Book contents
- Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Methodologies of Interpreting Hobbes: Historical and Philosophical
- Chapter 2 Hobbes’s Political-Philosophical Project: Science and Subversion
- Chapter 3 Hobbes’s Philosophical Method and the Passion of Curiosity
- Chapter 4 Hobbes, Life, and the Politics of Self-Preservation: The Role of Materialism in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Chapter 5 Human Nature and Motivation: Hamilton versus Hobbes
- Chapter 6 On Benevolence and Love of Others
- Chapter 7 Interpreting Hobbes’s Moral Theory: Rightness, Goodness, Virtue, and Responsibility
- Chapter 8 Interpreting Hobbes on Civil Liberties and Rights of Resistance
- Chapter 9 Hobbes and Christian Belief
- Chapter 10 Hobbes on Persons and Authorization
- Chapter 11 The Character and Significance of the State of Nature
- Chapter 12 Hobbes’s Confounding Foole
- Chapter 13 “Not a Woman-Hater,” “No Rapist,” or Even Inventor of “the Sensitive Male”? Feminist Interpretations of Hobbes’s Political Theory and Their Relevance for Hobbes Studies
- Chapter 14 The Productivity of Misreading: Interpreting Hobbes in a Hobbesian Contractarian Perspective
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Methodologies of Interpreting Hobbes: Historical and Philosophical
- Chapter 2 Hobbes’s Political-Philosophical Project: Science and Subversion
- Chapter 3 Hobbes’s Philosophical Method and the Passion of Curiosity
- Chapter 4 Hobbes, Life, and the Politics of Self-Preservation: The Role of Materialism in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy
- Chapter 5 Human Nature and Motivation: Hamilton versus Hobbes
- Chapter 6 On Benevolence and Love of Others
- Chapter 7 Interpreting Hobbes’s Moral Theory: Rightness, Goodness, Virtue, and Responsibility
- Chapter 8 Interpreting Hobbes on Civil Liberties and Rights of Resistance
- Chapter 9 Hobbes and Christian Belief
- Chapter 10 Hobbes on Persons and Authorization
- Chapter 11 The Character and Significance of the State of Nature
- Chapter 12 Hobbes’s Confounding Foole
- Chapter 13 “Not a Woman-Hater,” “No Rapist,” or Even Inventor of “the Sensitive Male”? Feminist Interpretations of Hobbes’s Political Theory and Their Relevance for Hobbes Studies
- Chapter 14 The Productivity of Misreading: Interpreting Hobbes in a Hobbesian Contractarian Perspective
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpreting Hobbes's Political Philosophy , pp. 258 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
“Illustrations of the State of the Church during the Great Rebellion.” 1850. The Theologian and Ecclesiastic 9 : 288–98.Google Scholar
Abbot, Robert. 1594. A Mirrour of Popish Subtilties Discouering Sundry Wretched and Miserable Euasions and Shifts.Google Scholar
Abbot, Robert. 1626. The rule of faith, or, An exposition of the Apostles Creed. London.Google Scholar
Abbot, Robert. 1657. Castigations of Mr. Hobbes his last animadversions in the case concerning liberty and universal necessity wherein all his exceptions about that controversie are fully satisfied. London.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2013. “The Representation of Hobbesian Sovereignty: Leviathan as Mythology.” In Hobbes Today: Insights for the 21st Century, ed. Lloyd, S. A., 113–52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2011. “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory.” American Political Science Review 105: 298–315.Google Scholar
Adams, Marcus. 2014. “The Wax and the Mechanical Mind: Reexamining Hobbes’s Objections to Descartes’s Meditations.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22(3): 403–24.Google Scholar
Adams, Marcus P. 2017. “Hobbes and Informed Consent in Medicine.” In Courtland, Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 106–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adams, Marcus. 2016. “Hobbes on natural philosophy as ‘True Physics’ and mixed mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Jeremy. 2017. “A Hobbesian Response to Terrorism.” In Courtland, Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 231–46. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1623. Elizabethan Homilies. Ian Lancashire. www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/ret/homilies/elizhom.html. Accessed on July 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Anselm. 2001. Proslogion: With the Replies of Gaunilo and Anselm. Edited by Williams, Thomas. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise and Witt, Charlotte, eds. 1993. A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Apeldoorn, Laurens van. 2012. “Reconsidering Hobbes’s Account of Practical Deliberation.” Hobbes Studies 25: 143–65.Google Scholar
Apeldoorn, Laurens van. 2015. “Hobbes on the Scientific Study of the Human Mind.” Archiv fur Gesichte der Philosophie 9(3): 308–33.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2017. “Hobbes on Mind: Practical Deliberation, Reasoning, and Language.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1) (January): 1–34.Google Scholar
Attersoll, William. 1612. Commentarie upon the Epistle of Sainte Paul to Philemon. London.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John. 1898. “Thomas Hobbes.” In Brief Lives, ed. Clark, Andrew, 321–403. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1993. ed. Williams, Thomas, On Free Choice of the Will. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. Urmson, J. O. and Marina, Sbisà, eds., How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Allan. 1998. “Scotus on the Consistency of the Incarnation and the Trinity.” Vivarium 36(1): 83–107.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 2000. Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael, eds., The New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Robert. 1573. In The Whole workes of W. Tyndall, Iohn Frith, and Doct. Barnes, three worthy martyrs, and principall teachers of this Churche of England collected and compiled.Google Scholar
Barnouw, J. 1989. “Hobbes’s Psychology of Thought: Endeavours, Purpose and Curiosity.” History of European Ideas 10: 519–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah. 2013. “‘Trust’ in Hobbes’s Political Thought.” Political Theory 41(6): 838–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah. 1983. “Subjects and Soldiers: Hobbes on Military Service.” History of Political Thought 4(1): 43–64.Google Scholar
Bennefield, Sebastian. 1615. Sinne against the Holy Ghost Discovered and Other Christian Doctrines Delivered. London.Google Scholar
Bernard, Richard. 1626. Rhemes against Rome: or, The remoouing of the Gagg of the New Gospell, and rightly placing it in the mouthes of the Romists.Google Scholar
Bertman, Martin A. 1976. “Equality in Hobbes, with reference to Aristotle.” Review of Politics 38(4): 534–44.Google Scholar
Birmingham, Peg. 2011. “Arendt and Hobbes: Glory, Sacrificial Violence, and the Political Imagination.” Research in Phenomenology 41(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1859. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott and company.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2015a. “History of Political Thought as Detective-Work.” History of European Ideas 41(8): 1178–94.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2015b. “The Irrelevance of (Straussian) Hermeneutics.” In Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Schröder, Winfried, 29–55. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2009. “Hobbes on Corruption.” History of Political Thought 30(4): 596–616.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2017a. “Interpreting Texts.” In Methods in Analytical Political Theory, ed. Blau, Adrian, 243–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2017b. “Introduction: a ‘How-To’ Approach.” In Methods in Analytical Political Theory, ed. Blau, Adrian, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Adrian. 2016. “Reason, Deliberation, and the Passions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, 195–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Robert. 1626. Some General Directions for a Comfortable Walking with God. London.Google Scholar
Boonin-Vail, D. 1994. Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, Joanne. 2018. “Hobbes and Physician-Assisted Suicide.” In Courtland, Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 91–105. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boucher, Joanne. 2012. “Thomas Hobbes and the Problem of Fetal Personhood.” In eds. Hirschmann and Wright, Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, 219–39.Google Scholar
Bramhall, John. 1995. “The Catching of Leviathan, or the Great Whale.” In ed. Rogers, Leviathan, 115–79.Google Scholar
Brennan, Teresa, and Pateman, Carol. 1979. “Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth. Women and the Origins of Liberalism.” Political Studies 27(2): 183–200.Google Scholar
Brewer, William, and Lambert, Bruce. 2001. “The Theory-Ladenness of Observation and the Theory-Ladenness of the Rest of the Scientific Process.” Philosophy of Science 68(3) supplement: 176–86.Google Scholar
Bunce, Robin. 2006. “Hobbes’s Forgotten Natural Histories.” Hobbes Studies 19: 77–101.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. 1994. “On Hobbesian Resistance Theory.” Political Studies 42(1): 62–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Joseph. 1726. “Upon Human Nature” Sermon 1 from Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel, reprinted in Baumrin, Bernard H., ed. 1969. Hobbes’s Leviathan: Interpretation and Criticism, 16–25. Belmont California: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Byron, Michael, and Venezia, Luciano. 2016. “Authors’ Exchange.” Hobbes Studies 29(2): 189–205.Google Scholar
Byron, Michael, Baumgold, Deborah, Krom, Michael, and Olsthoorn, Johan. 2017. “Online Colloquium: Submission and Subjection in Leviathan: Good Subjects in the Hobbesian Commonwealth.” www.europeanhobbessociety.org/newpublications/online-colloquium-1-submission-and-subjection-in-leviathan-good-subjects-in-the-hobbesian-commonwealth/. Accessed on September 06, 2017.Google Scholar
Byron, Michael. 2015. Submission and Subjection in Leviathan: Good Subjects in the Hobbesian Commonwealth. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshirer and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Richard Allen. 1975. “Leviathan Writ Small: Thomas Hobbes on the Family.” The American Political Science Review 69(1): 76–90.Google Scholar
Chung, Hun. 2015. “Hobbes’s State of Nature: A Modern Bayesian Game-Theoretic Analysis.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1: 485–508.Google Scholar
Clarendon, Edward, Earl of. 1995. “A Survey of Mr Hobbes His Leviathan.” In Rogers, “Leviathan,” 180–300.Google Scholar
Clark, Lorenne M. G., and Lange, Lynda. 1979. The Sexism of Social and Political Theory. Women and Reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010. The Arc of the Moral Universe and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. “The Case of Sutton’s Hospital.” http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/coke-selected-writings-of-sir-edward-coke-vol-i–5#lf0462-01_mnt114. Accessed on August 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward. “The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England or, A Commentary upon Littleton.” https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/imgsrv/download/pdf?id=njp.32101079882815;orient=0;size=100;seq=51;num=23;attachment=0. Accessed on August 16, 2017.Google Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey. 2011. “Restoration Anti-Catholicism: a Prejudice in Motion.” In England’s Wars of Religion, Revisited, eds. Prior, Charles and Burgess, Glenn, 281–306. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey. 2016. “Thomas Hobbes’s Ecclesiastical History.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, 520–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana H. 1994. “Women, gender, and contract: Feminist interpretations.” In The Social Contract From Hobbes to Rawls, ed. Boucher, David, 191–211. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Copp, David. 1980. “Hobbes on Artificial Persons and Collective Actions.” The Philosophical Review 89(4): 579–606.Google Scholar
Courtland, Shane D. 2017. Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan. 2018. “Hobbes, Calvinism, and Determinism.” In Hobbes on Politics and Religion, ed. Douglass, Robin and von Appeldoorn, Laurens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. 1994. “Introduction.” Leviathan with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668, ed. Curley, Edwin, VIII-XLVII. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. 1990. “Reflections on Hobbes: Recent Work on His Moral and Political Philosophy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 15: 169–226.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. 2004. “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” In Leviathan after 350 Years, eds. Sorell, Tom and Luc, Foisneau, 199–216. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Curran, Eleanor. 2006. “Can Rights Curb the Hobbesian Sovereign?: The Full Right to Self-Preservation, Duties of Sovereignty and the Limitations of Hohfeld.” Law and Philosophy 25(2): 243–65.Google Scholar
Curran, Eleanor. 2017. “Hobbes Comes Out for Equal Marriage.” In Courtland, , Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 161–78.Google Scholar
Curran, Eleanor. 2006. “Lost in Translation: Some Problems with a Hohfeldian Analysis of Hobbesian Rights.” Hobbes Studies 19(1): 58–76.Google Scholar
Curran, Eleanor. 2013. “An immodest proposal: Hobbes rather than Locke provides a forerunner for Modern Rights Theory.” Law and Philosophy 32: 515–38.Google Scholar
Curran, Eleanor. 2007. Reclaiming the Rights of the Hobbesian Subject. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2000. “Normativity and Projection in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Philosophical Review 109(3): 313–47.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. 1995. The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought”: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. 2006. “Heavenly Philosophy: What Thomas Hobbes Said to Jean Hampton.” Social Theory and Practice 32(3): 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deigh, J. 1996. “Reason and Ethics in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 33–60.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Liam. 2009. “Thinking-matter Then and Now: The Evolution of Mind-body Dualism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 26(1): 43–61.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1983. “Masculinity As Ideology in Political Theory: Hobbesian Man Considered.” Women’s Studies International Forum 6(6): 633–44.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1991. Configurations of Masculinity: A Feminist Perspective on Modern Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dungey, Nicholas. 2008. “Thomas Hobbes’s Materialism, Language, and the Possibility of Politics.” The Review of Politics 70: 190–220.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 2010. “The significance of Hobbes’s conception of power.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Theory 13(2–3): 417–33.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1981. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman. Women in social and political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1982. The Tudor Constitution, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evelyn, John. 1697. Numismata, a discourse of medals, ancient and modern … to which is added a digression concerning physiognomy.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis. 2014. Images of Anarchy: The Rhetoric and Science in Hobbes’s State of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ewin, R.E. 1991. Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
Field, Sandra. 2014. “Hobbes and the Question of Power.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52(1): 61–85.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. 1652. Observations concerning the Original of Government, Upon Mr Hobbes’s “Leviathan,” Mr Milton against Salmasius, H. Grotius “De Jure Belli.” London.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. 1991. Patriarchia and Other Writings, ed. Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. 2001. “A Puzzle About Hobbes’s Right of Self-Defense.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82(3–4): 332–61.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. 2012. “Hobbesian Legal Reasoning and the Problem of Wicked Laws.” In Lloyd, Hobbes Today, 49–75.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. 2006. “Hobbes and the Internal Point of View.” Fordham Law Review 75(3): 1211–28.Google Scholar
Fitzherbert, Thomas. 1610. The Second Part of a treatise Concerning Policy and Religion. Douai.Google Scholar
Foisneau, Luc. 2004. “Leviathan’s Theory of Justice.” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc, 105–22. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Foxe, John. 1583. Actes and Monuments of Matters most Speciall and Memorable, Happenyng in the Church with an Universall History of the Same, Wherein is Set Forth at large the Whole Race and Course of the Church, from the Primitive Age to these Latter Tymes of Ours.Google Scholar
Frost, Samantha. 2008. Lessons From a Materialist Thinker: Hobbesian Reflections on Ethics and Politics. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Samantha. 2010. “Fear and the Illusion of Autonomy” in New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Frost, and Coole, , eds. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Galileo, . 1615/1957. “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.” In Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York.Google Scholar
Garau, Rodolfo. 2016. “Springs, Nitre, and Conatus. The Role of the Heart in Hobbes’s Physiology and Animal Locomotion.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24(2): 231–56.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1993. “Between Hobbes and Rawls.” In Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement, eds. Gauthier, David and Sugden, Robert, 24–40. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1997. “Hobbes on Generation and Construction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 35(4): 509–21.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1988. “Hobbes’s Social Contract.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, ed. Rogers, G. A. J. and Ryan, Alan, 125–52. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1979. “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.” Journal of Philosophy 76: 547–59.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1965. “Hobbes, Mechanism, and Egoism.” Philosophical Quarterly. 15(61): 341–9.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1967. “Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28(4): 503–20; reprinted in Baumrin, Bernard H., ed. 1969. Hobbes’s Leviathan: Interpretation and Criticism, 107–26. Belmont California: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1972. “Introduction.” Man and Citizen. Thomas Hobbes’s De Homine and De Cive also known as Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Governments and Society. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1996. “Hobbes’s Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorrel, Tom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glover, Willis. 1965. “God and Thomas Hobbes.” in Hobbes Studies, 141–68. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. 2006. “The Context of The Foundations.” In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, eds. Brett, Annabel and Tully, James, 3–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Michael. 2000. “Theory in Practice: Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes, Reconsidered.” The Review of Politics 62(3): 531–61.Google Scholar
Green, Michael. 2015. “Authorization and Political Authority in Hobbes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(1): 25–47.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1605/2006. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, ed. Julia van Ittersum, Martine. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1625/2005. The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hakewill, George. 1616. An Answere to a Treatise Written by Dr. Carier, by Lay of a letter to his Maiestie. London.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James. 2014. “The Social Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought.” Modern Intellectual History 11(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1980. “Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Choice Theory?” The Journal of Philosophy 77: 6.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1989. “Should Political Philosophy be Done Without Metaphysics?” Ethics 99(4): 791–814.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1991. “Cooperating and Contracting: A Reply to I. Haji’s ‘Hampton on Hobbes on State-of-Nature Cooperation.’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51(3): 603–9.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1992. “Rational Choice and the Law.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15(3): 649–81.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1991. “Two Faces of Contractarian Thought” in Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on David Gauthier’s Morals By Agreement, ed. Vallentyne, Peter, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 2007. The Intrinsic Worth of Persons: Contractarianism in Moral and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanin, Mark. 2012. “Hobbes’s Theory of Conscience.” History of Political Thought 33: 55–85.Google Scholar
Harvey, Martin. 2002. “A Defense of Hobbes’s ‘Just Man.’” Hobbes Studies 15(1): 68–86.Google Scholar
Hequembourg, Stephen. 2013. “Hobbes’s Leviathan: A tale of two bodies.” The Seventeenth Century 28(1): 21–36.Google Scholar
Herbert, Gary. 1989. Thomas Hobbes: The Unity of Scientific & Moral Wisdom. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1989. “Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1227–44.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2016. “Hobbes on the Family.” In Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, Aloysius and Hoekstra, Kinch, 242–63. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1994. “Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory.” Philosophical Review 103(2): 387–90.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2009. Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., and Wright, Joanne H., eds. 2012. Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., and Wright, Joanne H. 2012. “Hobbes, History, Politics, and Gender: A Conversation with Carole Pateman and Quentin Skinner.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, eds. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joanne H., 18–43. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 2012. “Gordon Schochet on Hobbes, Gratitude and Women.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, eds. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joanne H., 125–45. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1839. Philosophical Rudiments Molesworth, volume II, ed. Bohn, John. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen (De Cive), eds. Tuck and Silverthorne. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 2008. Historia Ecclesiastica: critical edition, including text, translation, introduction, commentary and notes, eds. Springborg, Patricia, Stablein, Patricia, and Wilson, Paul. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1640/1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1680/1994. “Hobbes’ Verse Autobiography.” In Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668, ed. Curley, Edwin, liv–lxiv. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651b. Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Society and Government. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1652. De corpore politico, or, The elements of law, moral and politick with discourses upon severall heads, as of [brace] the law of nature, oathes and covenants, several kinds of government : with the changes and revolutions of them.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1656a. The questions concerning liberty, necessity, and chance clearly stated and debated between Dr. Bramhall … and Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1656b. Six lessons to the professors of the mathematiques one of geometry the other of astronomy, in the chaires set up by the noble and learned Sir Henry Savile in the University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1680. Considerations upon the Reputation, Loyalty, and Religion of Thomas Hobbes.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1681. Vita Carmine Expressa, in Thomae Hobbes Angli Malmesburiensis philosophi vita. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1682. An Answer to a Book Published by Dr. Bramhall … The Catching of the Leviathan. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1682. Seven Philosophical Problems and Two Propositions of Geometry. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan. With selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668, edited, with Introduction and Notes by Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen, edited and translated by Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1969. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, edited with a Preface and Critical Notes by Tönnies, Ferdinand. Second Edition with a New Introduction by Goldsmith, M. M.. London: Frank Cass & Co.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch, and Martinich, A. P., ed. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. 2013. “Hobbesian Equality.” In Hobbes Today. Insights for the 21st Century, ed. Lloyd, S. A., 76–112. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. 2005. “The de facto Turn in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” In Leviathan after 350 Years, eds. Sorrell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc, 33–74. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch. 2006. “The End of Philosophy (The Case of Hobbes).” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 25–62.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1920. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning: And Other Legal Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. 2015. “Hobbes’s First Cause.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(4): 647–67.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas. 2016. “Hobbes on the function of evaluative speech.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(1): 123–44.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W.S. 1922. “English Corporation Law in the 16th and 17th Centuries.” The Yale Law Journal 31(4): 382–407.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1990. “Political Psychology in Hobbes’s Behemoth.” In Thomas Hobbes & Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary, 120–52. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1970. Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Reprinted from the posthumous edition of 1777. Ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Jackson, Nicholas. 2007. Hobbes, Bramhall, and the Politics of Liberty and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaede, Maximilian. 2016. “Hobbes on the Making and Unmaking of Citizens.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19(1): 86–102.Google Scholar
