Abraham, K. S., ‘Self-Proving Causation’ (2013) 99 Virginia Law Review 1811–53Google Scholar

Abraham, K. S., The Forms and Functions of Tort Law, 2nd ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Agostini, F., ‘La tutela delle malattie professionali dopo la sentenza della Corte Costituzionale del 18 febbraio 1988 n. 179’ (1988) III Rivista giurisprudenza del lavoro 3–30Google Scholar

Akkermans, A. J., ‘Causaliteit bij letselschade en medische expertise’ (2003) 2 Tijdschrift voor Vergoeding Personenschade 93–104Google Scholar

Akkermans, A. J., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid bij onzeker causaal verband’ (diss. Tilburg) (Deventer: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink, 1997)Google Scholar

Akkermans, A. J., ‘Oorzakelijk verband’, in Onrechtmatige daad BW-Krant Jaarboek 1996 (Deventer: Gouda Quint, 1996)Google Scholar

Akkermans, A. J. and van Dijk, C. H., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid, omkeringsregel, bewijslastverlichting en eigen schuld: een inventarisatie van de stand van zaken’ (2012) 17 Aansprakelijkheid, Verzekering en Schade 157–77Google Scholar

Alarcão, R., Direito das obrigações (Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, 1983)Google Scholar

Alibrandi, G., Infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 2002)Google Scholar

Almeida Costa, M. J., Direito das obrigações, 12th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2008)Google Scholar

Almeida Costa, M. J., ‘O concurso da responsabilidade civil contratual e extracontratual’, in Ab uno ad omnes – 75 anos da Coimbra Editora (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1995), pp. 555–65Google Scholar

Alpa, G., La responsabilità civile. Parte generale (Turin: Utet, 2010)Google Scholar

Alpa, G. and Chiodi, G. (eds.), Il progetto italo-francese delle obbligazioni (1927). Un modello di armonizzazione nell’epoca della ricodificazione (Milan: Giuffrè, 2007)Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 2010)Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1985)Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Second, Torts (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1965)Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Torts (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1934)Google Scholar

Anderson, W. L., Levitan, L. and Tuckley, K., ‘The “Any Exposure” Theory Round II - Court Review of Minimal Exposure Expert Testimony in Asbestos and Toxic Tort Litigation Since 2008’ (2012) 22 Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 1–48Google Scholar

Andersson, H. Gränsproblem i skadeståndsrätten (Uppsala: Iustus, 2013)Google Scholar

Andersson, H., ‘The Tort Law Culture(s) of Scandinavia’ (2012) 3 Journal of European Tort Law 210–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, H., Skyddsändamål och adekvans (Uppsala: Iustus, 1993)Google Scholar

Andrade, M., Teoria geral das obrigações, 3rd ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1966)Google Scholar

Antolisei, F., Il rapporto di causalità nel diritto penale (Turin: Giappichelli, 1960)Google Scholar

Antonov, D., Tort Law (Непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1965)Google Scholar

Antunes Varela, J. M., Das obrigações em geral, I, 10th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2000)Google Scholar

Apathy, P., ‘Zur Haftung bei überholender Kausalität’, in Festschrift Koziol (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010), pp. 515–28Google Scholar

Apostolov, I., Law of Obligations, Part One (Облигационно право, Част първа) (Sofia: BAN, 1990)Google Scholar

Araújo, F., A procriação assistida e o problema da santidade da vida (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1999)Google Scholar

Argiriadis, A., Legal Issues, vol. A (Νομικά θέματα) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1978)Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., ‘The Open Door: Counterfactual versus Singularist Theories of Causation’, in Sankey, H. (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic, 1999), pp. 175–85Google Scholar

Askeland, B., Tapsfordelning og regress ved erstatningsoppgjör (Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2006)Google Scholar

Auletta, G., ‘Revocatoria fallimentare ed obbligo di corrispondere il valore del bene alienato’ (1956) III Foro padano 57–67Google Scholar

Azevedo de Almeida, M., ‘A responsabilidade civil perante os investidores por realização defeituosa de relatórios de auditoria, recomendações de investimento e relatórios de notação de risco’ (2010) Cadernos da Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários 9–31Google Scholar

Azevedo de Almeida, M., A responsabilidade civil do banqueiro perante os credores da empresa financiada (Coimbra: Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra / Coimbra Editora 2003)Google Scholar

Bączyk-Rozwadowska, K., ‘Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Poland’ (2011) 86 Chicago-Kent Law Review 1217–61Google Scholar

Bailey, S. H., ‘Causation in Negligence: What Is a Material Contribution?’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies 167–85Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność deliktowa w razie niepewności związku przyczynowego. Studium prawnoporównawcze (Toruń: TNOiK, 2013)Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., ‘A Polish Perspective on the House of Lords Judgment in Corr v. IBC Vehicles LTD’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 667–79Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., ‘Poland’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2006 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008), pp. 373–93Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., ‘Overview of Polish Private Law. Tort Law and Property Law’, in Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.), Opening Up European Tort Law (Munich: Sellier, 2007), pp. 233–43Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza za wykonywanie władzy publicznej (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2006)Google Scholar

Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność za produkt w USA (Toruń: TNOiK, 1999)Google Scholar

Bagshaw, R., ‘Causing the Behaviour of Others and Other Causal Mixtures’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 361–82Google Scholar

Bamberger, H. G. and Roth, H. (eds.), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar BGB, 37th ed. (Munich: Beck, 2015)Google Scholar

von Bar, C. (ed.), Principles of European Law. Non-Contractual Liability Arising Out of Damage Caused to Another (Munich: Sellier, 2009)Google Scholar

von Bar, C., The Common European Law of Torts, vol. II (Oxford: Clarendon, 2000)Google Scholar

von Bar, C., ‘The Study Group on a European Civil Code’, in European Parliament, The Private Law Systems in the EU: Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality and the Need for a European Civil Code, Working Paper, Legal Affairs Series, JURI 103 EN, 1999, 130–5Google Scholar

von Bar, C., The Common European Law of Torts, vol. I (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998)Google Scholar

von Bar, C., Clive, E., Beale, H. and Schulte-Nölke, H. (eds.), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (Munich: Sellier, 2009)Google Scholar

Barta, H., Zivilrecht: Grundriss und Einführung in das Rechtsdenken (Vienna: WUV-Univ.-Verl., 2004)Google Scholar

Baumgartner, A., Die (Dritt-)Haftung von Ratingagenturen und anderen Informationsexperten (Vienna: Verlag Österreich, 2016)Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. and Rosenberg, A., Hume and the Problem of Causation (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Behren, M. A. and Anderson, W. L., ‘The “Any Exposure” Theory: An Unsound Basis for Asbestos Causation and Expert Testimony’ (2008) 37 Southwestern University Law Review 479–510Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., Skadestånd för miljöskada (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2011)Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., Försäkringsavtalsrätt (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2006)Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., 14 uppsatser 1983–1991 (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1992)Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., Om jämkning av skadestånd (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1982)Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B. and Ullman, H., Produktansvaret (Uppsala: Iustus, 2001)Google Scholar

Ben-Shahar, O., ‘Causation and Foreseeability’, in Faure, M. (ed.), Tort Law and Economics (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics), 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2007), pp. 83–108Google Scholar

Biard, J.-F., ‘Les agences de notation de crédit’, La semaine juridique (Entreprises et Affaires) (2011) n° 27, 7 Juillet 1524–5Google Scholar

Bieniek, G., Komentarz do kodeksu cywilnego. Księga trzecia. Zobowiązania, vol. 1, 7th ed. (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2006)Google Scholar

Bikelis, S., ‘Neturtinės žalos atlyginimas (?) baudžiamosiose bylose dėl gyvybės atėmimo ir sunkaus sveikatos sutrikdymo’ (‘Compensation (?) of non-pecuniary damage in criminal cases for personal injuries and death’) (2011) 4(74) Teisės problemos 5–51Google Scholar

Birnbacher, D. and Hommen, D., ‘Omissions as Causes – Genuine, Quasi, or not at All?’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on “Causation and Responsibility” (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 133–56Google Scholar

Bloch Ehlers, A. and Ulfbeck, V. G., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Denmark’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 117–19Google Scholar

Bollenberger, R., ‘Das Kreditgeschäft’, in Apathy, P., Iro, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Österreichisches Bankvertragsrecht IV, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Springer, 2012), pp. 1–208Google Scholar

van Boom, W. H. and Giesen, I., ‘The Netherlands’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmemann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Borghetti, J. S., ‘Causation in Hepatitis B. Vaccination Litigation in France: Breaking Through Scientific Uncertainty?’, (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 543–66Google Scholar

Borghetti, J. S., ‘Litigation on Hepatitis B’ Vaccination and Demyelinating Diseases in France: Breaking through Scientific Uncertainty?’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 11–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borghetti, J. S., ‘France’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Brandão Proença, J. C., Direito das obrigações. Relatório sobre o programa, o conteúdo e os métodos de ensino da disciplina (Porto: Universidade Católica, 2007)Google Scholar

Brandão Proença, J. C., A conduta do lesado como pressuposto e critério de imputação do dano extracontratual (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1997)Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Haftungsrecht: Struktur, Prinzipien, Schutzbereich (Berlin: Springer, 2016)Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Tort Law in the European Union (The Hague: Kluwer, 2015)Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Common Principles of Tort Law (London: BIICL, 2004)Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, G., Colombi, Ciacchi A. and O’Callaghan, P. (eds.), Personality Rights in European Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Brun, P., Responsabilité civile extracontractuelle, 2nd ed. (Paris: Litec, 2009)Google Scholar

Brun, P., ‘Causalité juridique et causalité scientifique’, in ‘Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile’ (2007) 40 Revue Lamy Droit civil, suppl. no. 2630Google Scholar

Brunner, C. J. H., ‘Causaliteit en toerekening van schade’ (1981) 29 Verkeersrecht 210–7Google Scholar

von Buri, M., Über Causalität und deren Verantwortung (Leipzig: Gebhardt, 1873)Google Scholar

Burrows, A., ‘Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Damages for Loss of a Chance’ (2008) Journal of Personal Injury Law 31–43Google Scholar

Busnelli, F. D. and Comandé, G., ‘Italy’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 79–92Google Scholar

Bussani, M., Il diritto dell’Occidente. Geopolitica delle regole globali (Turin: Einaudi, 2010)Google Scholar

Bussani, M., ‘European Tort Law – A Way Forward?’, in Id. (ed.), European Tort Law. Eastern and Western Perspectives (Berne: Stämpfli, 2007), p. 365–78Google Scholar

Bussani, M., ‘Intention et lien de causalité dans le droit comparé de la responsabilité civile (la fable très peu convenue de la malice qui accroche)’, in De tous horizons. Mélanges Xavier Blanc-Jouvan (Paris: Société de législation comparée, 2005), p. 459–71Google Scholar

Bussani, M., “Integrative’ Comparative Law Enterprises and the Inner Stratification of Legal Systems’ (2000) 8 European Review of Private Law 85–99Google Scholar

Bussani, M., La colpa soggettiva. Modelli di valutazione della colpa extracontrattuale (Padua: Cedam, 1991)Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Tort Law and Legal Cultures’ (2015) 63 American Journal of Comparative Law 77–108Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Harmonization of Tort Law in Europe’, in Marciano, A. and Ramello, G.B. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Munich: Springer, 2014), pp. 1–22Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Fault, Causation and Damage in the Law of Negligence: A Comparative Appraisal’, in Ciacchi, A. Colombi, Godt, C., Rott, P. and Smith, L. J. (eds.), Haftungsrecht im dritten Millennium - Liability in the Third Millennium. Liber Amicorum Gert Brüggemeier (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp. 145–56Google Scholar

Bussani, M., Infantino, M. and Werro, F., ‘The Common Core Sound: Short Notes on Themes, Harmonies and Disharmonies in European Tort Law’ (2009) 20 King’s Law Journal 239–55Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.), Opening Up European Tort Law (Munich: Sellier, 2007)Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Mattei, U., ‘Le fonds commun du droit privé europeén’ (2000) 52 Revue internationale de droit comparé 29–48Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Mattei, U., ‘The Common Core Approach to European Private Law’ (1997–1998) 3 Columbia Journal of European Law 339–56Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Palmer, V. V., Pure Economic Loss in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Busto Lago, J. M., ‘Materiales para la construcción de la responsabilidad civil de los terceros de confianza: perspectiva desde la responsabilidad civil de auditores y de las agencias de rating y la teoría de las flood gates’ (2014) 18 Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña 31–64Google Scholar

Busto Lago, J. M., and Reglero Campos, L. F. (eds.), Lecciones de responsabilidad civil, 2nd ed. (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2012)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Methodological Approaches to Tort Law of the ECHR’, in Fenyves, A., Karner, E., Koziol, H. and Steiner, E. (eds.), Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 72–91Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Causation as a Legal Phenomenon’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), p. 7–26Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Die Verursachung im Entwurf eines neuen Schadenersatzrecht’, in Griss, I., Kathrein, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Springer, 2006), pp. 37–45Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Haftungsgrund und Zufall als alternativ mögliche Schadensursachen’, in Festschrift Frotz (Vienna: Mainz, 1993), pp. 3–10Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Aktuelle Streitfragen um die alternative Kausalität’, in Festschrift Beitzke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979), pp. 3–34Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., Probleme der Schadensverursachung nach deutschem und österreichischem Recht (Stuttgart: F. Enke, 1964)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, F., ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ (1959) Juristische Blätter 1–13Google Scholar

von Caemmerer, E., Das Problem des Kausalzusammenhangs im Privatrecht (Freiburg: Schutz, 1956)Google Scholar

Calabresi, G., ‘Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven’ (1975) 43 University of Chicago Law Review 69–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calamandrei, P., Studi sul processo civile, III (Padua: Cedam, 1934)Google Scholar

Calvão da Silva, J., Responsabilidade civil do produtor (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1990)Google Scholar

Cane, P., The Anatomy of Tort Law (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1997)Google Scholar

Capecchi, M., Il nesso di causalità (Padua: Cedam, 2002)Google Scholar

Capozzi, G., ‘Risarcimento dei danni e svalutazione della moneta’ (1945) Diritto e giurisprudenza 74–77Google Scholar

Cardona Ferreira, R., ‘The Loss of Chance in Civil Law Countries: A Comparative and Critical Analysis’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 53–74Google Scholar

Cardona Ferreira, R., ‘A perda de chance — análise comparativa e perspetivas de ordenação sistemática’ (2012) 144 O Direito 28–57Google Scholar

Cardona Ferreira, R., Indemnização do interesse contratual positivo e perda de chance (em especial, na contratação pública) (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2011)Google Scholar

Carlsson, M., Arbetsskada. Samspelet mellan skadestånd och andra ersättningsordningar (Stockholm: Jure, 2008)Google Scholar

Carnap, R., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (edited by Gardner, M.), corrected ed. (New York: Dover, 1995)Google Scholar

Carnap, R., Meaning and Necessity—A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1956)Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘Danos societários e governação de sociedades (corporate governance)’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 31–44Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘Sociedades e notação do risco (rating) – a protecção dos investidores’, in II Congresso Direito das Sociedades em Revista (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2012), pp. 341–6Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘A própria vida como dano? – Dimensões civis e constitucionais de uma questão-limite’, in Leite de Campos, D. and de Abreu Chinelatto, S. (eds.), Pessoa humana e direito (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2009), pp. 259–94Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘A protecção juscivil da vida pré-natal. Sobre o estatuto jurídico do embrião’ (2008) Direito e justiça 134–55Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., Direito civil, Responsabilidade civil. O método do caso (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2006)Google Scholar

Carneiro da Frada, M., Teoria da confiança e responsabilidade civil (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar

Carnevali, U., ‘Omessa informazione da parte del medico, danno da trattamento terapeutico e ipotetica scelta del paziente’ (2010) Responsabilità civile e previdenza 2181–7Google Scholar

Carpenter, C. E., ‘Concurrent Causation’ (1935) 83 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 941–52Google Scholar

Carval, S., La responsabilité civile dans sa fonction de peine privée (Paris: LGDJ, 1995)Google Scholar

Catala, P. and Weir, J. A., ‘Delict and Torts: A Study in Parallel – Part IV’ (1965) 39 Tulane Law Review 701–16Google Scholar

Catalucci, A., ‘In ordine al quesito se la nascita di un figlio non voluto costituisca danno risarcibile ai sensi dell’art. 2043’ (1983) Rivista italiana di medicina legale 812–13Google Scholar

Cendon, P., Il dolo nella responsabilità extracontrattuale (Turin: Giappichelli, 1976)Google Scholar

Chabas, F., ‘Bilan de quelques années de jurisprudence en matière de rôle causal’ (1970) Dalloz chr. 113Google Scholar

Chabas, F., L’influence de la pluralité de causes sur le droit à réparation (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)Google Scholar

Chamallas, M. and Wriggins, J. B., The Measure of Injury (New York: NYU Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Charalambakis, A., Medical Liability and Ethics (Ιατρική ευθύνη και δεοντολογία) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1993)Google Scholar

Chiolos, K., ‘Liability of the State for Damages from Illegal Acts or Omissions of its Organs’ (‘Η αποζημιωτική ευθύνη του Δημοσίου για παράνομες πράξεις ή παραλείψεις των οργάνων του’) (2007) 55 Nomiko Vima 1727–29Google Scholar

Clark, T. and Nolan, D., ‘A Critique of Chester v. Afshar’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Costs’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1–44Google Scholar

Coderch, P. S., ‘Causation and Liability’ (2000) 1 Indret 1–16.Google Scholar

Cohen, L. J., The Probable and the Provable (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994)Google Scholar

Corgas-Bernard, C., ‘La pluralité de responsables en droit français et dans d’autres ordres juridiques nationaux’, in GRERCA, Le droit français de la responsabilité civile confronté aux projets européens d’harmonisation (Paris: Irjs éditions, 2012), pp. 427–40Google Scholar

Cornu, G., ‘Obs. à Cass. crim., 10 juillet 1952’ (1952) II Juris-Classeur Périodique n° 7272Google Scholar

Czachórski, W., Zobowiązania (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2003)Google Scholar

Czachórski, W., in Radwanski, Z. (ed.), System prawa cywilnego, vol. 3, Part 1 (Warsaw: Ossolineum, 1981)Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Greece’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 171–82Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2012 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 301–32Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 279–305Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Death by Suicide and Damages to Third Persons in Greece’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 613–19Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Hinteregger, M. (ed.), Εnvironmental Liability and Ecological Damage in European Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2006), pp. 306–31Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2002 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2003), pp. 231–51Google Scholar

van Dam, C., European Tort Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar

Deakin, S., Johnston, A. and Markesinis, B., Markesinis and Deakins’ Tort Law, 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

De Cupis, A., Il danno teoria generale della responsabilità civile, vol. I (Milan: Giuffrè, 1979)Google Scholar

De Cupis, A., Dei fatti illeciti, 2nd ed. (Bologna, Roma: Zanichelli-Il Foro Italiano, 1971)Google Scholar

Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Note sous Cass. Civ. 1, 7 mars 1989 (1990) La semaine juridique II, n° 21403Google Scholar

Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Responsabilité délictuelle’, in Droit civil français d’Aubry et Rau, vol. VI-2 (Paris: Librairies techniques, 1989)Google Scholar

Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Note sous Cass. Civ. 2, 20 décembre 1972’ (1973) La semaine juridique II, n° 17541Google Scholar

Delgado, R., ‘Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-in-Fact for Indeterminate Plaintiffs’ (1983) 70 California Law Review 881–908Google Scholar

Deliyannis, I. and Kornilakis, P., Law of Obligations. Special Part (Eιδικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο), III (Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1992)Google Scholar

De Matteis, A. and Giubboni, S., Infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 2005)Google Scholar

Dias Pereira, A. G., ‘Portuguese Tort Law: A Comparison with the Principles of European Tort Law’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2004 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2005), pp. 623–48Google Scholar

Díez-Picazo, L., Fundamentos del derecho civil patrimonial V: La responsabilidad civil extracontractual (Navarra: Civitas, 2011)Google Scholar

van Dijk, C. H., ‘Causale perikelen: het is moeilijk en zal moeilijk blijven’ (2013) 12 Tijdschrift voor Vergoeding Personenschade 61–84Google Scholar

Dijkshoorn, W., ‘De leer van de redelijke toerekening: back to the eighties’ (2011) Aansprakelijkheid, Verzekering & Schade 257–68Google Scholar

Dobbs, D. B., The Law of Torts (St. Paul MN: West, 2000)Google Scholar

Dreyer, E., ‘Causalité civile et pénale’ (2007) 40 Revue Lamy de droit civil 35–8Google Scholar

Dubuisson, B., Durant, I. C. and Schmitz, N., ‘Belgium’ in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmerman, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer 2007)Google Scholar

Dufwa, B. W., Flera skadeståndsskyldiga (Stockholm: Juristförl., 1993)Google Scholar

Dufwa, B. W., Produktansvar (Stockholm: Forsakring, 1983)Google Scholar

Dybowski, T., in Radwanski, Z. (ed.), System prawa cywilnego, vol. 3, Part 1 (Warsaw: Ossolineum, 1981)Google Scholar

Dyson, M., ‘Tort and Crime’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 93–122Google Scholar

Dyson, M., ‘Tortious Apples and Criminal Oranges’, in Id. (ed.), Comparing Tort and Crime: Learning from across and within Legal Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 416–72Google Scholar

Ebert, I., ‘Tort Law and Insurance’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 144–50Google Scholar

Edelman, J., ‘Unnecessary Causation’ (2015) 89 Australian Law Journal 20–30Google Scholar

Ehlgen, C. B., Probabilistische Proportionalhaftung und Haftung für den Verlust von Chancen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar

Ehring, D., ‘Causal Relata’, in Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., and Menzies, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 387–413Google Scholar

Eliáš, K., Občanský zákoník: Velký akademický komentář, vol. 1, § 1–487 (Praha: Linde, 2008)Google Scholar

Elischer, D., ‘Pojetí škody, resp. újmy v aktuálních dokumentech evropského deliktního “soft law”’, Právník, č. 4/2011, str. 378–399Google Scholar

Elischer, D., ‘Náhrada nemateriálních aspektů při újmě na zdraví. Několik úvah k principu objektivizace náhrad’, Zdravotnické fórum. Pravidelná příloha časopisu Právní forum, 2011/2, 25–35Google Scholar

Elischer, D., Frinta, O. and Pauknerová, M., ‘Recodification of Private Law in the Czech Republic’, in Rivera, J. C. (ed.), The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), pp. 105–132Google Scholar

Emaus, J. M., Handhaving van EVRM-rechten via het aansprakelijkheidsrecht (diss. Utrecht) (The Hague: BJu, 2013)Google Scholar

Engel, D. M., ‘Lumping As Default in Tort Cases: The Cultural Interpretation of Injury and Causation’ (2010) 44 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 33–68Google Scholar

Engelhard, E. F. D. and Engelhard, I. M., ‘Shockschade’, in van Boom, W. H., Giesen, I. and Verheij, A. J. (eds.), Capita civilologie handboek empirie en privaatrecht (The Hague: BJu, 2013), pp. 517–39Google Scholar

Engisch, K., Die Kausalität als Merkmal der strafrechtlichen Tatbestände (Tübingen: Mohr, 1931) (English translation available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2743661)Google Scholar

Eriksson, A., Rätten till skadestånd vid miljöskador (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1986)Google Scholar

Erlenkämper, A. and Fichte, W. (eds.), Sozialrecht, 6th ed. (Köln: Luchterhand, 2008)Google Scholar

Esmein, P., ‘Le nez de Cléopâtre ou les affres de la causalité’ (1964) Dalloz chr. 205–216Google Scholar

European Group on Tort Law, Principles of European Tort Law (Vienna, New York: Springer 2005)Google Scholar

von Eyben, B. and Isager, H., Lærebog i Erstatningsret, 7th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF, 2011)Google Scholar

Fain, H., ‘Hart and Honoré on Causation in the Law’ (1966) 9 Inquiry 322–38Google Scholar

Fairgrieve, D. and G’sell-Macrez, F., ‘Causation in French Law: Pragmatism and Policy’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2011), pp. 111–29Google Scholar

Fasching, H. W. and Konecny, A., in Kommentar zu den Zivilprozessgesetzen, III, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2004)Google Scholar

Faure, M. and Bruggeman, V., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 105–22Google Scholar

Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. and Sarat, A., ‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…’ (1980–81) 15 Law & Society Review 631–54Google Scholar

Ferey, S. and G’sell-Macrez, F. (eds.), Causalité, responsabilité et contribution à la dette (Brussels: Bruylant, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Fernandes Cadilha, C. A., Regime da responsabilidade civil extracontratual do Estado e demais entidades públicas anotado, 2nd ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2011)Google Scholar

Filios, P., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 6th ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2011)Google Scholar

Fischer, D. A., ‘Insufficient Causes’ (2005–2006) 94 Kentucky Law Journal 276–317Google Scholar

Fischer, D. A., ‘Causation in Fact in Omission Cases’ (1992) Utah Law Review 1335–84Google Scholar

Fleischer, H., ‘Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen im Vertrags- und Deliktsrecht’, (1999) Juristenzeitung 766–75Google Scholar

Fleming, J. G., The American Tort Process (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988)Google Scholar

Forchielli, P., Il rapporto di causalità nell’illecito civile (Padua: Cedam, 1960)Google Scholar

Foot, P., ‘Hart and Honoré: Causation in the Law’ (1963) 72 Philosophical Review 505–15Google Scholar

Forray, V., ‘Commentaire complémentaire de l’article L. 650–1 du Code de commerce’ (2008) Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial 661–75Google Scholar

Fountedaki, K., Human Reproduction and Civil Medical Liability (Ανθρώπινη αναπαραγωγή και αστική ιατρική ευθύνη) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2007)Google Scholar

Fountedaki, K., ‘Issues of Civil Medical Liability in Case of Birth of a Person with Serious Illness or Disability (Wrongful Life)’ (‘Θέματα αστικής ιατρικής ευθύνης σε περίπτωση γέννησης ατόμου με σοβαρή ασθένεια ή αναπηρία (wrongful life)’) (2004) Digesta 471–83Google Scholar

Fountedaki, K., Civil Medical Liability (Aστική ιατρική ευθύνη) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2003)Google Scholar

Fountedaki, K., ‘Civil Medical Liability after the L. 2251/1994’ (‘Η αστική ιατρική ευθύνη μετά το ν. 2251/1994’) (1996) Kritiki Epitheorissi 179–204Google Scholar

Fountedaki, K., ‘The Issue of Causation in Medical Liability’ (‘Το πρόβλημα του αιτιώδους συνδέσμου στην ιατρική ευθύνη’) (1994) 35 Elliniki Dikaiosini 1226–39Google Scholar

Fourkiotis, K., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ελληνικόν Ενοχικόν Δίκαιον. Γενικόν μέρος) (Athens: Papazisis, 1964)Google Scholar

Fragoudaki, E., The Legal Treatment of Applications of Biogenetics – especially in Private Law Sector (Η νομική μεταχείριση των εφαρμογών της βιογενετικής - ιδίως από πλευράς ιδιωτικού δικαίου) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2008)Google Scholar

Fraley, J. M., ‘Re-examining Acts of God’ (2010) 27 Pace Environmental Law Review 669–90Google Scholar

Franzoni, M., Il danno risarcibile (Milan: Giuffrè, 2004)Google Scholar

Friberg, S. and Sunnqvist, M., ‘Crime and Tort in Sweden: Theoretical Distinction, Practical Connection’, in Dyson, M. (ed.), Comparing Tort and Crime. Learning from across and within Legal Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 173–222Google Scholar

Fulham-McQuillan, S., ‘Judicial Belief in Statistics as Fact: Loss of Chance in Ireland and England’ (2014) 30 Professional Negligence 9–31Google Scholar

Fumerton, R., ‘Moore, Causation, Counterfactuals, and Responsibility’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1273–81Google Scholar

Fumerton, R. and Kress, K., ‘Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, and Causal Sufficiency’ (2001) 64 Law and Contemporary Problems 83–105Google Scholar

Gabartas, H. and Šaltinytė, L., ‘Lithuania’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2010 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 353–83Google Scholar

Gaeta, S., ‘Sul momento cui va riferita la valutazione del danno da risarcire’ (1945) I, 2 Giurisprudenza italiana 105–8Google Scholar

Galanter, M., ‘The Dialectic of Injury and Remedy’ (2010) 44 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 1–10Google Scholar

Galanter, M., ‘Real World Torts: An Antidote to Anecdote’ (1996) 55 Maryland Law Review 1093–160Google Scholar

Galvão Telles, I., Direito das obrigações, 7th ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1997)Google Scholar

Garde, J., Nørgaard, C. A. and Revsbech, K., Forvaltningsret. Almindelige Emner, 5th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF, 2009)Google Scholar

Garlicki, S., Odpowiedzialność cywilna za nieszczęśliwe wypadki (Warsaw: Wydawn. Prawnicze, 1971)Google Scholar

Garlicki, S., ‘Glosa do orz. SN 17.04.1967, II PR 162/67’ (1968) 4 Nowe Prawo 664–71Google Scholar

Gass, M., Haftung für Rating-Agenturen (Vienna: Verlag Österreich, 2014)Google Scholar

Gebauer, M., Hypothetische Kausalität und Haftungsgrund (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007)Google Scholar

Georgiades, Ap., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2015)Google Scholar

Georgiades, Ap., Issues of Civil Liability (Zητήματα αστικής ευθύνης) (Athens: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1972)Google Scholar

Georgiades, Ap. and Stathopoulos, M. (eds.), Civil Code (Αστικός Κώδικας), IV (Athens: P. N. Sakkoulas, 1982)Google Scholar

Georgiades, Ap. and Stathopoulos, M. (eds.), Civil Code (Αστικός Κώδικας), II (Athens: P. N. Sakkoulas, 1979)Google Scholar

Georgiades, Ast., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 4th ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2003)Google Scholar

van Gerven, W., Larouche, P. and Lever, J., Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2000)Google Scholar

van Gerven, W., Lever, J., Larouche, Pierre, von Bar, C. and Viney, G., Tort Law. Scope of Protection (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1998)Google Scholar

Ghinoy, P., ‘Malattie professionali: criteri di accertamento e nozione di manifestazione’ (1997) II Giustizia civile 117–23Google Scholar

Giesen, I., ‘(Dis)Proportionele duidelijkheid’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht 2011, no. 19, 149–50Google Scholar

Giesen, I., ‘De aantrekkingskracht van Loreley. Over opkomst en ondergang (?) van de “omkeringsregel”’, in Hartlief, T. and Lindenbergh, S. D. (eds.), Tien pennenstreken over personenschade (The Hague: Sdu, 2009), pp. 69–86Google Scholar

Giesen, I., ‘The Burden of Proof and Other Procedural Devices in Tort Law’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2009), pp. 49–67Google Scholar

Giesen, I. and Keirse, A. L. M., ‘The Netherlands’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2010 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 426–60Google Scholar

Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B., ‘General Report’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B. (eds.), Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability. Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 1–73Google Scholar

Gimpel-Hinteregger, M., Theoretische Grundfragen der Umwelthaftung (Vienna: Manz, 1994)Google Scholar

Giometti, L., ‘La nozione di esposizione ad amianto; benefici contributivi e regime assicurativo: un sistema integrato di norme’ (2002) I Giurisprudenza italiana 522–6Google Scholar

Glaser, J., Abhandlungen aus dem österreichischen Strafrecht, I (Vienna: Tendler & Comp.: 1858)Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. C. P. and Zipursky, B. C., ‘Intervening Wrongdoing in Tort: The Restatement (Third)’s Unfortunate Embrace of Negligent Enabling’ (2009) 44 Wake Forest Law Review 1211–46Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. C. P., Sebok, A. J. and Zipursky, B. C. Tort Law. Responsibilities and Redress, 4th ed. (New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016)Google Scholar

Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Goldberg, R., Causation and Risk in the Law of Torts: Scientific Evidence and Medicinal Product Liability (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1999)Google Scholar

Golding, M. P., ‘Causation in the Law’ (1962) 59 Journal of Philosophy 85–95Google Scholar

Goleminov, C., Tort Liability (Отговорност за непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: Tilia, 1999)Google Scholar

Goleva, P., Law of Obligations (Облигационно право) (Sofia: Feneya, 2012)Google Scholar

Goleva, P., Civil and administrative liability in healthcare (Гражданска и административна отговорност в здравеопазването) (Sofia: IK Trud I Pravo, 2012)Google Scholar

Goleva, P., Tort Law (Деликтно право) (Sofia: Feneya, 2011)Google Scholar

Gomard, B., ‘Offentlige myndigheders erstatningsansvar’ (2004) Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen B.383Google Scholar

Gomes, J., ‘Ainda sobre a figura do dano da perda de oportunidade ou perda de chance’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 17–29Google Scholar

Gomes, J., ‘Em torno do dano da perda de chance — algumas reflexões’, in Dias, J. Figueiredo, Canotilho, J. J. Gomes and Costa, J. Faria (eds.), Ars judicandi. Estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Doutor António Castanheira Neves, II, Direito privado (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2008), pp. 289–327Google Scholar

Gomes, J., A gestão de negócios. Um instituto jurídico numa encruzilhada (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1993)Google Scholar

Gonçalves Moniz, A. R., ‘Responsabilidade da Administração por prestação de cuidados de saúde e violação do dever de vigilância’ (2015) Cadernos de justiça administrativa 37–52Google Scholar

Gorla, G., ‘Civilian Judicial Decisions – An Historical Account of Italian Style’ (1970) 44 Tulane Law Review 740–9Google Scholar

Gout, O., ‘Note sous Cass. 1ere civ., 17 juin 2010, n 09–67.011’ (2010) La semaine juridique n° 36, 870–1Google Scholar

Grady, M. F., ‘Causation and Foreseeability’, in Arlen, J. H. (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economic Analysis of Torts (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2013), pp. 114–48Google Scholar

Graziadei, M., ‘Liability for Fault in Italian law: The Development of Legal Doctrine from 1865 to the End of the Twentieth Century’, in Jansen, N. (ed.), The Development and Making of Legal Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010), pp. 126–63Google Scholar

Greco, P., ‘Debito pecuniario, debito di valore e svalutazione monetaria’ (1947) II Rivista di diritto commerciale 103–17Google Scholar

Green, L., ‘The Causal Relation Issue in Negligence Law’ (1962) 60 Michigan Law Review 543–76Google Scholar

Green, L., ‘Are There Dependable Rules of Causation?’ (1929) 77 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 601–28Google Scholar

Green, L., Rationale for Proximate Cause (Kansas City: Vernon Law Book, 1927)Google Scholar

Green, M. D., ‘Second Thoughts about Apportionment in Asbestos Litigation’ (2008) 37 Southwestern University Law Review 531–52Google Scholar

Green, M. D., ‘A Future for Asbestos Apportionment?’ (2006) 12 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 315–47Google Scholar

Green, S., Causation in Negligence (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2015)Google Scholar

Griss, I., Kathrein, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar

Grönwall, L., Hessmark, L.-G. and Jansson, H., Arbetsskadeförsäkring och statligt personskadeskydd (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2013)Google Scholar

Grosse-Wilde, T., ‘Die Relata eines juristischen Kausalbegriffs und der juristische Syllogismus’, in Bäcker, C. and Ziemann, S. (eds.), Junge Rechtsphilosophie, (2012) 135 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft pp. 43–54Google Scholar

G’sell, F., ‘Causation, Counterfactuals, and Probabilities in Philosophy and Legal Thinking’ (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 503–25Google Scholar

G’sell-Macrez, F., ‘La preuve du lien de causalité: comparaisons franco-américaines à propos des arrêts Distilbène’ (2010) 29 October Les Petites Affiches 6–17Google Scholar

G’sell-Macrez, F., Recherches sur la notion de causalité (Villeneuve d’Ascq: L’ARNT, 2005)Google Scholar

Haack, S., Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Hager, G., ‘Umweltschäden – ein Prüfstein für die Wandlungs- und Leistungsfähigkeit des Deliktsrechts’ [1986] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1961–71Google Scholar

Halling-Overgaard, S., Revisors erstatnings- og disciplinæransvar, 4th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF 2014)Google Scholar

Hamer, D., ‘“Factual Causation” and “Scope of Liability”: What’s the Difference?’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 155–88Google Scholar

Harrer, F., ‘Zufall und Wahrscheinlichkeit im Haftungsrecht’, Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 2012, 440–445Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T., Causation in the Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T., Causation in the Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1959)Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S. ‘Chapter 8. Law of Obligations’, in Chorus, J., Gerver, P. H. and Hondius, E. (eds.), Introduction to Dutch Law, 4th ed. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2006)Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S. and Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht. 6. Verbintenissenrecht, II, De verbintenis in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 2013)Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S. and Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht. 6. Verbintenissenrecht, I, De verbintenis in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 2012)Google Scholar

Hanson, J. D. and McCann, M., ‘Situationist Torts’ (2008) 41 Loyola Law Review 1345–454Google Scholar

Hanson, J. D. and Yosifon, D., ‘The Situation: An Introduction to the Situational Character, Critical Realism, Power Economics and Deep Capture’ (2003) 152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 129–346Google Scholar

Häusler, M.-S., Haftung ohne Kausalitätsnachweis (Vienna: Facultas, 2013)Google Scholar

Havel, B., ‘The Czech Republic’, in Smits, J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar 2012) pp. 279–85Google Scholar

Hebly, M., ‘Suïcide na een arbeidsongeval: een (on)geval apart?’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht 2010, no. 32, 258–63Google Scholar

Heerma van Voss, G. J. J., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht. 7. Bijzondere overeenkomsten, V, Arbeidsovereenkomst, collectievearbeidsovereenkomst en ondernemingsovereenkomst (Deventer: Kluwer, 2008)Google Scholar

Heinrich, E., ‘Teilhaftung bei alternativer Kausalität mit Zufall’ (2011) Juristische Blätter 277–87Google Scholar

Hellner, J., ‘The Swedish Alternative in an International Perspective’, in Oldertz, C. and Tidefelt, E. (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in Sweden and Other Countries (Stockholm: Juristförl., 1988), pp. 17–39Google Scholar

Hellner, J. and Radetzki, M., Skadeståndsrätt, 9th ed. (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2014)Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P., ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’ (1948) 15 Philosophy of Science 135–75Google Scholar

Hertz, K., ‘Erstatningsansvar for psykiske skader’ (2004) Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen B.183Google Scholar

Hill, A. B., ‘The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?’ (1965) 58 Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 295–300Google Scholar

Hodgson, D., The Law of Intervening Causation (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008)Google Scholar

Hoffmann, L., ‘Causation’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 592–603Google Scholar

Holčapek, T., Dokazování v medicínskoprávních sporech (Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2011)Google Scholar

Hondius, E., ‘Professional Liability’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 226–49Google Scholar

Honoré, T., ‘Causation in the Law’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 ed.), available at plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/causation-lawGoogle Scholar

Honoré, T., ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law’, in Owen, D. G. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 363–85Google Scholar

Honoré, A. M. (T.), Causation and Remoteness, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, vol. XI, ch. 7 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1971)Google Scholar

Honoré, T., ‘Die Kausalitätslehre im anglo-amerikanischen Recht im Vergleich zum deutschen Recht’ (1957) 69 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 463–74Google Scholar

Hume, D., An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1748)Google Scholar

Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature (London, 1739–1740)Google Scholar

Hylton, K. N., ‘Causation in Tort Law: A Reconsideration’, in Arlen, J. H. (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economic Analysis of Torts (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2013), pp. 97–113Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D., ‘The Tort of Negligence in the Common Law in the Nineneteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, in Schrage, E. J. H. (ed.), Negligence: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Torts (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 2001), pp. 229–71Google Scholar

Infantino, M., ‘Diffusing Tort Law Softly: Insights into the European Travels of Italian Tort Law’ (2015) 6 Journal of European Tort Law 1–22Google Scholar

Infantino, M., ‘Causation Theories and Causation Rules’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 279–99Google Scholar

Infantino, M., La causalità nella responsabilità extracontrattuale (Bern: Stämpli, 2012)Google Scholar

Infantino, M., ‘Making European Tort Law: The Game and Its Players’ (2010) 20 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 45–87Google Scholar

Iossiffov, B. and Balabanov, B., Delictual Liability (Непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: IM Clement University, 1989)Google Scholar

Issacharoff, S., ‘Can There Be a Behavioral Law and Economics’, (1998) 51 Vanderbilt Law Review 1729–45Google Scholar

Jaakke, J. C., ‘Strengere regels voor ratingbureaus. Een vereenvoudiging van de aansprakelijkheidstelling onder Nederlands recht?’, Ars Aequi 2014, 190–3Google Scholar

Jaakke, J. C., ‘De regulering van en toezicht op ratingbureaus in de Europese Unie’ (2012) 20 Onderneming en Financiering 43–55Google Scholar

Jansen, N., Die Struktur des Haftungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003)Google Scholar

Jansen, N., ‘The Idea of a Lost Chance’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 271–96Google Scholar

Jestaz, P., ‘Une question d’épistémologie’ (2001) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 547–58Google Scholar

Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R. and Thaler, R., ‘A Behavioural Approach to Law and Economics’, (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 1471–1550Google Scholar

Josephson, A. (ed.), Patientskadenämndens referatsamling. Avgöranden enligt patientskadelagen 1998–2009 (available at: www.eddy.se, 2010)Google Scholar

Jourdain, P., Les principes de la responsabilité civile, 8th ed. (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)Google Scholar

Jurkevičius, V., Kadner Graziano, T. and Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S., ‘The Impact of the Comparative Method on Lithuanian Private Law’, (2013) 21 European Review of Private Law 959–90Google Scholar

Kadner Graziano, T., ‘The “Loss of a Chance” in European Private Law. “All or Nothing” or Partial Compensation in Cases of Uncertainty of Causation’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 123–48Google Scholar

Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M., Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013)Google Scholar

Kalaidjiev, A., Law of Obligations, General Part (Облигационно право, Обща част) (Sofia: Sibi, 2001) – 6th ed. 2013Google Scholar

Kaliński, M., Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza, in Olejniczak, A. (ed.), System prawa prywatnego. Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna, vol. 6 (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009), pp. 1–214Google Scholar

Kaliński, M., Szkoda na mieniu i jej naprawienie (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2008)Google Scholar

Kaliński, M., ‘O normalności powiązań kauzalnych’ (2007) 11–12 Przegląd Sądowy 25–9Google Scholar

Kanellopoulou-Bottis, M., ‘The Infringement of Probability as Damage to Patrimony or Moral Harm’ (‘Η προσβολή της πιθανότητας ως περιουσιακή ζημία ή ως ηθική βλάβη’) (2003) Kritiki Epitheorissi 253–307Google Scholar

Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S., ‘Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages’ (1996) 39 Journal of Law and Economics 191–209Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., Law of Torts (Το δίκαιο των αδικοπραξιών) (Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki, 2014)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., Environment and Law (Περιβάλλον και δίκαιο) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2000)Google Scholar

Karasis, M., Joint and Several Debt, I, The Notion (Οφειλή εις ολόκληρον, Ι, Η έννοια), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1990)Google Scholar

Karczewski, C., Die Haftung für Schockschäden (Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Lang, 1992)Google Scholar

Karner, E., ‘Haftung für Rat und Auskunft zwischen Vertrag und Delikt’, in Festschrift Koziol (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010), pp. 695–720Google Scholar

Karner, E., ‘Zur Haftung von Rating-Agenturen’ (2010) Österreichisches Bank-Archiv 587–96Google Scholar

Karner, E., ‘Unerwünschte Zeugung und ungeplante Geburt – (k)eine Rechtsprechungsdivergenz?’ (2009) Zeitschrift für Ehe und Familie 91–4Google Scholar

Karner, E., Der Ersatz ideeller Schäden bei Körperverletzung (Vienna, New York: Springer, 1999)Google Scholar

Karner, E. ‘Rechtsprechungswende bei Schock- und Fernwirkungsschäden Dritter?’ (1998) Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 182–9Google Scholar

Karner, E. and Kernbichler, F., ‘Austria’, in Oliphant, K. and Wagner, G. (eds.), Employers’ Liability and Workers’ Compensation (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 63–110Google Scholar

Karner, E. and Koziol, H., Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens im österreichischen Recht und seine Reform, 15. Österreichischer Juristentag vol. II/1 (Vienna: Manz, 2003)Google Scholar

Karner, E. and Riss, O., ‘Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage in Austria: Tort Law’, in Oliphant, K. (ed.), Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 13–49Google Scholar

Karollus, M., Funktion und Dogmatik der Haftung aus Schutzgesetzverletzung (Vienna: Springer, 1992)Google Scholar

Kasche, M., Verlust von Heilungschancen: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Lang, 1999)Google Scholar

Kaye, D., ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation’ (1982) American Bar Foundation Research Journal 487–516Google Scholar

Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E. and Owen, D. G., Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 5th ed., (St. Paul MN: West, 1984)Google Scholar

Keil, G., ‘Making Causal Counterfactuals More Singular, and More Appropriate for Use in the Law’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 157–89Google Scholar

Keirse, A. L. M., ‘The Tortfeasor Takes his Victim as He Finds Him’, in Hartlief, T. and Lindenbergh, S. D. (eds.), Tien pennenstreken over personenschade (The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers, 2009), pp. 107–25Google Scholar

Keirse, A. L. M., 'Schadebeperkingsplicht: over eigen schuld aan omvang van de schade’ (diss. Groningen) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar

Keirse, A. L. M. and Schaub, M., ‘Dutch Case Note: Employer’s Liability for an Injured Employee’s Suicide in Dutch law’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 631–47Google Scholar

Kelman, M., ‘The Necessary Myth of Objective Causation Judgments in Liberal Political Theory’ (1987) 63 Chicago-Kent Law Review 579–637Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, D. M. and Santos, A. (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 19–73Google Scholar

Keren-Paz, T., Sex Trafficking: A Private Law Response (Abingdon: Routledge 2013)Google Scholar

Khoury, L., Uncertain Causation in Medical Liability (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2006)Google Scholar

Kitsaras, L., ‘Wrongful Birth: A Claim of the Parents against the Doctor for Monetary Compensation because of the Loss of the “Chance” of Interruption of the Pregnancy?’ (‘Wrongful birth: Αξίωση των γονέων έναντι του ιατρού για χρηματική ικανοποίηση λόγω απώλειας της «ευκαιρίας» διακοπής της κύησης;’) (2011) IA Chronika Idiotikou Dikaiou 166–73Google Scholar

Klaassen, C. J. M., Schadevergoeding: algemeen, II (Mon. BW B35) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2007)Google Scholar

Kleineman, J., Ren förmögenhetsskada. Särskilt vid vilseledandeavannanänkontraktspart (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1987)Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, J., ‘Causation’, in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.J., Zimmermann, R. and Stier, A. (eds.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 159–160Google Scholar

Kletečka, A. ‘Alternative Verursachungskonkurrenz mit dem Zufall’ (2009) Juristische Blätter 137–43Google Scholar

Kletečka, A. and Schauer, M., ABGB-ON^1.02 (Vienna: Manz, 2016)Google Scholar

Klicka, T., Beweislastverteilung im Zivilverfahrensrecht (Vienna: Manz, 1995)Google Scholar

Koch, A., Zwiazek przyczynowy jako podstawa odpowiedzialności odszkodowawczej w prawie cywilnym (Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe, 1975)Google Scholar

Koch, B. A., ‘Proportional Liability for Causal Uncertainty: How It Works on the Basis of a 200-Year-Old Code’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 67–86Google Scholar

Koch, B. A., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Austria’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 77–97Google Scholar

Koch, B. A., ‘Principles of European Tort Law’ (2009) 20 King’s Law Journal 203–14Google Scholar

Koch, B. A., ‘Austria’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Koch, B. A., ‘Wilburg’s “Flexible System” in a Nutshell’, in Koziol, H. and Steninger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2001 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2002), pp. 545–8Google Scholar

Koch, B. A. and Koziol, H., ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Koch, B. A. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002), pp. 395–435Google Scholar

Koch, B. A. and Schwarzenegger, P., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under Austrian Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague, Kluwer, 2004), pp. 9–27Google Scholar

Konov, T., The Basis of Civil Liability (Основание на гражданската отговорност) (Sofia: IM Clement University, 1995)Google Scholar

Kontogianni, A., Contributory Negligence in Civil Law (Η συνυπευθυνότητα του ζημιωθέντος στο Αστικό Δίκαιο) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2006)Google Scholar

Kornilakis, P., Law of Obligations. Special Part, I (Ειδικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2012)Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. B. and Ulen, T. S., ‘Law and Behavioural Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 1075–144Google Scholar

Korzonek, J. and Rosenbluth, I., Kodeks zobowiązań, Komentarz (Kraków: Księgarnia Powszechna, 1934–35)Google Scholar

Kötz, H. and Wagner, G., Deliktsrecht, 11th ed. (Munich: Verlag Franz Vahlen, 2010)Google Scholar

Kounougeri-Manoledaki, E., ‘The Problem of Hypothetical Causation in the Law of Compensation’ (‘Το πρόβλημα της υποθετικής αιτιότητας στο δίκαιο της αποζημίωσης’) (1981) Scientific Annual of Armenopoulos 185–202Google Scholar

Kozhuharov, A., Contract Law. Theory of Contractual Terms (Облигационно право, Общо учение за облигационното отношение) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1958)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht II, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2014)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Germanic Perspective (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2012); English Version of H. Koziol, Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Gedanken zur österreichischen Schadenersatzreform’, in Justiz, Bundesministerium für (ed.), 200 Jahre ABGB (Vienna: Manz, 2011), p. 307–33Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Natural and Legal Causation’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 53–67Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Comparative Report’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer: 2007), pp. 589–92Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Schadenersatz für den Verlust einer Chance?’ in Hohloch, G. and Frank, R., Schlechtriem, P. (eds.), Festschrift für Stoll (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001), pp. 233–50Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Damages under Austrian Law’, in Magnus, U. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages (The Hague: Kluwer, 2001), pp. 7–26Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Causation under Austrian Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 11–21Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Der Beweis des natürlichen Kausalzusammenhangs’, in Koller, A. (ed.), Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrechtstagung 1999 (St. Gallen: Verlag Institut für Versicherungswirtschaft der Universität St. Gallen, 1999), pp. 79–103Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Problems of Alternative Causation in Tort Law’, in Hausmaninger, H., Koziol, H., Rabello, A. M. and Gilead, I. (eds.), Developments in Austrian and Israeli Private Law (Vienna: Springer, 1999), pp. 177–86Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Rechtmäßiges Alternativverhalten – Auflockerung starrer Lösungsansätze’, in Festschrift Deutsch (Köln: C. Heymanns, 1999), pp. 179–87Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Wrongfulness under Austrian Law’, in Koziol, (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998), pp. 11–30Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht I, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 1997)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., ‘Delikt, Verletzung von Schuldverhältnissen und Zwischenbereich’ (1994) Juristische Blätter 209–23Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2007 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2006 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C., ‘Schadenersatz bei ungeplanter Geburt eines Kindes’ (2008) Österreichische Richterzeitung 138–48Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar

Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2003 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2004)Google Scholar

Koziol, H., Bydlinski, P. and Bollenberger, R. (eds.), Kurzkommentar zum ABGB (KBB), 5th ed. (Vienna, Springer, 2017)Google Scholar

Kramer, E., ‘Der Einfluß des BGB auf das schweizerische und österreichische Privatrecht’ (2000) 200 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 365–400Google Scholar

Krejci, H. and Böhler, E., ‘Schadenersatzrecht’, in Tomandl, T. (ed.), System des österreichischen Sozialversicherungsrechts (Vienna: Manz, 2017, loose leaf collection)Google Scholar

von Kries, J. A., ‘Über den Begriff der objektiven Möglichkeit und einige Anwendungen desselben’ Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie (1888) 12(2–4) 179–240, 287–323, 393–428Google Scholar

Lackoroński, B., ‘Orzecznictwo dotyczące odpowiedzialności za tzw. szkody pośrednie’ (2007) 9 Przegląd Sądowy 35–48Google Scholar

Lambert-Faivre, Y., ‘De la poursuite à la contribution: quelques arcanes de la causalité’ (1992) Dalloz chronique 311Google Scholar

Lamour, M.-P., ‘Des cas où l’on répare les dommages que l’on n’a pas causés’ (2002) Revue de la Recherche Juridique 1237–67Google Scholar

Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A., The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge Mass., London: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A., ‘Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach’ (1983) 12 Journal of Legal Studies 109–34Google Scholar

Lange, H. and Schiemann, G., Schadensersatz, 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003)Google Scholar

Lapoyade Deschamps, C., ‘La réparation du préjudice économique pur en droit français’ (1998) 50 Revue internationale de droit comparé 367–81Google Scholar

Larenz, K. and Canaris, C.-W., Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, II/2, 13th ed. (Munich: Beck, 1994)Google Scholar

Leite de Campos, D., ‘Da responsabilidade do credor na fase de incumprimento’ (1992) 52 Revista da Ordem dos Advogados 1–16Google Scholar

Leite de Campos, D., ‘A responsabilidade do banqueiro pela concessão ou não concessão de crédito’ (1986) 46 Revista da Ordem dos Advogados 49–55Google Scholar

Le Tourneau, P. (ed.), Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats (Paris: Dalloz Action, 2010)Google Scholar

Le Tourneau, P., Responsabilité civile professionnelle, 2nd ed. (Paris: Dalloz, 2005)Google Scholar

Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, B., Wyrządzenie szkody przez kilka osób (Warsaw: Wydaw. Prawnicze, 1978)Google Scholar

Lewis, D., ‘Causation as Influence’, in Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994), pp. 75–106Google Scholar

Lewis, D., ‘Causation’ (1973) 70 Journal of Philosophy 556–67Google Scholar

Lewis, R., ‘Insurance and the Tort System’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies 85–116Google Scholar

Lindenbergh, S. D., Arbeidsongevallen en beroepsziekten (Mon. Privaatrecht 13) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2009)Google Scholar

Lindenbergh, S. D. and Pape, S. B., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid bij onzeker causaal verband: deel 2’ (2011) Ars Aequi 720–5Google Scholar

Litzeropoulos, A., Elements of the Law of Obligations (Στοιχεία Ενοχικού Δικαίου) (Athens 1968; reprinted: Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2002)Google Scholar

Lixouriotis, I., ‘Note II under AP 106/2003’ (‘ΑΠ 106/2003, σημ. II’) (2004) Dikaio Epiheiriseon kai Etairion 950Google Scholar

Lohsse, S., ‘The Development of Traffic Liability in Germany’, in Ernst, W. (ed.), The Development of Traffic Liability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010), pp. 75–111Google Scholar

López y García de la Serrana, J. and Sánchez Ruiz de la Valdivia, I. (eds.). Cuestiones actuales sobre responsabilidad civil (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2013)Google Scholar

Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K., Tort Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

MacDonald, R. A., ‘Access to Civil Justice’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 492–521Google Scholar

Machnikowski, P., in Radwański, Z. (ed.), System prawa prywatnego, vol. 6 (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009)Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L., The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, corrected ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L., ‘Causes and Conditions’ (1965) 2 American Philosophical Quarterly 245–64Google Scholar

Magnus, U., ‘Causation by Omission’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 95–104Google Scholar

Magnus, , ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under German Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 87–102Google Scholar

Magnus, U., ‘Causation in German Tort Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 63–73Google Scholar

Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M., ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 259–91Google Scholar

Malaurie, P. and Aynès, L., Les obligations (Paris: Defrénois, 2011)Google Scholar

Malone, W. S., ‘Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact’ (1956) 9 Stanford Law Review 60–99Google Scholar

Mańko, R., ‘The Culture of Private Law in Central Europe after Enlargement: A Polish Perspective’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 527–48Google Scholar

Marando, G., Le azioni di responsabilità civile per infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 1987)Google Scholar

Marino, V., La responsabilità del datore per infortuni e malattie da lavoro (Milan: Angeli, 1990)Google Scholar

Markesinis, B., ‘Réflexions d’un comparatiste anglais sur et à partir de l’arrêt Perruche’ (2001) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 77–102Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. and Unberath, H., The German Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2002)Google Scholar

Marteau, P., La notion de causalité dans la responsabilité civile (Nice: Publications périodiques spécialisées, 1913)Google Scholar

Martín-Casals, M., ‘Proportional Liability in Spain’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 43–66Google Scholar

Martín-Casals, M. (ed.), Principios de derecho europeo de la responsabilidad civil: texto y comentario (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2008)Google Scholar

Martín-Casals, M. and Solé, J., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Spain’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 295–322Google Scholar

Martinez, P. R., Direito das obrigações, 3rd ed. (Lisboa: AAFDL, 2011)Google Scholar

Marty, G., ‘La relation de cause à effet comme condition de la responsabilité civile’ (1939) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 685Google Scholar

Mäsch, G., Chance und Schaden (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004)Google Scholar

Masè Dari, F., ‘Svalutazione monetaria e risarcimento del danno’ (1946) I, 2 Giurisprudenza italiana 197–200Google Scholar

Mattei, U., ‘Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law’ (1994) 42 American Journal of Comparative Law 195–218Google Scholar

McGrath, C.P. and Koziol, H., ‘Is Style of Reasoning a Fundamental Difference between the Common Law and the Civil Law?’ (2014) 78 Rabels Zeitschrift 709–49Google Scholar

McGregor, H., ‘Loss of Chance: Where Has It Come from and Where Is It Going?’ (2008) 24 Professional Negligence 2–12Google Scholar

McIvor, C., ‘The “Doubles the Risk” Test for Causation and Other Related Judicial Misconceptions about Epidemiology’, in Pitel, S. G. A, Neyers, J. W. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2013), pp. 215–34Google Scholar

McIvor, C., ‘Debunking some Judicial Myths about Epidemiology and its Relevance to UK Tort Law’ (2013) 21 Medical Law Review 553–87Google Scholar

McMahon, B. and Binchy, W., Law of Torts, 4th ed. (London: Butterworths, 2014)Google Scholar

Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, II, Direito das obrigações, III, Gestão de negócios. Enriquecimento sem causa. Responsabilidade civil (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2010)Google Scholar

Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, II, Direito das obrigações, I, Introdução. Sistemas e direito europeu das obrigações. Dogmática geral (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2009)Google Scholar

Menezes Cordeiro, A., Da modernização do direito civil, I, Aspectos gerais (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar

Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, I, Parte geral, III, Pessoas (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar

Menezes Leitão, L., Direito das obrigações, I, Introdução. Da constituição das obrigações, 12th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2015)Google Scholar

Menezes Leitão, L., ‘O dano da vida’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 3–16Google Scholar

Menezes Leitão, L., ‘A responsabilidade civil por danos causados ao ambiente’, in Gomes, C. Amado and Antunes, T. (eds.), Actas do colóquio A responsabilidade civil por dano ambiental (Lisboa: Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 2010), pp. 21–41, available at icjp.ptGoogle Scholar

Merryman, J. H., ‘The Italian Style II: Law’ (1966) 18 Stanford Law Review 396–437Google Scholar

Mikelėnas, V. (ed.), LR civilinio kodekso komentaras. Šeštoji knyga. Prievolių teisė (Commentary to the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Book 6. The Law on Obligations), I (Vilnius: Justitia, 2003)Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, 8th ed, (London: Longmans Green, 1872)Google Scholar

Miller, C., ‘Epidemiology in the Courtroom: Mixed Messages from Recent British Experience’ (2012) 11 Law, Probability and Risk 85–99Google Scholar

Miller, C., ‘Causation in Personal Injury after (and before) Sienkiewicz’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 396–420Google Scholar

Mizaras, V., ‘Lietuvos deliktų teisės aktualijos ir tendencijos’, in Mizaras, V. (ed.), Šiuolaikinės civilinės teisės raidos tendencijos ir perspektyvos (Trends and Perspectives in the Development of Contemporary Civil Law) (Vilnius: Justitia, 2007), pp. 51–74Google Scholar

Monateri, P. G., La responsabilità civile (Turin: Utet, 1998)Google Scholar

Monateri, P. G. and Chiaves, F. A., Italian Tort Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2014)Google Scholar

Moore, M., ‘Responses and Appreciations’, in Ferzan, K. K. and Morse, S. J. (eds.), Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 343–426Google Scholar

Moore, M. S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Moreno Martínez, J. A. (ed.), La responsabilidad civil y su problemática actual (Alicante: Dykinson, 2007)Google Scholar

Moréteau, O., ‘France: French Tort Law in the Light of European Harmonization’ (2013) 6 Journal of Civil Law Studies 768–801Google Scholar

Morgan, J., ‘Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 277–84Google Scholar

Mota Pinto, C. A. da, Pinto Monteiro, A. and Mota Pinto, P., Teoria geral do direito civil, 4th ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2005)Google Scholar

Mota Pinto, P., Interesse contratual negativo e interesse contratual positivo, I and II (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2008)Google Scholar

Mota Pinto, P., ‘Indemnização em caso de “nascimento indevido” e de “vida indevida” (“wrongful birth” e “wrongful life”)’, in Nos 20 anos do Código das Sociedades Comerciais. Homenagem aos Profs. Doutores A. Ferrer Correia, Orlando de Carvalho e Vasco Lobo Xavier, III, Vária (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2007), p. 915–46Google Scholar

Moura Vicente, D., Da responsabilidade pré-contratual em direito internacional privado (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2001)Google Scholar

Mummenhoff, W., Erfahrungssätze im Beweis der Kausalität (Cologne: Heymann, 1997)Google Scholar

Napoli, G. E., Il nesso causale come elemento costitutivo del fatto illecito (Naples: ESI, 2012)Google Scholar

Nasarre-Aznar, S., International Encyclopaedia for Tort Law – Spain (The Hague: Kluwer, 2008)Google Scholar

Nenov, I., Criminal Law. Generalities, Part I (Наказателно право. Обща част, 1 част) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1992)Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M., Prawo medyczne, 9th ed. (Toruń: TNOiK, 2010)Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M., Prawo medyczne, 8th ed. (Toruń: TNOiK, 2007)Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M., ‘Odpowiedzialność cywilna w braku ustalenia sprawcy szkody w prawie amerykańskim’, in Id., Prawo cywilne USA (Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa “Dom Organizatora”, 1999), pp. 45–57Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Poland’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, vol. I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer 2007)Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under Polish Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 153–65Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Contributory Negligence under Polish Law’, in Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004) pp. 149–62Google Scholar

Nesterowicz, M., Bagińska, E. and den Exter, A., Medical Law in Poland (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2011)Google Scholar

Neuberger (Lord) of Abbotsbury, ‘Loss of a chance and causation’ (2008) 24 Professional Negligence 206–14Google Scholar

Nikolopoulos, P., ‘“Wrongful Birth” and Offence to the Parents’ Personality’ (‘Ζημιογόνος τεκνοποίηση (Wrongful birth) και προσβολή της προσωπικότητας των γονέων’) (2011) 4 Efarmoges Astikou Dikaiou 812–20Google Scholar

Norkūnas, A., ‘Vartotojo teisių dėl žalos, padarytos nekokybiškais produktais, gynimo pokyčiai Lietuvai įstojus į Europos Sąjungą’ (Changes in the Protection of the Consumer Right to Compensation of Damage Caused by Defective Products Introduced by Lithuanian Membership in the European Union) (2006) 80(2) Jurisprudencija 73–9.Google Scholar

Nunes Vicente, M., ‘Algumas reflexões sobre as acções de wrongful life: a jurisprudência Perruche’ (2009) 4 Lex Medicinae 117–41Google Scholar

Olejniczak, A., in Kidyba, A. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, vol. 3, Zobowiązania – część ogólna (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2010)Google Scholar

Olejniczak, A. (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009)Google Scholar