References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Moral Person of the StatePufendorf, Sovereignty and Composite Polities, pp. 222 - 247Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adams, John, ‘To Horatio Gates, Philadelphia, March 23, 1776’, in Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, 9 vols., ed. Smith, Paul H. (Washington, DC, 1976–1979).Google Scholar
Adams, John, ‘Novanglus’, in Papers of John Adams, vol. 2, December 1773–April 1775, ed. Taylor, Robert J. (Cambridge, MA, 1977).Google Scholar
Adams, Thomas Randolph, American Independence – the Growth of an Idea: A Bibliographical Study of the American Political Pamphlets Printed between 1764 and 1776 Dealing with the Dispute between Great Britain and Her Colonies (Providence, RI, 1965).Google Scholar
Ahnert, Thomas, ‘Samuel Pufendorf and religious intolerance in the early Enlightenment’, in Natural Law and Toleration in the Early Enlightenment, eds. Parkin, John and Stanton, Timothy (Oxford, 2013).Google Scholar
Åkerlund, Erik, Nisi temere agat: Francisco Suárez on Final Causes and Final Causation (PhD dissertation, Uppsala University, 2011).Google Scholar
Alexander, James, ‘An essay on historical, philosophical and theological attitudes to modern political thought’, History of Political Thought, 25 (2004), pp. 116–148.Google Scholar
Alexander, James, ‘A systematic theory of tradition’, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10 (2016), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe, ‘Stoic theology’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, Brad (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
Allott, Philip, The Health of Nations: Society and Law Beyond the State (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Alonso-Lasheras, Diego, Luis de Molina’s De Iustitia et Iure: Justice as Virtue in an Economic Context (Leiden, 2011).Google Scholar
Anfray, Jean-Pascal, ‘Molina and John Duns Scotus’, in A Companion to Luis de Molina, eds. Aichele, Alexander and Kaufmann, Mathias (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank R., ‘Metaphor in political theory’, in Knowledge and Language, vol. 3, Metaphor and Language, eds. Ankersmit, Frank R. and Mooij, J. J. A. (Dordrecht, 1993).Google Scholar
Appold, Kenneth G., Abraham Calov’s Doctrine of Vocatio in its Systematic Context (Tübingen, 1998).Google Scholar
St. Aquinas, Thomas, Summa theologiae, 61 vols., ed. Gilby, Thomas (London, 1964–1981).Google Scholar
Armitage, David, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History (Cambridge, MA, 2006).Google Scholar
Armitage, David, ‘The Declaration of Independence: Its many histories’, William and Mary Quarterly, 65 (2008), pp. 357–362.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine and Nicole, Pierre, Logic, or the Art of Thinking, trans./ed. Buroker, Jill Vance (Cambridge, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara, John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism (Oxford, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, William B. Jr., ‘Natural history and the emblematic world view’, in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, eds. Westman, Robert S. and Lindberg, David C. (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
Backhaus, Jürgen G., ‘Christian Wolff on subsidiarity, the division of labor, and social welfare’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 4 (1997), pp. 129–146.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA, 1967).Google Scholar
Báñez, Domingo, ‘Apologia fratrum praedictatorum in provincia Hispaniae sacrae theologiae professorum, adversus novas quasdam assertiones cuiusdam doctoris Ludovici Molinae nuncupati’, in Domingo Báñez y las controversias sobre la gracia: Textos y documentos, ed. de Heredia, Vicente Beltrán (Madrid, 1968).Google Scholar
Báñez, Domingo, Comentarios inéditos a la prima secundae de Santo Tomás. Tomo II: De vitiis et peccatis (qq. 71–89), ed. de Heredia, Vicente Beltrán (Madrid, 1944).Google Scholar
Báñez, Domingo, ‘Scholastica commentaria in primam partem summae theologicae S. Thomae Aquinatis’, in Biblioteca de Thomistas Españoles: Reproducción de Textos, ed. Fr. Luis Urbano, M. R. V. (Dubuque, IA, 1934).Google Scholar
Báñez, Domingo, ‘Tractatus de vera et legitima concordia liberi arbitrii creati cum auxiliis gratiae Dei efficaciter moventis humanem voluntatem’, in Báñez, Domingo, Comentarios inéditos a la prima secundae de Santo Tomás. Tomo III: De gratia Dei (qq. 109–114), ed. de Heredia, Vicente Beltrán (Madrid, 1948).Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest, ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Gierke, Otto, Natural Law and the Theory of Society, trans./ed. Barker, Ernest (Cambridge, 1934).Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens, ‘Sovereignty and the personality of the state’, in The Concept of the State in International Relations, eds. Stirk, Peter M. R. and Schuett, Robert (Edinburgh, 2015).Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane, ‘Emer de Vattel and the externalization of sovereignty’, Journal of the History of International Law, 5 (2003), pp. 237–292.Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane, The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia (Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors (Cambridge, MA, 1969).Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan, ‘Writing the world: Disciplinary history and beyond’, International Affairs, 85 (2009), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H., Humanists and Holy Writ: New Testament Scholarship in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi, Signatura rerum: Segni, magia e conoscenza da Paracelso a Leibniz (Rome, 1987).Google Scholar
Sir Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols., ed. Katz, Stanley, (Chicago, 1979).Google Scholar
Bland, Richard, ‘An inquiry into the rights of the British Constitution’, in American Political Writing During the Founding Era, 1760–1805, eds. Hyneman, Charles S. and Lutz, Donald S. (Indianapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans, Paradigms for a Metaphorology, trans. Savage, Robert (Ithaca, NY, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Jean, The Six Bookes of a Commonweal, ed. McRae, Kenneth D., trans. Knollys, Richard (Cambridge, MA, 1962).Google Scholar
Boethius, , ‘A treatise against Eutyches and Nestorius’, in Boethius, , Theological Tractates & The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K. and Tester, S. J. (Cambridge, MA, 1973).Google Scholar
Bono, James J., ‘From Paracelsus to Newton: The word of God, the book of nature, and the eclipse of the “emblematic world view”’, in Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence, eds. Force, James E. and Popkin, Richard H. (Dordrecht, 1999).Google Scholar
Bono, James J., The Word of God and the Languages of Man: Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine, vol. 1, Ficino to Descartes (Madison, WI, 1995).Google Scholar
Bootle Attie, Katherine, ‘Re-membering the body politic: Hobbes and the construction of civic immortality’, ELH: English Literary History, 75 (2008), pp. 497–530.Google Scholar
Boucher, David, The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Human Rights in Transition (Oxford, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David, Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Leah, Acting and Thinking: The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt (Toronto, 1989).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law (Princeton, 2011).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., ‘Human freedom and Jesuit moral theology’, in Freedom and the Construction of Europe, vol. 2, Free Persons and Free States, eds. Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., ‘Individual and community in the “second scholastic”: Subjective rights in Domingo de Soto and Francisco Suárez’, in Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, eds. Blackwell, Constance and Kusukawa, Sachiko (Aldershot, 1999).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., ‘Luis de Molina on law and power’, in A Companion to Luis de Molina, eds. Aichele, Alexander and Kaufmann, Mathias (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel S., ‘What is intellectual history now?’, in What is History Now?, ed. Cannadine, David (Basingstoke, 2002).Google Scholar
Brito Vieira, Mónica, The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State (Leiden, 2009).Google Scholar
Brito Vieira, Mónica, ‘Francisco Suárez and the Principatus Politicus’, History of Political Thought, 29 (2008), pp. 273–294.Google Scholar
Brotherton, Joshua R., ‘The integrity of nature in the grace-freedom dynamic: Lonergan’s critique of Bañezian Thomism’, Theological Studies, 75 (2014), pp. 537–563.Google Scholar
Buickerood, James G., ‘The natural history of the understanding: Locke and the rise of facultative logic in the eighteenth century’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 6 (1985), pp. 157–190.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn. (Basingstoke, 2002).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, ‘The Grotian conception of international society’, in Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, eds. Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (London, 1966).Google Scholar
Burgdorf, Wolfgang, Reichskonstitution und Nation: Verfassungsreformprojekte für das Heilige Römische Reich Deutscher Nation in politischen Schrifttum von 1648 bis 1806 (Mainz, 1998).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, ‘Letter to Lord North, May 19, 1774’, in American Archives, Fourth Series. Containing a Documentary History of the English Colonies in North America from the King’s Message to Parliament, of March 7, 1774, to the Declaration of Independence by the United States, eds. Clarke, Matthew Saint Clair and Force, Peter, 6 vols. (Washington, DC, 1837).Google Scholar
Burns, J. H., ‘Fortescue and the political theory of dominium’, Historical Journal, 28 (1985), pp. 777–797.Google Scholar
Burns, Tony, ‘Interpreting and appropriating texts in the history of political thought: Quentin Skinner and poststructuralism’, Contemporary Political Theory, 10 (2011), pp. 313–331.Google Scholar
Butler, Peter F., ‘Legitimacy in a states-system: Vattel’s Law of Nations’, in The Reason of States: A Study in International Political Theory, ed. Donelan, Michael (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon, ‘The state as a “moral person”’, in Kant and Law, eds. Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (Aldershot, 2006).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion, trans./ed. Allen, John (Grand Rapids, MI, 1949).Google Scholar
Carey, Daniel, Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson: Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom, ‘Supplements and observations on Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen’, in Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Enlightenment: The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, eds. Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael (Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar
Carr, Craig L. and Seidler, Michael J., ‘Pufendorf, sociality and the modern state’, History of Political Thought, 17 (1996), pp. 354–378.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Glenn, ‘Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of European colonialism and exploitation or true cosmopolitans?’, Journal of the History of International Law, 10 (2008), pp. 181–209.Google Scholar
Cessario, Romanus ‘Molina and Aquinas’, in A Companion to Luis de Molina, eds. Aichele, Alexander and Kaufmann, Mathias (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Chaplin, Jonathan, ‘Toward a social pluralist theory of institutional rights’, Ave Maria Law Review, 3 (2005), pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Christie, Ian R., ‘A vision of empire: Thomas Whately and The Regulations Lately Made Concerning the Colonies’, English Historical Review, 113 (1998), pp. 300–320.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore, Before Anarchy: Hobbes and His Critics in Modern International Thought (New York, 2015).Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore, ‘Vattel’s Rousseau: Ius gentium and the natural liberty of states’, in Freedom and the Construction of Europe, vol. 2, Free Persons and Free States, eds. Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Cicero, , A Dialogue Concerning Oratorical Partitions. Online Library of Liberty version. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=734&chapter=87667&layout=html&Itemid=27.Google Scholar
Sir Coke, Edward, The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edward Coke, vol. 2, Institutes of the Lawes of England, ed. Sheppard, Steve (Indianapolis, 2003).Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet, ‘Property and poverty’, in The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350–1450, ed. Burns, J. H. (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet, ‘Using, not owning – duties, not rights: The consequences of some Franciscan perspectives on politics’, in Defenders and Critics of Franciscan Life, eds. Cusato, Michael F. and Geltner, Guy (Boston, MA, 2009).Google Scholar
Condren, Conal, Argument and Authority in Early Modern England: The Presuppositions of Oaths and Offices (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian B. and Schmitt, Charles B., A History of Western Philosophy, vol. 3, Renaissance Philosophy (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Cortissoz, Carlos, ‘The soul-state analogy in Aristotle’s Politics’. Paper presented at the twenty-eighth annual joint meeting of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy and the Society for the Study of Islamic Philosophy (New York, October 15–17, 2010).Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J., Capacity and Volition: A History of the Distinction of Absolute and Ordained Power (Bergamo, 1990).Google Scholar
Covell, Charles, The Law of Nations in Political Thought: A Critical Survey from Vitoria to Hegel (Basingstoke, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane, Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: The Coherence of Theism (Leiden, 1988).Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew, ‘Statehood, self-determination, and recognition’, in International Law, ed. Evans, Malcolm, 3rd edn. (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Cruz Cruz, Juan ‘Predestination and transcendent teleology: Molina and the first Molinism’, in A Companion to Luis de Molina, eds. Aichele, Alexander and Kaufmann, Mathias (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Daly, James, ‘Cosmic harmony and political thinking in early Stuart England’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 69 (1979), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability (Cambridge, MA, 2006).Google Scholar
Dawson, Hannah, ‘Natural religion: Pufendorf and Locke on the edge of freedom and reason’, in Freedom and the Construction of Europe, vol. 1, Religious Freedom and Civil Liberty, eds. Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Decock, Wim, Theologians and Contract Law: The Moral Transformation of the Ius Commune (ca. 1500–1650) (Leiden, 2012).Google Scholar
Deiser, George F., ‘The juristic person’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 57 (1908), pp. 131–142.Google Scholar
Dekker, Eef, ‘Was Arminius a Molinist?’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 27 (1996), pp. 337–352.Google Scholar
Deming, Will, ‘Paul, Gaius, and the “law of persons”: The conceptualization of Roman law in the early classical period’, Classical Quarterly, 51 (2001), pp. 218–230.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine, The Book of the Body Politic, trans./ed. Forhan, Kate Langdon (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
de Polanco, Juan Alfonso, ‘Brief directions to confessors, on confessing and how properly to discharge their functions’, in On Giving the Spiritual Exercises: The Early Jesuit Manuscript Directories and the Official Directory of 1599, ed. Palmer, Martin E. (St. Louis, MO, 1996).Google Scholar
Derathé, Raymond, Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard, ‘Between Kant and Pufendorf: Humanitarian intervention, statist anti-cosmopolitanism and critical international theory’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), pp. 151–174.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef, ‘Leibniz’s critique of Pufendorf: A dispute in the eve of the Enlightenment’, in The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and his Controversies, ed. Dascal, Marcelo (Amsterdam, 2010).Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef, ‘Samuel von Pufendorf and toleration’, in Beyond the Persecuting Society: Toleration before the Enlightenment, eds. Laursen, John Christian and Nederman, Cary J. (Philadelphia, 1998).Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin, ‘The body politic “is a fictitious body”: Hobbes on imagination and fiction’, Hobbes Studies, 27 (2014), pp. 126–147.Google Scholar
Drakopoulou, Maria, ‘Samuel Pufendorf, feminism and the question of “women and law”’, in Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy, ed. Drakopoulou, Maria (Abingdon, 2013).Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst, ‘Reason of state and the crisis of political Aristotelianism: An essay on the development of 17th century political philosophy’, History of European Ideas, 28 (2002), pp. 163–187.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst, ‘The reception of Hobbes in the political philosophy of the early German Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 29 (2003), pp. 255–289.Google Scholar
Dreschler, Wolfgang, ‘Christian Wolff (1679–1754): A biographical essay’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 4 (1997), pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred, ‘Federalisme et raison d’état dans la pensée politique pufendorfienne’, in Samuel Pufendorf, filosofo del diritto e della politica, ed. Fiorillo, Vanda (Naples, 1996).Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred, ‘Pufendorf’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, eds. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, Mark (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Duggan, Lawrence G., ‘Fear and confession on the eve of the Reformation’, Archive for Reformation History, 75 (1984), pp. 153–175.Google Scholar
Dulany, Daniel, ‘Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies’, in Pamphlets of the American Revolution 1750–1776, vol. 1, 1750–1765, ed. Bailyn, Bernard with Garrett, Jane N. (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
Dulles, Avery, ‘Jesuits and theology: Yesterday and today’, Theological Studies, 52 (1991), pp. 524–538.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis, Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
Dworetz, Steven M., The Unvarnished Doctrine: Locke, Liberalism, and the American Revolution (Durham, NC, 1990).Google Scholar
Eardley, P. S., ‘The foundations of freedom in later medieval philosophy: Giles of Rome and his contemporaries’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44 (2006), pp. 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. H., ‘A Europe of composite monarchies’, Past and Present, 137 (1992), pp. 48–71.Google Scholar
Epictetus, , The Handbook (The Encheiridion), trans. White, Nicholas P. (Indianapolis, 1983).Google Scholar
Esposito, Roberto, Third Person: Politics of Life and Philosophy of the Impersonal (Cambridge, 2012).Google Scholar
Farrell, Allan P., The Jesuit Code of Liberal Education: Development and Scope of the Ratio Studiorum (Milwaukee, WI, 1938).Google Scholar
Fasolt, Constantin, ‘A question of right: Hermann Conring’s New Discourse on the Roman-German Emperor’, Seventeenth Century Journal, 28 (1997), pp. 739–758.Google Scholar
Ferling, John E., The Loyalist Mind: Joseph Galloway and the American Revolution (Philadelphia, PA, 1977).Google Scholar
Fiering, Norman, Moral Philosophy at Seventeenth-Century Harvard: A Discipline in Transition (Chapel Hill, NC, 1981).Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula, ‘Empty signs? Reading the book of nature in Renaissance science’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21 (1990), pp. 511–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fliegelman, Jay, Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance (Stanford, CA, 1993).Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin, ‘Kant’s sovereignty dilemma: A contemporary analysis’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (2010), pp. 469–493.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray, Unions of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation (Leicester, 1981).Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome, ‘A sketch of an influence’, in Interpretations of Modern Legal Philosophies: Essays in Honor of Roscoe Pound, ed. Sayre, Paul (New York, 1947).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G., ‘Freedom of the will and the concept of a person’, Journal of Philosophy, 68 (1971), pp. 5–20.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian, ‘Sovereignty and the mixed constitution: Bodin and his critics’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. with Goldie, Mark (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J., ‘Comment’s on Michael Murray’s “Leibniz on divine foreknowledge of future contingents and human freedom”’. Unpublished paper. www.nd.edu/~afreddos/papers/murray.htm.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea, ‘Stoic determinism’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, Brad (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael, A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought (Berkeley, CA, 2012).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael, ‘A notion of a person in Epictetus’, in The Philosophy of Epictetus, eds. Scaltsas, Theodore and Mason, Andrew S. (Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar
Friedeburg, Robert von, Luther’s Legacy: The Thirty Years’ War and the Modern Notion of ‘State’ in the Empire, 1530s to 1790s (Cambridge, 2016).Google Scholar
Friedeburg, Robert von, ‘Reformed Monarchomachism and the genre of the “politica” in the Empire: The Politica of Johannes Althusius and the meaning of hierarchy in its constitutional and conceptual context’, Archivio della Ragion di Stato, 6 (1998), pp. 129–153.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L., Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Galloway, Joseph, A Candid Examination of the Mutual Claims of Great-Britain and the Colonies: With a Plan of Accommodation on Constitutional Principles (New York, 1775).Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter, Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, ‘From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding’, in Local Knowledge: Further Essays on Interpretive Anthropology (New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre and Jeziorski, Michael, ‘The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science’, in Metaphor and Thought, ed. Ortony, Andrew, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
George, III, ‘His Majesty’s most gracious speech to both Houses of Parliament, on Thursday the 26th of October, 1775’, in American Archives, Fourth Series. Containing a Documentary History of the English Colonies in North America from the King’s Message to Parliament, of March 7, 1774, to the Declaration of Independence by the United States, eds. Clarke, Matthew Saint Clair and Force, Peter, 6 vols. (Washington, DC, 1837).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Associations and Law: The Classical and Early Christian Stages, trans./ed. Heiman, George (Toronto, 1977).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Community in Historical Perspective, trans. Fischer, Mary, ed. Black, Anthony (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Das deutsche Genossenschaftrecht, vol. 1, Rechtsgeschichte der deutschen Genossenschaft (Berlin, 1868).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Das deutsche Genossenschaftrecht, vol. 2, Geschichte des deutschen Körperschaftsbegriffs (Berlin, 1873).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, vol. 3, Die Staats- und Korporationslehre des Alterthums und des Mittelalters und ihre Aufnahme in Deutschland (Berlin, 1881).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, The Development of Political Theory, trans. Freyd, Bernard (London, 1939).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, ‘German constitutional law and its relation to the American constitution’, Harvard Law Review, 23 (1910), pp. 273–290.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, ‘The idea of federalism’, in Otto Gierke, The Genossenschaft-Theory of Otto von Gierke, ed. Lewis, John D. (Madison, WI, 1935).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Natural Law and the Theory of Society, trans./ed. Barker, Ernest (Cambridge, 1934).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, ‘The nature of human associations’, in The Genossenschaft-Theory of Otto von Gierke, ed. Lewis, John D. (Madison, WI, 1935).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Political Theories of the Middle Age, trans./ed. Maitland, Frederic William (Cambridge, 1900).Google Scholar
Gould, Eliga H., ‘A virtual nation: Greater Britain and the imperial legacy of the American Revolution’, American Historical Review, 104 (1999), pp. 476–489.Google Scholar
Graybill, Gregory, Evangelical Free Will: Phillip Melanchthon’s Doctrinal Journey on the Origins of Faith (Oxford, 2010), p. 290.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Sean, ‘Leibniz against Molinism: Freedom, indifference, and the nature of the will’, in Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, J. A. (Oxford, 2005), p. 219.Google Scholar
Greene, Jack P., The Constitutional Origins of the American Revolution (New York, 2011).Google Scholar
Greene, Jack P., ed., Exclusionary Empire: English Liberty Overseas, 1600–1900 (New York, 2010).Google Scholar
Greene, Jack P., Peripheries and Center: Constitutional Development in the Extended Polities of the British Empire and the United States, 1607–1788 (Athens, GA, 1986).Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary J., ‘Kant’s approach to constitutionalism’, in Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension, ed. Rosenbaum, Alan S. (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles L., ‘Rights and wrongs: Jefferson, slavery, and philosophical quandaries’, in A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics, and Law, 1791 and 1991, eds. Lacey, Michael J. and Haakonssen, Knud (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Gross, Hanns, Empire and Sovereignty: A History of the Public Law Literature in the Holy Roman Empire, 1599–1804 (Chicago, 1973).Google Scholar
Grunert, Frank, ‘Absolutism(s): Necessary ambivalences in the political theory of Christian Wolff’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 73 (2005), pp. 141–152.Google Scholar
Guarino, Thomas, ‘Spoils from Egypt: Contemporary theology and non-foundationalist thought’, Laval théologique et philosophique, 51 (1995), pp. 573–587.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ‘Christian Wolff (1679–1754)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, eds. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ‘German natural law’, in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, eds. Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ‘Samuel Pufendorf (1632–1694)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, eds. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Haara, Heikki, ‘Pufendorf on passions and sociability’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 77 (2016), pp. 423–444.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Hager, Mark M., ‘Bodies politic: The progressive history of organizational “real entity” theory’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 50 (1989), pp. 575–654.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alastair, ‘Humanists and the Bible’, in The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Kraye, Jill (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John and Madison, James, The Federalist, eds. Carey, George W. and McLellan, James (Indianapolis, 2001).Google Scholar
Hardon, John A., History and Theology of Grace: The Catholic Teaching on Divine Grace (Ann Arbor, 2005).Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, The Singular Self: An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood (London, 1998).Google Scholar
Harris, Ron, ‘The transplantation of the legal discourse on corporate personality theories: German codification to British political pluralism and American big business’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 63 (2006), pp. 1421–1478.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
Harvey, A. D., Body Politic: Political Metaphor and Political Violence (Newcastle, 2007).Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan, No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli (New Haven, 2002).Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, ‘Skinner, Wittgenstein and historical method’, Paragraph, 34 (2013), pp. 371–387.Google Scholar
Healy, Margaret, ‘Medicine, metaphor, and “crisis” in the early modern social body’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 46 (2016), pp. 117–139.Google Scholar
Heeren, A. H. L., A Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe and Its Colonies, from Its Formation at the Close of the Fifteenth Century to Its Re-Establishment upon the Fall of Napoleon (London, 1864).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans./ed. Hofstadter, Albert (Bloomington, IN, 1988).Google Scholar
Hipp, Stephen A., ‘Person’ in Christian Tradition and the Conception of Saint Albert the Great: A Systematic Study of Its Concept as Illuminated by the Mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation (Münster, 2001).Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, 1977).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 1, Elements of Philosophy, the First Section Concerning Body, ed. Molesworth, William (London, 1839).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 5, The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance, ed. Molesworth, William (London, 1841).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan: The English and Latin Texts, ed. Malcolm, Noel (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J., Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J., ‘Response to Ian Hunter’, in Teaching New Histories of Philosophy, ed. Schneewind, J. B. (Princeton, 2004).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, ‘Intellectualism and voluntarism’, in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, Robert (Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas and Sander, Emmanuel, Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking (New York, 2013).Google Scholar
Holland, Ben, ‘The moral person of the state: Emer de Vattel and the foundations of international legal order’, History of European Ideas, 37 (2011), pp. 438–445.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben, ‘The Perpetual Peace Puzzle: Kant on persons and states’, Philosophy and Social Criticism (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Holland, Ben, ‘Pufendorf’s theory of facultative sovereignty: On the configuration of the soul of the state’, History of Political Thought, 33 (2012), pp. 427–454.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben, ‘Vattel on morally non-discriminatory peace’, in The Question of Peace in Modern Political Thought, eds. Koivukoski, Toivo and Tabachnick, David Edward (Waterloo, ON, 2014).Google Scholar
Hont, István, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA, 2005).Google Scholar
Hont, István, ‘The language of sociability and commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the theoretical foundations of the “four-stages” theory’, in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. Pagden, Anthony (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Höpfl, Harro, Jesuit Political Thought: The Society of Jesus and the State, c. 1540–1630 (Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim, ‘Universalization and related principles’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 78 (1992), pp. 289–300.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, ‘The figure of man and the territorialisation of justice in “Enlightenment” natural law: Pufendorf and Vattel’, Intellectual History Review, 23 (2013), pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, ‘Natural law as political philosophy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, eds. Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, ‘The recovery of natural law: Hochstrasser’s history of morality’, Economy and Society, 30 (2001), pp. 354–367.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge, 2001).Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, ‘Vattel’s Law of Nations: Diplomatic casuistry for the Protestant nation’, Grotiana, 31 (2010), pp. 108–140.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, ‘Vattel: Pluralism and its limits’, in Classical Theories of International Relations, eds. Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (Basingstoke, 1996).Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis, Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria, with A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, ed. Turco, Luigi (Indianapolis, 2007).Google Scholar
Hutson, James H., ed., A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind: Congressional State Papers, 1774–1776 (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
Ignatius of Loyola, ‘Formulas of the Institute of the Society of Jesus, approved and confirmed by Julius III’, in The Christianity Reader, eds. Gerhart, Mary and Udoh, Fabian E. (Chicago, 2007).Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H., ‘Aquinas, natural law, and Aristotelian eudaimonism’, in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s ‘Nicomachean Ethics’, ed. Kraut, Richard (Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Ishiguro, Hidé, ‘The primitiveness of the concept of a person’, in Philosophical Subjects, ed. van Straaten, Zak (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
Ivison, Duncan, ‘The nature of rights and the history of empire’, in British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500–1800, ed. Armitage, David (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
James, Harold, The Roman Predicament: How the Rules of International Order Create the Politics of Empire (Princeton, 2006).Google Scholar
Janssen, Peter L., ‘Political thought and traditionary action: The critical response to Skinner and Pocock’, History and Theory, 24 (1985), pp. 115–146.Google Scholar
Jayne, Allen, Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence: Origins, Philosophy, and Theology (Lexington, KY, 1998).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas, ‘Law of nations’, in Jefferson: Political Writings, eds. Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terence (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas, ‘A summary view of the rights of British America’, in Jefferson: Political Writings, eds. Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terence (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, 20 vols., eds. Lipscomb, Andrew A. and Bergh, Albert Ellory (Washington D.C, 1903).Google Scholar
Jeuernig, Anja, ‘Kant’s critique of the Leibnizian philosophy: Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz’, in Kant and the Early Moderns, eds. Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Beatrice (Princeton, 2008).Google Scholar
Johns, Christopher, ‘Leibniz, Pufendorf, and the possibility of moral self-governance’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21 (2013), pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kristine and Lynch, Paul, ‘Ad perfectum eloquentiam: The “spoils of Egypt” in Jesuit Renaissance rhetoric’, Rhetoric Review, 31 (2012), pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, Political Tracts: Containing ‘The False Alarm’, ‘Falkland’s Islands’, ‘The Patriot’ and ‘Taxation No Tyranny’ (London, 1776).Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning (Berkeley, CA, 1988).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals’, in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy, trans./ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim’ in Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology, History and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B. (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘The metaphysics of morals’, in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy, trans./ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘On the common saying: That may be correct in theory, but it is of no use in practice’, in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy, trans./ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘Toward perpetual peace: A philosophical project’, in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy, trans./ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking?’, in Kant, Immanuel, Religion and Rational Theology, trans./ed. Wood, Allen W. and Di Giovanni, George (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Kantola, Ilkka, ‘Pascal’s Wager and moral tutiorism’, in Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times, ed. Holmström-Hintikka, Ghita (Boston, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H., The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, 1957).Google Scholar
Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, ‘Introduction’, in de Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations, eds. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis, 2008).Google Scholar
Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony, ‘Divine foreknowledge and human freedom’, in Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Kenny, Anthony (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie, Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century (Washington, DC, 1995).Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G., ‘Composite states, representative institutions and the American Revolution’, Historical Research, 62 (1989), pp. 135–153.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G., Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays in Modern History (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Koessler, Maximilian, ‘The person in imagination or persona ficta of the corporation’, Louisiana Law Review, 9 (1949), pp. 438–449.Google Scholar
Korkman, Petter, ‘Voluntarism and moral obligation: Barbeyrac’s defence of Pufendorf revisited’, in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment, eds. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, P. (Dordrecht, 2003).Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society (Cambridge, MA, 1988).Google Scholar
Koterski, Joseph W., ‘Boethius and the theological origins of the concept of person’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 78 (2004), pp. 203–224.Google Scholar
Krieger, Leonard, The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law (Chicago, 1965).Google Scholar
Kronen, John D., ‘Francis Suarez’s influence on Lutheran scholasticism’. Paper presented at the Patristic, Medieval, and Renaissance Society conference (Villanova, PN, October 9, 1999).Google Scholar
Kusukawa, Sachiko, The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Phillip Melanchthon (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
LaCroix, Alison L., The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (Cambridge, MA, 2010).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik, ‘Buridan’s theory of free choice and its influence’, in Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes, eds. Lagerlund, Henrik and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko (Dordrecht, 2001).Google Scholar
Larrimore, Mark, ‘Orientalism and antivoluntarism in the history of ethics: On Christian Wolff’s Oratio de Sinarum Philosophia Practica’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 28 (2000), pp. 189–219.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford, 1933).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Grotian tradition in international law’, British Year Book of International Law, 23 (1946), pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Lawson, Stephanie, ‘Political studies and the contextual turn: A normative/methodological critique’, Political Studies, 56 (2008), pp. 584–603.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel, ‘Office is a thing borrowed: Jean Bodin on offices and seigneurial government’, Political Theory, 41 (2013), pp. 409–440.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, ‘Opinion on the principles of Pufendorf (1706)’, in Leibniz, Political Writings, trans./ed. Riley, Patrick, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Texts, eds. Woolhouse, R. S. and Francks, Richard (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, ed. Farrer, Austin, trans. Huggard, E. M. (London, 1952).Google Scholar
Lenner, Andrew C., ‘John Taylor and the origins of American federalism’, Journal of the Early Republic, 17 (1997), pp. 399–423.Google Scholar
Leonard, Daniel, ‘Massachusettensis’, in The American Colonial Crisis: The Daniel Leonard–John Adams Letters to the Press, 1774–1775, ed. Mason, Bernard (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Lieberman, David, The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Lifschitz, Avi, Language and Enlightenment: The Berlin Debates of the Eighteenth Century (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew, Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, 2nd edn. (Basingstoke, 1990).Google Scholar
List, Christian and Pettit, Philip, Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Little, Richard, ‘The expansion of the international society in Heeren’s account of the European states-system’. Working Paper 07–08 (School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies, University of Bristol, 2005). www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/spais/migrated/documents/little0708.pdf.Google Scholar
Lohr, Charles H., ‘Metaphysics’, in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, eds. Schmitt, Charles B. and Skinner, Quentin (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Long, Stephen, ‘Providence, freedom and natural law’, Nova et Vetera, 4 (2006), pp. 557–605.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin, ‘The bondage of the will’, in Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation, eds. Rupp, E. Gordon and Watson, Philip S. (Philadelphia, 1969).Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford, 1962).Google Scholar
Mahoney, John, The Making of Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic Tradition (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
Maier, Pauline, American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (New York, 1997).Google Scholar
Mancke, Elizabeth, ‘Empire and state’, in The British Atlantic World, 1500–1800, eds. Armitage, David and Braddick, Michael J., 2nd edn. (Basingstoke, 2009).Google Scholar
Maryks, Robert Aleksander, Saint Cicero and the Jesuits: The Influence of the Liberal Arts on the Adoption of Moral Probabilism (Aldershot, 2008).Google Scholar
Matava, R. J., Divine Causality and Human Free Choice: Domingo Báñez, Physical Premotion and the Controversy De Auxiliis Revisited (Leiden, 2016).Google Scholar
Matthews Grant, Walter, ‘Counterfactuals of freedom, future contingents, and the grounding objection to middle knowledge’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 74 (2000), pp. 307–323.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, ‘A category of the human mind: The notion of person, the notion of self’, in The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, eds. Carrithers, Michael, Collins, Steven and Lukes, Steven (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas, ‘Carmichael and Barbeyrac: The lost correspondence’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung, eds. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald (Berlin, 1996).Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E., State, Society and University in Germany, 1700–1914 (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
McGrath, Alistair, Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification, 3rd edn. (Cambridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Meador, Prentice A., ‘Skeptic theory of perception: A philosophical antecedent of Ciceronian probability’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54 (1968), pp. 340–351.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, ‘Against human rights: Liberty in the Western tradition’, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 1 (2012), pp. 203–234.Google Scholar
Milbank, John, The Suspended Middle: Henri de Lubac and the Renewed Split in Modern Catholic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI, 2014).Google Scholar
Milstein, Brian, ‘Kantian cosmopolitanism beyond Perpetual Peace: Commercium, critique, and the cosmopolitan problematic’, European Journal of Philosophy, 21 (2010), pp. 118–143.Google Scholar
Milton, Patrick, ‘Intervening against tyrannical rule in the Holy Roman Empire during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, German History, 33 (2015), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Moggach, Douglas, ‘Freedom and perfection: German debates on the state in the eighteenth century’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42 (2009), pp. 1003–1023.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis, ‘Censura contra propositiones vigintitres Patris Fratris Dominici Bannes’, in Geschichte des Molinismus, vol. 1, Neue Molinaschriften, ed. Stegmüller, Friedrich (Münster, 1935).Google Scholar
Molina, Luis, Liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione concordia, critical edn., ed. Rabeneck, Iohannes (Madrid, 1953).Google Scholar
Molina, Luis, On Divine Foreknowledge (Part IV of the Concordia), trans./ed. Freddoso, Alfred J. (Ithaca, NY, 1988).Google Scholar
Molina, Luis, ‘Summa haeresium maior’, in Geschichte des Molinismus, vol. 1, Neue Molinaschriften, ed. Stegmüller, Friedrich (Münster, 1935).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de, The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Nugent, Thomas (New York, 1949).Google Scholar
Moonan, Lawrence, Divine Power: The Medieval Power Distinction up to Its Adoption by Albert, Bonaventure, and Aquinas (Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund S. and Morgan, Helen M., The Stamp Act Crisis: Prologue to Revolution (Chapel Hill, NC, 1953).Google Scholar
Nakhimovsky, Isaac, The Closed Commercial State: Perpetual Peace and Commercial Society from Rousseau to Fichte (Princeton, 2011).Google Scholar
Nakhimovsky, Isaac, ‘Vattel’s theory of the international order: Commerce and the balance of power in the Law of Nations’, History of European Ideas, 33 (2007), pp. 147–173.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric, ‘Patriot Royalism: The Stuart monarchy in American political thought, 1769–75’, William and Mary Quarterly, 68 (2011), pp. 533–572.Google Scholar
Normore, C. G., ‘Picking and choosing: Anselm and Ockham on choice’, Vivarium, 36 (1998), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
O’Malley, John W., ‘Some distinctive characteristics of Jesuit spirituality in the sixteenth century’, in Jesuit Spirituality: Now and Future Resources, eds. O’Malley, John W., Padberg, J. and O’Keefe, V. (Chicago, 1990).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, The Concept of a Philosophical Jurisprudence: Essays and Reviews, 1926–51 (Exeter, 2008).Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis, Omnipotence and Promise: A History of the Scholastic Distinction of Powers (Toronto, 2002).Google Scholar
Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie, ‘A literary postscript: Characters, persons, selves, individuals’, in The Identities of Persons, ed. Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (Berkeley, CA, 1976).Google Scholar
Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie, ‘Persons and personae’, in Mind in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Mind (Boston, MA, 1988).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood, Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations (Abingdon, 2013).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood, The Republican Legacy in International Thought (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas, ‘Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth’, International Organization, 55 (2001), pp. 251–287.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony, The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony, ‘Fellow citizens and imperial subjects: Conquest and sovereignty in Europe’s overseas empires’, History and Theory, theme issue 44 (2005), pp. 28–46.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta, La biblioteca di Samuel Pufendorf: Catalogo dell’asta di Berlin del settembre 1697 (Wiesbaden, 1999).Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta, ‘Pufendorf disciple of Hobbes: The nature of man and the state of nature: The doctrine of socialitas’, History of European Ideas, 34 (2008), pp. 26–60.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta, Samuel Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes: Per una reinterpretazione del giusnaturalismo moderno (Bologna, 1990).Google Scholar
Palti, Elías Jose, ‘From ideas to concepts to metaphors: The German tradition of intellectual history and the complex fabric of language’, History and Theory, 49 (2010), pp. 194–211.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Samuel Pufendorf: Majority rule (logic, justification and limits) and forms of government’, Social Science Information, 49 (2009), pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
Pegis, Anton C., ‘Molina and human liberty’, in Jesuit Thinkers of the Renaissance, ed. Smith, Gerard (Milwaukee, 1939).Google Scholar
Penner, Sydney, ‘Free and rational: Suárez on the will’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 95 (2013), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics (Princeton, 2008).Google Scholar
Pierson, Christopher, Just Property: A History in the Latin West, vol. 1, Wealth, Virtue, and the Law (Oxford, 2013).Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas, ‘Suárez, Hobbes and the Scholastic tradition in action theory’, in The Will and Human Action: From Antiquity to the Present Day, eds. Pink, Thomas and Stone, M. W. F. (London, 2004).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, 1975).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘The myth of John Locke and the obsession with liberalism’, in John Locke: Papers Read at a Clark Library Seminar, 10 December, 1977, eds. Pocock, J. G. A. and Ashcraft, Richard (Los Angeles, 1980).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 77–79.Google Scholar
Puccetti, Roland, Persons: A Study of Possible Moral Agents in the Universe (London, 1968).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, The Divine Feudal Law: Or, Covenants with Mankind, Represented, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone, trans. Dorrington, Theophilus (Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, An Introduction to the History of the Principal Kingdoms and States of Europe, ed. Seidler, Michael J., trans. Crull, Jocodus (Indianapolis, 2013).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, The Law of Nature and Nations, ed. Barbeyrac, Jean, trans. Kennet, Basil, 5th edn. (London, 1749).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, Of the Nature and Qualification of Religion in Reference to Civil Society, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone, trans. Crull, Jocodus (Indianapolis, 2002).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, ed. Carr, Craig L., trans. Seidler, Michael J. (Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, The Present State of Germany, ed. Seidler, Michael J., trans. Bohun, Edmund (Indianapolis, 2007).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, ‘Specimen controversiarum’, in von Pufendorf, Samuel, Eris Scandica, ed. Palladini, Fiammetta (Berlin, 2002).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, ‘Spicilegium controversiarum’, in Pufendorf, Eris Scandica, ed. Palladini, Fiammetta (Berlin, 2002).Google Scholar
Pütter, Johann Sebastian, An Historical Development of the Present Political Constitution of the Germanic Empire, trans. Dornford, J. (London, 1790).Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip, ed., The Briefs of the American Revolution: Constitutional Arguments between Thomas Hutchinson, Governor of Massachusetts Bay, and James Bowdoin for the Council and John Adams for the House of Representatives (New York, 1981).Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip, Constitutional History of the American Revolution, vol. 3, The Authority to Legislate (Madison, WI, 1991).Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip, Constitutional History of the American Revolution, vol. 4, The Authority of Law (Madison, WI, 1993).Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip, ‘The irrelevance of the Declaration’, in Law in the American Revolution and the Revolution in Law: A Collection of Review Essays in American Legal History, ed. Hartog, Hendrik (New York, 1981).Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas, Thomas Reid on Practical Ethics, ed. Haakonssen, Knud (Edinburgh, 2007).Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias, ‘Nineteenth century German legal science’, Boston College Law Review, 31 (1990), pp. 837–897.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Reading history through constructivist eyes’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37 (2008), pp. 395–414.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick, Leibniz’ Universal Jurisprudence: Justice as the Charity of the Wise (Cambridge, MA, 1996).Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik, ‘On the ontological status of the state’, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (1996), pp. 439–466.Google Scholar
Robertson, John, ‘Sacred history and political thought: Neapolitan responses to the problem of sociability after Hobbes’, Historical Journal, 56 (2013), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Rørvik, Thor Inge, ‘Samuel Pufendorf – Natural law, moral entities and the civil foundation of morality’, in Philosophy of Justice, ed. Fløistad, Guttorm (Dordrecht, 2015).Google Scholar
Rosser, Gervase, The Art of Solidarity in the Middle Ages: Guilds in England 1250–1550 (Oxford, 2015).Google Scholar
Runciman, David, ‘The concept of the state: The sovereignty of a fiction’, in States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects, eds. Skinner, Quentin and Stråth, Bo (Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
Runciman, David, ‘What kind of person is Hobbes’s state? A reply to Skinner’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 8 (2000), pp. 268–278.Google Scholar
Ryerson, Richard Alan, ‘John Adams, republican monarchist: An inquiry into the origins of his constitutional thought’, in Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World, eds. Gould, Eliga H. and Onuf, Peter S. (Baltimore, MD, 2005).Google Scholar
Saarinen, Risto, Weakness of Will in Renaissance and Reformation Thought (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari, The Morality of the Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law (Helsinki, 1995).Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari, ‘Pufendorf and the Stoic model of natural law’, in Grotius and the Stoa, eds. Blom, Hans W. and Winkel, Laurens C. (Assen, 2004).Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Kari, ‘Pufendorf on natural equality, human dignity, and self-esteem’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 71 (2009), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Saine, Thomas P., The Problem of Being Modern, or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution (Detroit, 1997).Google Scholar
Salavastru, Andrei, ‘The idea of body politic in English thought in the XVth century: The new paradigm of John Fortescue’, Cahiers de Psychologie Politique, 20 (2012). http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/cahierspsychologiepolitique/index.php?id=1979.Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio, ‘Before and after natural law: Models of natural law in ancient and modern times’, in Early Modern Natural Law: Contexts and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment, eds. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, P. (Dordrecht, 2003).Google Scholar
Schäfer, Rieke, ‘Historicizing strong metaphors: A challenge for conceptual history’, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 7 (2012), pp. 28–51.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E., Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time (Baltimore, MD, 2004).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Alexander, ‘Irenic patriotism in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century German political discourse’, Historical Journal, 53 (2010), pp. 243–269.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm, ‘New structures of knowledge’, in A History of the University in Europe, vol. 2, Universities in Early Modern Europe, ed. de Ridder-Symoens, H. (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Schmutz, Jacob, ‘La doctrine médiévale des causes et la théologie de la nature pure (XIIIe-XVIIe siècles)’, Revue Thomiste, 101 (2001), pp. 217–264.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B., ‘Pufendorf’s place in the history of ethics’, Synthese, 72 (1987), pp. 123–155.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin, ‘Christian Wolff and Leibnizian monads’, Leibniz Review, 12 (2002), pp. 131–135.Google Scholar
Schröder, Peter, ‘The constitution of the Holy Roman Empire after 1648: Samuel Pufendorf’s assessment in his Monzambano’, Historical Journal, 42 (1999), pp. 961–983.Google Scholar
Schüßler, Rudolf, ‘On the anatomy of probabilism’, in Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity, eds. Kraye, Jill and Saarinen, Risto (Dordrecht, 2005).Google Scholar
Schuurman, Paul, ‘Moral self-ownership and ius possessionis in Scholastics’, in Transformations in Medieval and Early-Modern Rights Discourse, eds. Mäkinen, Virpi and Korkman, Petter (Dordrecht, 2006).Google Scholar
Schuurman, Paul, Ideas, Mental Faculties and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and Its Reception in the Dutch Republic, 1630–1750 (Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel, ‘Francisco Suárez on consent and political obligation’, Vivarium, 46 (2008), pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel, ‘Probabilism, just war and sovereign supremacy in the work of Gabriel Vázquez’, History of Political Thought, 34 (2013), pp. 177–194.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger and Finnis, John, ‘Corporate persons’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 63 (1989), pp. 239–274.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J., ‘Monstrous Pufendorf: Sovereignty and system in the Dissertations’, in Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe, eds. Cuttica, Cesare and Burgess, Glenn (London, 2012).Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J., ‘Pufendorf’s moral and political philosophy’, in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (updated March 2013). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pufendorf-moral/#LifWor.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J., ‘Religion, populism, and patriarchy: Political authority from Luther to Pufendorf’, Ethics, 103 (1993), pp. 551–569.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J., ‘“Turkish judgment” and the English Revolution: Pufendorf on the right of resistance’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung: Werk und Einfluss eines Deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren, eds. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald (Berlin, 1996).Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘The soul’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, eds. Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy, Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue (Cambridge, 1997), p. 130.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher, ‘Shadows of beings: Francisco Suárez’s entia rationis’, in The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez, eds. Hill, Benjamin and Lagerlund, Henrik (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Simmons, R. C. and Thomas, P. D. G., eds., Proceedings and Debates of the British Parliaments Respecting North America, 1754–1783, 6 vols. (Millwood, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
Simon, Joshua, ‘Símon Bolívar’s republican imperialism: Another ideology of American Revolution’, History of Political Thought, 33 (2012), pp. 280–304.Google Scholar
Skarica, Mirko, ‘The problem of God’s foreknowledge and human free action in Spanish philosophy’, in Hispanic Philosophy in the Age of Discovery, ed. White, Kevin (Washington, DC, 1997).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘From the state of princes to the person of the state’, in Visions of Politics, vol. 2, Renaissance Virtues (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘A genealogy of the modern state’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 162 (2009), pp. 325–370.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hobbes and the purely artificial person of the state’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 7 (1999), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hobbes on persons, authors and representatives’, in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Springborg, Patricia (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Hobbes on representation’, European Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2005), pp. 155–184.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘The state’, in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, eds. Ball, Terence, Farr, James and Hanson, Russell L. (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, ‘Surveying the foundations: A retrospect and reassessment’, in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, eds. Brett, Annabel and Tully, James with Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert Jr., Chappell, Vere and Rocca, Michael Della, ‘Determinism and human freedom’, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, eds. Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas D., ‘Plato’s analogy of soul and state’, Journal of Ethics, 3 (1999), pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
Society of Jesus, the, Ratio Studiorum, trans. Farrell, Allan P. (Washington, DC, 1970). www.bc.edu/sites/libraries/ratio/ratio1599.pdf.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael, Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution (Princeton, 2008).Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A., ed., Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Stewart, Matthew, The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World (New Haven, 2005).Google Scholar
Stolarski, P. T., ‘Dominican-Jesuit rivalry and the politics of Catholic renewal in Poland, 1564–1648’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 62 (2011), pp. 255–272.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F., ‘The origins of probabilism in late scholastic moral thought: A prolegomenon to further study’, Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales, 67 (2000), pp. 114–157.Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F., ‘The scope and limits of moral deliberation: Recta ratio, natural law, and conscience in Francisco Suárez’, in Imagination in the Later Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, eds. Nauta, Lodi and Pätzold, Detlev (Leuven, 2004).Google Scholar
Stone, M. W. F., ‘Scrupulosity and conscience: Probabilism in early modern scholastic ethics’, in Contexts of Conscience in Early Modern Europe 1500–1700, eds. Harald Braun and Edward Vallance (Basingstoke, 2000).Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin, ‘The Peace of Westphalia as a secular constitution’, Constellations, 15 (2008), pp. 173–188.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘De bonitate et malitia humanorum actuum’, in Suárez, Francisco, Opera omnia, vol. 4, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘A defence of the Catholic and Apostolic faith’, in Selections from Three Works, ed. Williams, Gwladys L., Brown, Ammi and Waldron, John (Oxford, 1944).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘De fine hominis’, in Opera omnia, vol. 4, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘De legibus, seu de Deo Legislatore’, in Opera omnia, vol. 5, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘De voluntario et involuntario’, in Opera omnia, vol. 4, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘Disputationes metaphysicae’, in Opera omnia, vol. 25, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, On Creation, Conservation, and Concurrence: Metaphysical Disputations 20, 21, and 22, trans. Freddoso, Alfred J. (South Bend, IL, 2002).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, On Efficient Causality: Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18, and 19, trans./ed. Freddoso, Alfred J. (New Haven, 1994).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, ‘Tractatus de gratia’, in Opera omnia, vol. 8, ed. Duval, Antoine Théophile (Paris, 1865–1878).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘The concept of a person’, in Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Human Agency and Language (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J., ‘The will as king over the powers of the soul: Uses and sources of an image in the thirteenth century’, Vivarium, 32 (1994), pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Adrian, Truly a Person, Truly God: A Post-Mythical View of Jesus (London, 1990).Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo, The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H., Censure and Heresy and the University of Paris, 1200–1400 (Philadelphia, PA, 1998).Google Scholar
Thomann, Marcel, ‘Vorwort’, in Wolff, Christian, Grundsätze des Natur- und Volckerrechts, ed. Thomann, Marcel (Hildesheim, 1980).Google Scholar
Threet, Douglas F., ‘Rhetorical function of Ciceronian probability’, Southern Speech Communication Journal, 39 (1974), pp. 309–321.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150–1625 (Atlanta, 1997).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, ‘Permissive natural law and property: Gratian to Kant’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62 (2001), pp. 381–399.Google Scholar
Toyoda, Tetsuya, ‘La doctrine vatellienne de l’égalité souveraine dans le contexte neuchâtelois’, Journal of the History of International Law, 11 (2009), pp. 103–124.Google Scholar
Trendlenburg, Adolf, ‘A contribution to the history of the word person’, The Monist, 20 (1910), pp. 336–363.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith, Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840 (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy (Cambridge, 2016).Google Scholar
Tukiainen, Arto ‘The commonwealth as a person in Hobbes’s Leviathan’, Hobbes Studies, 7 (1994), pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S., The Corporate Commonwealth: Pluralism and Political Fictions in England, 1516–1651 (Chicago, 2016).Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, ed. Dennison, James T., trans. Giger, George Musgrave (Phillipsburg, NJ, 1992–97).Google Scholar
Varden, Helga, ‘Kant’s non-voluntarist conception of political obligation: Why justice is impossible in the state of nature’, Kantian Review, 13 (2008), pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, Défense du système leibnitien contre les objections et les imputations de Mr. de Crousaz (Leiden, 1741).Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, ‘Dissertation on this question: Can natural law bring society to perfection without the assistance of political laws?’, trans. Hochstrasser, T. J., in de Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations, eds. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis, 2008).Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, ‘Essay on the foundation of natural law and on the first principle of the obligation men find themselves under to observe laws’, trans. Hochstrasser, T. J., in de Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations, eds. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis, 2008).Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, The Law of Nations, eds. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis, 2008).Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, Questions de droit naturel, et observations sur le traité du droit de la nature de M. Le baron de Wolf (Berne, 1762).Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian, ‘Analogy versus identity: The rejection of occult symbolism, 1580–1680’, in Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance, ed. Vickers, Brian (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Vidal, Fernando, Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psychology (Chicago, 2011).Google Scholar
Wakefield, Andre, ‘Cameralism: A German alternative to mercantilism’, in Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire, eds. Philip J. Stern and Carl Wennerlind (New York, 2014).Google Scholar
Walker Howe, Daniel, ‘The language of faculty psychology in The Federalist Papers’, in Conceptual Change and the Constitution, eds. Ball, Terence and Pocock, J. G. A. (Lawrence, KS, 1988).Google Scholar
Walker Howe, Daniel, ‘The political psychology of The Federalist’ in Walker Howe, Daniel, Making the American Self: Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Cambridge, MA, 1997).Google Scholar
Walker, Mack, German Home Towns: Community, State, and General Estate, 1648–1871 (Ithaca, NY, 1971).Google Scholar
Ward, Lee, The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America (New York, 2004).Google Scholar
Ware, Kallistos, ‘The unity of the human person according to the Greek Fathers’, in Persons and Personality: A Contemporary Inquiry, eds. Peacocke, Arthur and Gillet, Grant (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
Warner, Daniel, An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations (Boulder, CO, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, Joachim, Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, vol. 2, The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich 1648–1806 (New York, 2012).Google Scholar
[Whately, Thomas], The Regulations Lately Made Concerning the Colonies and the Taxes Imposed upon Them, Considered (London, 1765).Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G., ‘Vattel’s doctrine of the state’, History of Political Thought, 9 (1988), pp. 50–90.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q., The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change (Princeton, 1990).Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz, A History of Private Law in Europe, with Particular Reference to Germany, trans. Weir, Tony (Oxford, 1995).Google Scholar
Williams, Howard, Kant’s Critique of Hobbes: Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism (Cardiff, 2003).Google Scholar
Wilson, James, ‘Considerations on the nature and extent of the legislative authority of the British Parliament’, in Collected Works of James Wilson, vol. 1, eds. Hall, Kermit L. and Hall, Mark David (Indianapolis, IN, 2007).Google Scholar
Wilson, James, ‘Of municipal law’, in Collected Works of James Wilson, vol. 1, eds. Hall, Kermit L. and Hall, Mark David (Indianapolis, IN, 2007).Google Scholar
Wilson, James, ‘Speech delivered in the Convention for the Province of Pennsylvania, Held at Philadelphia, in January, 1775’, in Collected Works of James Wilson, vol. 1, eds. Hall, Kermit L. and Hall, Mark David (Indianapolis, IN, 2007).Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter H., ‘Still a monstrosity? Some reflections on early modern statehood’, Historical Journal, 69 (2006), pp. 565–576.Google Scholar
Wokler, Robert, ‘The manuscript authority of political thoughts’, in Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment, and Their Legacies, eds. Garsten, Bryan and Brooke, Christopher (Princeton, 2012).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, ‘Discourse on the practical philosophy of the Chinese’, in Moral Enlightenment: Leibniz and Wolff on China, eds. Ching, Julia and Oxtoby, Willard G. (Nettetal, 1992).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Institutiones juris naturae et gentium, ed. Thomann, Marcel (Hildesheim, 1969).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Jus gentium methodo scientifica pertractatum, ed. Drake, J. H., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1934).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, ‘On the philosopher king and the ruling philosopher’, in Moral Enlightenment: Leibniz and Wolff on China, eds. Ching, Julia and Oxtoby, Willard G. (Nettetal, 1992).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, ‘Prolegomena to empirical psychology’, trans. Richards, Robert J., Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 124 (1980), pp. 230–234.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, ‘Prolegomena to rational psychology’, trans. Richards, Robert J., Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 124 (1980), pp. 234–239.Google Scholar
Wolff, Martin, ‘On the nature of legal persons’, Law Quarterly Review, 54 (1938), pp. 494–521.Google Scholar
Yirush, Craig, Settlers, Liberty, and Empire: The Roots of Early American Political Theory, 1675–1775 (New York, 2011).Google Scholar
Zashin, Elliot and Chapman, Phillip C., ‘The uses of metaphor and analogy: Toward a renewal of political language’, Journal of Politics, 36 (1974), pp. 290–326.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P., ‘Natural rights and imperial constitutionalism: The American Revolution and the development of the American amalgam’, in Natural Rights Liberalism from Locke to Nozick, eds. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey (New York, 2005).Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone, ‘Religious commitment and secular reason: Pufendorf on the separation between religion and politics’, in Natural Law and Toleration in the Early Enlightenment, eds. Parkin, John and Stanton, Timothy (Oxford, 2013).Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone, ‘Samuel Pufendorf and the foundation of modern natural law: An account of the state of research and editions’, Central European History, 31 (1998), pp. 413–428.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone, ‘Vattel’s Law of Nations and just war theory’, History of European Ideas, 35 (2009), pp. 408–417.Google Scholar