James, Aaron. 2012. “Hobbesian Assurance Problems and Global Justice.” In Lloyd, , Hobbes Today, 264–87.Google Scholar
James, Susan. 1997. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S. 1998. “Contract and coercion: power and gender in Leviathan.” In Women writers and the early British political tradition, ed. Smith, Hilda L., 200–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 1999. Squaring the Circle: the War Between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 2016. “Hobbes on ‘Conatus’: A Study in the Foundations of Hobbesian Philosophy.” Hobbes Studies 29: 66–85.Google Scholar
Jewel, John. 1571. The Second Tome of Homilees of such Matters as were Promised. London.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1996. The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul. 1974. “Hobbes’s Anglican Doctrine of Salvation.” In Thomas Hobbes in His Time, eds. Rudolf, Schneider, and Waldman, , 102–25. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Judgment and Decree of the University of Oxford Past in their Convocation. 1683.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May be True in Theory but it does not Apply in Practice.’” In Kant: Political Writings, ed. Reiss, , 61–92. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, Clemens. 2008. “England im 17. Jahrhundert. Thomas Hobbes.” In Politischer Aristotelismus: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert, eds. Horn, Christoph and Hentschke, Ada Neschke, 252–75. Stuttgart/Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S. 1995. “The Rationality of Rule-Following: Hobbes’s Dispute with the Foole.” Law and Philosophy 14(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Kidder, Joel. 1983. “Acknowledgement as equals: Hobbes’s ninth law of nature.” Philosophical Quarterly 33(131): 133–46.Google Scholar
King, Preston. 1974. The Ideology of Order: a Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lawton, Robert, and Pringle, Helen. 1993. “A Life Well Lost? Hobbes and Self-Preservation.” Hobbes Studies 6: 58–79.Google Scholar
Lessay, Franck. 2004. “Hobbes’s Protestantism.” In Leviathan after 350 years, eds. Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc, 265–94. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lessay, Franck. 2007. “Hobbes’s Covenant Theology and Its Political Implications.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Springborg, Patricia, 243–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2018. “The Moral Assessment of Human Curiosity in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” in Paganini, , ed. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes’s Leviathan: The Power of Mind over Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 1997. “Coercion, Ideology, and Education in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” In Reclaiming the History of Ethics, eds. Reath, Andrewes, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine, 36–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2009. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A., ed. 2012. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2012. “Power and Sexual Subordination in Hobbes’s Political Theory.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, ed. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joanne H., 47–62. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2012. “Egoism.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes, ed. Lloyd, S. A., 125–7. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A., ed. 2013. Hobbes Today. Insights for the 21st Century. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2016. “Natural Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed.Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, 264–89. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2016. “Authorization and Moral Responsibility in the Philosophy of Hobbes.” Hobbes Studies 29: 169–88.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690/1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupoli, Agostino. 2016. “Hobbes and Religion without Theology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, 453–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederick William. 1911. “The Corporation Sole.” In The Collected Papers of Frederick William Maitland, Downing Professor of the Laws of England, ed. Fisher, H. A. L., volume 3, 210–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martel, James R. 2000. “The Radical Promise of Thomas Hobbes: The Road Not Taken in Liberal Theory.” Theory & Event 4(2): Project MUSE, muse.jhu.edu/article/32586.Google Scholar
Martel, James. 2007. Subverting the Leviathan: Reading Thomas Hobbes as a Radical Democrat. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Martinch, A. P. 1996. “On the Proper Interpretation of Hobbes’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34(2): 273–83.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2001. “Interpretation and Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82(3–4): 309–31.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2004. “The Interpretation of Covenants in Leviathan.” In Leviathan after 350 Years, eds. Sorell, Tom and Luc, Foisneau, 217–40. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2007. “Thomas Hobbes’s Interregnum Place of Worship.” Notes and Queries 252: 433–6.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2012. “On Thomas Hobbes’s English Calvinism: Necessity, Omnipotence, and Goodness.” Philosophical Readings 4(1): 18–30.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2013. “L’Auteur de Peche et les Demonique: Deux Problemes Calvinistes chez Hobbes et Certains de ses Contemporains.” In Jean Calvin et Thomas Hobbes, ed. Abel, O. and Weber, D., 43–71. Geneve: Editions Labor et Fides.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2016. “Thomas Hobbes and John Bramhall on Free Will.” In Routledge Companion to Free Will, ed. Griffith, Meghan, Levy, Neil, and Timpe, Kevin, 303–12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2016. “Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, and Hoekstra, , 315–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, Larry. 2013. Limiting Leviathan: Hobbes on Law and International Affairs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McArthur, Neil. 2012. “‘Thrown amongst Many’: Hobbes on Taxation and Fiscal Policy.” In Lloyd, , ed. Hobbes Today, 178–89.Google Scholar
McClure, Christopher Scott. 2013. “War, Madness, and Death: The Paradox of Honor in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Journal of Politics 76(1): 114–25.Google Scholar
McClure, Christopher Scott. 2011. “Hell and Anxiety in Hobbes’s Leviathan,” in The Review of Politics 73: 1–27.Google Scholar
McClure, Christopher Scott. 2016. Hobbes and the Artifice of Eternity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, John. 1954. History and Character of Calvinism. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNeilly, F. S. 1993. “Egoism in Hobbes,” in Ethics, vol. 2 of Thomas Hobbes: Critical Assessments, ed. Preston, King. New York, NY: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Metzger, Hans-Dieter. 1991. Thomas Hobbes und die Englische Revolution 1640–1660. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Meyers, C. D. 2013. “Hobbes and the Rationality of Self-Preservation: Grounding Morality on the Desires We Should Have.” The European Legacy 18(3): 269–86.Google Scholar
Minogue, Kenneth. 1981. “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations.” Philosophy 56: 533–52.Google Scholar
Mintz, Samuel I. 1970. The Hunting of Leviathan: Seventeenth century Reactions to the Materialism and Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Sarah. 2016. “Christianity and Civil Religion in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” in The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, and Hoekstra, , 501–19.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1959. “Hobbes’s Concept of Obligation.” Philosophical Review 6(1): 68–83.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan. 2017. “Hobbes and the Welfare State.” In Courtland, , Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 198–213.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi. 2002. “Hobbes the Pessimist? Continuity of Hobbes’s Views on Reason and Eloquence between The Elements of Law and Leviathan.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10(1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi. 2002. “Hobbes on Religion between The Elements of Law and Leviathan: A Dramatic Change of Direction?” In Journal of the History of Ideas 63: 577–98.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi. 2009. In Defense of Common Sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newey, Glen. “How Do We Find Out What He Meant?” Times Literary Supplement June 26, 1998, http://tls.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25368–1949826,00.html.Google Scholar
Newey, Glen. 2010. “Not a Woman Hater: Hobbes’s critique of patriarchy.” In The Politics of Gender: a Survey, ed. Lee, Yoke-Lian, 10–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: a Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175–220.Google Scholar
Nunan, Richard. 1989. “Hobbes on Morality, Rationality, and Foolishness.” Hobbes Studies 2(1): 40–64.Google Scholar
Odzuck, Eva. 2017. “The Concept of Trust in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” In Trust and Happiness in the History of European Political Thought, ed. Kontler, László and Somos, Mark, 118–41. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan. 2014. “Forfeiting Citizenship: Hobbes on Traitors, Rebels, and Enemies.” In Athenian Legacies: European Debates on Citizenship, ed. Kitromilides, Paschalis M., 237–52. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Pacchi, A. 1965. Convenzione e ipotesi nella formazione della filosofia naturale di Th. Hobbes. Florence.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 2012. “‘Passionate Thought’: reason and the passion of curiosity in Thomas Hobbes.” In Emotional Minds. The Passions and the Limits of Pure Inquiry in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Ebbersmeyer, S., 227–56. Berlin: Walter.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 1990. “Hobbes, Gassendi e la psicologia del meccanicismo.” In Hobbes Oggi, eds. Pacchi, A., Canziani, G., Napoli, A., 351–446. Milano.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 2015. “Hobbes’s Galilean Project. Its Philosophical and Theological Implications.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7: 1–46.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 2017. “Political Animals in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy: Some Rival Paradigms (Hobbes and Gassendi).” In Human & Animal Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy & Medicine, eds. Buchenau, Stephanie and Presti, Roberto Lo, 186–98. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 2018. “Hobbes philosopher of curiosity in context.” In Curiosity and the Passions of Knowledge. From Montaigne to Hobbes, ed. Paganini, G. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Paganini, Gianni. 2003. “Hobbes, Valla, and the Trinity.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11(2): 183–218.Google Scholar
Parkin, John. 2016. “Hobbes and Paradox.” in Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Kinch, Hoekstra, 624–41. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol, Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Powell, G. Bingham. 1992. “Political Obligation, Freedom and Feminism.” The American Political Science Review 86(1): 179–88.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1991. “God hath Ordained to Man a Helper: Hobbes, Patriarchy, and Conjugal Right.” In Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory, ed. Pateman, Carole and Lyndon Shanley, Mary, 53–73. Oxford: Polity Press in Association with Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1979. The Problem of Political Obligation. A Critical Analysis of Liberal Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pécharman, M. 2016. “Hobbes on Logic, or How to Deal with Aristotle’s Legacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, K.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Peters, Richard, and Tajfel, Henri. 1972. “Hobbes and Hull: Metaphysicians of Behavior.” In Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays, eds. Cranston, Maurice and Peters, Richard. Garden City: Anchor.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2008. Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. 1964. “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation – I.” American Political Science Review 58(2): 328–4.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. 1964. “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation – II.” American Political Science Review 58(4): 902–18.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, John. 1963. Man and Society: A Critical Examination of Some Important Social and Political Theories From Machiavelli To Marx. Volume One. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Pope, Walter. 1697. Life of the Right Reverend Father in God Seth, Lord Bishop of Salisbury. London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1672/1994. “On the Law of Nature and of Nations.” In The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, ed. Carr, Craig L., trans. Michael, Seidler. York, New, 93–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, Andrew, ed. 1999. Key Philosophers in Conversation: The Cogito Interviews. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1975. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” In Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, . 1999. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Rosamond. 1992. “Hobbes’s unReasonable Fool.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30(2): 93–102.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Rosamond. 2017. “Hobbesian Medical Ethics.” In Courtland, , Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 69–90.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Renato Janine. 2011. “‘Men of Feminine Courage’: Thomas Hobbes and Life as a Right.” Hobbes Studies 24(1): 44–61.Google Scholar
Robson, Gregory J. 2015. “Two Psychological Defenses of Hobbes’s Claim Against the ‘Fool.’” Hobbes Studies 28(2): 132–48.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J., ed. 1995. “Leviathan”: Contemporary Responses to the Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. 2000. “What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 268–78.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. 2016. “The Sovereign.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, and Hoekstra, , 359–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1996. “Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorell, Tom, 208–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schochet, Gordon J. 2012. “Thomas Hobbes on the Family and the State of Nature (1967).” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, eds. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joanne H., 105–24. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schochet, Gordon J. 1988. The Authoritarian Family and Political Attitudes in Seventeenth Century England. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, Karl. 1998. “Skinner’s Hobbes.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6(1): 115–25.Google Scholar
Schulz, Daniel, and Weiss, Alexander. 2010. “Introduction: Approaches in the History of Political Thought.” European Political Science 9(3): 283–90.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2005. “What is an Institution?” Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Shelton, George. 1992. Morality and Sovereignty in the Philosophy of Hobbes. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1999. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 7(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2005. “Hobbes on Representation.” European Journal of Philosophy 13(2): 155–84.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8(1): 3–53.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2012. “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My Critics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 73(1): 127–46.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1966. “The Ideological Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought.” The Historical Journal 9(3): 286–317.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2010. “The Sovereign State: a Genealogy.” In Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, eds. Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin, 26–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1988. “Reply to My Critics.” In Meaning & Context, 231–88. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2004. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics. Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. 1998. “The shadow of the future.” In Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka, ed. Coleman, Jules and Morris, Christopher, 12–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. 1994. “Hobbes and the Equality of Women.” Political Studies 42(3): 441–52.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. 2000. Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Houndsmill: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella. 2018. As Thick as Thieves: Exploring Thomas Hobbes’s Critique of Ancient Friendship and its Contemporary Relevance. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. 2007. “Leviathan and its Anglican context.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leviathan, ed. Springborg, Patricia, 358–74. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. 1992. Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorell, T. 2006. “Hobbes’s scheme of the sciences” in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbe, ed. Sorell, T., 45–61. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom. 2007. “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Springborg, Patricia, 128–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom, and Foisneau, Luc, eds. 2004. Leviathan after 350 years. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom, ed. 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom. 1988. “Science in Hobbes’s Politics,” in Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, Rogers and Ryan (eds) Oxford 1998, 67–80.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom. 2001. “Hobbes and the Morality Beyond Justice.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82: 227–42.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spragens, Thomas. 1973. The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Springbord, Patricia. 1995. “Hobbes’s Biblical Beasts: Leviathan and Behemoth.” Political Theory 23(2): 353–75.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia, ed. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia. 2008. “The Historia Ecclesiastica and Hobbes’s Philosophical Project.” In Hobbes, Thomas, Historia ecclesiastica. Critical edition, eds. Springborg, Patricia, Stablein, Patricia, and Wilson, Paul, 201–36. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2017. “A Hobbesian Approach to Public Policy.” In Courtland, , Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 11–27.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2013. “Equality.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes, ed. Lloyd, S. A., 171–6. London/New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2012. “Hobbes on ‘The Woman Question.’” Philosophy Compass 7(11): 772–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2012. “In Harm’s Way: Hobbes on the Duty to Fight for One’s Country.” In Lloyd, , Hobbes Today, 209–28.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2013. “Parental Authority.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes, edited by Lloyd, S. A., 193–6. London/New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2012. “Toward a Hobbesian Theory of Sexuality.” In Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, ed. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joanne H., 260–79. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2008. “Defending the Hobbesian Right of Self-Defense.” Political Theory 36(6): 781–802.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne. 2010. Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanlick, Nancy. 2002. “Hobbesian Friendship: Valuing Others for Oneself.” Journal of Social Philosophy 33(3): 345–59.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1977. Collected Papers on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science and History of Philosophy: Volume 2. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Peter J. 2002. “Hobbesian Resistance.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 856–65.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1965. “The Spirit of Hobbes’s Political Philosophy.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Brown, .Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1952. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Its Basis and Genesis. Translated from the German Manuscript by Elsa M. Sinclair. Chicago: Chicago University Press (reprint, first published in 1936 by The Clarendon Press, Oxford, England).Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 1986/2004. The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare, 2nd edn. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshirer and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Tabb, K. 2014. “The Fate of Nebuchadnezzar. Curiosity and Human Nature in Hobbes.” Hobbes Studies 27: 13–34.Google Scholar
Talaska, Richard. 1988. “Analytic and Synthetic Method According to Hobbes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(2): 207–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1938. “The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes.” Philosophy, vol XIII, 406–24 reprinted in Hobbes’s Leviathan: Interpretation and Criticism, ed. Baumrin, Bernard H., 35–48. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. 1993. “The Ethical Doctrine of Thomas Hobbes,” in Thomas Hobbes: Critical Assessments, vol. 2. ed. Preston, King. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trinkhaus, Charles. 1996. “Lorenzo Valla on the Problem of Speaking about the Trinity.” Journal of the History of Ideas 57(1): 27–53.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2007. “History.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy: Volume I, Goodin, Robert, Pettit, Philip and Pogge, Thomas 69–87. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1998. “Hobbes on Education.” In Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives, Rorty, Amelié Oksenberg 148–56. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2016. “Hobbes, Conscience, and Christianity.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, eds. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, 481–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1993. “The civil religion of Thomas Hobbes.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, eds. Philippson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Erika. 2011. “Feminist Political Theory.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, ed. Gibbons, Michael, 1033–36. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Helden, Albert. 1974. “Saturn and his Anses.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 5(2): 105–21.Google Scholar
van Mill, David. 2017. “Hobbes and Free Speech.” In Courtland, , Hobbesian Applied Ethics and Public Policy, 181–97.Google Scholar
van Mill, David. 2001. Liberty, Rationality, and Agency in Hobbes’s Leviathan. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vanderschraaf, Peter. 2013. “Game Theoretic Interpretations.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes, Lloyd, S. A., 39–49. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vanderschraaf, Peter. 2006. “War or Peace?: A Dynamical Analysis of Anarchy.” Economics and Philosophy 22: 243–79.Google Scholar
Venezia, Luciano. 2015. Hobbes on Legal Authority and Political Obligation. Houndsfield, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2000. “Self-Defense: Agent-Neutral and Agent-Relative Accounts.” California Law Review 88(3): 711–49.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard. 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. 1965a. Hobbes’s System of Ideas: A Study of the Political Significance of Philosophical Theories. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. 1965b. “Philosophy and Politics in Hobbes.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Brown, K. C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. (1969). Philosophy and Politics in Hobbes in K.C Brown (Ed) Hobbes Studies Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 237–62, reprinted in Hobbes’s Leviathan: Interpretation and Criticism, ed. Baumrin, Bernard H., 83–106. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. 1965. Hobbes’s System of Ideas: A Study in the Political Significance of Philosophical Theories. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard. 2006. “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought.” In Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History, eds. Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, 109–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitaker, William. 1585. An answere to a certeine booke, written by Maister William Rainolds. London.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas. 1600. Exposition of the Two First Verses of the Sixt Chapter to the Hebrews. London.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1960. Politics and Vision. Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joanne H. 2012. “Choice Talk, Breast Implants, and Feminist Consent Theory: Hobbes’s Legacy in Choice Feminism.” In Hirschmann, and Wright, , Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, 240–59.Google Scholar
Yates, Arthur. 2013. “A Hohfeldian Analysis of Hobbesian Rights.” Law and Philosophy 32(4): 405–34.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. 2009. Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. 1999. “Two Books on Thomas Hobbes.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60(2): 361–71.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. 1990. Ways of Lying: Dissimulation, Persecution, and Conformity in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. 2007. “Clarendon against Leviathan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Springboard, Patricia, 460–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaitchik, A. 1982. “Hobbes’s Reply to the Fool: The Problem of Consent and Obligation.” Political Theory 10(2): 245–66.Google Scholar