Bibliography

Giulio Maspero

doi:10.1017/9781009412056.010

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2024

Giulio Maspero

Show author details

Giulio Maspero: Affiliation:
Pontifical Institute of the Holy Cross, Rome

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cappadocian Reshaping of Metaphysics
Relational Being
, pp. 225 - 236

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009412056.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandre, Monique. “La variante de Lc 11, 2 dans la Troisème Homélie sur l’Oraison Dominicale de Grégoire de Nysse et la controverse avec les pneumatomaques,” in Cassin, M. et al. (eds.), Grégoire de Nysse: La Bible dans la construction de son discours. Actes du colloque de Paris, 9–10 février 2007, Études augustiniennes (Paris: Institut d’études augustiniennes, 2008), 163–189.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, Theodoros. “Das unendliche Sichausstrecken (Epektasis) zum Guten bei Gregor von Nyssa und Plotin. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung,” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 10 (2007): 302–312.Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khaled. Athanasius: The Coherence of His Thought (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

Anatolios, Khaled. Deification through the Cross (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2020).Google Scholar

Arnou, Pierre. “Arius et la doctrine des relations trinitaires,” Gregorianum 14 (1933): 269–272.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. “(Mis)Adventures in Trinitarian Ontologies,” in Polkinghorne, J. (ed.), The Trinity and an Entangled World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010), 130–145.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. Nicea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Balás, David. “Eternity and Time in Gregory of Nyssa’s Contra Eunomium,” in Dörrie, Heinrich, Altenburger, Margarete and Schram, Uta (eds.), Gregor von Nyssa und die Philosophie, Zweites Internationales Kolloquium über Gregor von Nyssa, Freckenhorst bei Münster, 18.–23 September 1972 (Leiden: Brill, 1976), 128–158.Google Scholar

Balás, David. “The Idea of Participation in the Structure of Origen’s Thought. Christian Transposition of a Theme of the Platonic tradition,” in Origeniana. Premier colloque international des études origéniennes (Montserrat, 18–21 Settembre 1973), Quaderni di Vetera Christianorum 12 (Bari: Istituto di letteratura cristiana antica, Università di Bari, 1975), 257–275.Google Scholar

Balás, David. Metousia theou: Man’s Participation in God’s Perfection according to St. Gregory (Rome: Herder, 1966).Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Présence et pensée (Paris: Beauchesne, 1947).Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von. “Welt aus Trinität,” in Theodramatik IV (Einsiedeln: Johannes-Verlag, 1983).Google Scholar

Baltzly, Dirk. “Porphyry and Plotinus on the Reality of Relations,” Journal of Neoplatonic Studies 6 (1998): 49–75.Google Scholar

Barnard, Leslie William. “What Was Arius’ Philosophy?,” Theologische Zeitschrift 28 (1972): 110–117.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michel Rene. The Power of God (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Barwise, Jon, and Etchemendy, John (eds.). The Liar: An Essay in Truth and Circularity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Batllo, Xavier. Ontologie scalaire et polémique trinitaire: le subordinatianisme d’Eunome et la distinction ktiston/aktiston dans le Contre Eunome I de Grégoire de Nysse (Münster: Aschendorff, 2013).Google Scholar

Bausola, Adriano. La libertà (Brescia: La Scuola, 1990).Google Scholar

Berti, Enrico. “Attualità dell’eredità di Aristotele,” PATH 5 (2006): 302–305.Google Scholar

Berti, Enrico. Struttura e significato della Meatafisica di Aristotele (Rome: Edusc, 2006).Google Scholar

Bonazzi, Mauro. “Towards Transcendence: Philo and the Renewal of Platonism in the Early Imperial Age,” in Alesse, F. (ed.), Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelianism Philosophy (Leuven: Brill, 2008), 233–251.Google Scholar

Bouchet, Jean René. “Le vocabulaire de l’union et du rapport des natures chez S. Grégoire de Nysse,” Revue thomiste 68 (1968): 533–582.Google Scholar

Brugarolas, Miguel (ed.). Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium I. An English Translation with Supporting Studies (Leuven: Brill, 1988).Google Scholar

