Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T12:45:57.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Rawls Rejected, Ignored and Radicalised

Debating Procedural Justice in China

from Part I - Constructing the Idea of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2017

Flora Sapio
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Susan Trevaskes
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Sarah Biddulph
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Elisa Nesossi
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Justice
The China Experience
, pp. 92 - 110
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, Tongdong. 2013. A Confucian version of hybrid regime: how does it work, and why is it superior? In Bell, Daniel & Li, Chenyang eds. The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two concepts of liberty. In Hardy, Henry ed. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ruihua. 1998. Lun chengxu zhengyi jiazhi de dulixing (Discussing the independence of the value of procedural justice). Fa shang yanjiu (Studies in Law and Business), 2: 2329.Google Scholar
Cline, Erin M. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the Sense of Justice, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1994. Pluralism and proceduralism. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 69: 589618.Google Scholar
Deng, Zhenglai. 2008. Shui zhi quanqiuhua? Hezhong fazhexue? – Kaifangxing quanqiuhuaguan yu Zhongguo falü zhexue jiangou lungang (Whose Globalization? Which Legal Philosophy? Outlook for Open Globalization and Outline for the Construction of China’s Legal Philosophy), Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan (Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2013. Taking Rights Seriously, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1958. Positivism and fidelity to law – a reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 71: 630672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. ‘Reasonable’ versus ‘true’, or on the morality of worldviews. In Cronin, Ciaran & De Greif, Pablo eds. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1958. Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71: 593629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Qinhua et al. 2009. 60 leading figures of law in China over the past 60 years. China Law, 62–90.Google Scholar
He, Xin, Wang, Lungang & Su, Yang. 2013. Above the roof, beneath the law: perceived justice behind disruptive tactics of migrant wage claimants in China. Law & Society Review, 47: 703738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Weidong. 2004. Falü chengxu de yiyi – dui Zhongguo fazhi jianshe de lingyi zhong sikao (Significance of the Legal Process: An Alternative Approach to Building the Chinese Legal System), Beijing: Zhongguo fazhi chubanshe (China Legal Publishing House).Google Scholar
Ji, Weidong. 2009. ‘To take the law as the public’: the diversification of society and legal discourse in contemporary China. In Balme, Stéphanie & Dowdle, Michael W. eds. Building Constitutionalism in China, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 125140.Google Scholar
Ji, Weidong. 2010. Xianzheng xin lun: quanqiuhua shidai de fa yu shehui bianqian (New Constitutional Theory: Legal and Social Change in an Era of Globalization), Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe (Peking University Press).Google Scholar
Ji, Weidong 2013. The judicial reform in China: the status quo and future directions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20: 185220.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shigong. 2003. Fazhi yu zhili – guojia zhuanxing zhong de falü (Legal System and Governance: Law in a Transforming State), Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe (China University of Political Science and Law Press).Google Scholar
Jiang, Shigong. 2007. Lifazhe de falixue (Legislators’ Jurisprudence), Beijing: Shenghuo·dushu·xinzhi sanlian shudian (SDX Joint Publishing Company Beijing).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 1685–1778.Google Scholar
Li, Buyun. 2008. Lun fazhi (On the Rule of Law), Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe (Social Sciences Academic Press).Google Scholar
Li, Fenfei. 2014. Zhengyi de dixian (The Bottom Line of Justice), Beijing: Qinghua daxue chubanshe (Tsinghua University Press).Google Scholar
Li, Lin. 2004. Tuijin fazhi gaige, jianshe fazhi guojia – 1978 nian yilai Zhongguo fazhi fazhan de huigu yu zhanwang (Promoting legal reform and building a state under the rule of law: retrospect and prospects of Chinese rule of law reforms since 1978). In Xia, Yong & Li, Lin eds. Fazhi yu 21 shiji (The Rule of Law and the 21st Century), Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe (Social Sciences Academic Press), 94108.Google Scholar
Li, Lin. 2013. Zenyang yi fazhi ningju gaige gongshi (How to achieve consensus on the rule of law reforms). Available from www.npc.gov.cn/npc/xinwen/rdlt/fzjs/2013-03/16/content_1786747.htm Accessed 30 July 2015.Google Scholar
Li, Victor H. 1978. Law without Lawyers: A Comparative View of Law in China and the United States, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Long, Weiqiu. 2010. The Market economy and regulatory change. In Dingjian, Cai & Chenguang, Wang eds. China’s Journey toward the Rule of Law: Legal Reform, 1978–2008, Brill: Leiden, pp. 347388.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley. 1967. Mao and mediation: politics and dispute resolution in communist China. California Law Review, 55: 12841359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978. On the Jewish question. In Tucker, Robert C. ed. The Marx-Engels Reader: Second Edition, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 2652Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1969. The Supreme Court, October 1968 term: foreword: on protecting the poor through the fourteenth amendment. Harvard Law Review, 83: 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan & Read, Benjamin L. 2011. Public Attitudes toward official justice in Beijing and rural China. In Woo, Margaret Y.K. & Gallagher, Mary E. Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Page, Jeremy. 2013. The wonk with the ear of Chinese president Xi Jinping. The Wall Street Journal, 4 June. Available from www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323728204578513422637924256 Accessed 30 July 2015.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randal. 1990. Confucian justice: achieving a humane society. International Philosophical Quarterly, 30: 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2002. China’s Long March toward Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2007. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1998. Creating a legal framework for economic development. World Bank Research Observer, 13: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1994. Political liberalism. Harvard Law Review, 107: 17651794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Samuli. 2014. Ideological renewal and nostalgia in China’s ‘avant-garde’ legal scholarship. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 13: 83125.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Samuli. 2016. Ideological Conflict and the Rule of Law in Contemporary China: Useful Paradoxes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Günther. 1983. Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law & Society Review, 17: 239285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2003. Virtue ethics and Confucianism. In Mou, Bo ed. Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 99121.Google Scholar
Wang, Chenguang 2010. From the rule of man to the rule of law. In Cai, Dingjian & Wang, Chenguang eds. China’s Journey toward the Rule of Law: Legal Reform, 1978–2008, Leiden: Brill, pp. 150.Google Scholar
Wang, Hui. 2003. China’s New Order: Society, Politics, and Economy in Transition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Huning. 1991. Meiguo fandui Meiguo (America vs. America), Shanghai: Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wang, Huning n.d. Luoersi ‘zhengyilun’ zhongyiben xu (Preface to the Chinese translation of John Rawls’ a Teory of Justice). Available from www.aisixiang.com/data/4985.html Accessed on 30 July 2015.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2001. Sifa gaige yanjiu (Research on Judicial Reforms), Beijing: Falü chubanshe (Beijing Law Press).Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2006. Wo guo minfadian zhongda yinan wenti zhi yanjiu (Major Problems in China’s Civil Code), Beijing: Falü chubanshe (Beijing Law Press).Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2011. Faxue fangfa lun (On Legal Methodology), Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe (Renmin University Press).Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2012. Civil law: its humanistic concerns. Social Sciences in China, 33: 4666.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2013. Rengequanfa zhong de renge zunyan jiazhi ji qi shixian (The value of dignity in personality rights and its implementation). Qinghua faxue (Tsinghua Law Review), 5: 519.Google Scholar
Wang, Shengjun. 2008. Shizhong jianchi ‘san ge zhishang’ shixian renmin fayuan gongzuo zhidao sixiang de yushijujin (Always adhere to the ‘three supremes’ in the reform of the people’s courts’ guiding ideology), Zhongguo shenpan (China Trial), 10: 47.Google Scholar
Xia, Yong. 2004. Zhongguo minquan zhexue (Philosophy of Chinese Civil Rights), Beijing: Shenghuo·dushu·xinzhi sanlian shudian (SDX Joint Publishing Company Beijing).Google Scholar
Xia, Yong. 2011. The Philosophy of Civil Rights in the Context of China, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Xinhua. 2012. Wang Huning – Member of Political Bureau of CPC Central Committee. Available from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/special/18cpcnc/2012-11/15/c_131977293.htm. Accessed on July 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Xie, Hui. 1997. Falü xinyang de linian yu jichu (Faith in Law: The Concept and Its Basis), Jinan: Shandong renmin chubanshe (Shandong People’s Publishing House).Google Scholar
Xin, Chunying. 2003. What kind of judicial power does China need? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1: 5878.Google Scholar
Yao, Dazhi. 2000. Xiandai zhihou: 20 shiji wanqi xifang zhexue (After Modernity: Western Philosophy in the Late Twentieth Century), Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe (The Oriental Press).Google Scholar
Zhu, Suli. 2004. Fazhi ji qi bentu ziyuan: Xiudingban (Rule of Law and Its Native Resources: Revised Edition), Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe (China University of Political Science and Law Press).Google Scholar
Zhu, Suli 2006. Song fa xia xiang: Zhongguo jiceng sifa zhidu yanjiu (Sending Law to the Countryside: Research on China’s Basic-Level Judicial System), Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe (China University of Political Science and Law Press).Google Scholar
Zhu, Suli. 2007. Political parties in China’s judiciary. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 17: 533–60.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×