Book contents
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- 1 The Morphogenetic Approach and Its Trajectory: A First-Person Account by the Author
- Part I Culture
- Part II Structure
- 5 Misrepresenting SAC as Dualism
- 6 The Majority of Agents Are the Dead: Implications for Central Conflation
- 7 Can Structuration and Morphogenesis Be Compatible?
- Part III Agency
7 - Can Structuration and Morphogenesis Be Compatible?
from Part II - Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- 1 The Morphogenetic Approach and Its Trajectory: A First-Person Account by the Author
- Part I Culture
- Part II Structure
- 5 Misrepresenting SAC as Dualism
- 6 The Majority of Agents Are the Dead: Implications for Central Conflation
- 7 Can Structuration and Morphogenesis Be Compatible?
- Part III Agency
Summary
Stones, unlike most Central Conflationists, argues for the articulation of the two approaches both ontologically snd methodologically. The concepts of dualism. Analytical dualism and duality are revisited and not found to be obstacles to compatibility
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Morphogenesis Answers Its Critics , pp. 142 - 162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024