Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sympathy in Perception , pp. 197 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allison, H. E. 1983. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ardley, G. 1958. The nature of perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 36(3): 189–200.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. 1984. Plotinus Ennead iv. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bach-y Rita, P. and Kercel, S.. 2002. Sensory substitution and augmentation. Intellectica, 2(35): 287–97.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translations, volume 1 of Bollingen Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayne, T. and Spener, M.. 2010. Introspective humility. Philosophical Issues, 20(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Benedetti, F. 1985. Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(4): 517–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Bergson, H. 1903. Introduction à la métaphysique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Reprinted in Bergson 1938 and translated as Bergson 1912a.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1912a. Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by T. E. Hulme. London: G.P. Putnam & Sons.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1938. La Pensée et le Mouvant: Essais et conférences. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. 1734. Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. J., Brelsta, G., Nelson, K., and Troscianko, T.. 1995. Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24: 1075–81.Google Scholar
Boehm, M. D. 1929. The Influence of Habit on the Faculty of Thinking. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Bower, M. and Gallagher, S.. 2013. Bodily affects as prenoetic elements in enactive perception. Phenomenology and Mind, 4(1): 78–93.Google Scholar
Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 1874. Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkte. Translated by A. C. Rancurello as Brentano 1973. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Broackes, J. 1997. The autonomy of colour. In Readings on Color: The Philosophy of Color, Byrne, A. and Hilbert, D., eds., volume I, pp. 191–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. 1952. Some elementary reflections on sense-perception. Philosophy, 27(100): 3–17. Reprinted in Broad 1965.Google Scholar
Broad, C. 1965. Some elementary reflections on sense-perception. In Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing, Swartz, R. J., ed., pp. 29–48. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. 1993. Robert Kilwardby O.P. On Time and Imagination, volume ix 2 of Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. 2015. Stoic sympathy. In Sympathy: A History, chapter 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 2003. Perceptual entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3): 503–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1979. Conflicting appearances. In Proceedings of the British Academy, volume lxv, pp. 69–111.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1982. Idealism and Greek philosophy: What Descartes saw and Berkeley missed. The Philosophical Review, 91(1): 3–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 1995. How much happens when Aristotle sees red and hears middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2.7–8. In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O., eds., pp. 421–34. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Cassam, Q.. 2014. Berkeley’s Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casati, R., Bona, E. D., and Dokic, J.. 2013. The Ockhamization of the event sources of sound. Analysis, 73(3): 462–66.Google Scholar
Casati, R. and Dokic, J.. 1994. La philosophie du son. Nîmes: Éditions Jacqueline Chambon.Google Scholar
Casati, R. and Dokic, J.. 2014. Sounds. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/sounds/.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. 2007. The Possibility of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2005. The spirit and the letter: Aristotle on perception. In Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, Salles, R., ed., chapter 11, pp. 245–320. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 2006. Perception and the fall from Eden. In Perceptual Experience, Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J., eds., chapter 2, pp. 49–125. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1988. Aristotle on hypothetical necessity and irreducibility. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 69(1): 1–53. Reprinted in Charles 1995.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1995. Aristotle on hypothetical necessity and irreducibility. In Aristotle, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Natural Philosophy, Irwin, T., ed., volume 7 of Classical Philosophy, Collected Papers, pp. 11–26. New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Chirimuuta, M. 2015. Outside Color: Perceptual Science and the Puzzle of Color in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 2008. Colour constancy as counterfactual. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(1): 61–92.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1997. Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1969. The individuation of events. In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Rescher, N., ed., pp. 216–34. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. and Harman, G., eds. 1972. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2005. On Touching – Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ducasse, C. 1942. Moore’s “Refutation of idealism.” In The Philosophy of GE Moore, Schilpp, P. A., ed., pp. 232–3. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 1988. Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 2015. Plotinus on sympatheia. In Sympathy, A History, chapter 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 1995. Ontological dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95: 269–90.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 2006. In defense of three-dimensionalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 103: 699–714.Google Scholar
Fish, W. 2009. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1882. 17 kernsätze zur logik. In Schriften zur Logik und Sprachphilosophie aus dem Nachlass, Gabriel, G., ed. Meiner Verlag, F.. Translated by Peter Long and Roger White Frege 1979.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, M. 2014. The First Sense, A Philosophical Study of Human Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 2008. The Unity of the Proposition, volume 64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 1994. Plotinus, The Arguments of the Philosophers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halligan, P. W. and Marshall, J. C.. 1991. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350: 498–500.Google Scholar
Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. 1989. The Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the Letters, Bollingen Series lxxi, 14th edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. 2002. Aristotle De Anima Books ii and iii (with passages om Book i). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Handel, S. 1995. Timbre perception and auditory object identification. In Hearing, Moore, B., ed., pp. 425–61. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2005. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Hatwell, Y., Streri, A., and Gentaz, E.. 2003. Touching and Knowing, Cognitive Psychology of Haptic Manual Perception. John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2008. Three-dimensionalism vs four-dimensionalism. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, Sider, T., Hawthorne, J., and Zimmerman, D., eds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1935/2000. The origin of the work of art. In Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger, Revised and Expanded Edition, Krell, D. F., ed., pp. 139–212. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. R. 1987. Color and Color Perception: A Study in Anthropocentric Realism. Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. R. 2005. Color constancy and the complexity of color. Philosophical Topics, 33(1): 141–58.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. R. and Kalderon, M. E.. 2000. Color and the inverted spectrum. In Color Perception: Philosophical, Psychological, Artistic, and Computational Perspectives, Davis, S., ed., volume ix of Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, pp. 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2015. Reflection: Galen’s sympathy. In Sympathy, A History, Schleisser, E., ed., Oxford Philosophical Concepts, pp. 61–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, L. and Pashler, H.. 2007. A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114: 599–631.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. Empedocles on colour and colour vision. In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Sedley, D., ed., volume 29, chapter 1, pp. 1–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2006. The Greek concept of sympatheia and its Byzantine appropriation in Michael Psellos. In The Occult Sciences in Byzantium, Magdalino, P. and Mavroudi, M., eds., chapter 2, pp. 97–117. Geneva: La Pommed’or.Google Scholar
Jansen, B. 1922–6. Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum. Florence: Collegium S. Bonaventurae: Bibliotecha Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi.Google Scholar
Jay, M. 1994. Downcast Eyes, the Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2006a. Better than mere knowledge? The function of sensory awareness. In Perceptual Experience, Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J., eds., chapter 7, pp. 260–90. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2007. Objective minds and the objectivity of our minds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(2): 233–69.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2011. On a neglected epistemic virtue. Philosophical Issues, 21(1): 165–218.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2013. Aristotle on sounds. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21(4): 631–48.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. 1954. The nobility of sight. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(4): 507–19.Google Scholar
Jones, L. A. and Lederman, S. J.. 2006. Human Hand Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. 1957. Hippocrates, volume 1 of Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2008. Metamerism, constancy, and knowing which. Mind, 117(468): 549–85.Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2015. Form without Matter, Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. forthcoming. Experiential pluralism and the power of perception. In Themes from Travis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. and Travis, C.. 2013. Oxford realism. In Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, Beaney, M., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, B. D. 1984. Aristotle and the Franciscans: Gerald Odonis’ Commentary on the Nichomachean Ethics. PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
King, J. C. 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. C., Soames, S., and Speaks, J.. 2014. New Thinking about Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. and Sihvola, J.. 2014. Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind, volume 12 of Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 1972/1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted from Davidson and Harman 1972, with a new preface.Google Scholar
Kulvicki, J. 2014. Images, New Problems of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacey, A. 1989. Bergson: The Arguments of the Philosophers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langton, R. 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leddington, J. 2014. What we hear. In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, Brown, R., ed., volume 6 of Studies in Brain and Mind, chapter 21, pp. 321–34. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.Google Scholar
Lederman, S. J. and Klatzky, R. L.. 1987. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19: 342–68.Google Scholar
Lemmon, E. 1967. Comments. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Rescher, N., ed., pp. 96–103. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. 1929. Mind and the World Order: Outlines of a Theory of Knowledge. Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 2009. Ramseyan humility. In Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, Mitchell, D. B. and Nola, R., eds., pp. 203–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. M.. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. 1977. Theories of Vision from al-Kindī to Kepler. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. 1996. Roger Bacon and the Origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages, a Critical Edition and English Translation of Bacon’s Perspectiva with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. 1998. Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature, a Critical Edition, with English Translation, Introduction, and Notes, of De multiplicatione specierum and De speculis comburnetibus. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. and Sedley, D.. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marion, M. 2000a. Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception i. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8(2): 299–338.Google Scholar
Marion, M. 2000b. Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception ii. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 8(3): 485–519.Google Scholar
Martin, M. 1992. Sight and touch. In The Contents of Experience, Crane, T., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. 1998. Setting things before the mind. In Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind, O’Hear, A., ed., Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. 2005. Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. 2015. Active perception and the representation of space. In Perception and Its Modalities, chapter 2, pp. 44–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998. Having the world in view: Sellars, Kant, and intentionality. Journal of Philosophy, xcv(9): 431–91. Reprinted in McDowell 2009b.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2008. Avoiding the myth of the given. In John McDowell: Experience, Norm, and Nature, pp. 1–14. Lindgaard, J., ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in McDowell 2009b.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2009a. Conceptual capacities in perception. In Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, pp. 127–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2009b. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Edie, James M., ed.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. 2009. Chain of causes: What is Stoic fate? In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Salles, R., ed., chapter 3, pp. 71–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mole, C. 2009. The motor theory of speech perception. In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, Nudds, M. and O’Callaghan, C., eds., chapter 10, pp. 211–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things, The Evolution of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. What is it like to be a bat? In Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nudds, M. 2009. Sounds and space. In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, O’Callaghan, C. and Nudds, M., eds., chapter 4, pp. 69–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nudds, M. 2010. What sounds are. In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Zimmerman, D., ed., volume 5, chapter 13, pp. 279–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nudds, M. 2014. Commentary on Leddington. In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, Brown, R., ed., volume 6 of Studies in Brain and Mind, chapter 23, pp. 343–50. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C. 2009. Sounds and events. In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, Nudds, M. and O’Callaghan, C., eds., chapter 2, pp. 26–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C. 2014. Audible independence and binding. In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, Brown, R., ed., volume 6 of Studies in Brain and Mind, chapter 22, pp. 335–42. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, and London: Springer.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G. 1987. Augustine’s Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1989. The sense of touch. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67(1): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1995. Proprioception and the body image. In The Body and the Self, Bermúdez, J., Marcel, A., and Eilan, N., eds., A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 2003. Sense data. In John Searle, Smith, B., ed., Contemporary Philosophy in Focus, chapter 8, pp. 169–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 2009. The location of perceived sound. In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, Nudds, M. and O’Callaghan, C., eds., chapter 6, pp. 111–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 1997. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 1999a. Olivi on human freedom. In Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298). Pensée sholastique, dissidence spiritue e et sociéteé, Boureau, A. and Piron, S., eds., volume 79 of Études de philosophie médiévale, pp. 15–25. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2000. Sensible qualities: The case of sound. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38(1): 27–40.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2002. The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, volume 3, Mind and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. 2007. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Patey, D. L. 1986. Johnson’s refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the stone again. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47(1): 139–45.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. M. 2011. Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, I. 2012. Afterimages and sensation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. 1950a. The apprehension of time. In Knowledge and Perception, chapter 3, pp. 47–51. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1993. Realism without absolutes. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 1(2): 179–92.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1994. Sense, nonsense, and the senses: An inquiry into the powers of the human mind. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(9): 445–517.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1999. The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. 2013. Bodily sensation and tactile perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(1): 134–54.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riedl, C. C. 1942. Robert Grosseteste, On Light (De Luce), Translation from the Latin with an Introduction. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Robbin, B. D. 2003. The phenomenological truth of visual emissions. American Psychologist, 58(6/7): 494–5.Google Scholar
Ross, G. 1906. Aristotle De Sensu and De Memoria, Text and Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. 1961. Aristotle De Anima, Edited with Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1971. Autobiographical. In Ryle, A Collection of Critical Essays, Modern Studies in Philosophy, pp. 1–16. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. 1959. Physics of the Stoics, volume 11. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. 2008. The unreliability of naive introspection. Philosophical Review, 117(2): 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 2015. Seeing Things as They Are: A Theory of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1992. Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus. In Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings, Fortenbraugh, W. W. and Gutas, D., eds., chapter 2, pp. 20–31. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1956. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Feigl, H. and Scriven, M., eds., volume 1. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Reprinted in Sellars 1997.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. and van der Eijk, P.. 2008. Nemesius: On the Nature of Man. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. 2008. Robert Kilwardby on sense perception. In Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, volume 6 of Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, chapter 6, pp. 87–100. Springer.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. 2012. Robert Kilwardby on the Human Soul, Plurality of Forms and Censorship in the Thirteenth Century, Investigating Medieval Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. and Toivanen, J.. 2010. The active nature of the soul in sense perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter Olivi. Vivarium, 48: 245–78.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M.. 2014. Active Perception in the History of Philosophy, volume 14 of Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind. Springer.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. and Chabris, C. F.. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28:1059–74.Google Scholar
Slakey, T. J. 1961. Aristotle on sense perception. Philosophical Review, 70(4): 470–84.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2002. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. 2001a. Alhacen’s Theory of Visual Perception, a Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of the First Three Books of Alhacen’s De Aspectibus, the Medieval Latin Version of Ibn al-Haytham’s Kitāb al-Manā ir, volume 1. Introduction and Latin Text of Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge. Independence Square, PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. 2001b. Alhacen’s Theory of Visual Perception, a Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of the First Three Books of Alhacen’s De Aspectibus, the Medieval Latin Version of Ibn al-Haytham’s Kitāb al-Manā ir, volume ii, English Translation, of Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge. Independence Square, PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Smith, N. K. 1965. Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 2010. What Is Meaning? Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1971. Aristotle on demarcating the five senses. The Philosophical Review, 80(1): 55–79.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2003. Intentionality and physiological process: Aristotle’s theory of sense-perception. In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O., eds., chapter 12, pp. 195–226. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2004. Aristotle on Memory, second edition. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 2008. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 2009. Hearing silence: The perception and introspection of absences. In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, Nudds, M. and O’Callaghan, C., eds., pp. 126–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spruit, L. 1994. Species Intelligibis From Perception to Knowledge, volume 1 of Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History. Leiden, New York, and Kóln: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2016. Introductory reflections, Making sense of ancient sight. In Sight and the Ancient Senses, Squire, M., ed., The Senses in Antiquity, pp. 1–35. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Stebbing, S. 1914. Pragmatism and French Voluntarism, number 6 in Girton College Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, 1973 edition. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2007. A world full of signs: Understanding divination in ancient Stoicism. In Seeing with Different Eyes: Essays in Astrology and Divination, Curry, P. and Voss, A., eds., chapter 1, pp. 3–20. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Tachau, K. H. 1988. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345, Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittlealters. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Toivanen, J. 2009. Animal Consciousness, Peter Olivi on Cognitive Functions of the Sensitive Soul, volume 370 of Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Toivanen, J. 2013. Perception and the Internal Senses, Peter of John Olivi on the Cognitive Functions of the Soul, volume 5 of Investigating Medieval Philosophy. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 2008. Occasion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 2013. The inward turn. In Perception, chapter 5, pp. 144–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1978. Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology, Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh During the Session 1927–28, A Corrected Edition. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1981. The truth in relativism. In Moral Luck, pp. 132–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1990. Identity and Discrimination. Oxford and Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winer, G. A. and Cottrell, J. E.. 1996. Does anything leave the eye when we see? Extramission beliefs of children and adults. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(5): 137–42.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1995. Dialectic, motion, and perception: De Anima, Book I. In Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O., eds., chapter 10, pp. 169–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. 1981. Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, Edited with an Introduction, Commentary, Concordance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wyschogrod, E. 1981. Empathy and sympathy as tactile encounter. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 6: 25–43.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, T., Craig, J. C., Beck, G. C., and Hsiao, S. S.. 2011. Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(48): 17603–11.Google Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, M. 2008. Perceiving one’s own body. In Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, Knuuttila, S. and Kärkäinen, P., eds., volume 6 of Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, chapter 7, pp. 101–16. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar