Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:27:14.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Leila Kawar
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Contesting Immigration Policy in Court
Legal Activism and its Radiating Effects in the United States and France
, pp. 193 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelgawad, Elizabeth Lambert, and Weber, Ann. 2008. “The Reception Process in France and Germany.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, ed. Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone, 107–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1985. “Lawyers and the Power to Change.” Law and Policy 7 (1): 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1995. Politics by Other Means. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agrikoliansky, Eric. 2002. La Ligue Française des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen depuis 1945: sociologie d’un engagement civique. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
Agrikoliansky, Eric 2005. “‘Liberté, liberté chérie...’: la gauche et la protection des libertés publiques dans les années 1970.” In Sur la portée sociale du droit, ed. Israel, Liora, Sacriste, Guillaume, Vauchez, Antoine, and Willemez, Laurent, 325–40. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Alaux, Jean-Pierre. 2009. “Asile: des décisions assez peu productrices de ‘droit’.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 259–64. Paris: GISTI.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. 2002. Semblances of Sovereignty: The Constitution, the State, and American Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2003. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier-Aitsahalia, Sophie. 1994. “Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision.” Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 535–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen, and Vargas, Jeanette. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: EC Law and UK Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 452–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Ellen. 2006. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ansley, Fran. 2005. “Local Contact Points at Global Divides: Labor Rights and Immigrant Rights as Sites for Cosmopolitan Legality.” In Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality, ed. de Sousa Santos, Boaventura and Rodriguez-Garavito, César A., 158–80. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ansley, Fran 2010. “Constructing Citizenship without a License: The Struggle of Undocumented Immigrants in the USA for Livelihoods and Recognition.” Studies in Social Justice 4 (2): 165–78.Google Scholar
Applebaum, David. 2003. “The Syndicat de la Magistrature 1968–1978: Elements in the History of French White Collar Professional Unionism.” In Lawyers and Vampires: Cultural Histories of Legal Professions, ed. Pue, W. Wesley and Sugarman, David, 269–89. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold. 1976. Unequal Justice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balderama, Francisco E., and Rodriguez, Raymond. 1995. Decade of Betrayal: Mexican Repatriation in the 1930s. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A. 1976. “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation.” Yale Law Journal 85 (4): 470516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Michael, and Reynoso, Cruz. 1972. “California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA): Survival of a Poverty Law Practice.” Chicano Law Review 1 (1): 179.Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Hoffman, Steve G., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2012. “Situated Justice: A Contextual Analysis of Fairness and Inequality in Employment Discrimination Litigation.” Law and Society Review 46 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Gregg A. 1992. “Establishing the United States Asylum Officer Corps: A First Report.” International Journal of Refugee Law 1 (4): 455–85.Google Scholar
Beyer, Gregg A. 2000. “Striking a Balance: The 1995 Asylum Reforms.” Paper presented at the INS Symposium and Celebration on the Fifth Anniversary of the 1995 Asylum Reforms, Washington, D.C., January.Google Scholar
Blanc-Chaléard, Marie-Claude. 2010. “Face à l’immigration.” In Comprendre la Ve République, ed. Garringues, Jean, Guillaume, Sylvie, and Sirinelli, Jean-François, 481–98. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blum, Carolyn Patty. 1991. “The Settlement of American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh: Landmark Victory for Central American Asylum-Seekers.” International Journal of Refugee Law 3 (2): 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, and Shuman, Amy. 2008. Rejecting Refugees: Political Asylum in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia. 2014. “Courts in Control? The Impact of the Judiciary on the Making of Family Migration Policies in France, Germany and the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., August 28–31.Google Scholar
Bouziri, Said. 2005. “Itinéraire d’un militant dans l’immigration.” Migrance 25: 118–33.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1987. The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Brigham, John 1996. The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Andrew, and Kumin, Judith. 2003. “Interception and Asylum: When Migration Control and Human Rights Collide.” Refuge: 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. Neville, and Bell, John. 1998. French Administrative Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Thomas F., and Barnes, Jeb. 2012. “Making Way: Legal Mobilization, Organizational Response, and Wheelchair Access.” Law and Society Review 46 (1): 167–98.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the I.N.S. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty 2005. Immigrants at the Margins: Law, Race, and Exclusion in Southern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, Kitty 2010. Invitation to Law and Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassia, Paul. 2009. Robert Badinter: un juriste en politique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Chavez, Ernesto. 2002. “Mi Raza Primero!”: Nationalism, Identity, and Insurgency in the Chicano Movement in Los Angeles, 1966–1978. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Alan, and Cummings, Scott L.. 2012. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques. 1989. “Changement politique et droit administratif.” In Les usages sociaux du droit, ed. Centre Universitaire de Recherches Administratives et Politiques de Picardie, 293326. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques 1993. “Les interprètes du droit.” In La doctrine juridique, ed. Centre Universitaire de Recherches Administratives et Politiques de Picardie, 259–82. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques 1999. L’Etat de Droit. Paris: Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Chin, Gabriel J. 1996. “The Civil Rights Revolution Comes to Immigration Law: A New Look at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.” North Carolina Law Review 75: 273345.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Roberts, Simon. 1981. Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques, Demoulin, Laurence, and Robert, Cécile. 2000. La juridicisation du politique: leçons scientifiques. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. 2000. “Contingent Articulations: A Critical Studies of Law.” In Law in the Domains of Culture, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas, 2164. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Bo. 1997. “Procedures for Expedited Removal and Asylum Screening under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.” Connecticut Law Review 29: 1501–24.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan. 1993. The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan 2000. Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants’ Struggle for U.S. Residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan 2006. “Cause Lawyering and Political Advocacy: Moving Law on Behalf of Central American Refugees.” In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 101–19. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan 2011. “The Rights of Noncitizens in the United States.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 289308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2007. “The Internationalization of Public Interest Law.” Duke Law Journal 57: 891959.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., and Trubek, Louise G.. 2008. “Globalizing Public Interest Law.” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 13: 153.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine. 2008. Making People Illegal: What Globalization Means for Migration and Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBenedictis, Don J. 1992. “INS in a Mood to Settle.” American Bar Association Journal 78: 36.Google Scholar
De Felice, Jean-Jacques. 2002. “Etre avocat pendant la guerre d’Algerie.” In Des Français contre la terreur d’Etat, ed. Barkat, Sidi Mohammed, 149–58. Paris: Editions Reflex.Google Scholar
Dooley, John A., and Houseman, Alan W.. 1984. Legal Services History. Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Dréano, Bernard. 2004. “In Paris, the Global Place Is No More Saint-Germain-des-Prés.” In Exploring Civil Society, edited by Glasius, Marlies, 82–8. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ducamin, Bernard. 1981. “The Role of the Conseil d’Etat in Drafting Legislation.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 30 (4): 882901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2009. States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Escafré-Dublet, Angéline. 2014. Culture et immigration: De la question sociale à l’enjeu politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faget, Jacques. 1995. “L'accès au droit: logiques de marché et enjeux sociaux.” Droit et Société 30–1: 367–78.Google Scholar
Family, Jill E. 2008. “Threats to the Future of the Immigration Class Action.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 27: 71122.Google Scholar
Favier, Pierre, and Martin-Roland, Michel. 1997. La décennie Mitterrand. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Favoreu, Louis. 1988. La politique saisi par le droit. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Feldman, Gregory. 2012. The Migration Apparatus: Security, Labor, and Policymaking in the European Union. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferré, Natalie. 2009. “Victoires volées.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 227–38. Paris: GISTI.Google Scholar
Fournier, Jacques. 2014. “Le Conseil d’Etat précurseur du droit à la vie familiale.” Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 2: 95–6.Google Scholar
Frenzen, Niels. 2010. “U.S. Migrant Interdiction Practices in International and Territorial Waters.” In Extraterritorial Immigration Control, ed. Ryan, Bernard and Mitsilegas, Valsamis, 375–96. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter, and Harris, Paul. 1982. “Building Power and Breaking Images: Critical Legal Theory and the Practice of Law.” NYU Review of Law and Social Change 11: 369411.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. “The Radiating Effects of Courts.” In Empirical Theories of Courts, ed. Boyum, Keith D. and Mather, Lynn M., 117–42. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1990. “Case Congregations and Their Careers.” Law and Society Review 24 (2): 371–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganz, Marshall. 2009. Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaxie, Daniel, ed. 1995. Rapport sur l’analyse secondaire des enquêtes d’opinion relatives à l’immigration et à la présence étrangère en France. Paris: APRED.Google Scholar
Geddes, Andrew. 2003. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1968. Islam Observed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Genevois, Bruno. 2009. “Le GISTI: requérant d’habitude? La vision du Conseil d’Etat.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 6579. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2006. “Party Politics and Constitutional Change: The Political Origins of Liberal Judicial Activism.” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, ed. Kersch, Ken and Kahn, Ronald, 138–68. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James, and Edwards, James. 1999. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Ginesy-Galand, Mireille. 1984. Les immigrés hors la cité: Le système d’encadrement dans les foyers. Paris: Editions l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ginger, Ann Fagan. 1993. Carol Weiss King: Human Rights Lawyer, 1895–1952. Niwot: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
GISTI. 1975. Le petit livre des travailleures immigrés. Paris: Editions Maspéro.Google Scholar
GISTI 1992. Guide de la nationalité française. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Gleeson, Shannon. 2013. Conflicting Commitments: The Politics of Enforcing Immigrant Worker Rights in San Jose and Houston. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Brandt. 2005. Storming the Court: How a Band of Yale Law Students Sued the President – And Won. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Gomes, Charles. 2000. “Les limites de la souveraineté.” Revue Française de Science Politique 50 (6): 422–33.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jennifer. 2005. Suburban Sweatshops: The Fight for Immigrant Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Jennifer 2006. “A Movement in the Wake of a New Law: The United Farm Workers and the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act.” In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 277301. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Hugh Davies. 2003. Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grelet, Stany, Margeot, Philippe, Patouillard, Victoire, and Saint-Saens, Isabelle. 2001. “Vingt ans après: Entretien avec Assane Ba.” Vacarme 16 (Summer): 414.Google Scholar
Grillo, R. D. 1985. Ideologies and Institutions in Urban France: The Representation of Immigrants. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie. 2000a. “European Courts and Foreigners’ Rights: A Comparative Study of Norms Diffusion.” International Migration Review 34 (4): 1088–125.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie 2000b. Les politiques d’immigration en Europe: Allemagne, France, Pays-Bas. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie 2002. “European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-Making as Venue Shopping.” Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (2): 251–71.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie 2011. “Mobilization, Social Movements and the Media.” In Sociology of the European Union, ed. Guiraudon, Virginie and Favell, Adrian, 12849. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, David G. 1995. Walls and Mirrors: Mexican Americans, Mexican Immigrants, and the Politics of Ethnicity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien. 1997. Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm. 2007. “The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, ed. Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, 141. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Rebecca. 2014. Let Me Be a Refugee: Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F., Ginsberg, Betsy, and Snow, Arthur. 1978. “The Public Interest Law Industry.” In Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis, ed. Weisbrod, Burton, 4279. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel, Hollingsworth, Elizabeth, and Erlanger, Howard. 1978. Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haney-López, Ian. 2003. Racism on Trial: The Chicano Fight for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B., and Merry, Sally. 1988. “Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation.” Law and Society Review 22 (4): 709–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Gordon, and Jaffe, Sanford M.. 1973. The Public Interest Law Firm: New Voices for New Constituencies. New York: The Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Haus, Leah A. 2002. Unions, Immigration, and Internationalization: New Challenges and Changing Coalitions in the United States and France. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Helton, Arthur C. 1984/1985. “The Most Ambitious Pro Bono Ever Attempted.” Human Rights 12: 1848.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Thomas. 2006. “Constructing Cause Lawyering: Professionalism, Politics, and Social Change in 1960s America.” PhD diss., Institute for Law and Society, New York University.Google Scholar
Hing, Bill Ong. 2000. “The Emma Lazarus Effect: A Case Study in Philanthropic Revitalization of the Immigrant Rights Community.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal (Fall): 4797.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Abraham. 1974. Unwanted Mexican Americans in the Great Depression; Repatriation Pressures, 1929–1939. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2004. “The Emerging Migration State.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 885906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1985. “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law.” Law and Society Review 19 (11): 1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Liora. 2003. “Faire émerger le droit des étrangers en le contestant, ou l’histoire paradoxale des premières années du GISTI.” Politix 16 (62): 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, David. 1996. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, David, and Ruffer, Galya. 2003. “Courts across Borders.” Human Rights Quarterly 25 (1): 7493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Junker, Barry. 2006. “Burden Sharing or Burden Shifting? Asylum and Expansion in the European Union.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 20: 293322.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Jeffrey Sterling. 2013. “Islands of Sovereignty: Haitian Migration and the Borders of Empire.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Liberal Legalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kanstroom, Dan. 2007. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. 1999. French Lawyers: A Study in Collective Action. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien, and Halliday, Terence C.. 2011. “The Legal Complex.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawar, Leila, and Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2012. “Symposium: New Directions in Comparative Public Law.” American Political Science Association Law and Courts Section Newsletter 22 (3): 32–6.Google Scholar
Keleman, , , R. Daniel. 2008. “The Americanisation of European Law? Adversarial legalism à la européenne.” European Political Science 7: 3240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Tobias. 2012. This Side of Silence: Human Rights, Torture, and the Recognition of Cruelty. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Sally J., Reisinger, William M., and Reitz, John C., eds. 1999. Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersch, Ken I. 2006. “The New Deal Triumph as the End of History?” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, ed. Kahn, Ronald and Kersch, Ken I., 169226. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tim. 2003. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, Ira J. 1981. “Restructuring the Asylum Process.” San Diego Law Review 19 (1): 91117.Google Scholar
Laham, Nicholas. 2000. Ronald Reagan and the Politics of Immigration Reform. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre. 2009. “Changer le droit, changer la société: Le moment d’un retournement.” Genèses 77: 110–23.Google Scholar
Lasser, Mitchel. 2009. Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2002. La fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du Conseil d’Etat. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2004a. “Note brève sur l’écologie du droit saisi comme énonciation.” Cosmopolitique 8: 3440.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2004b. “Scientific Objects and Legal Objectivity.” In Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social, ed. Pottage, Alain and Mundy, Martha, 73114. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Anna O. 2010. The Immigration Battle in American Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. Turner, Bryan S., 141–58. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Henri. 1994. Un combat pour la justice. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Henri, and Blum, Michel. 1970. “Crise de la justice.” Après-Demain 122 (March): 46.Google Scholar
Legomsky, Stephen H. 1984. “Immigration Law and the Principle of Plenary Congressional Power.” The Supreme Court Review 84: 255307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legomsky, Stephen H. 1987. Immigration and the Judiciary: Law and Politics in Britain and America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Ron, and Valverde, Mariana. 2008. “Studying Law by Association: Bruno Latour goes to the Conseil d’Etat.” Law and Social Inquiry 33 (Summer): 805–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Leslie C. 2009. “Guardians at the Gate: The Backgrounds, Career Paths, and Professional Development of Private US Immigration Lawyers.” Law and Social Inquiry 34 (2): 399436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Mary Dewhurst. 2007. The Boundaries of the Republic: Migrant Rights and the Limits of Universalism in France, 1918–1940. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lochak, Danièle. 1985. Etrangers: de quel droit? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle 1987. “Code de la nationalité: la logique de l'exclusion.” Les Temps Modernes 490 (May): 54104.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle 1993. “Quelle legitimité pour le juge administratif?” In Droit et Politique, ed. Centre Universitaire de Recherches Administratives et Politiques de Picardie, 141–57. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle 2009. “Trente ans de contentieux à l’initiative du GISTI.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 4364. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Lochak, Danièle 2011. “Des droits fondamentaux sacrifiés.” In Liberté de circulation: un droit, quelles politiques?, 1023. Paris: GISTI.Google Scholar
Loescher, Gill, and Scanlan, John A.. 1986. Calculated Kindness: Refugees and America’s Half-Open Door, 1945 to the Present. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1997. “Preliminary Notes on Judges’ Work: The Judge as a Constituent of Courtroom ‘Hearings’.” In Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law, ed. Travers, Max and Manzo, John F., 99130. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mack, Kenneth W. 2005. “Rethinking Civil Rights Lawyering and Politics in the Era Before Brown.” Yale Law Journal 115: 256354.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2005. “L’émergence d’un champ des droits de l’homme dans les pays européens: Enjeux professionnels et stratégies d’Etat au carrefour du droit et de la politique.” PhD diss., Sociology, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Mangenot, Michel. 2005. “The Conseil d’Etat and Europe.” In French Relations with the European Union, ed. Drake, Helen, 14278. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, and Hale, Daniel Crocker. 2014. “Cause Lawyering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David A. 2002. “Behind the Scenes on a Different Set: What Congress Needs to Do in the Aftermath of St. Cyr and Nguyen.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 16: 313–38.Google Scholar
Massot, Jean, Fouquet, Olivier, and Stahl, Jacques-Henri. 2001. Le Conseil d’Etat, juge de cassation. 3rd ed. Paris: Berger-Levrault.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, and Yngvesson, Barbara. 1980. “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes.” Law and Society Review 15 (3): 775822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Lilian. 2006. “La double peine. Histoire d'un lutte inachevée.” La Dispute. http://terra.rezo.net/article339.html.Google Scholar
Maugendre, Stéphane. 2009. “Présentation.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 23. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Mauger, Gérard. 1994. “Gauchisme, contre-culture et néo-libéralisme: pour une histoire de la génération de mai 1968.” In L’identité politique, ed. Centre Universitaire de Recherches Administratives et Politiques de Picardie, 206–26. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1986. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights At Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, and Silverstein, Helena. 1998. “Rethinking Law’s ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 261–90. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClymont, Mary, and Golub, Stephen. 2000. Many Roads to Justice: The Law-Related Work of Ford Foundation Grantees around the World. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
McGee, Kyle. 2014. Bruno Latour: The Normativity of Networks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKinley, Michelle. 1997. “Life Stories, Disclosure and the Law.” PoLAR 20 (2): 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Doris, Kerwin, Donald M., Chishti, Muzaffar, and Bergeron, Claire. 2013. Immigration Enforcement in the United States: The Rise of a Formidable Machinery. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep. 1994. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1998. “The Causes of Cause Lawyering: Toward an Understanding of the Motivation and Commitment of Social Justice Lawyers.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 3168. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menz, Georg. 2009. The Political Economy of Managed Migration: Nonstate Actors, Europeanization, and the Politics of Designing Migration Policies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1995. “Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law.” Law and Society Review 29 (1): 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, Nancy 1999. Colonizing Hawai’i. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mezey, Susan Gluck. 2007. Queers in Court: Gay Rights Law and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Michel, Claude. 2004. Les vingt ans du SAF, 1972–1992. Paris: Syndicat des Avocats de France.Google Scholar
Minami, Dale. 2000. “Speech: Asian Law Caucus: Recognizing Twenty-Five Years of Struggle.” UCLA Asian Pacific American Law Journal 6: 50–4.Google Scholar
Morag-Levine, Noga. 2003. “Partners No More: Relational Transformation and the Turn to Litigation in Two Conservationist Organizations.” Law and Society Review 37: 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, Nancy. 2005. “INS v. St. Cyr.” In Immigration Stories, ed. Martin, David A. and Schuck, Peter H., 279310. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Morawetz, Nancy 2011. “Counterbalancing Distorted Incentives in Supreme Court Pro Bono Practice: Recommedations for the New Supreme Court Pro Bono Bar and Public Interest Practice Communities.” New York University Law Review 86: 131206.Google Scholar
Moreau, Gérard. 2009. “Circulaires et droit.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 241–5. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Morris, Milton D. 1984. Immigration – The Beleaguered Bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Motomura, Hiroshi. 1990. “Immigration Law after a Century of Plenary Power: Phantom Norms and Statutory Interpretation.” Yale Law Journal 100: 545613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motomura, Hiroshi 2008. “The Rights of Others: Legal Claims and Immigration Outside the Law.” Duke Law Journal 59: 1723–62.Google Scholar
Naquet, Emmanuel. 2009. “Ligue des Droits de l’Homme, syndicalisme et syndicats dans le premier XXe siècle.” In Etre dreyfusard hier et aujourd’hui, ed. Manceron, Gilles and Naquet, Emmanuel, 371–80. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas. 2011. “Winning through Losing.” Iowa Law Review 96: 941.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2010. Comparative Criminal Justice: Making Sense of Difference. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, David, ed. 1997. Comparing Legal Cultures. Hants, UK: Dartmouth Publishers.Google Scholar
Nevins, Joseph. 2002. Operation Gatekeeper. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newton, Lina. 2008. Illegal, Alien, or Immigrant: The Politics of Immigration Reform. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ngai, Mai. 2005. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Albiston, Catherine R.. 2006. “What Do We Know about Lawyers’ Lives? The Organization of Public Interest Practice, 1975–2004.” North Carolina Law Review 84: 15911621.Google Scholar
Noblecourt, Michel. 1990. Les syndicats en questions. Paris: Les Editions Ouvrières.Google Scholar
Noiriel, Gérard. 2001. Etat, nation et immigration. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Noiriel, Gérard 2010. Dire la vérité au pouvoir. Les intellectuels en question. Paris: Agone.Google Scholar
Olivas, Michael A. 2005. “Plyler v. Doe, the Education of Undocumented Children, and the Polity.” In Immigration Stories, ed. Schuck, Peter H. and Martin, David A., 197220. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Olivas, Michael A. 2012. No Undocumented Child Left Behind. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan. 1995. “Comparing Women’s Rights Litigation in the Netherlands and the United States.” Polity 28: 189215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Péchu, Cécile. 2006. Droit au Logement: genèse et sociologie d’une mobilisation. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Pitti, Laure. 2006. “Une matrice algérienne? Trajectoires et recompositions militantes en terrain ouvrier, de la cause de l’indépendance aux grèves d’OS des années 1968–1975.” Politix 76: 143–66.Google Scholar
Pitti, Laure 2010. “Experts ‘bruts’ et médecins critiques: ou comment la mise en débats des savoirs médicaux a modifié la définition du saturnisme en France durant les années 1970.” Politix 23 (91): 103–32.Google Scholar
Plötner, Jens. 1998. “Report on France.” In The European Court and the National Courts, ed. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, and Weiler, Joseph H. H., 4176. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2000. “The Structural Context of Novel Rights Claims: Southern Civil Rights Organizing, 1961–1966.” Law and Society Review 34 (2): 367406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie, and Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 2011. “The Criminalization of Immigrants as a Racial Project.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 27 (3): 261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, Robert. 1975. “Lawyers for Social Change: Perspectives on Public Interest.” Stanford University Law Review 28: 207–61.Google Scholar
Redish, Martin H. 2009. Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Revon, Christian, ed. 1978. Boutiques de droit. Paris: Editions Solin.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. 2008. “Public Interest Law: The Movement at Midlife.” Stanford Law Review 60: 2027–78.Google Scholar
Richards, Mark J., and Kritzer, Herbert M.. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96 (June): 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 1998. “Infinity within the Brackets.” American Ethnologist 25 (3): 378–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise 2006. “[Deadlines]: Removing the Brackets on Politics in Bureaucratic and Anthropological Analysis.” In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Riles, Annelise, 7194. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise 2011. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodier, Claire. 2009. “Saisir la Cour de Justice des Communautés Europénnes: une route semée d’obstacles.” In Défendre la cause des étrangers en justice, ed. GISTI, 165–76. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Rosenau, Neal. 1989. “From the Barrio to the Boardroom.” ABA Journal 75: 60–4.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Lory Diana. 2003. “The Courts and Interception: The United States’ Interdiction Experience and Its Impact on Refugees and Asylum Seekers.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 17: 199219.Google Scholar
Ross, Kristin. 2002. May '68 and Its Afterlives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel, Violaine. 2002. Affaires de juges: les magistrats dans les scandales politiques en France. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salyer, Lucy E. 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
San Miguel, Guadelupe. 1987. Let All of Them Take Heed: Mexican Americans and the Campaign for Educational Equality in Texas, 1910–1981. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 2005. “Beyond Neoliberal Governance: The World Social Forum as SUbaltern Cosmopolitan Politics and Legality.” In Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality, ed. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa and Rodriguez-Garavito, César A., 2963. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stewart, eds. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stewart, eds. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stewart, eds. 2008. The Cultural Lives of Cause Lawyers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schain, Martin A. 2008. The Politics of Immigration in France, Britain, and the United States. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stewart. 1998. “The Struggle to Politicize Legal Practice: A Case Study of Left-Activist Lawyering in Seattle.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 118–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2004. “Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction.” Law and Society Review 38 (3): 389406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnapper, Dominique. 2010. Une sociologue au Conseil Constitutionnel. Paris: Galimard.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. 1983. Suing Government: Citizen Remedies for Official Wrongs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H., and Scheingold, Stewart, 1984. “The Transformation of Immigration Law.” Columbia Law Review 84 (1): 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, Peter, and Wang, Theodore Hsien. 1992. “Continuity and Change: Patterns of Immigration Litigation in the Courts, 1979–1990.” Stanford Law Review 45: 115–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, Ronen, and Chinsky, Sarah. 1998. “Destruction of Houses and Construction of a Cause: Lawyers and Bedouins in Israeli Courts.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stewart, 227–92. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1988. Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Control of Administration. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M., and Scheingold, Stewart, 1990. “Judicial Review in France.” Journal of Law and Politics 6: 531–48.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 1981. “Case Processing: Consumer Protection in an Attorney General’s Office.” Law and Society Review 15 (3–4): 849910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2009. Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siméant, Johanna. 1998. La cause des sans-papiers. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slama, Serge, and Ferran, Nicolas, eds. 2014. Défendre en justice la cause des personnes détenues. Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
Soennecken, Dagmar. 2008. “The Growing Influence of the Courts over the Fate of Refugees.” Review of European and Russian Affairs 4 (2): 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sterett, Susan. 1997. Creating Constitutionalism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirn, Bernard. 1991. Le Conseil d’Etat: Son Rôle, Sa Jurisprudence. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Stone, Alec. 1989. “Legal Constraints to Policy-Making: The Constitutional Council and the Council of State.” In Policy-Making in France from De Gaulle to Mitterand, ed. Godt, Paul, 2841. New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Stone, Alec 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Margaret H. 2002. “Behind the Scenes of St. Cyr and Zadvydas: Making Policy in the Midst of Litigation.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 16: 271312.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, Louise. 2011. “Public Interest Law: Facing the Problems of Maturity.” University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 33: 417–33.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1997. “Symobic Statutes and Real Laws: The Pathologies of Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and The Prison Litigation Reform Act.” Duke Law Journal 47: 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 2006. “The Supreme Court and the National Political Order: Collaboration and Confrontation.” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, ed. Kahn, Ronald and Kersch, Ken I., 117–37. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 2004. The NAACP’s Legal Strategy against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine, and Willemez, Laurent. 2007. La justice face à ses réformateurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Viet, Vincent. 1998. La France immigré: Construction d’une politique, 1914–1997. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Volpp, Leti. 2000. “Court-Stripping and Class-Wide Relief: A Response to Judicial Review in Immigration Cases After AADC.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 14: 463–79.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim, and Bloemraad, Irene. 2011. Rallying for Immigrant Rights: The Fight for Inclusion in 21st Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wadhia, Shoba Sivaprasad. 2013. “The Immigration Prosecutor and the Judge: Examining the Role of the Judiciary in Prosecutorial Discretion Decisions.” Harvard Latino Law Review 16: 3978.Google Scholar
Walters, William. 2002. “Deportation, Expulsion, and the International Police of Aliens.” Citizenship Studies 6 (3): 265–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Weil, Patrick. 2004. La France et ses étrangers: L’aventure d’une politique de l’immigration, de 1938 à nos jours. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Burton. 1978. “Conceptual Perspective on the Public Interest: An Economic Analysis.” In Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis, ed. Weisbrod, Burton, 429. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lucie. 1990. “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.” Buffalo Law Review 38 (1): 158.Google Scholar
Wiegand, Wolfgang. 1996. “Americanization of Law: Reception or Convergence.” In Legal Culture and the Legal Profession, ed. Friedman, Lawrence M. and Scheiber, Harry M., 137–51. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wihtol de Wenden, Catherine. 1988. Les immigrés et la politique. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Willemez, Laurent. 2003. “Quand les syndicats se saisissent du droit.” Sociétés Contemporaines 4 (52): 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitouni, Benedikte. 2007. “Michel Foucault et le Groupe d'Information sur les Prisons.” Les Temps Modernes 62 (645): 268307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. 2006. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Leila Kawar, Bowling Green State University, Ohio
  • Book: Contesting Immigration Policy in Court
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107741980.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Leila Kawar, Bowling Green State University, Ohio
  • Book: Contesting Immigration Policy in Court
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107741980.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Leila Kawar, Bowling Green State University, Ohio
  • Book: Contesting Immigration Policy in Court
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107741980.010
Available formats
×