Abel, Richard L. American Lawyers. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard. ‘England and Wales: A Comparison of the Professional Projects of Barristers and Solicitors’. In Abel, Richard and Lewis, Philips C. (eds.), Lawyers in Society, 39–91. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard. ‘Lawyers and Legal Services’. In Cane, Peter and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies, 796–816. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

‘ADR in Asia Pacific: Spotlight on Mediation in Hong Kong’. ADR in Asia Pacific Guide, Vol. 1. London: Herbert Smith Freehills, 2015.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Masood. ‘Implied Compulsory Mediation’. Civil Justice Quarterly, 31:2 (2012), 151–175.Google Scholar

Alexander, Nadjia. ‘Visualising the ADR Landscape’. ADR Bulletin, 7:3 (2004), 1–3.Google Scholar

Alexander, Nadja. ‘Global Trends in Mediation: Riding the Third Wave’. In Alexander, Nadja (ed.), Global Trends in Mediation, 1–36. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

Alexander, Nadja. International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2009.Google Scholar

Alexander, Nadja. The New Hong Kong Mediation Ordinance: Much Ado About Nothing? (2012) at http://kluwermediationblog.com (Accessed 16 April 2012).Google Scholar

Alexander, Nadja. How Is Med-Arb Regulated in Hong Kong? (2013) at http://kluwermediationblog.com (Accessed 10 November 2016).Google Scholar

Anleu, Sharyn L. Roach. Law and Social Change. London: SAGE, 2010.Google Scholar

Armour, John. ‘Enforcement Strategies in UK Corporate Governance: A Roadmap and Empirical Assessment’. In Armour, John and Payne, Jennifer (eds.), Rationality in Company Law: Essays in Honour of D.D. Prentice, 71–122. Oxford: Hart, 2009.Google Scholar

Armour, John, et al. ‘Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States’. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6:4 (2009), 687–722.Google Scholar

Arthur, Winfred, et al. Conducting Meta-Analysis Using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.Google Scholar

Astor, Hilary and Chinkin, Christine M. Dispute Resolution in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths, 1992.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Jerold S. Justice without Law? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research, 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2007.Google Scholar

Balas, Aron, et al. ‘The Divergence of Legal Procedures’. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1:2 (2009), 138–162.Google Scholar

Bay, Marvin, et al. ‘Note: The Integration of Alternative Dispute Resolution within the Subordinate Courts’ Adjudication Process’. Singapore Academic of Law Journal, 16 (2004), 501–515.Google Scholar

Bennett, Colin J. ‘How States Utilize Foreign Evidence’. Journal of Public Policy, 11:1 (1991), 31–54.Google Scholar

Berry, Frances Stokes and Berry, William D. ‘Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research’. In Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, 223–260. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. ‘The Elementary Forms of Conflict Management’. New Directions in the Study of Justice, Law, and Social Control. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Black, Julia. ‘What Is Regulatory Innovation?’. In Black, Julia et al. (eds.), Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis, 1–15. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackaby, Nigel. Refern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 6th ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Blake, Susan, et al. A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Jeremy A. ‘Meta-Analysis: A Primer For Legal Scholars’. Temple Law Review, 80 (2007), 201–244.Google Scholar

Bouchez, Louis and Karpf, Alexander. ‘The OECD’s Work on Corporate Governance and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms’. In Bouchez, Louis et al. (eds.), Topics in Corporate Finance: The Quality of Corporate Law and the Role of Corporate Law Judges, 3–18 Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center for Corporate Finance, 2006.Google Scholar

Boulle, Lawrence. Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. Sydney: Butterworths, 1996.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Judicial Field’. Hastings Law Journal, 38 (1987), 805–853.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. Minority Shareholders’ Remedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Boyne, George A., et al. ‘Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23:4 (2005), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brace, Ian. Questionnaire Design: How to Plan, Structure and Write Survey Material for Effective Market Research. London: Kogan Page, 2008.Google Scholar

Brazil-David, Renata. ‘Harmonization and Delocalization of International Commercial Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration, 28:5 (2011), 445–466.Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, Stavros L. ‘The Notion of the Superiority of Arbitration Agreements Over Jurisdiction Agreements: Time to Abandon It?’. Journal of International Arbitration, 24:4 (2007), 341–364.Google Scholar

Brooker, Penny. ‘The “Juridification” of Alternative Dispute Resolution’. Anglo-American Law Review, 28 (1999), 1–36.Google Scholar

Brooker, Penny. Mediation Law: Journey through Institutionalism to Juridification. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Brown, Henry J. and Marriott, Arthur. ADR Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2011.Google Scholar

Brunet, Edward. ‘Questing the Quality of Alternative Dispute Resolution’. Tulane Law Review, 62 (1987), 1–56.Google Scholar

Bühring-Uhle, Christian. Arbitration and Mediation in International Business. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

Burton, John. Conflict: Resolution and Provention. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bush, Robert A. Baruch. ‘Defining Quality in Dispute Resolution: Taxonomies and Anti-Taxonomies of Quality Arguments’. Denver University Law Review, 66 (1989), 335–380.Google Scholar

Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Folger, Joseph P. ‘Mediation and Social Justice: Risks and Opportunities’. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 27 (2012), 1–52.Google Scholar

Cameron, Camille and Kelly, Elsa. ‘Litigants in Person in Civil Proceedings: Part I’. Hong Kong Law Journal, 32 (2002), 313–342.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of the World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement’. The Modern Law Review, 56 (1989), 282–296.Google Scholar

Carter, James and Payton, Sophie. ‘Arbitration and Company Law in England and Wales’. European Company Law, 12:3 (2015), 138–143.Google Scholar

CEDR. CEDR Solve Commercial Mediation Statistics 2001/02 (May 2002) at www.cedr.co.uk (Accessed 4 December 2012).Google Scholar

Cheffins, Brian R. Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Chen, Huey-Tsyh and Rossi, Peter H. ‘The Multi-Goal, Theory-Driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science’. Social Forces, 59:1 (1980), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Huey-Tsyh and Rossi, Peter H. ‘Evaluating with Sense the Theory-Driven Approach’. Evaluation Review, 7:3 (1983), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen-Wishart, Mindy. ‘Legal Transplant and Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or a Working Mis-understanding?’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 62 (2013), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, Rita. ‘ADR and Shareholder Disputes: The Anglo-American Experience and Hong Kong Challenges’. Asian Dispute Review, (2008), 118–121.Google Scholar

Cheung, Rita. ‘Corporate Wrongs Litigated in the Context of Unfair Prejudice Claims: Reforming the Unfair Prejudice Remedy for the Redress of Corporate Wrongs’. Company Lawyer, 29:4 (2008), 98–104.Google Scholar

Cheung, Rita. ‘The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Allied to Active Judicial Case Management: A New Forum to Deal with Shareholder Disputes in Hong Kong’. Asia Pacific Law Review, 16 (2008), 91–104.Google Scholar

Cheung, Rita. Company Law and Shareholders’ Rights. Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2010.Google Scholar

Cheung, Sai-On. ‘Construction Mediation in Hong Kong’. In Brooker, Penny and Wilkinson, Suzanne (eds.), Mediation in the Construction Industry: An International Review, 62–81. Oxford: Spon Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Chrisman, P. Oswin, et al. ‘Collaborative Practice Mediation: Are We Ready to Serve This Emerging Market?.’ Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 6:3 (2006), 451–464.Google Scholar

Cohen, Amy J. ‘Revisiting Against Settlement: Some Reflections On Dispute Resolution and Public Values’. Fordham Law Review, 78 (2009), 1143–1170.Google Scholar

Cohen, Amy J. ‘ADR and Some Thoughts on the Social in Duncan Kennedy’s Third Globalization of Legal Thought’. Comparative Law Review, 3:1 (2012), 1–11.Google Scholar

Collier, John and Lowe, Vaughan. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Colyvas, Jeannette A. ‘Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization’. Sociological Theory, 29:1 (2011), 27–53.Google Scholar

Cooley, Linda and Lewkowicz, Jo. Dissertation Writing in Practice: Turning Ideas into Text. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Corporate Governance Review by The Standard Committee on Company Law Reform: A Consultation Paper made in Phase I of the Review. Hong Kong: Printing Department, 2001.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Butterworths, 1989.Google Scholar

Cox, David Roxbee and Snell, E. Joyce. The Analysis of Binary Data, 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1989.Google Scholar

Creswell, John W. and Clark, Vicki L. Plano. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thosand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2007.Google Scholar

Cronin-Harris, Catherine. ‘Mainstreaming: Systematizing Corporate Use of ADR’. Albany Law Review, 59 (1995), 847–879.Google Scholar

Damanpour, Fariborz, et al. ‘Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations’. Journal of Management Studies, 46:4 (2009), 650–675.Google Scholar

Davies, Adrian. Best Practice in Corporate Governance: Building Reputation and Sustainable Success. Surrey: Gower, 2006.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul. Introduction to Company Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Davis, Lance E. and North, Douglas C. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard, et al. ‘Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution’. Wisconsin Law Review, (1985), 1359–1404.Google Scholar

Denton, Gavin and Kun, Fan. ‘Hong Kong’. In Esplugues, Carlos and Barona, Silvia (eds.), Global Perspectives on ADR, 131–164. Cambridge, UK: Intersentia, 2014.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant. ‘Fussing about the Forum: Categories and Definitions as Stakes in a Professional Competition’. Law and Social Inquiry, 21 (1996), 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dignam, Alan J. and Lowry, John. Company Law, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul. ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’. In Zucker, Lynne G. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, 3–22. Cambridge: MA:: Ballinger, 1988.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W. ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review, 48:2 (1983), 147–160.Google Scholar

Dobinson, Ian and Johns, Francis. ‘Qualitative Legal Research’. In McConville, Mike and Wing-Hong, Chui (eds.), Research Methods for Law, 16–45. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Doidge, Craig G., et al. ‘Has New York Become Less Competitive in Global Markets? Evaluating Foreign Listing Choices Over Time’. Journal of Financial Economics, 91:3 (2009), 253–277.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin A. ‘The Conception that the Corporation Is a Nexus of Contracts, and the Dual Nature of the Firm’. The Journal of Corporation Law, 24 (1998), 819–836.Google Scholar

English Law Commission. Shareholder Remedies Consultation. Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 142, 1996.Google Scholar

English Law Commission. Shareholder Remedies. London: The Stationary Office, Law Commission Report No. 246, Cm 3769, 1997.Google Scholar

Ewald, William. ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43:4 (1995), 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fan, Kun. ‘Mediation and Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong’. International Litigation Quartely, 27:2 (2011), 11–14.Google Scholar

Fan, Kun. ‘The New Arbitration Ordinance in Hong Kong’. Journal of International Arbitration, 29:6 (2012), 715–722.Google Scholar

Farrar, John H. and Boulle, Laurence J. ‘Minority Shareholders Remedies – Shifting Dispute Resolution Paradigms’. Bond Law Review, 13 (2001), 1–32.Google Scholar

Farrar, John, et al. ‘Dispute Resolution in Family Companies’. Canterbury Law Review, 18 (2012), 155–186.Google Scholar

Felstiner, William L. F. ‘Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration’. Source: Law & Society Review, 9:4 (1975), 695–706.Google Scholar

Financial Dispute Resolution Centre. Consultation Paper on the Proposals to Enhance the Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme. 2016.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. ‘The Supreme Court 1978 Term Forward: The Forms of Justice’. Harvard Law Review, 93 (1979), 1–58.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. ‘The Social and Political Foundations of Adjudication’. Law and Human Behaviour, 6:2 (1982), 121–128.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. ‘Against Settlement’. The Yale Law Journal, 93:6 (1984), 1073–1090.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. ‘Out of Eden’. The Yale Law Journal, 94:7 (1985), 1669–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidson, Eliot. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Friedland, Roger and Alford, Robert R. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1985.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘On Legalistic Reasoning: A Footnote to Weber’. Wisconsin Law Review, (1966), 148–171.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘Legal Rules and the Process of Social Change’. Stanford Law Review, 19 (1967), 786–840.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘Legal Culture and Social Development’. Law & Society Review, 4 (1969), 29–44.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. Law and Society: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘The Law and Society Movement’. Stanford Law Review, 38 (1986), 763–780.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘Some Comments on Legal Interpretation’. Poetics Today, 9:1 (1988), 95–102.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture’. The Yale Law Journal, 98 (1989), 1579–1606.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. ‘Lawyers in Cross-Cultural Perspective’. In Abel, Richard L. and Lewis, Philips C. (eds.), Lawyers in Society: Comparative Theories, Vol. III, 1–26. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. ‘Mediation – Its Forms and Functions’. Southern California Law Review, 44 (1970), 305–339.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. ‘The Lawyer as an Architect of Social Structures’. In Winston, Kenneth I. (ed.), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller, 285–292. Oxford: Hart, 2001.Google Scholar

Fung, , the Honourable Justice. ‘Mediator’s Qualifications and Skills’, Conference on Mediation Conference, Hong Kong, 21 March 2014.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. ‘Litigation and Dispute Processing: Part One’. Law & Society Review, 9:1 (1974), 95–160.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. ‘Adjudication, Litigation, and Related Phenomena’. In Lipson, Leon and Wheeler, Stanton (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences, 151–257. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. ‘A World Without Trial’. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 7–34.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc and Lande, John. ‘Private Courts and Public Authority’. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 12 (1992), 393–415.Google Scholar

Gazal-Ayal, Oren and Perry, Ronen. ‘Imbalances of Power in ADR: The Impact of Representation and Dispute Resolution Method on Case Outcomes’. Law & Social Inquiry, (2014), 1–33.Google Scholar

Gelter, Martin. ‘The Dark Side of Shareholder Influence: Managerial Autonomy and Stakeholder Orientation in Comparative Corporate Governance’. Harvard Internationa Law Journal, 50 (2009), 129–194.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. Department for Constitutional Affairs. Central London Pilot Mediation Scheme, Evaluation Report (1998).Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. Paths to Justice: What People Think and Do about Going to Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing 1999.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. Court Based ADR initiatives for Non-Family Civil Cases. Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research series1/02, 2002.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. ‘Civil Justice Reform and ADR’, Conference on Civil Justice Reform: What has It Achieved? Hong Kong, 15 April 2010.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. Judging Civil Justice. The Hamlyn Lectures 59th Series. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel. ‘What Is Civil Justice For? Reform, ADR, and Access to Justice’. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 24:1 (2012), 397–417.Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel, et al. Twisting Arms: Court Referred and Court Linked Mediation Under Judicial Pressure. Ministry of Justice Research Series, Series 1/07, 2007.Google Scholar

Ghai, Yash. ‘The Rule of Law and Capitalism: Reflections on the Basic Law’. In Wacks, Raymond (ed.), Hong Kong, China and 1997: Essays in Legal Theory, 343–366. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Stephen B., et al. ‘ADR Problems and Prospects: Looking to the Future’. Judicature, 69 (1985), 291–299.Google Scholar

Gordon, Grant and Nicholson, Nigel. Family Wars: Classic Conflicts in Family Business and How to Deal with Them. London: Kogan Page, 2008.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al. ‘Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations’. The Milbank Quartely, 82:4 (2004), 581–629.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Royston, et al. ‘Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields’. Academy of Management Journal, 45:1 (2002), 58–80.Google Scholar

Groot, Diederik De. ‘Arbitration and Company Law: An Introduction’. European Company Law, 12:3 (2015), 125–127.Google Scholar

Halsbury’s Law of Hong Kong, Vol. 37, 2nd ed. (2011).Hong Kong: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Gujarati, Damodar N. Basic Econometrics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003.Google Scholar

Hardy, Cynthia and Maguire, Steve. ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship’. In Greenwood, Royston et al. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 198–217. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2008.Google Scholar

Hedeen, Timothy. ‘Coercion and Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: All Mediations Are Voluntary, but Some Are More Voluntary Than Others’. The Justice System Journal, 26:3 (2005), 273–291.Google Scholar

Henning, J. J. ‘Legislative Comment on the South African Close Corporation Under the New Companies Act: Part I’. Company Lawyer, 31:7 (2010), 225–228.Google Scholar

Hill, Timothy and Damon, So. ‘Resolving Construction Claims through Mediation’. Asian Dispute Review, (2010), 58–60.Google Scholar

Hollington, Robin. Hollington on Shareholders’ Rights, 7th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013.Google Scholar

The Hong Kong Basic Law Promotion Sterring Committee. Introduction to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Hong Kong: Law Press/Joint Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Civil Procedure. The White Book, Vol. 1. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Companies Law Revision Committee. Company Law: Second Report of the Companies Law Revision Committee. Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1973.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Department of Justice. Consultancy Study on the Demand for and Supply of Legal and Related Services. Hong Kong Department of Justice, 2008.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Department of Justice. Report of the Working Group on Mediation. Hong Kong Department of Justice, 2010.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Department of Justice. Enactment of Apology Legislation in Hong Kong: Final Report and Recommendations, 28 November 2016.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. Consultation Paper on the Draft Companies Bill: First Phase Consultation. Hong Kong Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, 2009.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. New Companies Ordinance: Subsidiary Legislation for Implementation of the New Companies Ordinance (Phase Two Consultation Document). Hong Kong Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, 2012.Google Scholar

The Hong Kong Institute of Directors. Guidelines on Corporate Governance in SMEs in Hong Kong, 2009.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Judiciary. Reform of the Civil Justice System in Hong Kong, Interim Report and Consultative Paper on Civil Justice Reform. Hong Kong Judiciary, 2000.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Judiciary. Reform of the Civil Justice System in Hong Kong. Final Report of the Working Party on Civil Justice Reform. Hong Kong Judiciary, 2004.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Legal Aid Department. Litigation vs. Mediation: An Alternative Way to Settle Disputes, 2010.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Mediation and Arbitration Centre, Pro Bono Mediation Services. www.hkmaac.org/mediation/pro_bono.php (Accessed 19 September 2016).Google Scholar

The Hong Kong SAR Government. Press Releases: Companies (Unfair Prejudice Petitions) Proceedings Rules Submitted to LegCo, 15 May 2013.Google Scholar

The Hong Kong SAR Government. Press Releases: Companies (Unfair Prejudice Petitions) Proceedings Rules Submitted to LegCo, 15 May 2013.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Standing Committee on Company Law Reform. The Report of the Standing Committee on Company Law Reform on the Recommendations of a Consultancy Report of the Review of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance, Hong Kong: Printing Department, 2000.Google Scholar

Hopt, Klaus J. and Steffek, Felix. ‘Mediation: Comparison of Laws, Regulatory Models, Fundamental Issues’. In Hopt, Klaus J. and Steffek, Felix (eds.), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective, 3–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hosmer, David W. and Lemeshow, Stanley. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son, 2000.Google Scholar

Hwang, Hokyu and Powell, Walter W. ‘Institutions and Entrepreneurship’. In Alvarez, Sharon A. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives, 201–232. New York: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar

Hwang, Michael. ‘The Prospects for Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution’. In Jesover, Fianna (ed.), Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets Enforcement of Corporate Governance in Asia the Unfinished Agenda, 97–102. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007.Google Scholar

Hwang, Michael, et al. ‘ADR in East Asia’. In Goldsmith, J. C. et al. (eds.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Vol. I, 147–189. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

Jacob, Jack I. H., Sir. The Fabric of English Civil Justice. London: Stevens, 1987.Google Scholar

Jackson, , Lord Justice. Review of Civil LItigation Costs: Final Report. London: The Stationary Office, 2009.Google Scholar

Jackson, Lord Justice. ‘New Approach to Civil Justice: From Woolf to Jackson’. Conference on Civil Justice Reform: What Has It Achieved? Hong Kong, 15 April 2010.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jack B. ‘The Role of Specialized Courts in Resolving Corporate Governance Disputes in the United States and in the EU: An American Judge’s Perspective’. In Bouchez, Louis et al. (eds.), Topics in Corporate Finance: The Quality of Corporate Law and the Role of Corporate Law Judges, 95–106. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center for Corporate Finance, 2006.Google Scholar

Jarrosson, Charles. ‘Legal Issues Raised by ADR’. In Ingen-Housz, Arnold (ed.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Vol. II, 157–181. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2011.Google Scholar

Jennings, P. Devereaux and Zandbergen, Paul A. ‘Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach’. Academy of Management Review, 20:4 (1995), 1015–1052.Google Scholar

Jepperson, Ronald L. ‘Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism’. In Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Johnson, Cathryn, et al. ‘Legitimacy as a Social Process’. Annual Review of Sociology, 32 (2006), 53–78.Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew. ‘Arbitrability of Company Law Disputes’. In Liu, Qiao and Shan, Wenhua (eds.), China and International Commercial Dispute Resolution, 195–227. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2016.Google Scholar

Jong, Eelke de. ‘Cultural Determinants of Ownership Concentration Across Countries’. International Business Governance and Ethics, 2 (2006), 145–164.Google Scholar

Jordan, Cally. ‘Family Resemblances: The Family Controlled Company in Asia and its Implications for Law Reform’. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 8 (1997), 89–104.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000. In Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, 19–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kennedy-Grant, Tómas ‘The New Zealand Experience of the UNCITRAL Model Law: A Review of the Position as at 31 December 2007’. Asian International Arbitration Journal, 4:1 (2008), 1–63.Google Scholar

Koh, Swee-Yen. ‘Singapore’s Highest Court Confirms Pro-arbitration Approach to Shareholder Disputes’. Asian Dispute Review, (2017), 67–71.Google Scholar

Kim, Susanna M. ‘The Provisional Director Remedy for Corporate Deadlock: A Proposed Model Statute’. Washington and Lee Law Review, 60 (2003), 111–181.Google Scholar

King, Mervyn. ‘Mediating Corporate Governance Disputes?’ In Conference on The Launch of Southern African IoD Mediation Center, Paris, 12 February 2007.Google Scholar

King, Mervyn. ‘The Synergies and Interaction between King III and the Companies Act 61 of 2008’. Acta Juridica, (2010), 446–455.Google Scholar

Lack, Jeremy. ‘Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR): The Spectrum of Hybrid Techniques Available to the Parties’. In ingen-Housz, Arnold (ed.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Vol. II, 339–379. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2011.Google Scholar

Lam Man-hon, Johnson. ‘Mediation in the Context of CJR: The Role of the Judiciary’, Conference on CJR: What Has It Achieved? Hong Kong, 15 April 2010.Google Scholar

Lam Man-hon, Johnson. ‘The Speech of the Honourable Mr Justice Lam, Justice of Appeal’, Conference on ‘Mediation First’ Pledge Reception, Hong Kong, 18 July 2013.Google Scholar

Lambros, Thomas D. ‘The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Adversarial Model for a New Era’. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 50 (1989), 789–807.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘The Diffusion of a Process Pluralist Ideology of Disputing: Factors Affecting Opinions of Business Lawyers and Executives’. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1995.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘Getting the Faith: Why Business Lawyers and Executives Believe Mediation’. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 5 (2000), 137–231.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘Using Dispute System Design Methods to Promote Good-Faith Participation in Court-Connected Mediation Programs’. UCLA Law Review, 50 (2002), 70–141.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘Commentary: Focusing on Program Design Issues in Future Research on Court Connected Mediation’. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22:1–2 (2004), 89–100.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘A Guide for Policymaking that Emphasizes Principles, and Public Needs’. Alternatives to High Cost Litigation, 26:11 (2008), 197–205.Google Scholar

Lande, John. ‘The Movement Toward Early Case Handling in Courts and Private Dispute Resolution’. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 24:1 (2008), 81–130.Google Scholar

Landsman, Stephan. ‘ADR and the Cost of Compulsion’. Stanford Law Review, 57 (2005), 1593–1630.Google Scholar

Lau, Alex, et al. ‘In Search of Good Governance for Asian Family Listed Companies: A Case Study on Hong Kong’. The Company Lawyer, 28:10 (2007), 306–311.Google Scholar

Lau, Chris. ‘‘‘Sorry Law” Moves a Step Closer’, South China Morning Post, 29 November 2016, C1.Google Scholar

The Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong. Report on Conditional Fees, 2007.Google Scholar

The Law Society of Hong Kong. Working Party on Conditional Fees: Response for the Law Reform Commission’s Report on Conditional Fees, 2007.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Austin, et al. Report on The Effectiveness of Using Mediation in Selected Civil Law Disputes: A Meta-Analysis, 2007.Google Scholar

Lawton, Philip. ‘Modeling the Chinese Family Firm and Minority Shareholer Protection: The Hong Kong Experience 1980–1995’. Managerial Law, 49:5/6 (2007), 249–271.Google Scholar

Lee, Tin-Yan. ‘Introductory Note to the New Arbitration Ordinance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’. International Legal Materials, 51 (2012), 133–197.Google Scholar

LegCo Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services. Development of Mediation Services and Mediation Services for Building Management Cases, 2011.Google Scholar

Legislative Council. Bills Committee on Mediation Bill: Background Brief prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat, 2011.Google Scholar

Legislative Council. Paper on Companies Bill Prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat (Background Brief), 2011.Google Scholar

Legislative Council. Legislative Council Brief: Companies Ordinance (Ord. No. 28 of 2012), 2013.Google Scholar

Legislative Council. Legislative Council Panel on Administration and Legal Services: Mediation, 2013.Google Scholar

Lempert, Richard and Arbor, Ann. ‘The Autonomy of Law: Two Visions Compared’. In Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, 152–190. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988.Google Scholar

Leung, Chun-Ying. The HKSAR Chief Executive, The 2013 Policy Address: Seek Change, Maintain Stability, Serve the People with Pragmatism. Hong Kong: Printing Department, 2013.Google Scholar

Leung, Chun-Ying. The HKSAR Chief Executive, Hong Kong Chief Executive, The Policy Address 2014: Support the Needy Let Youth Flourish Unleash Hong Kong’s Potential. Hong Kong: Printing Department, 2014.Google Scholar

Leung, Chun-Ying. The HKSAR Chief Executive. The 2016 Policy Address: Innovate for the Economy Improve Livelihood Foster Harmony Share Prosperity. Hong Kong: Printing Department, 2016.Google Scholar

Leung, Elsie. ‘Mediation: A Cultural Change’. Asian Pacific Law Review, 17 (2009), 39–46.Google Scholar

Levenstein, Eric, et al. ‘South Africa’. In Loos, Alexander (ed.), Directors Liability: A Worldwide Review, 3–10. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2012.Google Scholar

Liew, Carol. ‘Recent Developments in Mediation in East Asia’. In Ingen-Housz, Arnold (ed.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Vol. II, 515–557. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2011.Google Scholar

Lindamood, Darren P. ‘Comment: Redressing the Arbitration Process: An Alternative to the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009’. Wake Forest Law Review, 45 (2010), 291–318.Google Scholar

Lipsky, David B. and Seeber, Ronald L. ‘Patterns of ADR used in Corporate Disputes’. Dispute Resolution Journal, 54:1 (1999), 68–71.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Bostock, Sally. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Civil Justice Reform: Is ADR Being Used to Paper Over Cracks?: Reactions to Judge Jack Weinstein’s Article’. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 11 (1996), 397–402.Google Scholar

Lo, Stefan H. C and Charles, Z Qu. Law of Companies in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2013.Google Scholar

Lopich, Robert. ‘Collaborative Law Overview: Towards Collaborative Problem-solving in Business’. ADR Bulletin, 10:8 (2009), 161–166.Google Scholar

Lounsbury, Michael. ‘Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (2008), 348–361.Google Scholar

Lowry, John. ‘The Pursuit of Effective Minority Shareholder Protection: Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985’. Company Lawyer, 17 (1996), 67–72.Google Scholar

Lowry, John. ‘Mapping the Boundaries of Unfair Prejudice’. In Lacy, John de (ed.), The Reform of United Kingdom Company Law, 229–248. London: Cavendish, 2002.Google Scholar

Lynch, Katherine L. The Forces of Economic Globalization: Challenges to the Regime of International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003.Google Scholar

Ma, Ngok. ‘Electric Corporatism and State Interventions in Post-Colonial Hong Kong’. In Stephen, Chiu Wing-Kai and Siu-lun, Wong (eds.), Repositioning the Hong Kong Government, 63–90. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R. Corporate Governance: Promise Kept, Promise Broken. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, Julie. ‘The Evolution of New Lawyer: How Lawyers Are Reshaping the Practice of Law’. Journal of Dispute Resolution, (2008), 61–81.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, Julie. The New Lawyer: How Settlement Is Transforming the Practice of Law. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press, 2008.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, Julie. ‘ADR and the Courts: Renewing Our Commitment to Innovation’. Marquette Law Review, 95 (2012), 927–940.Google Scholar

Mack, Kathy. Court Referral to ADR: Criteria and Research (2003) at www.aija.org.au (Accessed 8 August 2011).Google Scholar

Mackie, Karl. ‘The Future for ADR Clauses After Cable & Wireless v. IBM’. Arbitration International, 19:3 (2003), 345–362.Google Scholar

Mackie, Karl, et al. The ADR Practice Guide: Commercial Dispute Resolution. Tottel, 2007.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law’. Northwestern University Law Review, 72:6 (1978), 854–905.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. American Arbitration Law: Reformation, Nationalization, Internationalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Main, Thomas O. ‘Traditional Equity and Contemporary Procedure’. Washington Law Review Association, 78 (2003), 429–515.Google Scholar

Main, Thomas O. ‘ADR: The New Equity’. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 74 (2005), 329–404.Google Scholar

Majid, Abdul, et al. ‘Company Directors’ Perception of Their Responsibilities and Duties: A Hong Kong Survey’. Hong Kong Law Journal, 28 (1998), 60–89.Google Scholar

Manning, Peter K. ‘“Big-Bang” Decisions: Notes on a Naturalistic Approach’. In Hawkins, Keith (ed.), The Uses of Discretion, 249–286. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Mather, Lynn, et al. Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAdoo, Bobbi, et al. ‘Institutionalization: What Do Empirical Studies Tell Us About Court Mediation?’. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 9 (2003), 8–10.Google Scholar

McCrudden, Christopher. ‘Legal Research and the Social Sciences’. Law Quarterly Review, 122 (2006), 632–650.Google Scholar

McGovern, Francis E. ‘Beyond Efficiency: A Bevy of ADR Justifications (An Unfootnoted Summary)’. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 3 (1996), 12–13.Google Scholar

McGregor, Lynn. ‘Corporate Governance in South Africa’. In A-Mallin, Christine (ed.), Handbook on International Corporate Governance: Country Analysis, 390–413. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

McVea, Harry. ‘Cases: Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Primacy of Contract’. The Modern Law Review, 75:6 (2012), 1123–1149.Google Scholar

Means, Benjamin. ‘NonMarket Values in Family Business’. William & Mary Law Review, 54 (2013), 1185–1250.Google Scholar

Meggitt, Gary and Aslam, Farzana. ‘Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong – A Critical Appraisal’. Civil Justice Quarterly, 28:1 (2009), 111–131.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. ‘For and Against Settlement: Uses and Abuses of the Mandatory Settlement Conference’. UCLA Law Review, 33 (1985), 485–514.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. ‘Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-opted or “The Law of ADR’’’. Florida State University Law Review, 19 (1991), 1–46.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. ‘Will Managed Care Give Us Access to Justice?’. In Smith, Roger (ed.), Achieving Civil Justice: Appropriate Dispute Resolution for the 1990s, 89–118. London: Legal Action Group, 1996.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. ‘When Dispute Resolution Begets Disputes of Its Own: Conflicts Among Dispute Profssionals’. UCLA Law Review, 44 (1997), 1871–1933.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. ‘From Legal Disputes to Conflict Resolution and Human Problem Solving: Legal Dispute Resolution in a Multidisciplinary Context’. Journal of Legal Education, 54:1 (2004), 7–29.Google Scholar

Merkin, Robert. Arbitration Act 1996, 2nd ed. London: LLP, 2005.Google Scholar

Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian. ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology, 83:2 (1977), 340–363.Google Scholar

Miller, Sandra K. ‘Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Private Company in the European Community: A Comparative Analysis of the German, United Kingdom, and French “Close Corporation Problem’’’. Cornell International Law Journal, 30 (1997), 381–427.Google Scholar

Milman, David. ‘The Rise of the Objective Concept of ‘Unfairness’ in UK Company Law’. Company Law Newsletter, 286 (2010), 1–4.Google Scholar

Milne, Richard. ‘Blood Ties Serve Business Well During the Crisis’. Financial Times, 28 December 2009, p. 15.Google Scholar

Mistelis, Loukas. ‘International Arbitration – Corporate Attitudes and Practices – 12 Perceptions Tested: Myths, Data and Analysis Research Report’. The American Review of International Arbitration, 15 (2004), 527–591.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Vanessa. ‘The US Approach Towards the Acquisition of Minority Shares: Have We Anything to Learn?’. Company and Securities Law Journal, 14:5 (1996), 283–311.Google Scholar

Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis. 'Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce'. Yale Law Journal, 88:5 (1979), 950–997.Google Scholar

Monroe, Bruce. ‘Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution by the State of California’. Pepperdine Law Review, 14:4 (1987), 945–987.Google Scholar

Morse, Janice M. ‘Principles of Mixed Methods and Multi-method Research Design’. In Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddle, Charles (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 189–208. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2003.Google Scholar

Nestor, Paul G. and K. Schutt, Russell. Research Methods in Psychology: Investigating Human Behaviour, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2015.Google Scholar

Neuman, William Lawrence, Basic of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 3rd ed. Pearson, 2012.Google Scholar

News: Dispute Resolution Legislation, Asian Dispute Review, (2017), 95–99.Google Scholar

Ng, Joyce and Hollingsworth, Julia. ‘Hong Kong Passes Law Making It Easier to Say “Sorry” Without Legal Consequences’, South China Morning Post (14 July 2017) at www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-crime/article/20102526/hong-kong/lawmakers-pass-sorry-law (Accessed 18 July 2017).Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, Jacqueline M. ‘Court Mediation and the Search for Justice through Law’. Washington University Law Quarterly, 74 (1996), 47–102.Google Scholar

Nolan-Haley, Jacqueline M. ‘The Merger of Law and Mediation: Lessons from Equity Jurisprudence and Roscoe Pound’. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6 (2005), 57–71.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Note. ‘Mandatory Arbitration as a Remedy for Intra-close Corporate Disputes’. Virginia Law Review, 56 (1970), 271–294.Google Scholar

Note. ‘ADR, the Judiciary, and Justice: Coming to Terms with the Alternatives’. Harvard Law Review, 113:7 (2000), 1851–1875.Google Scholar

OECD. Exploratory Meeting on Resolution of Corporate Governance Related Disputes at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/22/37188704.pdf (Accessed 12 December 2011).Google Scholar

Onyema, Emilia. ‘The Use of Med-Arb in International Commercial Dispute Resolution’. American Review of International Arbitration, 12 (2001), 411–423.Google Scholar

Paleker, Mohamed. ‘Mediation in South Africa: Here but Not All There’. In Alexander, Nadja (ed.), Global Trends in Mediation, 333–369. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

Paredes, Tray A. ‘A System Approach to Corporate Governance Reform: Why Importing US Corporate Law Isn’t the Answer’. William and Mary Law Review, 45 (2003), 1005–1157.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. E. Corporate Power and Responsibility. Oxford: Press, Clarendon 1993.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John. ‘Inclusive Company Law’. In Lacy, John de (ed.), The Reform of United Kingdom Company Law, 43–58. London: Cavendish, 2002.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. ‘Law as an Intellectual Stepchild’. In Johnson, Harry M. (ed.), Social System and Legal Process: Theory, Comparative Perspectives and Special Studies. 11–58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.Google Scholar

Partington, Martin. ‘Empirical Legal Research and Policy-Making’. In Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, 1025–1044. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pawson, Ray and Tilley, Nick. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE, 1997.Google Scholar

Payne, Jennifer. ‘Company Law’. All England Annual Review, 4 (2004), 647–677.Google Scholar

Payne, Jennifer, ‘Sections 459–461 Companies Act 1985 in Flux: The Future of Shareholder Protection’. Cambridge Law Journal, 64:3 (2005), 647–677.Google Scholar

Picardi, Carrie A. and Masick, Kevin D. Research Methods: Designing and Conducting Research with a Real-World Focus. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.Google Scholar

Pirie, Andrew J. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Thailand and Cambodia: Making Sense on (Un)Common Ground’. In Johnston, Douglas M. and Ferguson, Gerry (eds.), Asia-Pacific Legal Development. pp. 501–547. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Porta, Rafael La, et al. ‘Law and Finance’. Journal of Political Economy, 106:6 (1998), 1113–1155.Google Scholar

Porta, Rafael La, ‘Corporate Ownership Around the World’. Journal of Finance, 54:2 (1999), 471–517.Google Scholar

Porta, Rafael La, ‘Investor Protection and Corporate Governance’. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 3–27.Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W. ‘Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis’. In Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 183–203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. ‘Introduction’. In DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1–40. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Prentice, D. D. ‘The Theory of the Firm: Minority Shareholder Oppression: Sections 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 8:1 (1988), 55–91.Google Scholar

Press Release: Final Report and Recommendations on Enactment of Apology Legislation Published, 28 November 2016 at www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201611/28/P2016112800594.htm (Accessed 29 November 2016).Google Scholar

Press, Sharon. ‘Institutionalization: Savior or Saboteur of Mediation?’. Florida State University Law Review, 24 (1997), 903–917.Google Scholar

Purdy, Jill M. and Gary, Barbara. ‘Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields’. Academy of Management Journal, 52:2 (2009), 355–380.Google Scholar

Pruitt, Dean G. and Kim, Sung Hee. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2004.Google Scholar

Quek, Dorcas. ‘Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility of Implementing a Court-Mandated Mediation Program’. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11 (2010), 479–509.Google Scholar

Raven, Robert D. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: Expanding Opportunities’. The Arbitration Journal, 43:2 (1988), 44–48.Google Scholar

Regan, Francis. ‘Dispute Resolution in Australia: Theory, Evidence and Dilemmas’. In Wang, Gongyi and Tomasic, Roman (eds.), Alternative Dispute Resolution and Modern Rule of Law: Papers from the Sino-Australian Seminar, 49–59. Beijing: Law Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Reitz, John C. ‘How to Do Comparative Law’. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 46:4 (1998), 617–636.Google Scholar

Resnik, Judith. ‘Many Doors? Closing Doors? Alternative Dispute Resolution and Adjudication’. The Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10:2 (1995), 211–265.Google Scholar

Reuben, Richard C. ‘Constitutional Gravity: A Unitary Theory of Alternative Dispute Resoltuion and Public Civil Justice’. UCLA Law Review, 47 (2000), 949–1104.Google Scholar

Riley, Christopher A. ‘Contracting Out of Company Law: Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985 and the Role of the Courts’. The Modern Law Review, 55:6 (1992), 782–802.Google Scholar

Riskin, Leonard L. ‘Mediation and Lawyers’. Ohio State Law Journal, 43 (1992), 29–60.Google Scholar

Riskin, Leonard L., et al. Dispute Resolution and Lawyers, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Thompson West, 2006.Google Scholar

Roberts, Simon and Palmer, Michael. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Roodt, Christa. ‘Autonomy and Due Process in Arbitration: Recalibrating the Balance’. The Comparative and International Law Journal of South Africa, 41:2 (2011), 311–339.Google Scholar

Rose, Richard. ‘What Is Lesson Drawing?’. Journal of Public Policy, 11:1 (1991), 3–30.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Robert. Meta-Analytical Procedures for Social Research, rev. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1991.Google Scholar

Roux, Francois Le. The Applicability of the Third King Report on Corporate Governance to Small and Medium Enterprises. PhD thesis, The University of Stellenbosch, 2010.Google Scholar

Rowe, Mary and Bendersky, Corinne. ‘Workplace Justice, Zero Tolerance, and Zero Barriers’. In Kochan, Thomas A. and Lipsky, David B. (eds.), Negotiaions and Change: From the Workplace to Society, 117–140. Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Rozdeiczer, Lukasz and Campa, Alejandro Alvarez de la. Alternative Dispute Resolution Manual: Implementing Commercial Mediation – Small and Medium Enterprise Department at http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/Toolkits/adr/adr_fulltoolkit.pdf (Accessed 18 August 2009).Google Scholar

Runesson, Eric M. and Guy, Marie-Laurence. Mediating Corporate Governance Conflict and Disputes: Global Corporate Governance Forum Focus 4 (2007) at www.gcgf.org/ifcext/cgf.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/Focus+Mediation/$FILE/Focus4_Mediation_12.pdf (Accessed 18 August 2009).Google Scholar

Sandborg, David. ‘Dispatch From Hong Kong’. Dispute Resolution Magazine, (2013), 45–47.Google Scholar

Sandborg, David. ‘Construction ADR: Multistep ADR Gets Creative at Hong Kong’s New Airport’. Alternatives to High Cost Litigation, 17:3 (1999), 41–61.Google Scholar

Sander, Frank E. A. ‘Another View of Mandatory Mediation’. Dispute Resolution Journal, 16 (2007), 16.Google Scholar

Sander, Frank E. A. and Rozdiczer, Lukasz. ‘Matching Cases and Dispute Resolution Procedures: Detailed Analysis Leading to a Mediation-Centered Approach’. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 11 (2006), 1–41.Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas. ‘Secondary Rules of Recognition and Relative Legality in Transnational Regimes’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 56 (2011), 59–88.Google Scholar

SCMP. Mediation Isn’t Being Taken Seriously, 29 July 2011 at www.scmp.com/article/974803/mediation-isnt-being-taken-seriously (Accessed 10 January 2014).Google Scholar

Scott, Richard W. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001.Google Scholar

Scott, William R. Financial Accounting Theory, 3rd ed. Toronto: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar

Selznick, Philip. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Shaw, Lori Anne. ‘Divorce Mediation Outcome Research: A Meta-Analysis’. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27:4 (2010), 447–467.Google Scholar

Shipman, Shirley. ‘Compulsory Mediation: The Elephant in the Room’. Civil Justice Quarterly, 30:2 (2011), 163–191.Google Scholar

Singer, Linda R. Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Solomon, Lewis D. and Solomon, Janet Stern. ‘Using Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques to Settle Conflicts among Shareholders of Closely Held Corporations’. Wake Forest Law Review, 22 (1987), 105–126.Google Scholar

Spamann, Holger. ‘Contemporary Legal Transplants: Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law’. Brigham Young University Law Review, 11:6 (2009), 1813–1878.Google Scholar

Spiller, Peter. Dispute Resolution in New Zealand, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Statistics Relating to the Number of Local Companies Incorporated in Hong Kong at www.cr.gov.hk/en/statistics/statistics_02.htm (Accessed 10 May 2016).Google Scholar

Sternlight, Jean R. ‘Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Consistent with the Rule of Law? Lessons from Abroad’. DePaul Law Review, 56 (2006), 569–592.Google Scholar

Stipanowich, Thomas J. and Lamare, J. Ryan. ‘Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Management in Fortune 1000 Corporations’. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 19 (2014), 1–68.Google Scholar

Suchman, Mark C. ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’. Academy of Management Review, 20:3 (1995), 571–610.Google Scholar

Suddaby, Roy and Greenwood, Royston. ‘Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy’. Administrative Science Quartely, 50 (2005), 35–67.Google Scholar

Sugarman, David. ‘Reconceptualising Company Law: Reflections on the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on Shareholder Remedies: Part 1’. The Company Lawyer, 18:8 (1997), 226–247.Google Scholar

Sugarman, David. ‘Reconceptualising Company Law: Reflections on the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on Shareholder Remedies: Part 2’. Company Lawyer, 18:9 (1997), 274–282.Google Scholar

Susskind, Richard. The End of Lawyer: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services, rev ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tan, Karen. HKIAC Tops Prestigious Global Arbitration Survey at www.hkiac.org/news/hkiac-tops-prestigious-global-arbitration-survey (Accessed 4 May 2016).Google Scholar

Taylor, Lynne. ‘Minority Buy-Out Rights in the Company Act 1993’. Canterbury Law Review, 6 (1997), 539–563.Google Scholar

Taylor, Lynne. ‘Shareholder Agreements’. In Farrar, John et al. (eds.), Company and Securities Law in New Zealand, 65–68. New Zealand: Thomson Reuters, 2008.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther. ‘Introduction to Autopoietic Law’. In Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, 1–11. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther. ‘“And God Laughed...” Indeterminacy, Self-Reference and Paradox in Law’. German Law Journal, 12:1 (2011), 376–406.Google Scholar

Thibaut, John, et al. ‘Procedural Justice as Fairness’. Stanford Law Review, 26 (1974), 1271–1289.Google Scholar

Tolbert, Pamela S. and Zucker, Lynne G. ‘Studying Organization: Theory & Method’. In Clegg, Stewart R. and Hardy, Cynthia (eds.), The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory, 169–184. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1999.Google Scholar

Trubek, David. ‘Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism’. Wisconsin Law Review, (1972), 720–753.Google Scholar

Tsang, Donald. The HKSAR Chief Executive, The 2006–07 Policy Address: Proactive Pragmatic Always People First, 2006.Google Scholar

Tsang, Donald. The HKSAR Chief Executive, The 2007 Policy Address: A New Direction for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Publishing Department, 2007.Google Scholar

Tweeddale, Andrew and Tweeddale, Keren. A Practical Approach to Arbitration Law. London: Blackstone Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Twining, William. ‘Social Science and Diffusion of Law’. Journal of Law and Society, 32:2 (2005), 203–240.Google Scholar

Unger, Roberto Magabeira. Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Ury, William L., et al. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict, 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.Google Scholar

Velasco, Julian. ‘The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder’. University of California, Davis, 40:2 (2006), 407–467.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, Erik P. M. The Evolution of Legal Business Forms in Europe and the United States: Venture Capital, Joint Venture and Partnership Structures. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003.Google Scholar

Walker, Richard M. ‘Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government’. Public Administration, 84:2 (2006), 311–335.Google Scholar

Walker, Richard M., et al. Managing Public Services Innovation: The Experience of English Housing Associations. Bristol: Policy Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Wallgren, Carita. ‘ADR and Business’. In Goldsmith, J. C. et al. (eds.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Vol. I, 3–19. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

Ward, Ettie. ‘Mandatory Court-annexed Alternative Dispute Resolution in The United States Federal Courts: Panacea or Pandemic?’. St. John’s Law Review, 81 (2007), 77–98.Google Scholar

Warner, Rebecca M. Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through Multivariate Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2008.Google Scholar

Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Lake Mary, FL: Vandeplas, 1974.Google Scholar

Watson, Garry D. ‘From an Adversarial to a Managed System of Litigation: A Comparative Critique of Law Woolf’s Interim Report’. In Smith, Roger (ed.), Achieving Civil Justice: Appropriate Dispute Resolution for the 1990s, 63–88. London: Legal Action Group, 1996.Google Scholar

Watson, Susan. ‘The Board of Directors’. In Farrar, John et al. (eds.), Company and Securities Law in New Zealand, 269–329. New Zealand: Thomson Reuters 2008.Google Scholar

Wedderburn, K. W. ‘Shareholders’ Rights and the Rule in Foss v Harbottle’. Cambridge Law Journal, (1957), 194–215.Google Scholar

Weiss, Carol H. Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.Google Scholar

Wejnert, Barbara. ‘Integration Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework’. Annual Review of Sociology, 28 (2002), 297–326.Google Scholar

Westphal, James E. ‘The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions’. American Sociological Review, 69 (2004), 433–457.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Michael. ‘Introduction’. In Wilkinson, Michael and Burton, Janet (eds.), Reform of the Civil Process in Hong Kong, 1–62. Hong Kong: Butterworths Asia, 2000.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Michael and Burton, Janet. ‘Conclusions’. In Wilkinson, Michael and Burton, Janet (eds.), Reform of the Civil Process in Hong Kong, 323. Hong Kong: Butterworths Asia, 2000.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Michael and Sandor, Michael. The Professional Conduct of Lawyers in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Butterworths, Asia, 2008.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. ‘Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations’. In Buckley, Peter J. and Michie, Jonathan (eds.), Firms, Organizations and Contract: A Reader in Industrial Organization, 168–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wilson, Claire. Hong Kong Mediation Ordinance: Commentary and Annotations. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2013.Google Scholar

Wissler, Roselle L. ‘Court-connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research’. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 17 (2002), 641–704.Google Scholar

Wissler, Roselle L. ‘Barriers to Attorneys’ Discussion and Use of ADR’. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 19:2 (2004), 459–508.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Richard A. ‘Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions’. Journal of Management Studies, 31:3 (1994), 405–431.Google Scholar

Wong, Albert. ‘Bar Chief Backs Reforms on Financial Checks’. The Standard, 13 January 2009, A3.Google Scholar

Wong, Hung. ‘Changes in Social Policy in Hong Kong since 1997: Old Wine in New Bottles?’ In Wai-man, Lam et al. (eds.), Contemporary Hong Kong Government and Politics, 277–296. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Wong, Wilson and Yuen, Raymond. ‘Economic Policy’. In Wai-man, Lam et al. (eds.), Contemporary Hong Kong Government and Politics. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Wong, Yan-Lung. ‘The Benefits of Mediation’. In Conference on Hong Kong Mediation Council Annual Dinner, Hong Kong, 17 March 2006.Google Scholar

Wong, Yan-Lung. ‘The Use and Development of Mediation in Hong Kong’. Asian Dispute Reivew, (2008), 54–56.Google Scholar

The World Bank. South Africa Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes Accounting and Auditing at www.worldbank.org (Accessed 8 June 2017).Google Scholar

World Bank Group. Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency at www.doingbusiness.org (Accessed 10 September 2016).Google Scholar

Yeo Li-Hui, Beatrice Mathilda and Chew, Fiona. ‘Case Note on Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v. Silica Invetors Ltd [2016] 1 SLR 373: The Arbitration and Litigation of Minority Shareholder Disputes’. Singapore Academic Law Journal, 28 (2016), 382–407.Google Scholar

Yeow-Choy, Choong and Ganesh, Warren P. ‘Public Policy Consideratoins in Arbitral Proceedings in Selected Common Law Jurisdictions’. Hong Kong Law Journal, 44:1 (2014), 179–205.Google Scholar

Young, Angus. ‘Reforming Directors’ Duties in Hong Kong: The Journey, Stakeholders and Oversights’. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 23:4 (2012), 142–154.Google Scholar

Yuen, Rimsky, ‘HK a Perfect Partner in Mediation’. In Conference on Asia Pacific International Mediation Summit, India, 15 February 2015.Google Scholar

Yuen, Rimsky. ‘Secretary Justice’s Speech’. In Conference on 19th International Congress of Maritime Arbitration, 11 May 2015.Google Scholar

Yun, Zhao. ‘Revisiting the Issue of Enforceability of Mediation Agreements in Hong Kong’. China-EU Law Journal, 1(2013), 115–133.Google Scholar

Zemans, Frances Kahn. ‘Framework for Analysis of Legal Mobilization: A Decision-Making Model’. American Bar Foundation, 7:4 (1982), 989–1071.Google Scholar

Zucker, Lynne G. ‘Organizations as Institutions’. In Bacharach, Samuel B. (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations: A Research Annual, 83–107. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Zucker, Lynne G. ‘The Role of Institutionalization Cultural Persistence’. In Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 169–184. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, A. A. S. ‘Reform in the Shadow of Lawyers’ Interests’. In Zuckerman, A. A. S. and Cranston, Ross (eds.), Reform of Civil Procedure: Essay on “Access to Justice”, 61–78. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Adrian. ‘The Challenge of Civil Justice Reform: Effective Court Management of Litigation’. City University of Hong Kong Law Review, 1:1 (2009), 49–71.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Adrian A. S. Civil Procedure London: LexisNexis UK, 2003.Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad and Käotz, Hein. Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar