Service. Journal of Civil Service, 8 (3), 1–20. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
References
Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2000). In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of The US Federal Executive. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Berlinski, S., Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2007). The length of ministerial tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945–97. British Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 245–262.Google Scholar
Choi, S. J. (2020). Korean civil service systems from recruitment to retirement. In Moon, C. I., & Moon, M. J. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Korean Politics and Public Administration. Routledge.Google Scholar
Choi, S. O., & Park, S. M. (2013). The Establishment of Career Civil Service System in the Korean Government. Ministry of Strategy and Finance.Google Scholar
Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2005). The corrective effect of ministerial resignations on government popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 46–56.Google Scholar
Durant, R. (1992). The American President Revisited. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765.Google Scholar
Haggard, S., Kang, D., & Moon, C. I. (1997). Japanese colonialism and Korean development: A critique. World Development, 25(6), 867–881.Google Scholar
Hahm, S. D., Jung, K., & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Exploring the determinants of the entry and exit of ministers in Korea: 1980–2008. Governance, 26(4), 657–675.Google Scholar
HollibaughJr, G. E., Horton, G., & Lewis, D. E. (2014). Presidents and patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1024–1042.Google Scholar
Hong, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Loyalty or competence: Political use of performance information and negativity bias. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 829–840.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D., & Martinez-Gallardo, C. (2008). Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 169–180.Google Scholar
Kim, B. H., & Hong, S. (2019). Political change and turnovers: How do political principals consider organizational, individual, and performance information? Public Choice, 181(3), 291–308.Google Scholar
Kim, B. K. (1987). Bringing and Managing Socioeconomic Change: The State in Korea and Mexico. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kim, P. S. (2004). Presidential personnel innovation for presidential appointees in Korea: toward an institutional presidency. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 24(3), 235–246.Google Scholar
Kim, P. S. (2009). A case for performance management for political appointees. Public Personnel Management, 38(4), 1–18.Google Scholar
Kohli, A. (1994). Where do high growth political economies come from? The Japanese lineage of Korea’s “developmental state”. World Development, 22(9), 1269–1293.Google Scholar
Krause, G. A., & O’Connell, A. J. (2011). Compliance, competence, and bureaucratic leadership in US federal government agencies: A Bayesian generalized latent trait analysis. Working paper.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Jae Moon, M., & Hahm, S. D. (2010). Dual faces of ministerial leadership in South Korea: Does political responsiveness or administrative responsibility enhance perceived ministerial performance? Administration & Society, 42(1_suppl), 77S–101S.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. E. (2011). Presidential appointments and personnel. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 47–66.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. E., & Waterman, R. W. (2013). The invisible presidential appointments: An examination of appointments to the department of labor, 2001–11. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1985). The politicized presidency. In Chubb, J. E. & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.), The New Direction in American Politics (pp. 235–271). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P., & Roberts, A. S. (2010). The triumph of loyalty over competence: The Bush administration and the exhaustion of the politicized presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 572–581.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Y., Haglund, E. T., & Waterman, R. W. (2017). The missing element: Examining the loyalty‐competence nexus in presidential appointments. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 47(1), 62–91.Google Scholar
Park, S., & Kim, B. S. (2014). Who is appointed to what position? The politics of appointment in quangos of Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 325–351.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, J. P. (1996). The Strategic Presidency: Hitting the Ground Running (2nd ed.). University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Poocharoen, O. O., & Brillantes, A. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 140–163.Google Scholar
Rho, S. Y., and Lee, S. J. (2017) History and context of public administration in South Korea. In Berman, E. M. (Ed.), Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan (pp. 329–354). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sundell, A. (2014). Are formal civil service examinations the most meritocratic way to recruit civil servants? Not in all countries. Public Administration, 92(2), 440–457.Google Scholar
Waterman, R. W. (1989). Presidential Influence and the Administrative State. University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1994). Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Westview Press.Google Scholar
References
Abinales, P. N. (2005). Life after the Coup: The Military and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Philippines, Philippine Political Science Journal, 26(49), 27–62.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Susan R., Desierto, Diane Alferez and Volosin, Natalia (2011). Hyper-Presidentialism: Separation of Powers without Checks and Balances in Argentina and the Philippines, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29(1), 246–333.Google Scholar
Alfiler, M. C. P. (2008). The Philippine Administrative System as Enabling Institution. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 52(2–4), 224–244.Google Scholar
Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G. and Löffler, L. (2018). More Delegation, more Political Control? Politicization of Senior-level Appointments in 18 European Countries. Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Baracskay, Daniel (2009). Political Patronage [electronic resource]. The First Amendment Encyclopedia, Middle Tennessee State University (accessed Jan 27, 2021). www.mtsu.edu/rst-amendment/article/1140/political-patronageGoogle Scholar
Billington, James H. (1999). Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Brillantes, A. B., Jr. and Fernandez-Carag, M. T. (2016). Building Executive Capacity in the Public Service for Better Governance: The Philippine Civil Service. In Podger, A. and Wanna, J. (Eds.). Sharpening the Sword of State: Building Executive Capacities in the Public Services of the Asia-Pacific (pp. 151–180). Acton, Australia: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Career Executive Service Board. (n.d.). CES Statistics Report. Retrieved from www.cesb.gov.ph/Google Scholar
Carino, Ledivina V. (1985). The Politicization of the Philippine Bureaucracy: Corruption or Commitment? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 51(1), 13–18, March.Google Scholar
Carino, Ledivina V. (1990). An Assessment of Public Administration in the Philippines, 1986–1988, PIDS Working Paper Series No.1990–03.Google Scholar
Civil Service Commission. (n.d.). Inventory of Government Personnel Overview. Accessed at http://www.csc.gov.phGoogle Scholar
Constantino as cited in Robles, Alan C. (2008). Civil Service Reform. Whose service? Development + Cooperation (D+C).Google Scholar
Constantino-David, Karina. (2007). “Politics, Perils and Pains of Building Institutions”. Keynote address to the Human Development Network General Assembly. March.Google Scholar
Corpuz, Onofre D. (1957). The Bureaucracy in the Philippines. Manila: University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
De Guzman, R. P., Brillantes, A. B. Jr. and Pacho, A. G. (1988). The Bureaucracy. In De Guzman, R. P. and Reforma, M. A. (Eds.), Government and Politics of the Philippines (pp. 180–206). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Endriga, Jose N. (2001). The National Civil Service System of the Philippines. In Burns, John P. and Bowornwathana, Bidhya (Eds.), Civil Service System in Asia (pp. 212–248). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedman, Eva-Lotta E. and Sidel, John T., (2000). Philippine Politics and Society in the Twentieth Century: Colonial Legacies, Post-Colonial Trajectories (p. 125). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heydarian, R. J. (2018). The Rise of Duterte: A Populist Revolt against Elite Democracy. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5918-6Google Scholar
Heywood, Paul M. (2018). Cooptation: Recruiting Clients and Patrons. In Ledeneva, A. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Informality: Understanding Social and Cultural Complexity, Volume 2 (Open Access) (pp. 380–382). [7.10] London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351899Google Scholar
Hodder, R. (2014). High-level Political Appointments in the Philippines. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4560-05-4Google Scholar
Jones, Clayton (1989). Assessing the Marcos Legacy. Philippines. The Christian Science Monitor.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (1995). Toward a More Comprehensive Analysis of Philippine Politics: Beyond the Patron-Client. Factional Framework. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(2), 401–419.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). ‘Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction’. In Kitschelt, H.and Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.), Patron, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mair, P. and Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, Peter (2020). A Patron-Strongman who delivers. Explaining enduring public support for President Duterte in the Philippines. A Peace Research Institute Frankfurt Report 1/2020.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. E. (2008). The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Alfred (Ed.). (1994). An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Ronald U. and Ocampo, Jude B. (2017). Caught between Imperial Manila and the Provincial Dynasties: Towards a New Fiscal Federalism, in: Public Policy vols. XVI&XVII, 29–51, https://t1p.de/6yv9Google Scholar
Mendoza, Maria Fe Villamejor and Baylon, Minerva S. (2018). “The State of the Philippine Public Bureaucracy: Challenges and Prospects” Paper presented at the International Conference on “The State of Public Bureaucracy in East Asia” held on 6–7 July, 2018 at the Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael and Norman, Phillipa (2009). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 2009.Google Scholar
Monsod, Toby C. (2015). Political intervention in the Philippine bureaucracy, 1987–2010: How, where and to what effect? UPSE Discussion Paper No. 2015–17.Google Scholar
Monsod, T.C. (2017). Political Appointees in the Philippine Bureaucracy: Do Increasing Numbers Help or Harm? Philippine Political Science Journal, DOI: 10.1080/01154451.2017.1320130, 2017Google Scholar
Ocampo, Romeo B. (2008). From Public Administration to Public Management, from Governance to Governmentality: Conceptual Challenges to Public Administration. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 52(2–4), 91–118.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy B., Larraburu, Conrado and Francisco, Panizza (2018). Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12560. Also in Public Administration, Wiley Online.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicisation: What Is It and Why should We Care? In Civil Servants and Politics (pp. 12–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert (2005). Oligarchic Patrimonialism, Bossism, Electoral Clientelism and Contested Democracy in the Philippines. Comparative Politics, 37(2), 229–50. DOI: 10.2307/20072884Google Scholar
Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert (2007). “Trapo Parties and Corruption” KASAMA Vol. 21 No. 1, Solidarity Philippines-Australia Network, January–March.Google Scholar
Reyes, Jeremiah (2015). Loob and Kapwa: An Introduction to a Filipino Virtue Ethics. Asian Philosophy 25(2), 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2015.1043173Google Scholar
Robles, A. C. (2007). The Asia-Europe Meeting: the theory and practice of interregionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American political science review 66(1), 91–113.Google Scholar
Tadem, T. S. E. (2018). Technocracy and Class Politics in Policy-making. In Thompson, M. R. and Batalla, E. V. C. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philippines (pp. 267–272). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Teehankee, Julio C. (2012). “Clientelism and Party Politics in the Philippines.” In Tomas, Dirk and Ufen, Andreas (Eds.), Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines (pp. 186–214). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark Richard (2014). The Politics Philippine Presidents Make, Critical Asian Studies, 46(3), 433–460, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjiptoherijanto, Prijono (2008). “Civil Service Reforms in the Philippines: The Role of Civil Society”, A Report Submitted to The Nippon Foundation Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines August.Google Scholar
Veneracion, J. B. (1988). Merit or Patronage: A History of the Philippine Civil Service. Quezon City: Great Books Trading.Google Scholar
Wong, Pak Nung and Lara-De Leon, Kristinne (2018). Padrino System (The Philippines) In Ledeneva, A. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Informality: Understanding Social and Cultural Complexity, Volume 2 (Open Access) (pp. 380–382). [7.10] UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351899Google Scholar
World Bank (2018). Strengthening Human Resources in the Philippine Bureaucracy: Developing a Modern, Fit for Purpose Civil Service to Support a “Middle Class” Society. Draft Report. www.cesb.gov.ph www.csc.gov.ph www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1987/07/25/executive-order-no-292/www.ocialgazette.gov.ph/1991/10/10/republic-act-no-7160-s-1991/ www.dbm.gov.ph 1987 Philippine Constitution PD 1 Act No. 5 Executive Order No. 292, Revised Administrative Code of 1987, Section 7. RA 11466 Rule I, General Policies on Recruitment, 2017 Omnibus Rules on Appointments and Other Human Resource Actions (ORAOHRA), Revised 2018.Google Scholar