Campenhausen, Hans von. “Das Bekenntnis Eusebs von Caesarea (Nicea 325),” Zeitschrift fur die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 67 (1976): 123–130.Google Scholar

Chaitin, Gregory J. The Unknowable (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar

Chevalier, Jean. Saint Augustin et la pensée grecque. Les relations trinitaires (Fribourg: Librairie de l’Université, 1940).Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, Riccardo. “Le traité de Galien Sur la démonstration et sa postérité tardo-antique,” in Chiaradonna, Riccardo and Trabattoni, Franco (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism (Leuven: Brill, 2009), 43–77.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, Riccardo. Plotino (Rome: Carocci, 2009).Google Scholar

Clark, W. Norris. Explorations in Metaphysics (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Clark, W. Norris. The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Clark, W. Norris. Person and Being (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Clark, W. Norris. The Philosophical Approach to God: A New Thomistic Perspective (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah. “Afterword: Relational Ontology, Trinity, and Science,” in Polkinghorne, J. (ed.), The Trinity and an Entangled World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010), 184–199.Google Scholar

Coakley, Sarah (ed.). Re-thinking Gregory of Nyssa (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar

Coda, Piero. “L’ontologia trinitaria: che cos’è?,” Sophia 4 (2012): 159–179.Google Scholar

Coda, Piero. “Ontologia trinitaria,” in Lacoste, J. Y. (ed.), Dizionario critico della teologia (Rome: Borla-Città Nuova, 2005), 1412–1415.Google Scholar

Coda, Piero. Per una lettura trinitaria del prologo di Giovanni (Milan: Bompiani, 2007).Google Scholar

Coda, Piero, and Zák, Lubomir (eds.). Abitando la Trinità (Rome: Città Nuova, 1998).Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, vol. I (Leuven: Brill, 1985).Google Scholar

Conti, Alessandro. “La teoria della relazione nei commentatori neoplatonici delle Categorie di Aristotele,” Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 38 (1983): 259–283.Google Scholar

Cordovilla Pérez, Ángel. “The Trinitarian Concept of Person,” in Wozniak, Robert and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions and Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology (London: T&T Clark, 2012), 105–145.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. “Eunome l’Arien et l’exégèse neó-platonicienne du Cratyle,” Revue des Études Grecques 69 (1956): 412–432.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. “La notion de personne chez les Pères grecs,” Bulletin des Amis du Card. Danièlou 19 (1983): 3–10.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Origène (Paris: Ed. de la Table Ronde, 1948).Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Platonisme et théologie mystique (Paris: Aubier, 1944).Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. La Trinité et le mystère de l’existence (Paris: Desclée De Brouwer, 1968).Google Scholar

de Andia, Ysabel. “La koinônia du Saint Esprit dans le traité Sur le Saint Esprit de Saint Basile,” in de Andia, Y. and Leander Hofrichter, P. (eds.), Der heilige Geist im Leben der Kirche (Innsbruck-Wien: Tyrolia Verlag, 2005), 83–111.Google Scholar

De Haas, Frans. “Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle’s Categories?,” Phronesis 46 (2001): 492–526.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. Basil of Caesarea’s Anti-Eunomian Theory of Names: Christian Theology and Late-Antique Philosophy in the Fourth Century Trinitarian Controversy (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark, “The Influence of Athanasius and the Homoiousians on Basil of Caesarea’s Decentralization of ‘Unbegotten,’” Journal of Early Christian Studies 19 (2011): 197–233.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. “The Literary Corpus of George of Laodicea,” Vigiliae Christianae 65 (2011): 150–169.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. “Origen and Basil of Caesarea on the Liar Paradox,” Augustinianum 51 (2011): 349–365.Google Scholar

DelCogliano, Mark. “The Significance of George of Laodicea in the Fourth-Century Trinitarian Debates,” Studia Patristica 46 (2010): 307–311.Google Scholar

Dillon, John M. “Iamblichus νοερὰ θεωρία of Aristotle’s Categories,” Syllecta Classica 8 (1997): 65–77.Google Scholar

Dillon, John M. The Middle Platonists (Bristol: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Donati, Pierpaolo, Malo, Antonio, and Maspero, Gulio (eds.). Social Science, Philosophy and Theology in Dialogue: A Relational Perspective (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Dörrie, Heinrich, Altenburger, Margarete and Schram, Uta (eds.). Gregor von Nyssa und die Philosophie, Zweites Internationales Kolloquium über GregGregor von Nyssa, Freckenhorst bei Münster, 18–23 September 1972 (Leiden: Brill, 1976).Google Scholar

Douglass, Scot. Theology of the Gap: Cappadocian Language Theory and the Trinitarian Controversy (New York: Peter Lang, 2005).Google Scholar

Drecoll, Volker H. Die Entwicklung der Trinitätslehre des Basilius von Cäsarea: sein Weg vom Homöusianer zum Neonizäner (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, 1996).Google Scholar

Drecoll, Volker H., and Berghaus, Margitta (eds.). Gregory of Nyssa: The Minor Treatises on Trinitarian Theology and Apollinarism. Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa, Tübingen, 17–20 September 2008 (Brill: Leuven, 2011).Google Scholar

Duncombe, Matthew. Ancient Relativity. Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, and Sceptics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark J. Aristotle and Early Christian Thought (London; New York: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark J. “Clement of Alexandria and His Doctrine of the Logos,” Vigiliae Christianae 54 (2000): 159–177.Google Scholar

Escribano-Alberca, Ignacio. “Zum zyklischen Zeitbegriff der alexandrinischen und kappadokischen Theologie,” Studia Patristica 11 (1972): 42–51.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael, “The Reality of Relations: The Case of Quantum Physics,” in Marmodoro, A. and Yates, D. (eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 219–234.Google Scholar

Evangeliou, Christos. Aristotle’s Categories and Porphyry (Leuven: Brill, 1988).Google Scholar

Fattal, Michel. Du Logos de Plotin au Logos de saint Jean. Vers la solution d”un problème métaphysique? (Paris: Cerf, 2014).Google Scholar

Ferguson, Everett. “Progress in Perfection: Gregory of Nyssa’s Vita Moysis,” Studia Patristica 14 (1976): 307–314.Google Scholar

Girard, René. The One by Whom Scandal Comes (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Giulea, Dragoş Andrei. “Basil of Caesarea’s Authorship of Epistle 361 and His Relationship with the Homoiousians Reconsidered,” Vigiliae Christianae 72 (2018): 41–70.Google Scholar

Gnilka, Christian. Chrêsis: die Methode der Kirchenväter im Umgang mit der antiken Kultur: Der Begriff des “rechten Gebrauchs” (Basel: Schwabe, 2012).Google Scholar

Graeser, Andreas. Plotinus and the Stoics: A Preliminary Study (Leuven: Brill, 1972).Google Scholar

Grenz, Stanley J. Rediscovering the Triune God: The Trinity in Contemporary Theology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press 2004).Google Scholar

Grenz, Stanley J. The Social God and the Relational Self: A Trinitarian Theology of the Imago Dei (Louisville: Westminister Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Greshake, Gisbert. Der dreieine Gott (Freidburg: Herder, 1997).Google Scholar

Gunton, Colin E. The Promise of Trinitarian Theology (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991).Google Scholar

Hankey, Wayne J. “Theoria versus Poesis: Neoplatonism and Trinitarian Difference in Aquinas, John Milbank, Jean-Luc Marion and John Zizioulas,” Modern Theology 15(1999): 387–415.Google Scholar

Hanson, Richard P. C. The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988).Google Scholar

Harnack, Adolf von. History of Dogma, vol. II (New York: Dover, 1961).Google Scholar

Hauschild, Wolf-Dieter. “Die Antinizänische Sammlung des Sabinus von Heraclea,” Vigiliae Christinae 24 (1970): 105–126.Google Scholar

Hauschild, Wolf-Dieter. Gottes Geist und der Mensch (Mϋnchen: Chr. Kaiser, 1972).Google Scholar

Havrda, Matyáš. “Galenus Christianus? The Doctrine of Demonstration in Stromata VIII and the Question of its Source,” Vigiliae Christianae 65 (2011): 343–375.Google Scholar

Havrda, Matyáš. The So-called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria: Early Christian Reception of Greek Scientific Methodology (Leuven: Brill, 2016).Google Scholar

Haykin, Michael. The Spirit of God: The Exegesis of 1 and 2 Corinthians in the Pneumatomachian Controversy of the Fourth Century (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar

Hemmerle, Klaus. Thesen zu einer trinitarischen Ontologie (Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1983).Google Scholar

Henry, Paul. Les états du texte de Plotin (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1938).Google Scholar

Hermanin De Reichenfeld, Giovanni. The Role of the Holy Spirit in the Gospel of John within Origen’s and Augustine’s Commentaries, PhD diss., University of Exeter, 2018.Google Scholar

Hermanin De Reichenfeld, Giovanni. The Spirit, the World and the Trinity: Origen’s and Augustine’s Understanding of the Gospel of John (Turnhout: Brepols, 2021).Google Scholar

Him Ip, Pui. Origen and the Emergence of Divine Simplicity before Nicaea (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2022).Google Scholar

Iezzoni, Emanuele. “Ontologia trinitaria: dal mistero della rivelazione una sfida per la filosofia contemporanea,” Nuova Umanità 29 (2007): 187–224.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, Margherita. “Simplicio, gli Stoici e le categorie,” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 41 (1986): 3–18.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Werner. Humanism and Theology (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1943).Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001).Google Scholar

Karfíková, Lenka. “Infinity,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 423–426.Google Scholar

Karfíková, Lenka. “Ad Ablabium, Quod non sint tres dii,” in Drecoll, Volker H. and Berghaus, Margitta (eds.), Gregory of Nyssa: The Minor Treatises on Trinitarian Theology and Apollinarism. Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa, Tübingen, 17–20 September 2008 (Brill: Leuven, 2011), 131–168.Google Scholar

Kittel, Gerhard (ed.). Theologische Woerterbuch zum Neuen Testament, vol. IV (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1942).Google Scholar

Kobusch, Theo. “Name und Sein. Zu den sprachphilosophischen Grundlagen in der Schrift ‘Contra Eunomium’ des Gregor von Nyssa,” in Brugarolas, Miguel (ed.), Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium I. An English Translation with Supporting Studies (Leuven: Brill, 1988), 295–318.Google Scholar

Krämer, Hans Joachim, and Catan, John R. Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics: A Work on the Theory of the Principles and Unwritten Doctrines of Plato with a Collection of the Fundamental Documents (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Krienke, Markus, and Salato, Nicola. “A proposito di ontologia trinitaria. Il contributo di Antonio Rosmini Serbati ed Edith Stein, per una fondazione in chiave teosofica e fenomenologica della filosofia cristiana,” Rassegna di Teologia 49 (2008): 227–261.Google Scholar

Lacoste, Jean-Yves. Encyclopedia of Christian Theology, vol. I (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

LaCugna, Catherine Mowry. God for Us: The Trinity and the Christian Life (New York: Harper, 1993).Google Scholar

Lafont, Ghislain. Peut-on connaître Dieu en Jésus-Christ? (Paris: Cerf, 1969).Google Scholar

Laird, Martin. “Apophasis and Logophasis in Gregory of Nyssa’s Commentarius in Canticum Canticorum,” Studia Patristica 37 (2001): 126–132.Google Scholar

La Matina, Marcello. “Philosophy of Language,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 604–611.Google Scholar

Lamberz, Erich. Concilium Nicaenum II (787), Corpus Christianorum. Conciliorum Oecumenicorum. Generaliumque Decreta (Turnhout: De Gruyter, 2006).Google Scholar

Levering, Matthew. Scripture and Metaphysics: Aquinas and the Renewal of Trinitarian Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Lévy, Carlos “La question de la dyade chez Philon d’Alexandrie,” in Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.), A Platonic Pythagoras. Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007), 11–28.Google Scholar

Limone, Vito. Origene e la filosofia greca. Scienze, testi, lessico (Brescia: Morcelliana, 2018).Google Scholar

Ludlow, Morwenna. Gregory of Nyssa: Ancient and (Post)modern (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Luna, Concetta. “La relation chez Simplicius,” in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1987), 113–147.Google Scholar

Malingrey, Anne-Marie. “Philosophia”: Étude d’un groupe de mots dans la littérature grecque des présocratiques au IV e siècle après J. C. (Paris: Klincksiek, 1961).Google Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna. “Gregory of Nyssa on the Trinity (with Focus on His Letter ad Ablabius),” in Marmodoro, Anna (ed.), Exploring Gregory of Nyssa: Philosophical, Theological and Historical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 220–234.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna, and Yates, David (eds.) The Metaphysics of Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Ad Ablabium. Quod non sint tres dii,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 3–5.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Cavern,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 131–132.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “La cristología de Gregorio de Nisa desde la perspectiva del II Concilio de Costantinopla,” Scripta Theologica 36 (2004): 359–373.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. Dio trino perché vivo (Brescia: Morcelliana, 2018).Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “El Espíritu, la Cruz y la unidad: syndeô, syndesmos y syndetikos en Gregorio de Nisa,” Scripta Theologica 38 (2006): 445–471.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “The Fire, the Kingdom and the Glory: The Creator Spirit and the Intra-Trinitarian Processions in the Adversus Macedonianos of Gregory of Nyssa,” in Drecoll, Volker H. and Berghaus, Margitta (eds.), Gregory of Nyssa: The Minor Treatises on Trinitarian Theology and Apollinarism. Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa, Tübingen, 17–20 September 2008 (Brill: Leuven, 2011), 229–276.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Image,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 411–415.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. The Mystery of Communion. Encountering the Trinity (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Ontologia e storia in Jean Daniélou,” in Maspero, G. and Lynch, J. (eds.), Storia e Mistero. Una chiave di accesso alla teologia di Joseph Ratzinger e Jean Daniélou, ROR Studies Series 2 (Roma: EDUSC, 2016), 115–151.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio.“Relazione e ontologia in Gregorio di Nissa e Agostino,” Scripta Theologica 47 (2015): 607–641.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio.“Relazione e Silenzio: Apofatismo ed ontologia trinitaria in Gregorio di Nissa,” Augustinianum 53, no. 1 (2013): 105–116.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Remarks on the Relevance of Gregory of Nyssa’s Trinitarian Doctrine for the Epistemological Perspective of 20th Century Psychoanalysis,” European Journal of Science and Theology 6 (2010): 17–31.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Re-thinking Gregory of Nyssa’s Christology in the Light of Its Use (chrêsis) in the Second Council of Constantinople,” in Brugarolas, M. (ed.), Fourth-Century Christology in Context: A Reconsideration, Studia Patristica 112, (Leuven: Peeters, 2021), 159–178.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. Re-Thinking the Filioque with the Greek Fathers (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2023).Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “The Spirit Manifested by the Son in Cappadocian Thought,” Studia Patristica 67 (2013): 3–11.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Teologia biblica ed esegesi cristologico-trinitaria alla luce del rapporto tra historia ed oikonomia in Gregorio di Nissa,” Annales theologici 22 (2008): 11–34.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. “Theologia Ancilla Mysterii: epistemología relacional e interdisciplinariedad,” Scripta Theologica 50 (2018): 1–16.Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio. Trinity and Man (Leuven: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar

Maspero, Giulio, Degli Esposti, Mirko, and Benedetto, Dario. “Who Wrote Basil’s Epistula 38? A Possible Answer through Quantitative Analysis,” in Leemans, J. and Cassin, M. (eds.), Gregory of Nyssa’s Contra Eunomium III. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Gregory of Nyssa Colloquium (Leuven, 14–17 September 2010) (Leuven: Brill, 2014), 579–594.Google Scholar

Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco. “Apatheia,” in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 51–54.Google Scholar

Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco. “Cristologia e Linguaggio in Gregorio di Nissa,” in Moreschini, C. and Menestrina, G. (eds.), Lingua e teologia nel cristianesimo greco (Brescia: Morcelliana, 1999), 227–249.Google Scholar

Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco. “Notas sobre el lenguaje cristológico de Gregory de Nisa,” Scripta Theologica 35 (2003): 89–112.Google Scholar

Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco, and Maspero, Giulio (eds.). The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000).Google Scholar

Mees, Michael. “Mensch und Geschichte bei Gregor von Nyssa,” Augustinianum 16 (1976): 317–335.Google Scholar

Meinhold, Peter. “Pneumatomachoi,” in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Alterthumswissenschaft 21, no. 1 (1951): 1066–1101.Google Scholar

Meredith, Anthony. The Cappadocians (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995).Google Scholar

Merino, Marcelo. “El Stromata VIII de Clemente de Alejandría,” Scripta Theologica 37 (2005): 13–54.Google Scholar

Mignucci, Mario. “Aristotle’s Definitions of Relatives in Cat. 7,” Phronesis 31 (1986): 101–127.Google Scholar

Mignucci, Mario. “The Liar Paradox and the Stoics,” in Lerodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), 54–70.Google Scholar

Mignucci, Mario. “The Stoic Notion of Relatives,” in Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M. (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics: Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum (Pontignano, August 21–28, 1986), (Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1988), 129–217.Google Scholar

Milbank, John. “Only Theology Overcomes Metaphysics,” New Blackfriars 76(1995): 325–334.Google Scholar

Milbank, John. “The Second Difference: For a Trinitarianism without Reserve,” Modern Theology 2(1986): 213–234.Google Scholar

Milbank, John. The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar

Morales, Xavier. La théologie trinitaire d’Athanase d’Alexandrie (Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2006).Google Scholar

Moraux, Paul. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, vol. I (Berlin: Gruyter, 1973).Google Scholar

Moreschini, Claudio. I Padri Cappadoci (Rome: Città Nuova, 2008).Google Scholar

Moreschini, Claudio. Gregorio di Nissa. Teologia trinitaria (Milano: Rusconi, 1994).Google Scholar

Mugler, Charles. “ΕΞΙΣ, ΣΧΕΣΙΣ et ΣΧΗΜΑ chez Platon,” Revue des études grecques 71 (1957): 72–92.Google Scholar

Nautin, Pierre. “La Fin des Stromates et les Hypotyposes de Clément d’Alexandrie,” Vigilie Christianae 30 (1976): 268–302.Google Scholar

O’Byrne, Declan. For Us and For Our Salvation: The “Christological” Councils and Trinitarian Anthropology (Roma: Urbaniana University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Oeing-Hanhoff, Ludger. “Trinitarische Ontologie und Metaphysik der Person,” in Breuning, W. (ed.), Trinität: Aktuelle Perspektiven der Theologie (Freidburg: Herder, 1984), 143–182.Google Scholar

Otis, Brooks. “Gregory of Nyssa and the Cappadocian Conception of Time,” Studia Patristica 14 (1976): 327–357.Google Scholar

Papageorgiou, Panayiotis. “Plotinus and Eunomius: A Parallel Theology of the Three Hypostases,” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 37 (1992): 215–231.Google Scholar

Patterson, Lloyd G. “The Conversion of Diastema in the Patristic View of Time,” in Norris, R. A. (ed.), Lux in Lumine. Essays to Honor W. Norman Pittenger (New York: Seabury Press, 1966), 93–111.Google Scholar

Pazzini, Domenico. In principio era il Logos: Origene e il prologo del Vangelo di Giovanni (Brescia: Paideia, 1983).Google Scholar

Pérez de Laborda, Miguel. “La preesistenza delle perfezioni in Dio. L’apofatismo di san Tommaso,” Annales Theologici 21 (2007): 279–298.Google Scholar

Plass, Paul. “Transcendent Time and Eternity in Gregory of Nyssa,” Vigiliae Christianae 34 (1980): 180–192.Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, John. The Trinity and an Entangled World (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010).Google Scholar

Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Gregory of Nyssa’s Doctrinal Works: A Literary Study (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery: The Role of Philosophical Asceticism from Ancient Judaism to Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. “Apofatismo cristiano e relativismo pagano: un confronto tra filosofi platonici,” in Mazzanti, A. M. (ed.), Verità e mistero (Bologna: ESD, 2009), 89–144.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. “Origen’s Anti-Subordinationism and Its Heritage in the Nicene and Cappadocian Line,” Vigiliae christianae 65 (2011), 21–49.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. “The Trinitarian Theology of Gregory of Nyssa in his In Illud: Tunc et ipse Filius: His Polemic against ‘Arian’ Subordinationism and the Apokatastasis,” in Drecoll, Volker H. and Berghaus, Margitta (eds.), Gregory of Nyssa: The Minor Treatises on Trinitarian Theology and Apollinarism. Proceedings of the 11th International Colloquium on Gregory of Nyssa, Tübingen, 17–20 September 2008 (Brill: Leuven, 2011), 445–478.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph. Der Gott des Glaubens und der Gott der Philosophen. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der theologia naturalis (Trier: Paulinus, 2006).Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph. Introduction to Christianity (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Reale, Giovanni. Eros dèmone mediatore (Milan: Rizzoli, 2005).Google Scholar

Reale, Giovanni (ed.). Metafisica di Aristotele (Milan: Bompiani, 2004).Google Scholar

Reale, Giovanni. Toward a New Interpretation of Plato (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Reinhardt, Tobias. “Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories,” in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplementary Volume 94 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 513–529.Google Scholar

Rist, John M. “Basil’s ‘Neoplatonism’: Its Background and Nature,” in Fedwick, P. J. (ed.), Basil of Caesarea, Christian, Humanist, Ascetic (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1981), 137–220.Google Scholar

Robertson, Jon M. Christ as Mediator: A Study of the Theologies of Eusebius of Caesarea, Marcellus of Ancyra, and Athanasius of Alexandria (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Robertson, David G. “Relatives in Basil of Caesarea,” Studia Patristica 37 (2001): 277–287.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Philip. Basil of Caesarea (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 95–101.Google Scholar

Ruiz Aldaz, Juan Ignacio. “Contra Eunomium III”, in Mateo-Seco, Lucas Francisco and Maspero, Giulio (eds.), The Brill Dictionary of Gregory di Nyssa (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010), 307–310.Google Scholar

Runia, David T. “Why Does Clement of Alexandria Call Philo ‘The Pythagorean’?” Vigiliae Christianae 49(1995): 1–22.Google Scholar

Rüstow, Alexander. Der Lügner: Theorie, Geschichte und Auflösung (New York; London: Garland, 1987).Google Scholar

Samek Lodovici, Emanuele. Dio e mondo: relazione, causa, spazio in S. Agostino (Roma: Studium, 1979).Google Scholar

Sánchez Sorondo, Marcelo (ed.). La vita. Storia e teoresi (Rome: Mursia, 1998).Google Scholar

Scaltas, Theodore. “Relations as Plural Predications in Plato,” in Marmodoro, A. and Yates, D. (eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 19–35.Google Scholar

Sharples, Robert W. Peripatetic Philosophy, 200 BC to AD 200 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Scheffczyk, Leo, and Ziegenaus, Anton (eds.). Katholische Dogmatik II (Aachen: MM Verlag, 1996).Google Scholar

Schönborn, Christoph. L’icône du Christ: Fondements théologiques (Paris: Cerf, 2003).Google Scholar

Schwöbel, Christoph. Gott in Beziehung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002).Google Scholar

Sfameni Gasparro, Giulia. “Monoteismo pagano nella Antichità tardiva? Una questione di tipologia storico-religioso,” Annali di Scienze Religiose 8 (2003): 97–127.Google Scholar

Sferlea, Ovidiu. “On the Interpretation of the Theory of Perpetual Progress (epektasis). Taking into Account the Testimony of Eastern Monastic Tradition,” Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 109 (2014): 564–587.Google Scholar

Sharples, Robert W. Peripatetic Philosophy, 200 BC to AD 200 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Simonetti, Manlio. Il Cristo, vol. II, Fond. Lorenzo Valla (Milano: Mondadori, 1986).Google Scholar

Simonetti, Manlio. “Spirito Santo” in Monaci Castagno, A. (ed.), Dizionario Origene (Roma: Città Nuova, 2000), 450–456.Google Scholar

Soloviev, Vladimir. Politics, Law and Morality: Essays by V.S. Soloviev (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Sorensen, Roy. A Brief History of the Paradox. Philosophy and the Labyrinths of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Špidlík, Tomáš. “L’eternità e il tempo, la zoé e il bios, problema dei Padri Cappadoci,” Augustinianum 16 (1976): 107–116.Google Scholar

Spira, Andreas. “Le temps d’un homme selon Aristote et Grégoire de Nyssa,” in Colloques internationaux du CNRS (París: CNRS, 1984), 283–294.Google Scholar

Stead, George Christopher. “The Platonism of Arius,” Journal of Theological Studies 15 (1964): 16–31.Google Scholar

Steenson, Jeffrey N. “Basil of Ancyra on the meaning of homoousios,” in Gregg, R. C. (ed.), Arianism: Historical and Theological Reassessments (Cambridge: Wipf and Stock, 1985), 267–279.Google Scholar

Steenson, Jeffrey N. “Basil of Ancyra and the Course of Nicene Orthodoxy,” PhD thesis, Oxford, 1983Google Scholar

Strutwolf, Holger. Die Trinitätstheologie und Christologie des Euseb von Caesarea: Eine dogmengeschichtliche Untersuchung seiner Platonismusrezeption und Wirkungsgeschichte (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999).Google Scholar

Studer, Basil. Trinity and Incarnation: The Faith of the Early Church, ed. Louth, A. (London; New York: T&T Clark, 1993).Google Scholar

Taranto, Salvatore. Gregory di Nyssa. Un contributo alla storia dell’interpretazione (Brescia: Morcelliana, 2009).Google Scholar

Torrance, Thomas F. The Christian Doctrine of God, One Being Three Persons (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1997).Google Scholar

Torrance, Thomas F. The Trinitarian Faith (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988).Google Scholar

Troiano, Marina Silvia. “I Cappadoci e la questione dell’origine dei nomi nella polemica contro Eunomio,” Vetera Christianorum 17 (1980): 313–346.Google Scholar

Uribarri Bilbao, Gabino. “La gramática de los seis primeros concilios ecuménicos. Implicaciones de la ontología trinitaria y cristológica para la antropología y la soteriología,” Gregorianum 91 (2000): 240–254.Google Scholar

Ventimiglia, Giovanni. Differenza e contradizione. Il problema dell’essere in Tommaso d’Aquino: esse, diversum, contradictio (Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 1997).Google Scholar

Verghese, T. Paul. “διάστημα and διάστασις in Gregory of Nyssa. Introduction to a Concept and the Posing of a Problem,” in Dörrie, Heinrich, Altenburger, Margarete and Schram, Uta (eds.), Gregor von Nyssa und die Philosophie, Zweites Internationales Kolloquium über Gregor von Nyssa, Freckenhorst bei Münster, 18.–23 September 1972 (Leiden: Brill, 19, 243–258.Google Scholar

Vigorelli, Ilaria. La relazione: Dio e l’uomo. Schesis e antropologia trinitaria in Gregorio di Nissa (Roma: Città Nuova, 2021).Google Scholar

Vigorelli, Ilaria. “Schesis in Origen,” in Jacobsen, A-Ch. (ed.), Origen and Origenism in the History of Western Thought, Origeniana undecima (Leuven: Peeters, 2016), 885–900.Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav. Trinität und Gemeinschaft. Eine ökumenische Ekklesiologie (Mainz; Neukirchen-Vlyn: Grünewald; Neukirchener Verlag, 1996).Google Scholar

Weiswurm, Alcuin Alois. The Nature of Human Knowledge according to Saint Gregory of Nyssa (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Wickham, Lionel R. “The Syntagmation of Aetius the Anomean,” Journal of Theological Studies 19 (1968): 532–569.Google Scholar

Williams, Rowan. Arius: Heresy and Tradition (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002).Google Scholar

Wozniak, Robert, and Maspero, Giulio (eds.). Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions and Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology (London: T&T Clark, 2012).Google Scholar

Yannaras, Christos. Relational Ontology (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Zachhuber, Johannes. The Rise of Christian Theology and the End of Ancient Metaphysics: Patristic Philosophy from the Cappadocian Fathers to John of Damascus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Zambrano, María. Filosofía y poesía (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1996).Google Scholar

Zizioulas, John D. Being and Communion: Studies in the Personhood of the Church (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Zizioulas, John D. Communion and Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church (London: T&T Clark, 2006).Google Scholar

Zizioulas, John D. “Trinitarian Freedom: Is God Free in Trinitarian Life?,” in Maspero, G. and Wozniak, R. (eds.), Re-Thinking Trinitarian Theology (London: T&T Clark, 2012), 193–207.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive