Abeillé, A. and Godard, D. 2010. ‘Complex predicates in the Romance languages’, in Godard, D. (ed.), Fundamental issues in the Romance languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 107–70.Google Scholar

Alsina, A. 1996. The role of argument structure in grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Asudeh, A. and Toivonen, I. 2009. ‘Lexical-functional grammar’, in Heine, and Narrog, (eds.), pp. 425–58.Google Scholar

Bech, K. and Eide, K. G. 2014. Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börjars, K. and Burridge, K. 2011. ‘From preposition to purposive to infinitival marker: The Pennsylvania German fer … zu construction’, in Putnam, M. T. (ed.), Studies on German-language islands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börjars, K., Payne, J. and Chisarik, E. 1999. ‘On the justification for functional categories in LFG’, in Butt, M. and King, T. Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG99 conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Available at: http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/LFG4-1999/.Google Scholar

Börjars, K., Harries, P. and Vincent, N. 2016. ‘Growing syntax: The development of a DP in North Germanic’, Language 92: e1–e37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börjars, K. and Vincent, N. 2011. ‘Grammaticalization and directionality’, in Heine, and Narrog, (eds.), pp. 163–76.Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2008. ‘What will you have, DP or NP?’, in Elfner, E. and Walkow, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society meeting 37, vol. 1. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 101–14.Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2009. ‘More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages’, Studia Linguistica 63(2): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I. and Wechsler, S. 2015. Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, M. 2010. ‘The light verb jungle: Still hacking away’, in Amberber, M., Baker, B. and Harvey, M. (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure. Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, M. and Lahiri, A. 2013. ‘Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs’, Lingua 135: 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Ö. 2001. ‘Grammaticalization and the life cycles of constructions’, RASK – Internationalt Tidsskrift for Sprog og Kommunikation 14: 91–134.Google Scholar

Dalrymple, M. 2001. Lexical functional grammar. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francis, E. J. and. Michaelis, L. A. 2003. ‘Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory’, in Francis, E. J. and Michaelis, L. A. (eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Harries, P. 2015. ‘The distribution of definiteness markers and the growth of syntactic structure from Old Norse to Modern Faroese’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hinterhölzl, R. and Petrova, S. (eds.) 2009. Information structure and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jøhndal, M. 2012. ‘Non-finiteness in Latin’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1995. ‘Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax’, in Roberts, I. and Battye, A. (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford University Press, pp. 140–67.Google Scholar

Korn, A. 2011. ‘Pronouns as verbs, verbs as pronouns: Demonstratives and the copula in Iranian’, in Korn, A., Haig, G., Karimi, S. and Samvelian, P. (eds.), Topics in Iranian linguistics. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert, pp. 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeger, P. R. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Lander, E. and Haegeman, L. 2013. ‘ON as an NP language, with observations on the common Norse and Northwest Germanic Runic inscriptions’, Transactions of the Philological Society 111: 1–40.Google Scholar

Ledgeway, A. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Ch. N. and Thompson, S.A. 1977. ‘A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes’, in Li, Ch. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 419–45.Google Scholar

Nordlinger, R. and Sadler, L. 2007. ‘Verbless clauses: Revealing the structure within’, in Zaenen, A. (ed.), Architectures, rules, and preferences: Variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 139–60.Google Scholar

Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A Minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sag, I., Boas, H. and Kay, P. 2012. ‘Introducing sign-based construction grammar’, in Boas, H. and Sag, I. (eds.), Sign-Based construction grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. and Wu, Z. 2002. ‘From D to T: Determiner incorporation and the creation of tense’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11: 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toivonen, I. 2003. Non-projecting words: A case study of Swedish particles. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traugott, E. C. and Trousdale, G. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van de Velde, F. 2010. ‘The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP’, Linguistics 48: 263–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Gelderen, E. 2014. ‘Generative syntax and language change’, in Bowern, C. and Evans, B. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 326–42.Google Scholar

Vincent, N. 2001. ‘LFG as a model of syntactic change’, in Butt, M. and King, T. Holloway (eds.), Time over matter: Diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Vincent, N. 2016. ‘Causatives in Latin and Romance’, in Adams, J. and Vincent, N. (eds.), Early and late Latin: Continuity or change? Cambridge University Press, pp. 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar