Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:00:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Evolving Approaches to Zoo-Based Conservation

from Part I - Programs and Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Allison B. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Meredith J. Bashaw
Affiliation:
Franklin and Marshall College, Pennsylvania
Terry L. Maple
Affiliation:
Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens
Get access

Summary

Zoos and aquariums are powerful forces in animal conservation and education. As zoos and aquariums work to save animals and their habitats, they have expanded their research programs, basic and applied, on site and in the field. This chapter provides a broad overview of key issues related to the history, purpose, justification, utility, and diversity of research conducted in modern zoological parks and aquariums today. The breadth of scientific disciplines spans from the molecular to the individual to the population and to the ecosystem where they are reintroduced or conserved. We touch on a variety of important issues associated with the conduct of research in zoological institutions, including a brief exploration of the history of zoo research; advantages and disadvantages of conducting research in the zoo setting; the diversity, purpose, and utility of zoo research; administration of zoo research programs; research priority setting; zoo–university and other partnerships; animal welfare and other ethical considerations; publication of research results; and funding to sustain zoo research programs.
Type
Chapter
Information
Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
Their Role in Conservation and Research
, pp. 45 - 63
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARCS (2016). 2016 Annual Report on Conservation and Science Highlights. Retrieved from www.aza.org/assets/2332/aza_arcshighlights_2016_final_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
AZA (2018). AZA Accreditation Standards. Retrieved from www.aza.org/assets/2332/guide_to_accreditation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. (2007). Animal ambassadors: An analysis of the effectiveness and conservation impact of ex situ breeding efforts. In Zimmermann, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L., & West, C. (Eds.), Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation? (pp. 139154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barongi, R., Fisken, F., Parker, M., & Gusset, M. (2015). Committing to Conservation: The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy. Gland: WAZA Executive Office.Google Scholar
Beck, B., Walkup, K., Rodrigues, M., Unwin, S., Travis, D., & Stoinski, T. (2007). Best Practice Guidelines for the Re-Introduction of Great Apes. Gland: The World Conservation Union.Google Scholar
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5), e1400253.Google Scholar
Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R., & Scheuerlein, A. (2011). An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science, 331(6023), 13901391.Google Scholar
Conway, W., & Hutchins, M. (2001). Introduction. In Conway, W., Hutchins, M., Souza, M., Kapetanakos, Y., & Paul, E. (Eds.), American Zoo and Aquarium Association Field Conservation Research Guide (pp. 17). New York: Wildlife Conservation Society and Atlanta: Zoo Atlanta.Google Scholar
EAZA. (2017). Strategic Plan 2017–2020: Progressive Zoos and Aquariums Collaborating to Lead on Conservation. Amsterdam: European Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar
Eves, H., & Hutchins, M. (2001). The bushmeat crisis task force: Cooperative US efforts to curb the illegal commercial bushmeat trade in Africa. In Conway, W., Hutchins, M., Souza, M., Kapetanakos, Y., & Paul, E. (Eds.), American Zoo and Aquarium Association Field Conservation Research Guide (pp. 181186). New York: Wildlife Conservation Society and Atlanta: Zoo Atlanta.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. E., Doak, D. F., George, D., Burnett, J., Brandt, J., Church, M., … Smith, D. R. (2012). Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), 1144911454.Google Scholar
Gilbert, T., Gardner, R., Kraaijeveld, A., & Riordan, P. (2017). Contributions of zoos and aquariums to reintroductions: Historical reintroduction efforts in the context of changing conservation perspectives. International Zoo Yearbook, 51(1), 1531.Google Scholar
Hutchins, M., & Conway, W. G. (1995). Beyond Noah’s ark: The evolving role of modern zoological parks and aquariums in field conservation. International Zoo Yearbook, 34(1), 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN/SSC (1993). Executive Summary, the World Zoo Conservation Strategy; the Role of the Zoos and Aquaria of the World in Global Conservation. Brookfield: IUCN Species Survival Commission.Google Scholar
Jarvis, C. (1965). Zoos and conservation symposium. International Zoo Yearbook, 5(1), 97100.Google Scholar
Keulartz, J. (2015). Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 335351.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. G. (1989). Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation. BioScience, 39(3), 152161.Google Scholar
Martin, T., Lurbiecki, H., Joy, J., & Mooers, A. (2014). Mammal and bird species held in zoos are less endemic and less threatened than their close relatives not held in zoos. Animal Conservation, 17(2), 8996.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 543554.Google Scholar
Miller, B., Conway, W., Reading, R. P., Wemmer, C., Wildt, D., Kleiman, D., … Hutchins, M. (2004). Evaluating the conservation mission of zoos, aquariums, botanical gardens, and natural history museums. Conservation Biology, 18(1), 8693.Google Scholar
Norton, B. G., Hutchins, M., Stevens, E. F., & Maple, T. L. (1995). Ethics on the Ark: Zoos, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. L., Lowry, R., Dorrian, J., & Litchfield, C. A. (2014). Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo‐based educational campaign: ’Don’t Palm Us Off’ for orang‐utan conservation. Zoo Biology, 33(3), 184196.Google Scholar
Price, M. R. S., & Fa, J. E. (2007). Reintroductions from zoos: A conservation guiding light or a shooting star? In Zimmermann, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L., & West, C. (Eds.), Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation? (pp. 155177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabb, G. B. (1994). The changing roles of zoological parks in conserving biological diversity. American Zoologist, 34(1), 159164.Google Scholar
Rahbek, C. (1993). Captive breeding – A useful tool in the preservation of biodiversity? Biodiversity & Conservation, 2(4), 426437.Google Scholar
Reading, R. P., & Kellert, S. R. (1993). Attitudes toward a proposed reintroduction of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Conservation Biology, 7(3), 569580.Google Scholar
Robert, A., Colas, B., Guigon, I., Kerbiriou, C., Mihoub, J. B., Saint‐Jalme, M., & Sarrazin, F. (2015). Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: A demographic assessment. Animal Conservation, 18(5), 397406.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 10801083.Google Scholar
Snyder, N. F., Derrickson, S. R., Beissinger, S. R., Wiley, J. W., Smith, T. B., Toone, W. D., & Miller, B. (1996). Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology, 10(2), 338348.Google Scholar
Tribe, A., & Booth, R. (2003). Assessing the role of zoos in wildlife conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(1), 6574.Google Scholar
WAZA (2005). Building a Future for Wildlife – The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy. Bern: World Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). The conservation mission in the wild: Zoos as conservation NGOs? In Zimmermann, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L., & West, C. (Eds.), Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation? (pp. 303321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×